I want one too!
On a side note, his story about transformers is a nice illustration that being able to express something in a mathematical equation is not equivalent to understanding something.
of course not !!!! :)
The ACT Magic nights are alive and well, and getting crazier all the time.
And I'm happy to say, no blood has been spilled yet... though at times we've come close :).
CubeSats + 3D printing... for space.
I'm surprised this isn't an ACT project :)
more info: SpiderFab: Process for On-Orbit Construction of Kilometer-Scale Apertures
$100,000 from NASA's Innovative Advanced Concepts program to hammer out a design and figure out whether spacecraft self-construction makes business sense .... I can answer for 0$ ..... NO
Infact the question is just stupid: a) spacecraft self-construction exist: then it is a no brainer to decide wether it makes business sense b) it does not: then there is no business
interesting information - was not that clear to me
instead of doing this via mendeley, we should go over our act publication page and upload all those pdf that fall into this category ...
throwing empty spacesuits out of the ISS, converted into improvised satellites... now there's something I'd expect to see coming out of an ACT brainstorming session :)
Black Metal...sounds like something for the ACT Magic Cards.
But apart from that - is it possible to shift the PV type of absorption into gamma ray spectrum?
THIS is how the ACT should give its science coffees, and I am not referring to the fat stage or the guy's dress.
Next time I'm attending this traditional ACT exercise I expect such a show!
Thats pretty cool indeed! I am for it in the next budget run! :) However, its technically not holographic though as this looks like a projection on Mylar film at 45 degrees from a bottom projector. It looks 3D and holographic as the background is transparent.
Yeah... 2011 called with the greetings.
However, there was quite an interesting news about KSP recently... Perhaps it's been ACT's small failure to spot this opportunity? Considering we wrote space missions games ourselves...
This guy actually makes very detailed video tutorials about how to master the orbital dynamics in Kerbal.
I think the level of detail (and sometimes realism) is quite impressive: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxzC4EngIsMrPmbm6Nxvb-A
@Marek: true, old news. But "opportunity"? For what? The games we write are always games with a scientific purpose (not training not educational)
Kerbal Space programme is cool, but it is a game just like Microsoft Flight Simulator (but less accurate). Having ESA mission simulated in it is also cool but is it what we should or could do? Even more is it want we want to do? My personal opinion: No-No-No
> The games we write are always games with a scientific purpose (not training not educational)
I'd say investigating how to get the crowd may be an important part of "science of crowdsourcing".
So, an obvious example would be comparing how many participants the original ACT space mission game attracted versus a variant implemented in Kerbal and why. Easily made and easily publishable I think.
But that's just an obvious example I can give on the spot. I think there is more potential than that, so would not dismiss the idea so definitively.
But then, correct me if I'm wrong, social sciences are still not represented in the ACT... Perhaps an idea to revive during the upcoming retreat? ;-)
It's out there for TWO days and no one has posted it here yet? What's happening to the ACT...
In any case, yet-another-year-ACT-didn't-make-it... Better luck next time.
I think e.g. de Tommaso et al. results have application in almost any business, ESA notwithstanding, in terms of implications for optimal office decor...
Great! Women perhaps are not more intelligent as individuals, but now at least they have more collective intelligence... Interesting research topic, though, but I doubt that any of these results can be generalized to real live situations.
Maybe by passing the message to ensure some men understand it would be their interest to have (more) women in their teams ? No problem at the ACT, this maybe why it works so well ? :-))
Here is a probably definite answer to the strong polemics around the test of gravitational redshift with atom interferometers, which would be far better than the one done by ACES/PHARAO. Read the abstract it's very ACT like, Luzi should like it :) The original Nature paper is the one of Muller, Peters and Chu (the nobel and secretary of energy in the US):
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7283/full/nature08776.html