China's first defeat at the World Trade Organization may trigger more complaints against the nation, which already faces another four cases challenging its commercial practices, trade lawyers say.
Can you move "tags" and "Posted by" parts to the bottom of the content instead of putting them ahead of the description part, it's very unusable when subscribing with some briefing-based RSS readers like Anothr.com, or Twitterfeeds.com to feed into Twitter, etc. The limitation of the abstraction length could leave no space for description.
Format: sometimes it could work for user A, but not user B. If we change it for user B, then user A may not be thrilled. We will take a look again of other services RSS format to evaluate.
1. for Diigo, the most important theme is the "highlighted" part, then it should be the first presented content 2. for many content, people wont' set tags, the "tag" part will be mostly left blank, it's quite space wasting 3. the "posted by xxx" is almost unnecessary because of the subscriber definitely understand the context of whose RSS, anyway, it's can be coded as ...
you can refer to the most of the RSS feed from other application
maggie_diigo wrote: > Format: sometimes it could work for user A, but not user B. If we change it for user B, then user A may not be thrilled. We will take a look again of other services RSS format to evaluate. > > Any input from other users?
The 3. item didn't display properly in this forum because I posted some XML there. for any RSS format, both tag, author information are coded as an XML element instead of putting all stuff into "Description" part. Try to take a look at the RSS 2.0 spec.
It's not User A, or User B problem, it's a defacto.
isaacmao wrote: > 1. for Diigo, the most important theme is the "highlighted" part, then it should be the first presented content > 2. for many content, people wont' set tags, the "tag" part will be mostly left blank, it's quite space wasting > 3. the "posted by xxx" is almost unnecessary because of the subscriber definitely understand the context of whose RSS, anyway, it's can be coded as ... > > you can refer to the most of the RSS feed from other application > > > > maggie_diigo wrote: > > Format: sometimes it could work for user A, but not user B. If we change it for user B, then user A may not be thrilled. We will take a look again of other services RSS format to evaluate. > > > > Any input from other users?
started by isaac Mao on 16 Feb 08
===========================================================
Bloomberg.com: Canada
Tags: no_tag
Posted by: isaacmao
Highlights and Sticky Notes:
China's first defeat at the World
Trade Organization may trigger more complaints against the nation,
which already faces another four cases challenging its commercial
practices, trade lawyers say.
=========================================================
Can you move "tags" and "Posted by" parts to the bottom of the content instead of putting them ahead of the description part, it's very unusable when subscribing with some briefing-based RSS readers like Anothr.com, or Twitterfeeds.com to feed into Twitter, etc. The limitation of the abstraction length could leave no space for description.
Thanks.
Any input from other users?
2. for many content, people wont' set tags, the "tag" part will be mostly left blank, it's quite space wasting
3. the "posted by xxx" is almost unnecessary because of the subscriber definitely understand the context of whose RSS, anyway, it's can be coded as
you can refer to the most of the RSS feed from other application
maggie_diigo wrote:
> Format: sometimes it could work for user A, but not user B. If we change it for user B, then user A may not be thrilled. We will take a look again of other services RSS format to evaluate.
>
> Any input from other users?
for any RSS format, both tag, author information are coded as an XML element instead of putting all stuff into "Description" part. Try to take a look at the RSS 2.0 spec.
It's not User A, or User B problem, it's a defacto.
isaacmao wrote:
> 1. for Diigo, the most important theme is the "highlighted" part, then it should be the first presented content
> 2. for many content, people wont' set tags, the "tag" part will be mostly left blank, it's quite space wasting
> 3. the "posted by xxx" is almost unnecessary because of the subscriber definitely understand the context of whose RSS, anyway, it's can be coded as
>
> you can refer to the most of the RSS feed from other application
>
>
>
> maggie_diigo wrote:
> > Format: sometimes it could work for user A, but not user B. If we change it for user B, then user A may not be thrilled. We will take a look again of other services RSS format to evaluate.
> >
> > Any input from other users?