Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Reason/s & Belief
Sunny Jackson

Bundlr - Humanism 101 - 0 views

  • reliance on reason, evidence, and free inquiry
  • considers the welfare of humankind - rather than the welfare of a supposed God or gods - to be of paramount importance
  • affirms our ability and responsibility to lead meaningful, ethical lives
  • ...80 more annotations...
  • people can find purpose in life and maximize their long-term happiness by developing their talents and using those talents for the service of humanity
  • human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives
  • a democratic and ethical lifestance
  • value knowledge based on reason and hard evidence
  • this is the only life
  • adding to the greater good of humanity
  • using human efforts to meet human needs
  • recognizes human beings as a part of nature
  • supporters of the principle of separation of church and state
  • humanity must take responsibility for its own destiny
  • individual freedom
  • represents a consensus of what all or almost all Humanists believe
  • universal human dignity
  • we owe it to ourselves and others to make it the best life possible for ourselves and all
  • values-be they religious, ethical, social, or political-have their source in human experience and culture
  • an uncreated universe that obeys natural laws
  • service to others is a major focus of Humanism
  • stands for the building of a more humane society
  • people's fulfillment by personal effort
  • knowledge can be obtained through rational thought and experimentation
  • advocates the extension of participatory democracy
  • Humanists believe in and value love, equality, peace, freedom and reason
  • derives the goals of life from human need
  • accept democracy
  • the preciousness and dignity of the individual person is a central humanist value
  • an approach to life based on reason and our common humanity, recognizing that moral values are properly founded on human nature and experience
  • a philosophy, world view, or lifestance
  • a rational philosophy informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by compassion
  • Humanist values are mainstream American values
  • when people are free to think for themselves, using reason and knowledge as their tools, they are best able to solve this world's problems
  • the open society, standing for human rights and social justice
  • Humanists take responsibility for their own lives and relish the adventure of being part of new discoveries, seeking new knowledge, exploring new options
  • a philosophy
  • Since most believe that an afterlife is non-existent, they regard life here on earth to be particularly precious
  • ethics based on human and other natural values in a spirit of reason and free inquiry through human capabilities
  • nature is all that exists or is real
  • Affirming the dignity of each human being
  • many people realize that they are already humanists and just did not know
  • Humanists stand for the building of a more humane, just, compassionate, and democratic society using a pragmatic ethics based on human reason, experience, and reliable knowledge-an ethics that judges the consequences of human actions by the well-being of all life on Earth.
  • Although religious texts can teach good lessons, they also advocate fear, intolerance, hate and ignorance.
  • highly motivated to alleviating pain and misery around the world
  • Secular Humanism a non-religiously based philosophy
  • supports the maximization of individual liberty and opportunity consonant with social and planetary responsibility
  • Humanists view this natural world as wondrous and precious, and as offering limitless opportunities for exploration, fascination, creativity, companionship, and joy
  • All quotes from religious texts were checked by scripture scholars to ensure accuracy, context and proper translation. 
  • value freedom of inquiry, expression and action
  • have a history of combating bigotry, hatred, discrimination, intolerance and censorship
  • truth could be discovered by human effort
  • humans have the freedom to give meaning, value, and purpose to their lives by their own independent thought, free inquiry, and responsible, creative activity
  • moral values derive their source from human experience
  • humanists enjoy the open-endedness of a quest and the freedom of discovery
  • Humanism considers the universe to be the result of an extremely long and complex evolution under immutable laws of nature
  • Humanists seek to understand the universe by using science and its methods of critical inquiry-logical reasoning, empirical evidence, and skeptical evaluation of conjectures and conclusions-to obtain reliable knowledge
  • The rights of men and women should be equal and sacred
  • a philosophy centered upon the needs and interests of people
  • marriage should be a perfect partnership
  • love coupled with empathy, democracy, and a commitment to selfless service
  • secular humanist values are consistent with mainstream America
  • fundamentalist religion has no right to claim the moral high ground
  • Humanism is the idea that you can be good without a belief in God.
  • the lack of any evidence for an afterlife means this life should be lived as though it's the only one we have
  • When people view the Bible as the word of a just and omniscient God, and attempt to have society's laws and social practices reflect biblical teachings, serious error and harm will occur if the Bible was actually written by fallible humans who lived in an unenlightened era.
  • When the subjects involve governmental issues, all of society can be affected
  • In most communities, an opposing view is rarely, if ever, heard
  • It would instead perpetuate the ideas of an ignorant and superstitious past - and prevent humanity from rising to a higher level.
  • written solely by humans
  • it contains numerous contradictions
  • The Bible is an unreliable authority
  • The massive and incessant promotion of the Bible significantly influences the beliefs of millions
  • Humanists also reject the Bible because it approves of outrageous cruelty and injustice.
  • because so many people have been told the Bible is the "Good Book," biblical teachings shape the attitudes of millions
  • Humanity’s condition could be greatly improved if those resources were used for solving the world's problems instead of worshiping a nonexistent God.
  • Logically, if two statements are contradictory, at least one of them is false.
  • the suffering of the innocent is the essence of injustice
  • the book has many false statements and is not infallible
  • the Bible teaches that God repeatedly violated this moral precept by harming innocent people
  • Instances of cruel and unjust behavior by the biblical God are seen in the most basic Christian doctrines.
  • hundreds of contradictions mean there are at least hundreds of incorrect statements in the Bible
  • because the writers of the Bible lived in an unenlightened era, the book contains many errors and harmful teachings
  • Each contradiction is an instance where at least one of the verses is wrong.
Sunny Jackson

Top Conversation Killers for Atheists: How Religious Theists Can Hurt Their Cause - 0 views

  • take some time to learn how atheists and dictionaries define atheism and agnosticism
  • learn something
  • a real conversation is a two-way street where both contribute and both are interested in taking something away
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • identify and eliminate basic errors
  • For atheists, quoting passages from the Bible proves nothing about any gods whatsoever. At most, it may prove that the person doing the quoting doesn't have anything better to offer.
  • you can't prove anything to atheists by simply quoting the Bible
  • People making a positive claim have a burden of proof; this means that they voluntarily assume an obligation to support their claim
  • make your own arguments
  • many theists do something in particular: they offer arguments for the existence of their god and then ignore the various objections and rebuttals offered by atheists.
  • It's one thing not to agree with those rebuttals, but quite another to go on repeating the argument as if no objections had been raised at all.
  • do some research to learn what the most common objections and rebuttals are
  • atheists will challenge a theist to provide evidence to support their claims. The proper response is to actually provide evidence.
  • It's up to the claimant to show that their position has enough merit to be taken seriously and be looked at more closely.
  • One way or another, the theist appears to be expressing superiority over atheists in a passive-aggressive manner. That suggests they weren't interested in serious conversation to begin with.
Sunny Jackson

Fallacies of Relevance: Appeal to Unqualified Authority (Argumentum ad Verecundiam) - 0 views

  • people are browbeaten by such arguments into accepting a proposition by the testimony of an authority because they are too modest to base a challenge on their own knowledge
  • Authorities can be challenged
  • you can question whether or not the alleged authority really is an authority in this area of knowledge
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • A second basis for challenge is whether or not the authority in question is making statements in his or her area of expertise
  • we can challenge an appeal to authority based on whether or not the testimony being offered is something which would find widespread agreement among other experts in that field
  • if this is the only person in the entire field making such claims, the mere fact that they have expertise doesn’t warrant belief in it, especially considering the weight of contrary testimony
  • look directly at the evidence they are offering
  • we cannot rely upon them
Sunny Jackson

Appeals to Authority: Appeal To Anonymous Authority - 0 views

  • a person claims we should believe a proposition because it is also believed or claimed by some authority figure or figures — but in this case the authority is not named
  • Instead of identifying who this authority is, we get vague statements about “experts” or “scientists” who have “proven” something to be “true.”
  • a valid authority is one who can be checked and whose statements can be verified
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • the support offered is completely inadequate to the task of supporting them
  • independently evaluate the data which they have used
  • Here we don’t even know if the so-called “experts” are qualified authorities in the fields in question — and that is in addition to not knowing who they are so we can check the data and conclusions.
  • check for ourselves
  • a good basis for their position
  • The insult comes in via the implication
  • who reject the above are automatically excluded from consideration
  • who is this “they” who says so?
  • evaluate the claim
  • vacuous
  • vague
  • When “they” say things, that is just a rumor — it might be true, or it might not be. We cannot accept it as true, however, without evidence
  • find that evidence when asked
  • an anonymous authority isn’t sufficient to get us to believe the claims in question
  • provide more substantive support
Sunny Jackson

Faulty Causation Fallacies: Oversimplification and Exaggeration - 0 views

  • the series of actual causes for an event are either reduced or multiplied to the point where there is no longer a genuine, causal connection between the alleged causes and the actual effect
  • multiple causes are reduced to just one or a few (oversimplification)
  • oversimplification
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • a couple of causes are multiplied into many (exaggeration)
  • Although it is true that an explanation should be no more complicated than necessary, one must be very careful not to construct an explanation which is less complicated than necessary
  • assumes
  • can be attributed to a single cause
  • A myriad of other factors in society are completely ignored, as if the social and economic conditions haven't changed in any relevant way.
  • In the real world, events typically have multiple, intersecting causes which together produce the events we see.
  • there is a wide variety of different factors which can influence the morality of individuals and groups
  • the sole or even primary cause
  • A common reason for oversimplification, especially in the political realm, is a personal agenda
  • taking credit
  • placing blame
  • The logical problem here is the dismissal of all the other factors which contribute
  • causal factors which contribute
  • often ignored by those who oversimplify the situation
  • its error lies in vastly oversimplifying
  • to the point where it becomes unrecognizable.
  • not the only process which is involved
  • a one-dimension theory which cannot possibly be true
  • portray
  • an oversimplification fallacy can also become a Straw Man Fallacy if a person takes the oversimplified description of a position and then proceeds to criticize it as if it were the genuine position
  • an exaggeration fallacy is committed when an argument tries to include additional causal influences which are ultimately irrelevant to the matter at hand
  • an identifiable effect
  • the real causes only end up being masked by additional and irrelevant pseudo-causes
Sunny Jackson

Appeals to Emotion and Desire: Index of Fallacies - 0 views

  • your emotional reaction does not necessarily have any bearing on the truth or falsity of a conclusion
  • One common way the Appeal to Emotion is created is by appealing to an audience's prejudices or desires
  • what we want to be true isn't relevant when trying to determine what is true
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Usually, such an appeal is not made openly or obviously
Sunny Jackson

Fallacies: Argumentum ad Baculum - 0 views

  • A god is not made any more likely to exist simply because someone says that if we don't believe in it, then we will be harmed in the end
  • belief in a god is not made any more rational simply because we are afraid of going to some hell
  • no evidence is offered that such a possibility is really a credible threat
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • prudential reasons
Sunny Jackson

What if Atheists are Wrong? Aren't You Afraid of Hell? Can You Take the Chance? - 0 views

  • If there is a god who punishes people for rational doubt, why would you want to spend an eternity with it anyway?
  • you can’t trust it
  • Not spending eternity with such a being doesn’t sound like much of a loss
« First ‹ Previous 301 - 320 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page