Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

This article is about what we talked about earlier in the semester - that in order to fully learn an L2, children must first be proficient in their L1. It reinforced the idea that being bilingual isn't something to be looked down upon and something that hinders education, but something that enhance learning.

Linguist John McWhorter links Donald Trump's use of casual speech as one of the reasons for his popular appeal. Even Trump's penchant for Twitter is understandable: the 140-character limit creates a way of writing that, like texting, diverges as little as possible from talking. America's relationship to language has become more informal by the decade since the 1960s, just as it has to dress, sexual matters, culinary habits, dance and much else. Given this historical context, we have to realize that Trump's talking style isn't as exotically barbaric as it looks on the page - the oddness is that it winds up on the page at all. And second, we have to understand that his fans' not minding how he talks is symptomatic of how all of us relate to formality nowadays. Language has just come along with it.

BEING bilingual has some obvious advantages. Learning more than one language enables new conversations and new experiences. But in recent years, psychology researchers have demonstrated some less obvious advantages of bilingualism, too. For instance, bilingual children may enjoy certain cognitive benefits, such as improved executive function - which is critical for problem solving and other mentally demanding activities.

I'm reminded of my favorite line from Jonathan Franzen's _The Corrections_: "the schizophrenic eyes of the cellularly-occupied".

"The pure traditionalist and pure revisionist positions are both oblivious to what is at stake in arguments over language. The traditionalists claim they are just asking us to play by the rules of the game; revisionists say they are just asking us to accept the fact that language is always changing. But both sides ignore the profound consequences of how we speak."

How different parts of our brain deals with and analyzes written fictional stories and how fiction actually helps us make connections to the things we find in everyday life. Fiction evokes thoughts and feelings with the type of word choice used.

Interesting follow-up to the handout on reading creating simulations in the brain. The brain, it seems, does not make much of a distinction between reading about an experience and encountering it in real life; in each case, the same neurological regions are stimulated. Reading provides a strong simulation of reality.

Blast from the past: diagramming sentences!

English is a very widespread language and is spoken in various places around the world. Spanish and Chinese are also both very popular languages. But why can't they be as dominant as english? In English a necessity for places around the world?

Text messaging is a surprisingly good way to get candid responses to sensitive questions, according to a new study to be presented this week at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.

I've noticed this trend, too, in a lot of the articles I've posted recently. Something to be aware of: "...we worry that shorter, single-study articles can be poor models of science. ... we are troubled by the link between small study size and publication bias. Theoretically, if several small studies on a topic, each with its own small data set, are sent to publishers, the overall published results should be equivalent to the results of a single large study on that topic using a complete data set. But according to several "meta-studies" that have been conducted, this is often not the case: rather than the small studies' converging on the same result as a large study when published, the small studies give a very different result. ... Small studies are inherently unreliable - larger studies or, better still, multiple studies on the same topic, are more likely to give definitive, accurate results."

"But a series of ingenious experiments have shown that many people with dyslexia possess distinctive perceptual abilities. For example, scientists have produced a growing body of evidence that people with the condition have sharper peripheral vision than others. ... Moreover, these capacities appear to trade off: if you're adept at focusing on details located in the center of the visual field, which is key to reading, you're likely to be less proficient at recognizing features and patterns in the broad regions of the periphery. ... Although people with dyslexia are found in every profession, including law, medicine and science, observers have long noted that they populate fields like art and design in unusually high numbers. ... in some situations, it turns out, those with dyslexia are actually the superior learners."

Americans lean toward speaking English and it shows in our society today. We come off as lazy as we rely on the people from other countries to learn our language so that they can communicate with us. But compared to the rest of the world, are monolingualists a minority ?

Interesting. Analyzed the way children learn language called parsing.

The dominance of English as the global language is a mixed blessing, as native speakers often lose the brain benefits of a second language THERE are many reasons to be grateful for being part of the "Anglosphere". English is the world's lingua franca, the language of science, technology, business, diplomacy and popular culture.

Anthony Shugaar reflects on the fine art of literary translation: how do you properly render details like dialect or culturally-understood details?

The benefits of bilingualism