In project after project, the lesson was the same: information technology amplified the intent and capacity of human and institutional stakeholders, but it didn't substitute for their deficiencies. If we collaborated with a self-confident community or a competent non-profit, things went well. But, if we worked with a corrupt organization or an indifferent group, no amount of well-designed technology was helpful. Ironically, although we looked to technology to attain large-scale impact into places where circumstances were most dire, technology by itself was unable to improve situations where well-intentioned competence was absent. What mattered most was individual and institutional intent and capacity.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
2More
New York Times, in Collaboration with WNYC Radio, Launches SchoolBook, an Interactive E... - 1 views
1More
GovernanceNow.com | Kho-kho model of innovation: techpedia.in - 0 views
1 - 9 of 9
Showing 20▼ items per page