Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

bp holdings barcelona CINCINNATI (CN) - The 6th Circuit tossed an $82.6 million judgment against companies accused of using false Medicare claims to bilk millions from taxpayers. In a federal whistle-blower complaint, the United States claimed that Renal Care Group, Renal Care Group Supply Co. and Fresenius Medical Care Holdings recklessly disregarded federal law between 1999 and 2005 when billing Medicare for home dialysis supplies and equipment. The government claimed that Renal Care Group had submitted false claims for equipment provided to home dialysis patients, and set up a sham billing company that interfered with patients' choice of supply options and forced their business. U.S. District Judge William Haynes awarded the government $82.6 million at summary judgment, but the federal appeals court reversed Friday. It found that there was no evidence that the defendants acted with actual knowledge or deliberate ignorance of the truth. "The defendants did not act with reckless disregard of the alleged falsity of their submissions to Medicare," Judge R. Guy Cole Jr. wrote for a three-member panel. "And given that there is no evidence in the record that they acted with actual knowledge (in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(1)(A)(i)), or in deliberate ignorance of the truth (in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(1)(A)(ii)), they are therefore not liable under Count One of the complaint for False claims Act liability." The case has been remanded back to federal court. bp holdings barcelona

wow…it's amazing i like that.

bp holdings barcelona http://bpholdingsbarcelonaandmadridspain.blogspot.com.es/2012/10/bp-holdings-medicare-fraud-ruling-83m.html CINCINNATI (CN) - The 6th Circuit tossed an $82.6 million judgment against companies accused of using false Medicare claims to bilk millions from taxpayers. In a federal whistle-blower complaint, the United States claimed that Renal Care Group, Renal Care Group Supply Co. and Fresenius Medical Care Holdings recklessly disregarded federal law between 1999 and 2005 when billing Medicare for home dialysis supplies and equipment. The government claimed that Renal Care Group had submitted false claims for equipment provided to home dialysis patients, and set up a sham billing company that interfered with patients' choice of supply options and forced their business. U.S. District Judge William Haynes awarded the government $82.6 million at summary judgment, but the federal appeals court reversed Friday. It found that there was no evidence that the defendants acted with actual knowledge or deliberate ignorance of the truth. "The defendants did not act with reckless disregard of the alleged falsity of their submissions to Medicare," Judge R. Guy Cole Jr. wrote for a three-member panel. "And given that there is no evidence in the record that they acted with actual knowledge (in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(1)(A)(i)), or in deliberate ignorance of the truth (in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(1)(A)(ii)), they are therefore not liable under Count One of the complaint for False claims Act liability." The case has been remanded back to federal court. bp holdings barcelona RELATED ARTICLE: http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/10/11/51170.htm

http://issuu.com/groups/aee87643-9a77-4b6e-b065-f35ebea5b57f/4127cbfb-288c-4136-af03-dcc5eb21501f Competition - BPholdings reviews and press releases Competition scam alert Like many companies, it seems that BP is also being targeted by fraudsters claiming that a BP competition has been won and seeking banking and other personal details BP have recently received complaints from members of the public advising that they were contacted by individuals informing them that they have won a BP Competition and a prize. The "prizes" on offer range from cash to vehicles, cars or plasma TV's. The caller sometimes asks for identity numbers, physical addresses and/or banking details before the prize can be claimed. We would urge any person contacted not to respond to any callers claiming to represent BP and offering prizes of any kind nor to volunteer any information. Please contact us if you receive a call from someone claiming to work for BP congratulating you on winning a prize in a BP competition. You can easily verify this by calling our Customer Contact Centre on 0860 222 166 or by visiting BP's web site http://www.bp.co.za and sending us an e-mail using the Contact us prompt on our home page. It would be of great assistance in trying to curtail this kind of activity if you obtained as much information from the caller as possible and provide this to BP. Tags: bp holdings reviews and press releases, competition scam alert http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1111512-combating-tax-fraud-bp-holdings http://archive.org/details/BpHoldings10TopTipsToBeatTheScammersBpHoldings http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=16004221&contentId=7043666 http://mlkshk.com/p/QYSX

http://jazonmert.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/the-irs-wants-to-shrink-payments-to-tax-fraud-whistleblowers-bp-spain-holdings-madrid-articles/ FORTUNE -- Hoping to win millions of dollars from the Internal Revenue Service for exposing tax fraud? It's going to get even tougher -- and some powerful people in Washington are not amused. In January, Sen. Charles Grassley, the 79-year-old Iowa Republican, chastised acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller over his recent proposal to restrict the agency's whistleblower program, already an object of criticism since its creation in 2006. The proposed curbs, Grassley wrote in a letter to Miller, showed one thing: that the IRS and its boss, the Treasury Department, "view whistleblowers with hostility." What exactly is at issue? The current whistleblower rules say a tipster can collect a reward of 15%-30% of proceeds brought in as a direct result of a tip. The dirt has to involve tax evasion of at least $2 million or tax fraud by an individual making at least $200,000 a year. Miller's proposed restrictions will likely shrink payouts. Among the curbs: making it nearly impossible for whistleblowers to share in rewards stemming from a company's inflation of losses, and excluding from rewards any money brought in from so-called Fbar fines. These draconian fines, levied on offshore tax evaders, are often dozens and even hundreds of times the amount of actual back-tax an evader must pay. MORE: 3 things Jamie Dimon might have meant when he said he was 'richer than you' But here's the rub in this unusual political fight: Even in its current structure, very few whistleblower claims get paid, thanks to bureaucratic foot-dragging at the IRS, according to lawyers representing whistleblowers. Despite receiving more than 1,960 claims since 2006, the IRS made its first payment only in 2011. In total, it has paid only three claims. The biggest: $104 million to convicted felon Bradley Birkenfeld, the former UBS AG private banker who kick-started the

Scammed BP Holdings What to do so you don't get taken by common work at home job scams: Internet ScamBusters #62 Today we'll focus on Part 2 of our series on home-based business scams and work-at-home scams. If you missed Part 1 in last month's issue on the Top 10 scams of this type 10 Tips on Avoiding Work At Home and Home Based Business Scams 1. Never, NEVER pay for the chance to work! This is the cardinal rule. You should treat working at home just like you would treat working for an employer at their place of business. If you were going for a job interview in the 'real world,' how would you react if the interviewer asked you to pay $50 or $100 to land the job, for starter materials, or for a 'good faith' payment to make sure you were serious about the business? You'd think it was absurd. No legitimate company charges employees a fee for a job. Whenever you're asked to pay for the chance at a job, or information about work-from-home jobs, you know it's a scam. Home-based businesses, on the other hand, may require start-up costs to cover investments, materials, franchises, or other items. As we state in the next step, check things out before you pay anything. 2. Check out the business before you pay anything. Have you heard of the business that's soliciting your money? If not, check them out carefully. Make sure they have a physical address and a phone number. Call to see if it's a real phone number. Do a search on http://www.Google.com to see if you can find any positive or negative comments. Check references carefully. Some warning signs of scammer companies: - They use free Web hosting services (such as Tripod or Geocities). - They use free Web email services (such as Yahoo! Mail or Hotmail). - They use Post Office boxes for mailings and don't disclose their real addresses. - They won't give you a telephone number where you can contact them. 3. Use your credit card to make purchases. This sounds counter-intuitive, but if you are going to

Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of the eurozone financial crisis, and other key events in the world economy. The unfolding corruption allegations in Spain continue to dominate the agenda, after helping send European stock markets sliding yesterday. El País, which broke the story last week, reports this morning that Spain's anti-corruption prosecutor is holding a wide-ranging investigation into claims that senior members of the ruling People's party, including prime minister Mariano Rajoy, received secret, illegal payments over many years. The prosecutor, it says, is comparing the PP's last 13 years of public accounts with the 'secret accounting system', which El Pais claims was created by treasurer Luis Bárcenas. According to El País the investigation will consider whether any individuals, or the PP, committed tax fraud by not declaring secret payments, and whether limits on political donations were breached.

BP HOLDINGS MADRID SPAIN WIKIA What to do so you don't get taken by common work at home job scams: Internet ScamBusters #62 Today we'll focus on Part 2 of our series on home-based business scams and work-at-home scams. If you missed Part 1 in last month's issue on the Top 10 scams of this type 10 Tips on Avoiding Work At Home and Home Based Business Scams 1. Never, NEVER pay for the chance to work!' This is the cardinal rule. You should treat working at home just like you would treat working for an employer at their place of business. If you were going for a job interview in the 'real world,' how would you react if the interviewer asked you to pay $50 or $100 to land the job, for starter materials, or for a 'good faith' payment to make sure you were serious about the business? You'd think it was absurd. No legitimate company charges employees a fee for a job. Whenever you're asked to pay for the chance at a job, or information about work-from-home jobs, you know it's a scam. Home-based businesses, on the other hand, may require start-up costs to cover investments, materials, franchises, or other items. As we state in the next step, check things out before you pay anything. 2. Check out the business before you pay anything.' Have you heard of the business that's soliciting your money? If not, check them out carefully. Make sure they have a physical address and a phone number. Call to see if it's a real phone number. Do a search on http://www.Google.com to see if you can find any positive or negative comments. Check references carefully. Some warning signs of scammer companies: They use free Web hosting services (such as Tripod or Geocities). They use free Web email services (such as Yahoo! Mail or Hotmail). They use Post Office boxes for mailings and don't disclose their real addresses. They won't give you a telephone number where you can contact them. 3. Use your credit card to make purchases.' This sounds counter-intuitive, but if you are going to buy a

http://zackandrew25.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/work-at-home-jobs-how-to-avoid-getting-scammed-bp-holdings-madrid-spain-wikia/ bp holdings madrid spain wikia What to do so you don't get taken by common work at home job scams: Internet ScamBusters #62 Today we'll focus on Part 2 of our series on home-based business scams and work-at-home scams. If you missed Part 1 in last month's issue on the Top 10 scams of this type 10 Tips on Avoiding Work At Home and Home Based Business Scams 1. Never, NEVER pay for the chance to work!' This is the cardinal rule. You should treat working at home just like you would treat working for an employer at their place of business. If you were going for a job interview in the 'real world,' how would you react if the interviewer asked you to pay $50 or $100 to land the job, for starter materials, or for a 'good faith' payment to make sure you were serious about the business? You'd think it was absurd. No legitimate company charges employees a fee for a job. Whenever you're asked to pay for the chance at a job, or information about work-from-home jobs, you know it's a scam. Home-based businesses, on the other hand, may require start-up costs to cover investments, materials, franchises, or other items. As we state in the next step, check things out before you pay anything. 2. Check out the business before you pay anything.' Have you heard of the business that's soliciting your money? If not, check them out carefully. Make sure they have a physical address and a phone number. Call to see if it's a real phone number. Do a search on http://www.Google.com to see if you can find any positive or negative comments. Check references carefully. Some warning signs of scammer companies: They use free Web hosting services (such as Tripod or Geocities). They use free Web email services (such as Yahoo! Mail or Hotmail). They use Post Office boxes for mailings and don't disclose their real addresses. They won'

"Your access to, use of and reliance on BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  and content accessed through BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  is entirely at your own risk. BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  (including, without limitation, the websites, programs, services, forums and content accessed through the websites, programs, services and forums) is provided on an "as is" basis without any warranties of any kind. All express and implied warranties (including, without limitation, warranties of merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement of proprietary rights) are expressly disclaimed. Kindly consult your financial advisor or stock broker to verify the accuracy and recency of all the information prior to taking any investment decision. While due diligence is done and care taken prior to uploading the stock price data, BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  is not liable for any information errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. News reports and feature articles in BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  seek to present an unbiased picture of developments in the markets and the corporate world. Actual developments can turn out to be different due to circumstances beyond  BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain 's control and knowledge. BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  does not take any responsibility for investment or bsiness decisions taken by readers on the basis of reports and articles published in the newspaper. Wthout limiting the foregoing, BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  also disclaims all warranties for or with respect to: (a) the security, reliability, timeliness, accuracy and performance of BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain  and content accessed through BP Holdings Barcelona & Madrid Spain ; (b) computer worms, viruses, spyware, adware and any other malware, malicious code or harmful content or components accessed, r

bp holdings * Løsning av alle kriminelle krav med Department of Justice inkluderer $ 4000000000 betalt i avdrag over en periode på fem år * Oppløsning av alle verdipapirer krav med Securities and Exchange Commission inkluderer $525 millioner betalt i avdrag over en periode på tre år * Eksisterende oppe i 38,1 milliarder dollar anklagen mot inntekt å øke med ca $3,85 milliarder * BP er forberedt på å energisk forsvare seg mot gjenværende sivile krav BP kunngjorde i dag at det har inngått avtale med myndighetene i USA, underlagt court godkjenning å løse alle føderale anklagene og alle krav av Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mot selskapet stammer fra Deepwater Horizon-ulykken olje søl, og respons. "Alle oss på BP beklager dypt det tragiske tapet av liv forårsaket av Deepwater Horizon-ulykken i tillegg til virkningen av utslippet på Gulf coast region," sa Bob Dudley, bps gruppe administrerende direktør. "Fra begynnelsen, vi trappet ved å svare på spill, betale legitime krav og finansiering restaurering innsats i gulfen. Vi beklager vår rolle i ulykken, og som reflekterer dagens oppløsning med den amerikanske regjeringen videre, vi har akseptert ansvaret for våre handlinger." I å eliminere muligheten for noen ytterligere føderale anklagene mot selskapet basert på ulykken, BP har tatt en annen betydelig skritt fremover i å fjerne juridisk usikkerhet og kan nå fokusere mer fullstendig på å forsvare seg mot alle gjenværende sivile krav. "Vi tror denne oppløsningen er i beste interesse for BP og aksjonærene," sa Carl Henrik Svanberg, bps formann. Det fjerner to betydelige juridiske risikoer og tillater oss å energisk forsvare selskapet mot de gjenværende sivile kravene." bp holdings

Things like this are useful to read.

bp holdings Sweden The incidence of financial fraud in the United States is on the rise. Americans submitted more than 1.5 million complaints about financial and other fraud in 2011 - a 62 percent increase in just three years - according to the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) annual "Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book" the most comprehensive database of U.S. fraud trends (see Figure 1). Joe Borg, head of Alabama's securities commission and a leader among state securities regulators, agreed there is a proliferation of fraud, and he largely blames the Internet. His agency had an unprecedented 31-case backlog of criminal trials involving financial fraud in September 2011. "It's not unusual to have 20-25 convictions a year, but when we have 31 backed up - and we're trying them as fast as we can - the trend is up," he said. Borg ticks off the reasons: "Downturn in the economy. Fear among the public. The idea that the government can't protect them anymore. Medical costs are going through the roof. Those are fears. The Internet is the vehicle. The Internet's a big, big factor." Neil Power, supervisor of the FBI's Economic Crimes Squad in Boston, said the public is not fully aware of how pervasive fraud is, because only the most prominent cases, such as Bernard L. Madoff's $50 billion Ponzi scheme, are covered by the media. The vast majority of cases fly under the public's radar. "There is a substantial amount of fraud being addressed that's not being covered," he said. Many more scammers are never caught by a regulatory system rife with staff shortages and inadequate resources. For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) admitted in April 2010 that it has never examined some 3,000 registered U.S. investment advisers, Investment News reported. In Canada, only a small percentage of total fraud is reported to law enforcement: one in three Canadians has been targeted by a scammer, yet only 14 perc

Nice website over here! I just wanna thank you for that.

bp holdings article code 85258080768, Feeding Frenzy fraud watch In the months after the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded 300 miles off Florida's coast in April 2010, hotel and restaurant owners, fishermen and shopkeepers kept a grim vigil, waiting to see whether the millions of gallons of spilled oil would taint the state's beaches and harm its seafood. From a distance, thousands of others watched too, the Canadian, European and American tourists and business travelers who had hoped to rent the Tampa Bay, Sarasota or Naples hotel rooms, dine at the restaurants, shop at the stores, and meet in the conference halls along the Gulf of Mexico. Instead, many traveled elsewhere. Although no flocks of oil-soaked pelicans washed up on Florida's shores, and the 200 million spilled gallons did not blacken beaches as so many feared, the coastal communities and their businesses were nonetheless damaged by the BP oil spill, through economic losses - the visitors who never came. That is the contention of cities and counties, and thousands of business owners whose revenues fell in the months following the disaster. A number of Florida resorts and other businesses that sought early compensation for their losses - the plunge in expected revenue - found their requests denied, although London-based BP had set up a $20 billion fund for victims. But the firms couldn't prove their revenue declines were related to the spill. In December, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier in New Orleans gave final approval to a $7.8 billion partial class-action settlement providing for economic and property damages from the spill, including those in Florida. BP separately agreed to pay $4.5 billion in penalties and pleaded guilty to felony misconduct in the disaster, which cost 11 lives. Barbier now is presiding over a trial to determine whether BP was grossly negligent, with another $17 billion in potential penalties at stake. A new, streamlined process recognizes losses farther from the ex