Flow Theory
Print
Collect It!
var shared = false;
if(!window['loadedCollectionJS']) {
window['loadedCollectionJS'] = true;
Asset.javascript('/js/moo/collections/collections.js');
}
var scripts = $$('script'),
thisScriptTag = scripts[scripts.length - 1],
el = thisScriptTag.getPrevious('.collect-button-wrap');
if(el) {
el.store('collectPath', "http://www.education.com/reference/article/flow-theory/")
}
var switchTo5x=true;stLight.options({publisher:'d0d0d8a8-d1f8-49ff-9318-fed5383cff80',doNotHash:true,NotCopy:true,hashAddressBar:false});Email
var sharedemail = false;
(function() {
stLight.options({
onhover: false,
clickCallBack: function(){
if(typeof window.sharedemail != 'undefined') { new Request({ method: 'post', url: '/service/service.'+'php?sn=sharelog&f=ase&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.education.com%2Freference%2Farticle%2Fflow-theory%2F&ceid=41882&click=email'}).send(); sharedemail=true; } }
});
stWidget.addEntry({
'service':'email',
title:"Flow Theory",
summary: "",
url: "http://www.ed"+"ucation.com/reference/article/flow-theory/", element: document.getElementById("sharethis-7167")
});
})();
if(!window['plusoneloaded']) {
new Asset.javascript('https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js');
window['plusoneloaded'] = true;
}
function plusone_vote( obj ) {
//track in Google Analytics
_gaq.push(['_trackEvent','plusone',obj.state]);
//track in Omniture
if((typeof(window.Omniture) != 'undefined')) {
var params = {evars:{5:obj.state}};
if(obj.state == 'on') params.events = [6];
Omniture.fireEvent(params,'Google Plus One Click');
}
}
By Amy Schweinle | Andrea Bjornestad Updated on Dec 23, 2009
MAJOR RESEARCH METHODS
FACTORS INFLUENCING FLOW AND MOTIVATIONAL CONSEQUENCES
IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHERS
Flo
For example, Mel Riddile points out that when one conditions on various measures of poverty, instead of trailing other nations, the U.S. actually comes out on top! He concludes that "when it comes to school improvement, it's poverty not stupid." Poverty causes educational deficiency. Now, I like to actually have data to play around with, in part because people have been known to lie about politically charged issues and in part because I like to have nice graphs (which are not provided by Riddile). Anyway, it turns out that international poverty data is pretty hard to come by and fraught with interpretational difficulties. On the other hand, the National Assessment of Educational Progress provides test data for most of the states in the U.S., and the U.S. Census Bureau provides data on the percentage of people in poverty by state. I took the NAEP data for 8th grade science achievement and regressed on the percentage of people below the poverty line for the measured states. The two are negatively associated: as poverty increases, science achievement scores decrease according to the relationship in the plot below. (Alaska, Kansas, Nebraska, and Vermont did not meet NAEP reporting guidelines and are not included in the plot above.) The association is highly significant (p=9.98*10-6). I also took pilot NAEP data for 8th grade mathematics achievement and regressed on the percentage of people below the poverty line for the measured states. (Evidently, the NAEP has only just started testing for mathematics achievement, and only eleven states were included in their pilot.) Again, the two are negatively associated. The slope of the relation turns out to be almost exactly the same as for science achievement. The association is not as significant, but it is still significant (p=0.0186). (My guess is the association is less significant in this case because fewer states were measured.) Clearly there is an association between poverty and achievement in science and mathem
