Skip to main content

Home/ Big 12 Engineering Project-Policy Research/ Group items tagged approval

Rss Feed Group items tagged

abutler

KBOR - Policy and Procedure Manual Appendix G Approval of New Academic Programs - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Registrar Information: page 36 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual ACADEMIC CALENDAR a. The Academic Calendar of each institution under the jurisdiction of the Board shall provide for an academic year minimally consisting of two sixteen week semesters totaling 150 instructional days plus five final exam days each semester. b. Each Regents university shall file a three-year Academic Calendar adhering to holidays and breaks approved by the Board. Each institution shall follow the calendar as approved by the Board. Any deviation for reasons other than natural disasters or national emergencies must have prior approval of the Board. (6-19-70; 1-18-90; 5-20-93) 2. COURSE NUMBERING SYSTEM a. In order to maintain a common system of classification of academic information for all Regents institutions, course levels are to be identified by the first digit catalog course number as follows: 000-099 No credit courses. 100-299 Lower division, undergraduate. Designed as freshman-sophomore courses. 300-499 Upper division, undergraduate. Designed as junior and senior courses. 500-699 Upper division, undergraduate. Primarily for juniors and seniors, with enrollment of less than 50% Graduate I students. 700-799 Graduate and upper division. For Graduate I students primarily; with enrollment of less than 50% undergraduates. 800-899 Designed primarily for Graduate I students. 900-999 Designed primarily for Graduate II students. Grad. I = Courses and thesis for Masters students who will ordinarily have accumulated from 1 through 30 graduate hours and students enrolled in professional schools (Law, Veterinary Medicine, M.D., Architecture, etc.). Grad. II = Courses for Specialists and Doctoral students who will ordinarily have completed greater than 30 hours of graduate work. The dual listing of courses may be permitted on a limited basis with the written approval of the graduate dean of each institution. A current list of such dually listed cours
  •  
    Collaboration: page 118 Kansas Board of Regents Policy and Procedure Manual APPENDIX K COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE PROCEDURES Proposals for collaborative programs/degrees must include the following and should be limited to two pages: (a) A brief description of the nature of the collaboration and the benefits to Kansas (b) Lists of partners in the collaboration and degrees/certificates (if any) to be conferred by each partner (c) Description of faculty load and faculty compensation for each partner (d) Tuition/fees for each partner (e) Description of student support services provided by each partner (1) Academic Advising (2) Financial Aid (3) Access to facilities (4) Transcripting procedures (f) Plans for joint use of facilities (g) Plans for joint purchase and/or maintenance of facilities (1-19-05) ------------------------------------------------------------------ 25. COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM/DEGREE POLICY page 148 The Kansas Board of Regents encourages and supports system-wide cooperative and collaborative efforts among postsecondary institutions within the State of Kansas and between Kansas institutions and out-of-state institutions, including international institutions. a. Defion of collaborative programs/degrees Collaborative programs/degrees are defined as programs/degrees developed and/or approved jointly by more than one institution; students from each participating institution may study parts of the program/degree at the collaborating institutions. In this policy, "program" refers to a formal academic course of study. Although most programs result in a degree or a major within a degree, in some cases, such as teaching endorsements, a program does not result in a major or a degree. b. Requirements for collaborative programs/degrees (1) Effective August 2005, all new collaborative programs must be reported to SCOCAO and SCOP according to the procedures described in Appendix K. The purpose of the report is to
  •  
    APPENDIX D RESIDENCY RULES AND REGULATIONS Article 3--GUIDELINES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RESIDENCY FOR FEE PURPOSES Page 88 88-3-1. Student Information. Whenever a question arises concerning a person's residence classification for fee purposes, that person shall be provided with a copy of information substantially as set forth in this regulation, together with K.A.R. 88-3-2 through 88-3-13. "Carefully read the information, statute, and regulations that follow. Then, if you believe you should be eligible for resident classification for fee purposes, complete the attached application for residence classification and submit it to the registrar within 30 days of your notification of classification as a nonresident for fee purposes. When an appeal is made by a student from a determination that the student is a nonresident, the student must pay nonresident fees at the time designated for payment of fees. If the student is found to be a resident, the difference between resident and nonresident fees will be refunded. Subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 77-601, et seq. decisions of the residence committee shall not be subject to further administrative review by any officer or committee of the university, or by the state board of regents." Responsibility "The responsibility of enrolling under proper residence classification for fee purposes is placed on the student. If there is any possible question of residence classification under the regulations of the state board of regents, it is the duty of the student when registering and paying fees to raise the question with the registrar. If a student enrolls incorrectly as a resident of Kansas and it is determined at a later date the student was a nonresident for fee purposes, the student shall be required to pay the nonresident fee for all terms during which the student was incorrectly registered." (Authorized by K.S.A. 76-730; implementing K.S.A. 76-729; effective, E-71-35, Aug. 20, 1971; effective Jan. 1, 1972; a
abutler

OSRHE Policy and Procedure Manual 3.4 Program Approval Page 69 - 0 views

  •  
    Finance Info: 3.17.18 Fiscal Provisions for Electronic and Traditional Off-campus Instruction. Page 157 3.17.20 Electronic Curriculum Development Fund. Page 159
  • ...3 more comments...
  •  
    Program Approval Info: 3.17.16 Program Approval and Review. Page 156
  •  
    3.7.4 Criteria for Evaluation Page 69: the above link takes you to this page.
  •  
    Course and Program Approval: 3.4 Program Approval. Page 49
  •  
    3.14.8 Certificates: Certificates and other forms of academic recognition other than degrees may be awarded by institutions only as authorized by the State Regents and in the form approved by them for this puspose. Institutions should submit reequests to award certificates only when the certificate is identified on the transcript, diploma, or degree (See the State Regents Aademic Program Review Policy). Awards or certificates give for completion of short courses, non-credit offerings, basic education courses, or other such experiences need not be submitted for State Regents' Approval. Page 127
  •  
    Academic Program Review. Page 68
abutler

Graduate Deans Agreement GPIDEA - 0 views

  •  
    Graduate Deans Agreement Great Plains Interactive Distance Education Alliance (Great Plains IDEA) Adopted October 30, 2001, Updated March 18, 2003 The Graduate Deans of the Universities that are members of the Great Plains IDEA and that are participating in the Master's and graduate certificate programs offered through the Great Plains IDEA, on behalf of their respective Graduate Faculties, have agreed to the following principles and procedures in order to facilitate the development and delivery of inter-institutional graduate programs through their institutions. Principle 1: The participating Graduate Schools mutually respect the academic standards and quality of the academic departments involved in this joint program, therefore: 1.1 Courses approved for delivery by this program will be considered inter-institutional courses and will be exempt from transfer credit policies. 1.2 Faculty members who provide instruction in this program must carry graduate faculty status at their home institution; however, further documentation or approval will not be required by the other members of the Alliance. 1.3 Students admitted as degree-seeking students in Great Plains IDEA programs will be accepted automatically by all other members of the Alliance for enrollment in courses that are a part of the curricula of Great Plains IDEA programs. Admission to a Great Plains IDEA program will be based on the criteria established at each participating institution and program pre-requisites established for the Alliance Program to which admission is sought. Institutions are encouraged not to require the GRE. 1.4 The number of students that may be admitted to the program by each participating institution will be determined by agreement of the participating institutions. 1.5 The content of the curriculum will be determined by agreement of the participating institutions. Principle 2: The participating Graduate Schools recognize that the implementatio
abutler

Iowa State University: New Program Approval FORM DOC - 0 views

  •  
    Also includes Supplemental materials.
abutler

Baylor University: Guaranteed Tuition Option - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      4.108. Non-Formula-Funded (Extension) Course and Program General Provisions. (a) Institutions shall not submit non-state-funded lower-division credit courses to Regional Councils. (b) Institutions shall not submit distance education courses delivered outside the state to non-Texas residents for formula funding. (c) The Commissioner shall develop standards for institutions offering out-ofstate/ country courses and programs. The following provisions apply to all courses covered under this subchapter, unless otherwise specified: (3) Institutions may submit for formula funding the following types of academic credit courses: distance education courses delivered to Texas and non-Texas residents located on-campus or at another location in Texas, distance education courses delivered to Texas residents located out of state or out of country; Study-Abroad courses, and Study-in-America courses. (4) Institutions shall not submit the following types of courses for formula funding: (A) distance education courses taken by non-resident students who are located out of state or out of country, (B) courses in out-of-state or out-of-country programs, as defined above, taken by any student, or (C) Extension courses. (5) For courses not eligible to be submitted for formula funding, institutions shall charge fees that are equal to or greater than Texas resident tuition and applicable fees, and that are sufficient to cover the total cost of instruction and overhead, including administrative costs, benefits, computers and equipment, and other related costs. (6) Study-in-America and Study-Abroad courses offered by institutions of higher education, or by an approved consortium composed of Texas public institutions, shall be approved by the Commissioner in order for the semester credit hours or contact hours generated in those courses to receive formula funding. The Commissioner shall develop procedures and standards for Study-in-America and Study-Abroad offering
abutler

Missouri Department of Higher Education: Clarifying Comments For the Review of Academic... - 0 views

    • abutler
       
      Benefits of Collaboration Collaboration for mutual benefits is strongly encouraged. Institutions are expected to describe whether collaborating with other institutions is feasible. Regardless of whether collaboration is part of the proposed program, if an institution proposes to deliver a program that is already offered in the state, i.e., already exists in the official CBHE program inventory, the proposing institution should include its rationale for collaborating or for moving forward alone. The possibility of contractual and cost-sharing arrangements among institutions within and across sectors should be given consideration.
    • abutler
       
      Distance-Based and Off-Site Programs Technology continues to have a major impact on the number of alternatives open to institutions in the design and delivery of academic programs. Proposals for distance-learning programs should be in alignment with the board's Principles of Good Practice for Distance Learning/Web-based Courses. In the case of proposals for off-site delivery, proposing institutions should work collaboratively by building on the inventory of available coursework within the locale and by utilizing the human resources and facilities of local providers to thereby reduce the costs associated with establishing new delivery sites.
abutler

KSU Disvision of Contintuing Education Compensation for Teaching - 0 views

  •  
    Kansas State University: Offering a Course for Credit through the Division of Continuing Education Kansas State University, five Regents universities and Washburn University are assigned to geographic service areas within the state. It is possible to offer credit courses outside K-State's geographic jurisdiction (see map in University Policies Section); however, the process requires a minimum of six weeks. This time period is necessary for Board of Regents approval, as well as effective advertising. The exceptions to this rule are specialty programs unique to K-State, such as Adult and Continuing Education, Agriculture Education, and Family and Consumer Sciences.
1 - 20 of 66 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page