The idea is that if we provide social transparency and enable attribution of work to individual workers in Wikipedia, then this will eventually result in increased credibility and trust in the page content, and therefore higher levels of trust in Wikipedia.
Wikipedia itself keeps track of these studies and openly discusses them here, which is a form of social transparency itself. However, even Wales himself have been quoted as saying that "while Wikipedia is useful for many things, he would like to make it known that he does not recommend it to college students for serious research." Indeed, the standard complaint I often hear about Wikipedia is that because of its editorial policy (anyone can edit anything), it is an unreliable source of information.
mohammad khan on 26 Dec 13Text messaging woes may grow, some experts say So far, it seems to be mostly a minor annoyance.http://monarchantique.com/7280just delete them," said Colin Powers, 20, a student at the Art Institute of Philadelphia, who has received a few unsolicited text messages hawking "special offers" at Web sites.
