Skip to main content

Home/ ETAP640/ Group items tagged dogs

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Anne de la Chapelle

Charlie - 0 views

  •  
    my dog
Lisa Martin

Future Shock. Too much change in a too short period of time - FT Careers Blog - 0 views

  • Subjectively, we feel this acceleration of time, we grew up in a slower paced world and it was easier for us to adapt to change. Today we are bombarded with information, products, events and it’s sometimes hard to keep up. It may be easier for some, harder for others
    • Lisa Martin
       
      "You can't teach an old dog new tricks?" I don't know that I've ever fully believed that. I think its more along the lines of old dogs don't necessarily want to learn new tricks.
  • Think about the news, communications and mass media. Since the internet became mainstream the way information is shared has changed radically. News one day old is already OLD. News is being produced in real time; worldwide communications are in real time too. Even more, there is more news everywhere. And it’s not that some years ago nothing happened. It’s that it’s become easier to broadcast them, allowing us to dramatically increase the information that can be distributed to the world.
    • Lisa Martin
       
      Prior to the world being so "wired", most people didn't even know who the pope was.
  • The younger generations have a less daunting task, mainly because they were raised in this wired/online world. They are accustomed to it.
    • Lisa Martin
       
      I feel like as a 30 year old, I fall between the older generations and younger ones. There was no computer at my mother's house until my senior year of high school and I didnt have a cell phone until my third year in college.
Aubrey Warneck

Cyber Safety for Kids - 0 views

  •  
    Information about Internet safety from McGruff the crime dog.
Catherine Strattner

Universal Intellectual Standards - 0 views

  • Universal intellectual standards are standards which must be applied to thinking whenever one is interested in checking the quality of reasoning about a problem, issue, or situation. To think critically entails having command of these standards. To help students learn them, teachers should pose questions which probe student thinking; questions which hold students accountable for their thinking; questions which, through consistent use by the teacher in the classroom, become internalized by students as questions they need to ask themselves. The ultimate goal, then, is for these questions to become infused in the thinking of students, forming part of their inner voice, which then guides them to better and better reasoning. While there are many universal standards, the following are some of the most essential:
  • CLARITY: Could you elaborate further on that point? Could you express that point in another way? Could you give me an illustration? Could you give me an example? Clarity is the gateway standard.
  • ACCURACY: Is that really true? How could we check that? How could we find out if that is true?  A statement can be clear but not accurate, as in "Most dogs are over 300 pounds in weight."
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • PRECISION: Could you give more details? Could you be more specific? A statement can be both clear and accurate, but not precise, as in "Jack is overweight." (We don’t know how overweight Jack is, one pound or 500 pounds.)
  • RELEVANCE: How is that connected to the question? How does that bear on the issue? A statement can be clear, accurate, and precise, but not relevant to the question at issue.
  • DEPTH: How does your answer address the complexities in the question? How are you taking into account the problems in the question? Is that dealing with the most significant factors? A statement can be clear, accurate, precise, and relevant, but superficial (that is, lack depth).
  • BREADTH: Do we need to consider another point of view? Is there another way to look at this question? What would this look like from a conservative standpoint? What would this look like from the point of view of . . .?  A line of reasoning may be clear accurate, precise, relevant, and deep, but lack breadth (as in an argument from either the conservative or liberal standpoint which gets deeply into an issue, but only recognizes the insights of one side of the question.)
  • LOGIC: Does this really make sense? Does that follow from what you said? How does that follow? But before you implied this, and now you are saying that; how can both be true? When we think, we bring a variety of thoughts together into some order. When the combination of thoughts are mutually supporting and make sense in combination, the thinking is "logical." When the combination is not mutually supporting, is contradictory in some sense or does not "make sense," the combination is not logical.
  • FAIRNESS:  Do I have a vested interest in this issue?  Am I sympathetically representing the viewpoints of others?  Human think is often biased in the direction of the thinker - in what are the perceived interests of the thinker.  Humans do not naturally consider the rights and needs of others on the same plane with their own rights and needs.  We therefore must actively work to make sure we are applying the intellectual standard of fairness to our thinking.  Since we naturally see ourselves as fair even when we are unfair, this can be very difficult.  A commitment to fairmindedness is a starting place.
  •  
    I think this is helpful in assessing the quality of critical thinking.
alexandra m. pickett

Web Ink Now: Friending cats and following eggs: On social networks you ARE your photo - 0 views

  • the default "egg" on Twitter and silhouette Facebook. The default says: “I can’t be bothered to upload an image.
  • But when somebody has an image that is not an actual photo of them, I hesitate and usually do not connect. Why are they hiding? Why use a dog or flower or building, or famous person, or logo instead?
alexandra m. pickett

George's Adventures in ETAP640 - 0 views

  • I’m not sure I really want to, to be frank, but it is a requirement for my ETAP640 course I am taking.
  • value proposition
    • alexandra m. pickett
       
      i like "value add"
    • alexandra m. pickett
       
      and "due dilligence"
  • No worries, right?  You all and Alex will help me.
    • alexandra m. pickett
       
      absolutely!! i'm in!!! my (just a bit eccentric) husband, in an attempt to understand life, the universe, and everything, has been "studying science" for a couple of years now. By that i mean reading-voraciously-everything-he-can-get-his-hands-on. He has asked me more than once if i have any real or imaginary (meaning people i only know online) physics professor friends to whom he can address his many questions : ) (i think this interest -bordering on obsession, is a mid-life attempt to come to terms with his mortal human husk - and i blame his mother for raising a heathen.) Nevertheless, he started with electricity, moved on to biology, then chemistry, the periodic table, physics, quantum phisyics and is now he is trying to teach it to our dog. http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2929826.Chad_Orzel Every morning, book in hand, toothbrush in mouth, he gives us the highlights and pointers (me, my daughter and bella his havanese physics student) FYI - he thinks Einstein's little black book - which he read in its entirety- ( twice) on relativity, was over rated. : ) I am extraordinarily intrigued by your course concept and can't wait to see what you do! : )
1 - 11 of 11
Showing 20 items per page