Skip to main content

Home/ Big 12 Engineering Project-Policy Research/ Group items tagged section7

Rss Feed Group items tagged

abutler

Missouri Department of Higher Education: Clarifying Comments For the Review of Academic... - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Benefits of Collaboration Collaboration for mutual benefits is strongly encouraged. Institutions are expected to describe whether collaborating with other institutions is feasible. Regardless of whether collaboration is part of the proposed program, if an institution proposes to deliver a program that is already offered in the state, i.e., already exists in the official CBHE program inventory, the proposing institution should include its rationale for collaborating or for moving forward alone. The possibility of contractual and cost-sharing arrangements among institutions within and across sectors should be given consideration.
    • abutler
       
      Distance-Based and Off-Site Programs Technology continues to have a major impact on the number of alternatives open to institutions in the design and delivery of academic programs. Proposals for distance-learning programs should be in alignment with the board's Principles of Good Practice for Distance Learning/Web-based Courses. In the case of proposals for off-site delivery, proposing institutions should work collaboratively by building on the inventory of available coursework within the locale and by utilizing the human resources and facilities of local providers to thereby reduce the costs associated with establishing new delivery sites.
abutler

University of Kansas: Graduate School policies procedures for Graduate Certificate Prog... - 0 views

  •  
    When the proposal involves collaboration with the other institutions there will need to be official written endorsement for the graduate certificate program from those areas where the program will exist. These institutions must offer a baccalaureate degree with requirements for the degree substantially equivalent to those at KU.
abutler

KBOR - Policy and Procedure Manual Appendix G Approval of New Academic Programs - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Registrar Information: page 36 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual ACADEMIC CALENDAR a. The Academic Calendar of each institution under the jurisdiction of the Board shall provide for an academic year minimally consisting of two sixteen week semesters totaling 150 instructional days plus five final exam days each semester. b. Each Regents university shall file a three-year Academic Calendar adhering to holidays and breaks approved by the Board. Each institution shall follow the calendar as approved by the Board. Any deviation for reasons other than natural disasters or national emergencies must have prior approval of the Board. (6-19-70; 1-18-90; 5-20-93) 2. COURSE NUMBERING SYSTEM a. In order to maintain a common system of classification of academic information for all Regents institutions, course levels are to be identified by the first digit catalog course number as follows: 000-099 No credit courses. 100-299 Lower division, undergraduate. Designed as freshman-sophomore courses. 300-499 Upper division, undergraduate. Designed as junior and senior courses. 500-699 Upper division, undergraduate. Primarily for juniors and seniors, with enrollment of less than 50% Graduate I students. 700-799 Graduate and upper division. For Graduate I students primarily; with enrollment of less than 50% undergraduates. 800-899 Designed primarily for Graduate I students. 900-999 Designed primarily for Graduate II students. Grad. I = Courses and thesis for Masters students who will ordinarily have accumulated from 1 through 30 graduate hours and students enrolled in professional schools (Law, Veterinary Medicine, M.D., Architecture, etc.). Grad. II = Courses for Specialists and Doctoral students who will ordinarily have completed greater than 30 hours of graduate work. The dual listing of courses may be permitted on a limited basis with the written approval of the graduate dean of each institution. A current list of such dually listed cours
  •  
    Collaboration: page 118 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual APPENDIX K COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE PROCEDURES Proposals for collaborative programs/degrees must include the following and should be limited to two pages: (a) A brief description of the nature of the collaboration and the benefits to Kansas (b) Lists of partners in the collaboration and degrees/certificates (if any) to be conferred by each partner (c) Description of faculty load and faculty compensation for each partner (d) Tuition/fees for each partner (e) Description of student support services provided by each partner (1) Academic Advising (2) Financial Aid (3) Access to facilities (4) Transcripting procedures (f) Plans for joint use of facilities (g) Plans for joint purchase and/or maintenance of facilities (1-19-05) ------------------------------------------------------------------ 25. COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE POLICY page 148 The Kansas Board of Regents encourages and supports system-wide cooperative and collaborative efforts among postsecondary institutions within the State of Kansas and between Kansas institutions and out-of-state institutions, including international institutions. a. Defion of collaborative programs/degrees Collaborative programs/degrees are defined as programs/degrees developed and/or approved jointly by more than one institution; students from each participating institution may study parts of the program/degree at the collaborating institutions. In this policy, "program" refers to a formal academic course of study. Although most programs result in a degree or a major within a degree, in some cases, such as teaching endorsements, a program does not result in a major or a degree. b. Requirements for collaborative programs/degrees (1) Effective August 2005, all new collaborative programs must be reported to SCOCAO and SCOP according to the procedures described in Appendix K. The purpose of the report is to
  •  
    APPENDIX D RESIDENCY RULES AND REGULATIONS Article 3--GUIDELINES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RESIDENCY FOR FEE PURPOSES Page 88 88-3-1. Student Information. Whenever a question arises concerning a person's residence classification for fee purposes, that person shall be provided with a copy of information substantially as set forth in this regulation, together with K.A.R. 88-3-2 through 88-3-13. "Carefully read the information, statute, and regulations that follow. Then, if you believe you should be eligible for resident classification for fee purposes, complete the attached application for residence classification and submit it to the registrar within 30 days of your notification of classification as a nonresident for fee purposes. When an appeal is made by a student from a determination that the student is a nonresident, the student must pay nonresident fees at the time designated for payment of fees. If the student is found to be a resident, the difference between resident and nonresident fees will be refunded. Subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 77-601, et seq. decisions of the residence committee shall not be subject to further administrative review by any officer or committee of the university, or by the state board of regents." Responsibility "The responsibility of enrolling under proper residence classification for fee purposes is placed on the student. If there is any possible question of residence classification under the regulations of the state board of regents, it is the duty of the student when registering and paying fees to raise the question with the registrar. If a student enrolls incorrectly as a resident of Kansas and it is determined at a later date the student was a nonresident for fee purposes, the student shall be required to pay the nonresident fee for all terms during which the student was incorrectly registered." (Authorized by K.S.A. 76-730; implementing K.S.A. 76-729; effective, E-71-35, Aug. 20, 1971; effective Jan. 1, 1972; a
abutler

Texas Tech University: Assessment Plan for Distance Learning & Off-Campus Instruction - 0 views

  •  
    APPENDIX 1-4A Section 1 Question 4 Institutional Issues Assessment Plan for Distance Learning and Off-Campus Instruction 1. Assessment of student learning outcomes Readiness Survey * Assessment of student readiness to complete course delivered in a specified modality * Administered prior to a student's first enrollment in a course delivered via a specific modality * Development of readiness surveys for each modality (e.g., broadcast TV, Internet, video conferencing, mixed modalities) Modality Assessment * Student self-report of how modality affected course delivery * Administered at end of term for each course * Instruments developed for each modality of delivery (e.g., broadcast TV, Internet, video conferencing, mixed modalities) Learning Objectives Assessment * Assessment of student mastery of learning objectives for a specific course * Faculty member for course establishes learning objectives and processes for assessment, documents findings, and uses for improvement of teaching and student learning * Conducted by faculty or faculty team each term course is offered Degree program student learning outcomes assessment * Discipline or degree program faculty identify specific learning outcomes that are expected of students * Methods of assessment selected from best practices in discipline * Assessment plan designed and implemented by disciplinary faculty * Assessment conducted at several points of student's progress through degree program (sometimes, at entrance, mid-point, and at exit) * Degree program faculty document findings and use for improvement in teaching and student learning 2. Retention * Institutional Research to implement retention reporting for two groups: 1) distance learners and 2) off-campus educational site students. * Retention research will parallel existing retention research conducted for students studying at Lubbock. * Retention benchmarks for distance learners and off-camp
  •  
    APPENDIX 2-1C Section 2 Question 1 Educational Programs Texas Tech University Distance Learning and Off-Campus Site Program Proposal I. Title of program (e.g., English, Secondary Teaching Certificate, Business Administration) II. Degree offered (BA, BS, BBA, M.Ed., MBA, MA, MS, etc.) III. Timeline for offering the degree (Beginning date, courses per term, end date; continuous offering or cohort-based offering) IV. Brief description of degree and curriculum (brief narrative of academic program) V. Evidence of long-term need for each program in terms of student demand (marketing analysis of regional or state-wide student demand, THECB approved programs, state occupational data, institutional data, etc.) VI. Evidence of institutional capacity to assure the students can make continuous progress toward their degree (Institutional faculty staffing adequacy, regional part-time adequacy, facility and technology adequacy, institutional commitment, etc.) VII. Strategy for providing comparable on-campus support to distance and offcampus learners (standards for admission, enrollment, registration, financial aid, availability of faculty for on-site or Internet office-hours, institutional and regional library resources, administrative support personnel to provide on-site services, training for support staff who will work with distance or off-campus learners, quality control measures, etc.) VIII. Strategies for scheduling courses to meet degree requirements for distance and off-campus learners (sequencing of course delivery, method of delivery, etc.). IX. Degree plan (required curriculum for degree completion; under-division courses required but not currently offered by regional community college; recommended four-year program for undergraduates; recommended term-by-term program for graduate students). X. Degree courses (list each course number, title and description from current institutional catalog) XI. Learning outcomes and assessment processes for courses and
  •  
    Section 3 Faculty 1. The qualifications for distance education faculty are the same as faculty teaching the same courses in a traditional on-campus format. Please describe rationale applied for making exceptions. ELECTRONICALLY-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION Faculty members are the core of distance education and off-campus instruction. Issues related to faculty qualifications and services are covered in a variety of University Operating Policies, which will be referenced in appropriate portions of this report. Faculty Qualifications Full and part-time faculty members must meet the qualifications stipulated by SACS. OP 32.02 http://www.depts.ttu.edu/opmanual/New.contents.links/32academic_policies_faculty.htm denotes the qualifications needed for all faculty levels. Departmental chairpersons must certify the qualifications of faculty members at the time of employment, including those faculty members contracted for course development and implementation through Outreach and Extended Studies and those teaching at off-campus educational sites. Exceptions to the stated requirements are not typical at Texas Tech, but may be permitted in cases of persons who have "demonstrated exceptional scholarly or creative activity or substantial professional experience." As noted by Institutional Research and by Outreach and Extended Studies, over 95% of those teaching distance courses are the same faculty members who teach the course on campus. OFF CAMPUS INSTRUCTION At Texas Tech University faculty members who teach in the various distance education programs and courses hold the same credentials as those teaching on-campus courses. Full and part-time faculty teaching distance courses or at off-campus sites are appointed by the respective academic departments at Lubbock. All policies and procedures that apply to on-campus faculty members apply to faculty members teaching distance education courses and at off-campus educational sites.
abutler

University of Oklahoma Policy and Procedure Manual: Certificate Policy - 0 views

  •  

abutler

University of Oklahoma: Frequently Asked Questions About Program Modifications - 0 views

  •  
    Level V - Subgroupings of courses within a major often referred to as tracks or concentrations. Page 2. These are permitted, but are not regulated by State Regents' policies and they do not appear on the diploma or transcript.
1 - 20 of 59 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page