Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Government Diigo
carsonschaa

Virginia move to abolish death penalty part of broader wave of change - CSMonitor.com - 1 views

I think death penalty shouldn't be a round anymore but however I think it should be only used if you killed another person on purpose or multiple people.

started by carsonschaa on 15 Mar 21 no follow-up yet
carsonschaa

Virginia move to abolish death penalty part of broader wave of change - CSMonitor.com - 2 views

I think death penalty shouldn't be a round anymore but however I think it should be only used if you killed another person on purpose or multiple people.

started by carsonschaa on 15 Mar 21 no follow-up yet
brandonwch

With COVID-19 Relief Passed, It's Time for Democrats to Destroy the Filibuster - 0 views

  •  
    With the Filibuster in place, nothing gets done. The Filibuster allows the minority of congress to block popular legislation. Ignoring the often unrepresentative nature of the congress, this is a serious problem that isn't even enshrined in the constitution. What are your thoughts on the Filibuster?
  •  
    I agree, an example of this would be the 15 Dollar minimum wage increase. 62% of Americans support the increase but since the filibuster is in place the minority Republicans will continuously block the bill.
qanderson136

Jeep Wrangler Engine Explodes After 50,000 RPM Rev - 2 views

  •  
    I think that being able to tow a trailer or car behind a truck should be something that anyone could do, but things like this make me think that there needs to be some type of additional training when doing so. What are your thoughts?
  •  
    I think it would be a good idea to require some form of training to be able to tow things on busy roads where others are in danger but I think for short distances on smaller less active roads there should be no training. In my opinion, it's the driver's responsibility to make sure they don´t destroy their vehicle but I also didn't think about the other people that could be killed for just driving near someone towing something the wrong way. In that case, I think there should be some sort of training so that others on the road are not at risk.
ataylor074

Vigils For Atlanta Victims And Anti-Racism Protests Draw Thousands Across U.S. : NPR - 2 views

  •  
    Do you guys think he should face more charges?
  •  
    As the article says, since the pandemic started they have been getting a lot of hate because of the virus. Asians have a lot of fear to go outside and live their "normal" life before the pandemic. There have also been a lot of racist comments towards them such as "you brought the virus over here". Racism still happening is terrible and sad.
mcaamal

Second Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine Has Stronger Side Effects - 22 views

  •  
    I think that even though the second dose of the COVID-19 had stronger effects, all of us should consider taking it. At this point, it's our only hope to end the pandemic.
  • ...24 more comments...
  •  
    The second dose really does have stronger side effects. My mom got her vaccine because she works with law enforcement and she was sick for a few days after she got hers and she said when she woke up the morning after her shot that it felt like someone hit her in the arm with a baseball bat.
  •  
    yes, the second dose does have side effects, but the same thing happens with the flu vaccine. the only difference is that this vaccine doesn't actually inject you with the virus. it just sends antibodies to teach your body to fight it.
  •  
    This article talks more in-depth about what coronavirus vaccines do to your body. For example, it talks about how the first vaccine teaches your body how to react to the virus. With the second vaccine, you will more than likely be getting more side effects. According to the article, no matter how many side effects people will get, the vaccine will still be working in your body. What are your guy's thoughts about the vaccine?
  •  
    I think that even though the second dose of the COVID-19 had stronger effects, we should all consider taking it. At this point, it's our only hope to end the pandemic.
  •  
    I think that even though it has stronger side effects people should still consider getting the vaccine. The stronger side effects may be rough, but I'm sure getting Covid is worse.
  •  
    The article discusses how the second Covid shot will most likely hit harder than the first. It talks about how that's actually a good thing because these common symptoms are typically signs that the vaccine is working. While I have had friends that have suffered from the second shot, I would still get the shot because it's better than getting Covid.
  •  
    I think that because the side effects are stronger we should allow the vaccine more time for development, but we should still consider getting it.
  •  
    Even though the second dose of the COVID-19 had stronger effects, I think all of us should consider taking it at this point, it's our only hope to end the pandemic.
  •  
    I think that even with the second shot having more side effects we should still get it because it is our only option at this point but I do also think that there needed to be more time for the vaccine to develop and for us to know if it could really effect us in the future.
  •  
    I completely trust the Maderna vaccine as my dad was part of the trial for it and he had no problems with it (he didn't have the placebo, he had the actual vaccine), and that's good enough for me, if he was fine, ill most likely be fine.
  •  
    I think although the second dose has stronger side effects it shouldn't stop you from not getting the vaccine at all. I think the vaccine is our only chance of getting rid of COVID and it will only work if the majority of Americans get it. At the end of the day, I think the side effects of the vaccine can't be as bad as the long-lasting effects COVID can have on you.
  •  
    The COVID shot reminds me of the flu shot because when you get the flu shot it is normal to get sick afterwards or have pain but it will prevent you later from getting the flu. Even though the covid shot has side effects it is still good to get it because it will prevent you from getting COVID
  •  
    Even though the second dose has strong side effects I think that it's vital that everyone gets vaccinated if we ever want to return to normal life. I got my first dose last week and besides a sore arm and being a little thirsty I was fine. It affects people in different ways so I could get no side effects when I get my second dose or I could get a ton of negative ones. It's only for 48 hours according to the article and I´m willing to endure the risk of being sick if it means making the world hopefully safe and normal again.
  •  
    I think its really your choice. I personally believe I do not need to be getting a newly made vaccine that no one knows the possible future effects from it. If I get Covid I get it and I feel it's more important for older people to get the vaccine if they like, you do you. But as well as the J & J vaccine, I feel it is unneeded things being put into your body where there has already been multiple of horrible results from people getting the vaccine. You won't be seeing me vaccinated.
  •  
    Personally, I would not get the vaccine because nobody knows what it is going to do to you later. If there are no long-term effects and it truly does protect you from the virus then I completely understand why you would get it. The thing is, no one 100% knows so I would be very hesitant to get it.
  •  
    I think you should get the vaccine but you should not be forced to get it. If someone is worried that the vaccine is not safe then they should not have to get it if they do not want it.
  •  
    Even though it has stronger effects I still think everyone should consider getting vaccinated. Of course, there should be no forcing anyone to get vaccinated, it's just important that everyone weighs their options. I was really really sick with Covid earlier this year and it was awful. If I can do my part to protect myself and everyone else I'm going to do it.
  •  
    I think that it's a good thing since as the article said, it means it's working. If there is a chance for people to be able to not get the harsh effects of COVID-19 then maybe they should get the shot so they can be prepared for it. Idk.
  •  
    It's still in the works so of course it's going to have different/stronger effects.
  •  
    I believe that we all should take the second dose because it will help with Covid and in fact it's definitely stronger than the first one.
  •  
    I think that people should be able to decide if they want the second dose or not, but I hope they do.
  •  
    I think more Americans should get the vaccine despite the side effects the vaccine has on them. It's our best chance of not catching or spreading the virus meaning that we can return to our normal lives. A couple of days of the side effects the vaccine has on them outweighs the long-term effects of not getting the vaccine including the fact that if you get COVID, there's a possibility your symptoms from the virus will last even after you're free of spreading the virus.
  •  
    I agree with everyone's comments, even though the second dose has worse effects i think people should try to get it because other wise we'll never "go back to normal"
  •  
    I think we should stick to the vaccine that we KNOW works best
  •  
    I think that since it is common for everyone to have these worse effects, it is going to be known as not affecting certain people. If the effects are only covid symptoms that aren't super deadly, then I think it should be okay? I think that the people who are getting it are being vulnerable and helpful for those who are nervous and reluctant to get the vaccine.
  •  
    Side effects of a vaccine are totally normal, it's like when you get the flu vaccine some people do get sick. Either way, it's your best hope is not getting covid. What else are you gonna do besides harm others more prone to the disease?
mgerman776

https://www.kait8.com/2021/03/22/bumpy-road-ahead-gas-prices/ - 0 views

w

started by mgerman776 on 22 Mar 21 no follow-up yet
alyne47

NCAA fixes women's weight room for March Madness after getting called out - syracuse.com - 12 views

  •  
    Some people think the NCAA is still playing favoritism between Men's and Women's basketball. Having smaller gyms, Haveing women courts being played on the same that volleyball games use, Having the men's basketball TV Schedule name be "NCAA Basketball Tournament " and not be identified (A little confusing point but people had an issue. ) So what do you think of the 3 problems above? What other changes do you think need to be made?
  • ...8 more comments...
  •  
    I think giving the women a new weight room was the right thing to do. They are both playing in one of the biggest college tournaments in the US and they deserve to be treated fairly. I also think it's great that some big-name NBA players came forward to address the situation to help bring more attention to it.
  •  
    Giving the women the better weight room was definitely the smart choice. They definitely deserve it, but I see why it wasn't there in the first place. The NCAA loses money every single year having a women's tournament so they just put more money into where they were getting the most money. It was still not fair at all and the girls don't deserve that.
  •  
    I believe that it's insane that this situation even happened. If the women had just gotten a weight room like the men's from the beginning, then this whole situation could have been avoided. It's honestly laughable that officials gave the women just a single rack of dumbbells thinking that it would be fine. In all, I'm glad that they fixed their mistake but this situation could have been easily avoided.
  •  
    I think that it was a messed up situation it was like that before and that should have happened a while ago. The women's team deserves a good gym to work out in with the right accessible tools to get their workouts in. They should be having the support to grow individually and as a team.
  •  
    I'm glad that this issue was addressed, and apologized for. It was so unfair for the women who played sports
  •  
    I think that giving the women a new and improved weight room was the smart choice. It is unfair for men to have a superior weight room over women.
  •  
    Adding more weights and improving the weight room was the right thing to do. But why would they give women so much less than the men. Both genders have equal talents so why discriminate between them.
  •  
    I'm glad that the women got an improved weight room. It is kinda sad how no one would of known about this if the women wouldn't have said anything about it.
  •  
    I think giving the women a new weight room was a good choice, it's good that they addressed the problem. But the fact that it was a problem in the first place is kind of ridiculous. It could have been easily avoided if they had just given the women's team a proper weight room to begin with.
  •  
    I don't think it was fair that the weight room was not just like the boy's weight room! It is kinda sad that no one would have known about this if the women wouldn't have said anything about it.
Bryan Pregon

Boulder assault weapons ban blocked in court 10 days before shooting at supermarket - T... - 0 views

  •  
    "Boulder, Colo., barred assault weapons in 2018, as a way to prevent mass shootings ... But 10 days after that ban was blocked in court, the city was rocked by its own tragedy: Ten people, were killed at a supermarket in the city's south end on Monday after a gunman opened fire, law enforcement officials said."
Bryan Pregon

76% of Georgia Voters Think It Shouldn't Be a Crime to Give Voters Food and Water While... - 13 views

  •  
    This new bill is making it easier to cause voter suppression. Making it harder to request an absentee ballot and decreasing the number of ballot boxes will make it harder for people to vote, on top of waiting in a long line in the hot Georgian sun.
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    I don´t understand how giving food or water would be criminal. You think that voters would be encouraged to vote but apparently not. I can see how needing an ID to vote would be necessary but not allowing time to get a voting ballot makes no sense. I feel like the only people this will hurt are the politicians.
  •  
    This new bill is just making it harder for people to vote, it doesn't look like it will do any good.
  •  
    this bill is and will going to make it harder for people to vote but i still dont understand how giving food and water would be criminal
  •  
    I don't think giving people food or water while they wait in line to vote is a crime. It will just make people not want to vote and it won't help anything.
  •  
    This bill will make it harder for people to vote but I still don't understand how giving food and water would be criminal!!
  •  
    I've looked into this bill a lot and at this point, it is Republican Lawmakers trying to get the more densely populated areas of Georiga to not be able to vote as easily. Typically the more heavily populated areas of any state are typically Democratic. So to me and many others, it's pretty easy to see they are trying to suppress Democrat Votes to make it so a Democrat will never win Georiga again.
  •  
    I dont understand how this is a crime as it's just helping people while they wait, and without food or water it could make people not want to vote.
qanderson136

Biden should have dodged reelection question at first news conference - 16 views

  •  
    Should Biden run for president at the end of 2024? What are your thoughts?
  • ...13 more comments...
  •  
    In an ideal world, Biden wouldn't run so that a more popular progressive candidate could run. Unfortunately, Biden likely will run for re-election at the end of his term, or the DNC will push hard for another milquetoast centrist if he doesn't.
  •  
    I agree with Brandon. I don't think Biden is the best president out there. From what I saw, many people only voted for him to get Trump out of office. However, from what I read in the article, Biden was confident when he said, "Yes. My plan is to run for reelection. That's my expectation." As the current newly appointed president, it's good that Biden responded confidently even if he doesn't run again. He would have looked weak if he said anything else. Also, why are reporters asking this question so soon? Biden has only been in office for like three months. The press is just trying to hurry up life.
  •  
    I don't think that he should run again, he should allow another to run who might be able to be more productive or something.
  •  
    I don't think he will end up running again by the end of his term and I don't think he should either as he has labeled himself as a bridge president I think it's illogical to run again. him winning the presidency creates some momentum for the party and it's pretty obvious that from here some more democratic candidates will come forwards vying to be the top candidate, and I don't think Joe Biden coming to join them would be of any benefit and it would probably stand more as a division within the party. Joe Biden pretty much just stood as anti-Trump in this election for people so when people have the option to choose for another candidate I don't think many would choose Biden.
  •  
    Depending on how his term ends out should be a deciding factor for reelection.
  •  
    i think it's too early to think about reelection because even if he wants to run again, he might change his mind about it in a few years.
  •  
    I believe we should wait to answer this question, cause we don't know what he's going to do in the future.
  •  
    Biden has made some big mistakes, and has done things I don't approve of...But it's been less than a year, so I will give him a chance to correct his mistakes.
  •  
    I agree with Jackie, it's too early in Biden's presidency to be asking whether or not he'll run again. I'm sure he'll try to run again, but I'm not sure how successful he'll be. Many people just voted for him because they didn't want Trump in office, so I'm doubtful they'll vote for him when there are other options.
  •  
    it's too early in Biden's presidency to be asking whether or not he'll run again its been like 3 months that's a question that should be asked around the time of reelection.
  •  
    I don't Biden should run again because they are better options out there for our president. Many people only voted for Biden because they didn't like how trump was as a person rather than what his policies did.
  •  
    Personally, I think that Biden will run for president and I think that in 2024 he will lose. Do you think the rock can become president in 2024?
  •  
    I agree with most of the comments. It´s too early to tell if Biden will run again especially since it's only been a few months. Depending on what he does in the office and the feedback he gets will dictate if he runs again. I do feel that Biden was sort of elected just to get Trump out of the office and I hope that in the next election there's a better option besides just the one main factor was he wasn´t Trump. Either way, I look forward to following the rocks campaign.
  •  
    I personally think that Biden will not run for president in 2024. I think it is also too soon for anyone to say anything since it hasn't been a year. Everyone was concerned about Biden's age when he ran for president, I feel like he shouldn't run for president again for that reason. What if he has too many health issues? What are your thoughts?
  •  
    I agree with most of the comments that it is too early to tell, I think there is a chance he will run again but I don't see him getting voted in again. At least hopefully by then, we'd have better people to choose from as well. But especially cause of his age and him already being slow in general, it is unlikely for him to run again.
ataylor074

Derek Chauvin case: George Floyd honored in Minneapolisahead of trial - 17 views

  •  
    What do you guys think about this?
  • ...11 more comments...
  •  
    I think that they're doing an amazing job at peacefully trying to get justice for George Floyd, they mentioned a group called Mother's Love who were standing outside of the trial I think and were handing out flyers and offering emotional support.
  •  
    I'm glad that the trial is finally underway. I just wonder how they found unbiased members to make up a jury? You'd have to be living under a rock to have not heard about this case and formed some kind of opinion. While I do believe the officer is in the wrong, he still deserves the right to a fair trial, and I'm wondering how fair this trial will be since it's such a public matter and so personal to so many.
  •  
    I'm glad the trial is finally happening, I wonder if the person who shot George Floyd will be guilty
  •  
    I believe that George Floyd had an extremely unreasonable death and he didn't get his deserved rights. I also believe that a remembrance should be in order to remind us that we have protection against things like this.
  •  
    The continuous protest throughout the trial is something that is going to keep the light on this important issue. The trial is going to stay focused on and true justice will be served for George Floyd.
  •  
    I'm glad that they found the person that killed George Floyd guilty.
  •  
    I'm glad that they found the person that killed George Floyd and found guilty.
  •  
    It is good that he was convicted of all the crimes charged against him. I couldn't imagine the outcome being different.
  •  
    I'm glad that justice was served and that Derek Chauvin was convicted of all the crimes against him. Let's just hope that other people like George Floyd will get their justice too.
  •  
    I'm glad he was actually found guilty since there have been many times before where justice hasn't been served and they go free but this is good progress.
  •  
    It's good that he was found guilty, he 100% was guilty. George Floyd didn't have the greatest past but that was no reason enough for him to be murdered.
  •  
    I think it's good that he was finally found guilty. I'm glad that some justice was served in this case unlike many many others that deserve it.
  •  
    I think it's good that finally after a year Chauvin was finally found guilty, finally some justice.
Bryan Pregon

Parole officer "empathy training" leads to a 13% drop in parolees' reoffending rates - 11 views

  •  
    I think this is a really interesting approach and I'd be interested to see if they did this with everyone what the results would be.
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    I really agree with this. I think that we should do more things like this for the public especially with people who are having trouble with the law. Instead of putting people in prison for nonviolent charges they can hopefully learn to live a better life before they commit a worse crime and end up serving life in prison. The purpose of prisons is to rehabilitate those who can't live in the public and I think that to a certain extent it does that but clearly, it's not doing enough.
  •  
    I think this is good because you never really know how somebody could feel until you up them to test and to see if they can feel Normal human emotions
  •  
    I like this idea and I think they should try and implement it in more areas. Helping people try to get better out of prison would do great measures because if no one helps them or tries to point them in the right direction, they will go back to their old ways.
  •  
    I feel like this was a really good idea and should be present in all parole officer's training. It allows them to see from a different perspective and open their eyes up a bit more. Helps people get out of difficult situations.
  •  
    I think this is a really good thing. I think it's super beneficial to the officers and the inmates
  •  
    This is a good idea and is beneficial for all who are involved. It seems like a good thing since it might help those who chose a wrong course of action onto a right one.
  •  
    I hope they'll be able to keep it up, it's super beneficial!
Bryan Pregon

Executive actions: Biden turns to limited moves on gun control with Congress at a stand... - 2 views

  •  
    "Biden turns to limited executive actions on gun control with Congress at a standstill"
Bryan Pregon

Biden's budget meets criticism from right and left on Pentagon spending | Reuters - 2 views

  •  
    "U.S. President Joe Biden asked Congress to sharply hike spending on climate change, cancer and underperforming schools, but his first budget wishlist on Friday drew howls of bipartisan concern over military spending."
qanderson136

Biden's Executive Actions On Gun Control: How Effective Might They Be? : NPR - 1 views

  •  
    Thoughts?
ataylor074

The Violence Against Women Act Faces A Rocky Road For Reauthorization | HuffPost - 2 views

  •  
    How do you guys feel about this act? Do you think they should pass this bill again?
peytongrenoble

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/duane-wright-killed-police-brooklyn-center-minneso... - 0 views

What do you guys take from this article?

news

started by peytongrenoble on 12 Apr 21 no follow-up yet
qanderson136

A heavily fortified Minneapolis awaits verdict in Chauvin trial - POLITICO - 14 views

  •  
    Thoughts?
  • ...9 more comments...
  •  
    Both side are going to pull their own narritive for who or what killed George Floyd however it is weird to see how the defense of the office pulled in the racial difference between the two.
  •  
    Justice has been served in this case but if there was true justice George Floyd would still be alive. This is a good step but it's not nearly enough.
  •  
    I don't think we should celebrate the bare minimum of putting away a murderer. While he is locked up, there are so many other's out there spreading the same harm and sharing the same narrative towards their fellow comrades. So many officers get away with a plethora of crimes, and some just stand by and watch. There can't be any"good ones" if they stand by and watch it happen without saying a word when they have the power to do so.
  •  
    I agree with Sarai. There is so much racism that takes place in the police force, the death penalty, the government, and our overall society. People have fought against racism for decades. And winning one case, while it may be a starting point, is not something to celebrate when people of color have struggled so much.
  •  
    I think it is good that we locked him up but I also think we need to do more about this kind of stuff. This stuff seems to happen often and something needs to be done about it.
  •  
    Something needs to be done, so something like this doesn't happen and more lives can be kept.
  •  
    The fact that a guilty verdict for Chauvin was even a surprise is a very bad thing it's good that there's finally some progress though.
  •  
    It seems like no one tried to help him, but that's what I'm thinking about from reading this passage.
  •  
    I personally don't understand how people thought he would be not guilty. There is so much evidence proving him guilty, yet many were still shocked. My primary issue with the case is how it took someone to be killed for light to be shed on racism. There isn't complete justice, but we are getting pushed in the right direction.
  •  
    It's obvious that this man needed to be punished for his actions and no one should be shocked. Watching the video of George Floyds last few minutes was awkward and seemed inhuman and could have easily had been stopped regardless of the struggle he was giving or the drugs he was on, that officer killed him. He spent the last few minutes of a precious life begging for mercy and that was it. So Chauvin is getting the treatment anyone else would get.
  •  
    It is crazy how some people do not see Chauvin in the wrong. This was complete discrimination against him and this should not have happened. Punishments are necessary for him and he took a life from a family that could never be given back or forgiven, when he could've handled the situation in a more fair, civil way.
« First ‹ Previous 2161 - 2180 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page