Skip to main content

Home/ Big 12 Engineering Project-Policy Research/ Group items tagged texas

Rss Feed Group items tagged

abutler

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board: Approval of Distance Education Off-Campus an... - 0 views

  • (5) For courses not eligible to be submitted for formula funding, institutions shall charge fees that are equal to or greater than Texas resident tuition and applicable fees, and that are sufficient to cover the total cost of instruction and overhead, including administrative costs, benefits, computers and equipment, and other related costs.
  • §4.108 Non-Formula-Funded (Extension) Course and Program General Provisions (a) Institutions shall not submit non-state-funded lower-division credit courses to Regional Councils. (b) Institutions shall not submit distance education courses delivered outside the state to non-Texas residents for formula funding. (c) The Commissioner shall develop standards for institutions offering out-of-state/country courses and programs. (d) Institutions shall not jeopardize or diminish the status of formula-funded on-campus courses and programs in order to offer extension courses. Extension courses shall not be a substitute for offering a sufficient number of formula-funded on-campus courses. (e) Institutions shall report fees received for extension and out-of-state/country courses in accordance with general institutional accounting practices. (f) Institutions shall report enrollments, courses and graduates associated with extension offerings as required by the Commissioner. Source Note: The provisions of this §4.108 adopted to be effective August 21, 2005, 30 TexReg 4642
  • (15) Formula funding--The method used to allocate appropriated sources of funds among institutions of higher education. (16) Formula-funded course--An academic credit course delivered face-to-face or by distance education, including correspondence, whose semester credit hours are submitted for formula funding.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Out-of-state and out-of-country courses do not receive formula funding and are a type of academic credit extension offering. They may be offered through distance education or face-to-face instruction.
  • egular on-campus student--A student who is admitted to an institution, the majority of whose semester credit hours are reported for formula funding, and whose coursework is primarily taken at an institution's main campus.
  • (1) Academic credit courses, degree and certificate programs, and formula-funded workforce continuing education provided by a community college through distance education or outside of the boundaries of its taxing district through off-campus instruction;
  • 3) Academic credit courses, degree and certificate programs, and formula-funded workforce continuing education provided by a public technical college or Lamar state college through distance education or off-campus instruction;
  • (2) Institutions shall report distance education and off-campus courses submitted for formula funding in accordance with the Board's uniform reporting system and the reporting provisions of this subchapter.
  • (3) Institutions may submit for formula funding the following types of academic credit courses: distance education courses delivered to Texas and non-Texas residents located on-campus or at another location in Texas, distance education courses delivered to Texas residents located out of state or out of country; Study-Abroad courses, and Study-in-America courses. (4) Institutions shall not submit the following types of courses for formula funding: (A) distance education courses taken by non-resident students who are located out of state or out of country, (B) courses in out-of-state or out-of-country programs, as defined above, taken by any student, or (C) extension courses.
abutler

Baylor University: Guaranteed Tuition Option - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      4.108. Non-Formula-Funded (Extension) Course and Program General Provisions. (a) Institutions shall not submit non-state-funded lower-division credit courses to Regional Councils. (b) Institutions shall not submit distance education courses delivered outside the state to non-Texas residents for formula funding. (c) The Commissioner shall develop standards for institutions offering out-ofstate/ country courses and programs. The following provisions apply to all courses covered under this subchapter, unless otherwise specified: (3) Institutions may submit for formula funding the following types of academic credit courses: distance education courses delivered to Texas and non-Texas residents located on-campus or at another location in Texas, distance education courses delivered to Texas residents located out of state or out of country; Study-Abroad courses, and Study-in-America courses. (4) Institutions shall not submit the following types of courses for formula funding: (A) distance education courses taken by non-resident students who are located out of state or out of country, (B) courses in out-of-state or out-of-country programs, as defined above, taken by any student, or (C) Extension courses. (5) For courses not eligible to be submitted for formula funding, institutions shall charge fees that are equal to or greater than Texas resident tuition and applicable fees, and that are sufficient to cover the total cost of instruction and overhead, including administrative costs, benefits, computers and equipment, and other related costs. (6) Study-in-America and Study-Abroad courses offered by institutions of higher education, or by an approved consortium composed of Texas public institutions, shall be approved by the Commissioner in order for the semester credit hours or contact hours generated in those courses to receive formula funding. The Commissioner shall develop procedures and standards for Study-in-America and Study-Abroad offering
abutler

Texas Tech University: Assessment Plan for Distance Learning & Off-Campus Instruction - 0 views

  •  
    APPENDIX 1-4A Section 1 Question 4 Institutional Issues Assessment Plan for Distance Learning and Off-Campus Instruction 1. Assessment of student learning outcomes Readiness Survey * Assessment of student readiness to complete course delivered in a specified modality * Administered prior to a student's first enrollment in a course delivered via a specific modality * Development of readiness surveys for each modality (e.g., broadcast TV, Internet, video conferencing, mixed modalities) Modality Assessment * Student self-report of how modality affected course delivery * Administered at end of term for each course * Instruments developed for each modality of delivery (e.g., broadcast TV, Internet, video conferencing, mixed modalities) Learning Objectives Assessment * Assessment of student mastery of learning objectives for a specific course * Faculty member for course establishes learning objectives and processes for assessment, documents findings, and uses for improvement of teaching and student learning * Conducted by faculty or faculty team each term course is offered Degree program student learning outcomes assessment * Discipline or degree program faculty identify specific learning outcomes that are expected of students * Methods of assessment selected from best practices in discipline * Assessment plan designed and implemented by disciplinary faculty * Assessment conducted at several points of student's progress through degree program (sometimes, at entrance, mid-point, and at exit) * Degree program faculty document findings and use for improvement in teaching and student learning 2. Retention * Institutional Research to implement retention reporting for two groups: 1) distance learners and 2) off-campus educational site students. * Retention research will parallel existing retention research conducted for students studying at Lubbock. * Retention benchmarks for distance learners and off-camp
  •  
    APPENDIX 2-1C Section 2 Question 1 Educational Programs Texas Tech University Distance Learning and Off-Campus Site Program Proposal I. Title of program (e.g., English, Secondary Teaching Certificate, Business Administration) II. Degree offered (BA, BS, BBA, M.Ed., MBA, MA, MS, etc.) III. Timeline for offering the degree (Beginning date, courses per term, end date; continuous offering or cohort-based offering) IV. Brief description of degree and curriculum (brief narrative of academic program) V. Evidence of long-term need for each program in terms of student demand (marketing analysis of regional or state-wide student demand, THECB approved programs, state occupational data, institutional data, etc.) VI. Evidence of institutional capacity to assure the students can make continuous progress toward their degree (Institutional faculty staffing adequacy, regional part-time adequacy, facility and technology adequacy, institutional commitment, etc.) VII. Strategy for providing comparable on-campus support to distance and offcampus learners (standards for admission, enrollment, registration, financial aid, availability of faculty for on-site or Internet office-hours, institutional and regional library resources, administrative support personnel to provide on-site services, training for support staff who will work with distance or off-campus learners, quality control measures, etc.) VIII. Strategies for scheduling courses to meet degree requirements for distance and off-campus learners (sequencing of course delivery, method of delivery, etc.). IX. Degree plan (required curriculum for degree completion; under-division courses required but not currently offered by regional community college; recommended four-year program for undergraduates; recommended term-by-term program for graduate students). X. Degree courses (list each course number, title and description from current institutional catalog) XI. Learning outcomes and assessment processes for courses and
  •  
    Section 3 Faculty 1. The qualifications for distance education faculty are the same as faculty teaching the same courses in a traditional on-campus format. Please describe rationale applied for making exceptions. ELECTRONICALLY-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION Faculty members are the core of distance education and off-campus instruction. Issues related to faculty qualifications and services are covered in a variety of University Operating Policies, which will be referenced in appropriate portions of this report. Faculty Qualifications Full and part-time faculty members must meet the qualifications stipulated by SACS. OP 32.02 http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/New.contents.links/32academic_policies_faculty.htm denotes the qualifications needed for all faculty levels. Departmental chairpersons must certify the qualifications of faculty members at the time of employment, including those faculty members contracted for course development and implementation through Outreach and Extended Studies and those teaching at off-campus educational sites. Exceptions to the stated requirements are not typical at Texas Tech, but may be permitted in cases of persons who have "demonstrated exceptional scholarly or creative activity or substantial professional experience." As noted by Institutional Research and by Outreach and Extended Studies, over 95% of those teaching distance courses are the same faculty members who teach the course on campus. OFF CAMPUS INSTRUCTION At Texas Tech University faculty members who teach in the various distance education programs and courses hold the same credentials as those teaching on-campus courses. Full and part-time faculty teaching distance courses or at off-campus sites are appointed by the respective academic departments at Lubbock. All policies and procedures that apply to on-campus faculty members apply to faculty members teaching distance education courses and at off-campus educational sites.
abutler

Texas Tech University Strategic Plan Goal 5. Partnerships - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Excerpts of Texas Tech University Strategic Plan Goal 5 Partnerships: Objective 5.4: Develop partnerships with other educational institutions. Strategies: Identify partnerships with other educational institutions, both nationally and internationally, that provide opportunities for external funding. Expand the Gateway Program. Expand the partnerships with Early Childhood - 12 schools. Expand the partnerships with post-secondary institutions. Market the partnership programs. Assessments: Number of inter-university partnerships. Number of K-12 partnerships. Number of post secondary institution partnerships. Number of students in the Gateway Program.
abutler

Texas A&M University Distance Education Credit Course and Programs - 0 views

  •  
    Excerpts Include: 1.2 All rules and regulations of Texas A&M University and the University System that pertain to instructional programs on the main campus apply equally to distance education offerings. 1.3 Distance education credit courses, for which the University receives formula funding from the state, are considered part of the regular assigned teaching load of the faculty members. 7. SUPPORT FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION FACULTY 7.1. Like other contributions to teaching and scholarship, contributions to distance education, as part of assigned responsibilities, will be a factor in promotion and tenure decisions and merit increase decisions. A distance education course should be counted in the workload report in the same manner the course would be counted if taught by conventional methods. Preparation to teach a course by distance for the first time, or adapting a course for delivery by distance for the first time, should be credited for workload report purposes just as preparation to teach any other new course would be credited.
abutler

Texas Tech University Division of Outreach and Distance Education Strategic Plan - 0 views

  •  
    TTU Division of Outreach and Distance Education Strategic Plan (August 2006) Excerpts: Goal 5. Partnerships: Build strategic partnerships and alliances. Critical Success Factors (measures of the degree of success over the next 5 years): * Establish 2 institutional, community or regional partnerships. * Establish 2 partnerships with other institutions, agencies, professional associations, businesses, or industry.
abutler

Texas Tech University Strategic Plan : Goal 4. Technology - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Goal 4: Benefit from the use of technology in the delivery of services. Create technology infrastructure that provides easy collaborative interaction in a learning environment. Offer 12 degree programs through distance learning and 8% of total course inventory through distance learning. 75% of appropriate recruiting tools will be Internet-based. Objective 4.2: Integrate the use of technology in teaching and learning processes. Strategies: Engage faculty in how instruction is impacted by technology. Provide an appropriate infrastructure for distance learning. Assessments: Number of distance courses. Amount of external support. Number and capabilities of technology classrooms. Number of courses using technology. Objective 4.6: Increase the number of electronically delivered degree programs and courses. Strategies: Develop and implement additional electronically delivered courses and programs. Support faculty training for electronically delivered instruction. Support faculty training in the design and implementation of electronically delivered curriculum. Provide appropriate technological resources for electronically delivered instruction. Market electronically delivered courses and degree programs. Assessments: Number of electronically delivered courses. Number of electronically delivered degrees. Student enrollment.
abutler

Texas Tech University: College of Engineering Strategic Plan - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      The missions of the College of Engineering are to: Offer quality undergraduate programs that stress the fundamentals of engineering and its practice. Prepare graduates for an engineering career, advanced studies, or other professional paths. Provide quality graduate programs for students seeking strong research experiences in preparation for a professional, academic, or research career; as well as quality flexible graduate programs for students seeking professional enhancement. Pursue basic and applied research to generate new knowledge and create technical solutions to society's challenges. Serve the broader educational and professional engineering community. Vision: Excelling as a national leader in engineering education and research. Strategic Goals of the College of Engineering: 6. Pursue targeted areas of opportunity for the college. As an engineering college that is increasing its national visibility, we can have the greatest impact by focusing our limited faculty and funding resources in selected niche areas that exploit our current or potential strengths and have a significant impact on the nation. Benchmarks by 2012: Identify two or more areas of opportunity and obtain greater than $1M in research funds and/or establish academic offerings in those areas. Strategies include: Hold a series of summits at TTU over the next two years in areas of significant national importance. Invite speakers/panelists that include politicians, funding agency representatives, National Academy members, technical experts, and others to share their view of research and workforce needs in these areas. Identify topical areas for summits through a faculty proposal process coordinated by the Strategic Directions Committee. Start with a summit in the area of energy. Elucidate niche areas of opportunity by assessing the synergy that results between national needs and faculty interests. Invest in the resulting areas of opportunity t
abutler

Texas A&M University Student Learning Outcomes - 0 views

  •  

abutler

Texas A&M University: Program Assessment for Professional Accreditation and Internal Pr... - 0 views

  •  

1 - 20 of 56 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page