Methodology 2019 | Freedom House - 0 views
-
three-tiered system consisting of scores, ratings, and status.
- ...27 more annotations...
-
The political rights questions are grouped into three subcategories: Electoral Process (3 questions), Political Pluralism and Participation (4), and Functioning of Government (3).
-
The civil liberties questions are grouped into four subcategories: Freedom of Expression and Belief (4 questions), Associational and Organizational Rights (3), Rule of Law (4), and Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights (4).
-
For the discretionary question, a score of 1 to 4 may be subtracted, as applicable (the worse the situation, the more points may be subtracted).
-
The highest overall score that can be awarded for political rights is 40 (or a score of 4 for each of the 10 questions). T
-
highest overall score that can be awarded for civil liberties is 60 (or a score of 4 for each of the 15 questions).
-
ach rating of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the greatest degree of freedom and 7 the smallest degree of freedom, corresponds to a specific range of total scores (see tables 1 and 2).
-
The average of a country or territory’s political rights and civil liberties ratings is called the Freedom Rating
-
A trend arrow must be linked to a specific change or changes in score, and cannot be assigned if the country had no net change in score
-
designation “electoral democracy” to countries that have met certain minimum standards for political rights and civil liberties;
-
an electoral democracy designation requires a score of 7 or better in the Electoral Process subcategory, an overall political rights score of 20 or better, and an overall civil liberties score of 30 or better.
-
Countries and territories with a rating of 6 have very restricted political rights. They are ruled by authoritarian regimes, often with leaders or parties that originally took power by force and have been in office for decades.
-
hey may hold tightly controlled elections and grant a few political rights, such as some representation or autonomy for minority groups.
-
While some are draconian police states, others may lack an authoritative and functioning central government and suffer from extreme violence or rule by regional warlords.
-
virtually no freedom of expression or association, do not protect the rights of detainees and prisoners, and often control most economic activity.
-
The gap between a country or territory’s political rights and civil liberties ratings is rarely more than two points. Politically oppressive states typically do not allow a well-developed civil society, for example, and it is difficult, if not impossible, to maintain political freedoms in the absence of civil liberties like press freedom and the rule of law.