Skip to main content

Home/ Victims of Crime/ Group items tagged fact

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Nye Frank

CIV PRO OUTLINE - 0 views

74.125.155.132/search

mandamus

shared by Nye Frank on 31 Dec 09 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 31 Dec 09
     
    This is the html version of the file http://students.law.ucdavis.edu/LSA/files/outlines/Civ%20Pro%20-%20Unknown%20-%200203.doc. Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web. CIV PRO OUTLINE As of 5/1 1. WHAT'S CIVIL PROCEDURE? 1. Prescribes and administers process for enforcing rights and duties specified in substantive law 2. EVOLUTION OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (pgs. 18-32) 1. Significant Anglo-Saxon institutions at time of conquest: 1. Crown 2. Local tribunals 1. Slow and uncertain in operation 2. Earliest forms of royal intervention 1. Executive 2. Administrative 3. Writ 1. Written directive from king to royal official/to individual/group of individuals ordering addressees to do/refrain from doing designated act 2. Procedural steps by which prosecuted not uniform 3. Praecipe 1. Executive command made without inquiry 4. Novel disseisin/querela 1. Derived from procedure in which judicial inquest of complaints heard first and then executive action followed 4. king's direct entertainment of complaints of subjects 3. Early evolution of royal courts 1. Medieval central government 1. King's court/curia regis 2. Why separate branches? 1. Administrative necessity for orderly record keeping 2. Historical fact that early Plantagenet kings had domains in France that were more important to them than England and which required their presence on continent for long periods of time (king absent a lot) 4. Common law procedure 1. Background of all medieval litigation was hope of bringing parties to some sort of voluntary accord
Nye Frank

Public Lands Law - 0 views

webcache.googleusercontent.com/search

law land public lands

shared by Nye Frank on 16 Aug 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 16 Aug 10
     
    Political parties taking elder property in secret by zoning overlays. Riverside County Water Board who is the County Supervisor Marion Ashley. Probate Homicides at a profit. Needs the Federal Government to take action against corruption
  • Nye Frank on 16 Aug 10
     
    Riverside County Internal Affairs -When I complained they said they can no longer talk to me. To: Andre O'harra Mr Ohara -I feel bad having to request from you what I need. I have been reading several corruption cases and it makes me feel like I am putting you in unfriendly waters. I would not if I did not have to. I do not want to put anyone in danger. But unfortunatly you and I are in the same boat. Sorry. I have been reading the laws regarding citizens over 65. I believe after reading the information I have that my mother has a legal standing to actually stand in my fathers place with all the rights he would have. Also I believe this case should of been reported to protective services as my father was over 65 and my mother who was also at the attack and had her husband choked in front of her while he was passed out. I cannot tell you what this has done to my mothers well being mentally and physically. The law states anyone over 65, not just a dependent. The situation in our small community has become very stressful. This is not just going to go away. -- My mother and I know how it feels. I had told you before how the Reddish family had followed us the first night of my dads death, yelled at our host for inviting us, then rang the phone every few minutes during dinner. They have watched our home and anyone from our area that visited us was harassed several times. Now the neighbor who was in jail for trying to kill his mother in law is out. I had asked about getting records on the case before. Several people close to that case early on before we knew no investigation told me Ty was selling illegal guns before. He use to work construction under the table with the guy. It is told as a fact not a story in our area. No police records of course on it. . No one will even look at mom she has lived here 30 years. I know it is fear they have but it still hurts. And mom is so alone now, she needs support. But I have to tell you my mom still sho
  • Nye Frank on 16 Aug 10
     
    Riverside County Internal Affairs -When I complained they said they can no longer talk to me. To: Andre O'harra Mr Ohara -I feel bad having to request from you what I need. I have been reading several corruption cases and it makes me feel like I am putting you in unfriendly waters. I would not if I did not have to. I do not want to put anyone in danger. But unfortunatly you and I are in the same boat. Sorry. I have been reading the laws regarding citizens over 65. I believe after reading the information I have that my mother has a legal standing to actually stand in my fathers place with all the rights he would have. Also I believe this case should of been reported to protective services as my father was over 65 and my mother who was also at the attack and had her husband choked in front of her while he was passed out. I cannot tell you what this has done to my mothers well being mentally and physically. The law states anyone over 65, not just a dependent. The situation in our small community has become very stressful. This is not just going to go away. -- My mother and I know how it feels. I had told you before how the Reddish family had followed us the first night of my dads death, yelled at our host for inviting us, then rang the phone every few minutes during dinner. They have watched our home and anyone from our area that visited us was harassed several times. Now the neighbor who was in jail for trying to kill his mother in law is out. I had asked about getting records on the case before. Several people close to that case early on before we knew no investigation told me Ty was selling illegal guns before. He use to work construction under the table with the guy. It is told as a fact not a story in our area. No police records of course on it. . No one will even look at mom she has lived here 30 years. I know it is fear they have but it still hurts. And mom is so alone now, she needs support. But I have to tell you my mom still sho
Nye Frank

elder abuse - 0 views

api.addthis.com/...offer

elder abuse financial

shared by Nye Frank on 30 Jun 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 30 Jun 10
     
    This is Google's cache of http://www.ncea.aoa.gov/ncearoot/main_site/Library/CANE/CANE_Series/CANE_FinancialExploitation.aspx. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 27, 2010 13:10:27 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more Text-only versionThese search terms are highlighted: financial elderly person includes constitute property crimes regardless age victim california These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: exploytation acts thin includes U.S. Administration on Aging Home NCEA E-News State Resources Calendar About NCEA What We Do NCEA Partners NCEA Initiatives Find Help Help Hotline ElderCare Locator Find State Resources Resources for Families Adult Protective Services FAQ's Frequently Asked Questions Basics Resource for Professionals Nursing Home Abuse Resources Community Outreach Newsletter NCEA Listserve Online Links Promising Practice Library CANE Publications Events & Webcast Laws Statistic & Research Training Library Abuse Statistics Survey, Reports & Testimonies Research Briefs & Agenda National Incident Study Home > Library > CANE Printer Friendly Text Size: T T T Financial Exploitation of the Elderly: An Update of the Literature Financial exploitation of the elderly is becoming an increasingly familiar problem. Regular review of news headlines reveals that elders and vulnerable adults are victimized routinely by frauds, scams and identity theft, at the hands of strangers as well as loved ones, not only in the United States, but throughout the world. As technology advances, perpetrator
Nye Frank

statement of fact-Make your case in court Prof. Pedro A. Malavet, Civil Procedure Class... - 0 views

nersp.osg.ufl.edu/...part04.htm

law court fact case how to

shared by Nye Frank on 03 Jan 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 03 Jan 10
     
    statement of fact
Nye Frank

FindLaw | Cases and Codes - 0 views

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/...getcase.pl

1983 indifference minimum in standard case

shared by Nye Frank on 29 Jul 09 - Cached
  • F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1990) (noting that the Supreme Court's reasoning in Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), likely "preserve[d] Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process analysis for those instances in which a free citizen is denied his or her constitutional right to life through means other than a law enforcement official's arrest, investigatory stop or other seizure"), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 851 (1990).
    • Nye Frank
      Nye Frank on 29 Jul 09
       
      The Supreme Court has held that "[w]here a particular amendment `provides an explicit textual source of constitutional protection' against a particular sort of government behavior, `that Amendment, not the more generalized notion of `substantive due process,' must be the guide for analyzing these claims." Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. 266 , 114 S. Ct. 807, 813 (1994) (plurality opinion) (quoting Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989)).
  • But when a law enforcement officer arbitrarily acts to deprive a person of life and personal security in the course of pursuing his official duties, constitutional due process rights may be implicated. Daniels, 474 U.S. at 331 ("The touchstone of due process is protection of the individual against arbitrary action of government."). Section 1983 "contains no state-of-mind requirement independent of that necessary to state a violation of the underlying constitutional right." Daniels, 474 U.S. at 330 . See Daniels, 474 U.S. at 330 . The underlying constitutional rights at issue here are substantive due process rights to life and liberty or personal security. In Daniels, the Supreme Court held that where an official's or government entity's conduct constitutes mere negligence, no substantive due process violation occurs. Daniels, 474 U.S. at 328 . Daniels expressly left open the question whether something less than intentional conduct such as recklessness or gross negligence would suffice "to trigger the protections of the Due Process Clause." Id. at 334 n.3. But in City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989), the Court held that nonintentional government conduct can violate the Due Process Clause and thus lead to S 1983 liability. City of Canton held that a municipality may be liable for a failure to train its employees when such failure demonstrates "deliberate indifference to rights of persons with whom police come into contact." Id. at 388.
  • Five circuits have addressed S 1983 liability in the context of high-speed pursuits. These circuits have applied various labels to the standard of conduct that may lead to liability. See, e.g., Fagan v. City of Vineland, 22 F.3d 1296 (3rd Cir. 1994) (en banc) (overruling previous reckless indifference standard and adopting shocks the conscience standard); Medina v. City and County of Denver, 960 F.2d 1493, 1496 (10th Cir. 1992) (reckless disregard); Temkin v. Frederick County Comm'rs, 945 F.2d 716, 723 (4th Cir. 1991) (shocks the conscience), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1095 (1992); Roach v. City of Fredericktown, 882 F.2d 294, 297 (8th Cir. 1989) (holding gross negligence insufficient but not stating what standard should be applied); Jones v. Sherrill, 827 F.2d 1102, 1106 (6th Cir. 1987) (holding gross negligence or outrageous conduct sufficient in some circumstances). 4
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • In one such due process case, we held that either "gross negligence, recklessness, or `deliberate indifference'" was sufficient to state a substantive due process violation. Wood v. Ostrander, 851 F.2d 1212, 1214 (9th Cir. 1988) ("Wood
  • I"), reh'g granted and opinion modified by, 879 F.2d 583 (9th Cir. 1989) ("Wood II"), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 938 (1990). Relying on the standard set out in Wood I, we later held that "grossly negligent or reckless official conduct that infringes upon an interest protected by the Due Process Clause is actionable under S 1983." Fargo v. City of San Juan Bautista, 857 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1988). But Fargo's grossly negligent standard was explicitly based on Wood I, which was modified on rehearing and superseded by Wood II. In Wood II, we stepped back from the grossly negligent standard. We noted that an intervening Supreme Court decision, City of Canton, 489 U.S. 378 , had called into question this standard as set forth in Wood I and Fargo. Wood II, 879 F.2d at 588.
  • In Fargo, we defined gross negligence as "`more than ordinary inadvertence or inattention, but less perhaps than conscious indifference to the consequences.'" Fargo, 857 F.2d at 641 (quoting W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts S 34, at 212 (5th ed. 1984)). We also noted that an officer's state of mind is not an issue in a claim based on gross negligence, "although the contrary may be true where the claim involves recklessness." Id. at 642. Although we declined to decide whether an innocent state of mind would negate recklessness or "whether recklessness may be presumed conclusively from conduct," we did note that recklessness and deliberate indifference are equivalent in the sense that they both generally refer to conduct involving "a `conscious disregard' of public safety." Id. at 642 n.7. We also said that, "where state officials have notice of the possibility of harm, `negligence can rise to the level of deliberate indifference to or reckless disregard for' the victim." Id. (quoting Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344, 357 (1986) (Blackmun, J., dissenting)). Because we concluded that a triable issue of fact remained as to whether the police officer's conduct might have been grossly negligent, we found it unnecessary to determine whether the officer's conduct might have risen to the more culpable standard of recklessness. Id. at 643
  • In Wood II, we redefined the standard forS 1983 substantive due process violations by police officers. As explained above, we recognized that the Supreme Court's decision in City of Canton, 489 U.S. 378 , had called into question our decisions in Wood I and Fargo that gross negligence was sufficient. Wood II, 879 F.2d at 588. Analyzing the facts in Wood under City of Canton's deliberate indifference standard, we concluded that there remained a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the police officer in Wood had been deliberately indifferent to the plaintiff's interest in her personal security. Id. at 588.
  • Wood II makes clear that, in this circuit, an officer can be held liable for a S 1983 claim if that officer's conduct is delib erately indifferent to or in reckless disregard of a person's right to life and personal security.
  • Here, plaintiffs have alleged that Officer Smith violated the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department General Order regarding pursuits ("General Order")6 by instituting and then continuing the pursuit even when a reasonable officer would have known that to do so was in reckless disregard of Lewis's and Willard's safety. A violation of police procedures is relevant to determine whether a substantive due process violation has occurred. Fargo, 857 F.2d at 642. Police procedures are designed, in part, to guide officers when they engage in conduct that poses a serious risk of harm to either a suspect or to the general public. See id.
  • The General Order requires an officer to communicate his intention to pursue a vehicle to the sheriff's department dispatch center. But defendants concede that Smith did not contact the dispatch center. The General Order requires an officer to consider whether the seriousness of the offense warrants a chase at speeds in excess of the posted limit. But here, the only apparent "offense" was the boys' refusal to stop when another officer told them to do so. The General Order requires an officer to consider whether the need for apprehension justifies the pursuit under existing conditions. Yet Smith apparently only "needed" to apprehend the boys because they refused to stop. The General Order requires an officer to consider whether the pursuit presents unreasonable hazards to life and property. But taking the facts here in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, there existed an unreasonable hazard to Lewis's and Willard's lives. The General Order also directs an officer to discontinue a pursuit when the hazards of continuing outweigh the benefits of immediate apprehension. But here, there was no apparent danger involved in permitting the boys to escape. There certainly was risk of harm to others in continuing the pursuit.
  • In City of Canton the Supreme Court held that deliberate indifference was the minimum standard of culpability necessary to maintain a S 1983 due process action against a municipality for a policy or custom of inadequate training of police officers. City of Canton, 489 U.S. at 388 . The Court reasoned that a municipality's inadequate training of its employees can only constitute a "policy or custom" when such inadequate training "evidences a `deliberate indifference' to the rights of its inhabitants." Id. at 389. But the Court also specified that the deliberate indifference standard "does not turn upon the degree of fault (if any) that a plaintiff must show to make out an underlying claim of a constitutional violation." Id. at 388 n.8. City of Canton thus did not explicitly overrule our decisions in either Wood I or Fargo because they involved claims of substantive due process violations against individual police officers.
  • Nye Frank on 29 Jul 09
     
    The Supreme Court has held that "[w]here a particular amendment `provides an explicit textual source of constitutional protection' against a particular sort of government behavior, `that Amendment, not the more generalized notion of `substantive due process,' must be the guide for analyzing these claims." Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. 266 , 114 S. Ct. 807, 813 (1994) (plurality opinion) (quoting Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989)).
Nye Frank

FindLaw | Cases and Codes - 0 views

webcache.googleusercontent.com/search

issue material fact relevant applied correctly court district law

shared by Nye Frank on 07 Jul 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 07 Jul 10
     
    ", concluding that the Navarros failed to offer any evidence of a County policy or custom of treating domestic violence 911 calls differently from non-domestic violence 911 calls, nor any evidence of a County policy or custom of depriving residents in minority neighborhoods of equal police protection, nor any evidence of the Sheriff's deliberate or conscious indifference to the rights of abused women or residents in minority neighborhoods. 2 The Navarros now appeal."
  • Nye Frank on 07 Jul 10
     
    any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law
Nye Frank

Riverside County Homicide Coverup of Nye Frank - 0 views

nyefrank.typepad.com

Riverside County supervisors corruption elder homicide

shared by Nye Frank on 05 Jul 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 05 Jul 10
     
    Legal Council notified of attorney stating false statement of fact into court in homicide of Nye Frank
  • ...1 more comment...
  • Nye Frank on 05 Jul 10
     
    There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:c1KTay-Fv2EJ:www.answers.com/topic/criminal-law+legislative+homicide+cover+up+equal+to+criminal+conduct+chargeable&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
  • Nye Frank on 05 Jul 10
     
    http://www.diigo.com/search?what=you+tube+nye+frank+racing Stalking by the killer and his parents against a elder and her family is ok for Riverside County Sheriff an DA.This month Rod Pacheco will do a Victims march. In 2008 he got a award for a elder crime victim advocate program that he had Federal Funding for. Elder Lee Frank was told by County DA Victim Advocate there was not a elder advocate in RiversideCounty. But Rod Pacheco got a public award for his great program for elder advocate that year.
  • Nye Frank on 05 Jul 10
     
    http://www.diigo.com/search?what=you+tube+nye+frank+racing Stalking by the killer and his parents against a elder and her family is ok for Riverside County Sheriff an DA.This month Rod Pacheco will do a Victims march. In 2008 he got a award for a elder crime victim advocate program that he had Federal Funding for. Elder Lee Frank was told by County DA Victim Advocate there was not a elder advocate in RiversideCounty. But Rod Pacheco got a public award for his great program for elder advocate that year.
Nye Frank

Windows Live space's Blog - Windows Live - 0 views

politicsinlandempire.spaces.live.com/?_c01_BlogPart=blogentry&_c=BlogPart

southern district victim space

shared by Nye Frank on 23 Jun 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 23 Jun 10
     
    Crimes Causing Harm to Property Depending on the value of the property involved, as well as the level of violence, most property crimes fall into the category of felony in Texas. The legal definition of theft is unlawfully taking the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property. This definition is much broader than what most people think of as theft. It includes embezzlement, keeping found property without making a reasonable attempt to find its rightful owner, obtaining the services of another person or telecommunication services by fraud, shoplifting, unauthorized access to credit cards, and writing bad checks. Robbery is similar to theft; in fact, theft is a part of robbery. A person commits robbery if, during a theft, he or she intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another person, threatens a person, or places another person in fear of immediate injury or death. Aggravated robbery, which is a felony of the first degree, is a robbery in which a person is seriously injured or in which the defendant uses a deadly weapon. If the robbery causes fear of immediate injury or death to a victim who is 65 years of age or older, or who has a mental, physical, or developmental disability, the crime also constitutes an aggravated robbery. Burglary is entering into a building, portion of a building, or habitation with the intent to commit theft or a felony there. Not only is it burglary to enter a house unlawfully with the intent to steal money or property, but it is also burglary to enter with the intent to commit a felony such as arson or murder. White Collar Crimes http://www.weblocator.com/attorney/tx/law/c13.html#txc130500
Nye Frank

1983 conduct under color of the state law versus constitutional state action - Google S... - 0 views

www.google.com/search

1983 constittution state action corruption

shared by Nye Frank on 20 Aug 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 20 Aug 10
     
    "conscience shocking, in a constitutional sense. ..... Wade, 461 U.S. 30 (1983); City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, 453 U.S. 247 (1981). ..."
Nye Frank

S. 795: Elder Justice Act of 2009 (GovTrack.us) - 0 views

74.125.155.132/search

white collar

shared by Nye Frank on 25 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 25 Feb 10
     
    Crimes Causing Harm to Property Depending on the value of the property involved, as well as the level of violence, most property crimes fall into the category of felony in Texas. The legal definition of theft is unlawfully taking the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property. This definition is much broader than what most people think of as theft. It includes embezzlement, keeping found property without making a reasonable attempt to find its rightful owner, obtaining the services of another person or telecommunication services by fraud, shoplifting, unauthorized access to credit cards, and writing bad checks. Robbery is similar to theft; in fact, theft is a part of robbery. A person commits robbery if, during a theft, he or she intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another person, threatens a person, or places another person in fear of immediate injury or death. Aggravated robbery, which is a felony of the first degree, is a robbery in which a person is seriously injured or in which the defendant uses a deadly weapon. If the robbery causes fear of immediate injury or death to a victim who is 65 years of age or older, or who has a mental, physical, or developmental disability, the crime also constitutes an aggravated robbery. Burglary is entering into a building, portion of a building, or habitation with the intent to commit theft or a felony there. Not only is it burglary to enter a house unlawfully with the intent to steal money or property, but it is also burglary to enter with the intent to commit a felony such as arson or murder. White Collar Crimes http://www.weblocator.com/attorney/tx/law/c13.html#txc130500
Nye Frank

CRS/LII Annotated Constitution Fifth Amendment - 0 views

74.125.155.132/search

riverside annotated amendment constitution due process

shared by Nye Frank on 24 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 24 Feb 10
     
    "This formal approach to the meaning of due process could obviously have limited both Congress and the state legislatures in the development of procedures unknown to English law. But when California's abandonment of indictment by grand jury was challenged, the Court refused to be limited by the fact that such proceeding was the English practice and that Coke had indicated that it was a proceeding required as "the law of the land." The meaning of the Court in Murray's Lessee was "that a process of law, which is not otherwise forbidden, must be taken to be due process of law, if it can show the sanction of settled usage both in England and in this country; but it by no means follows that nothing else can be due process of law." To hold that only historical, traditional procedures can constitute due process , the Court said, "would be to deny every quality of the law but its age, and to render it incapable [p.1348] of progress or improvement." 23 Therefore, in observing the due process guarantee, it was concluded, the Court must look "not [to] particular forms of procedures, but [to] the very substance of individual rights to life, liberty, and property." The due process clause prescribed "the limits of those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions. . . . It follows that any legal proceeding enforced by public authority, whether sanctioned by age and custom, or newly devised in the discretion of the legislative power, in furtherance of the general public good, which regards and preserves these principles of liberty and justice, must be held to be due process of law." 24"
Nye Frank

742 F.2d 371 - 0 views

74.125.155.132/search

crime victims

shared by Nye Frank on 24 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 24 Feb 10
     
    "The uncontested facts show that Evans cannot satisfy the requirement of "affirmatively prov[ing] prejudice." It is inconceivable to us, and not merely improbable as in Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 644 n. 12, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 2257 n. 12, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), that Evans would have gone to trial on a defense of intoxication, or that if he had done so he either would have been acquitted or, if convicted, would nevertheless have been given a shorter sentence than he actually received. It just is not believable that Evans did all the things he does not deny having done, involving elaborate negotiations with the police over several hours, in some sort of alcohol-induced trance. In this respect the present case resembles Morgan v. Israel, 735 F.2d 1033 (7th Cir.1984). In evaluating the voluntariness of Morgan's failure to plead not guilty we said, "It is sufficiently clear that Morgan had no hope at all of an acquittal to enable us to infer that he would not have changed his plea to not guilty .... He admitted having shot Mallason; and when you shoot a person several times, with fatal results, the inference of deliberate homicide is irresistible .... The jury never would have believed that he lacked the ... elementary mental capacity required to form a murderous intent...." Id. at 1036. So here, no jury could have believed that Evans was not acting deliberately when he did all the things he did in the police station. Therefore, being told that if he had not been acting deliberately he would have been acquitted of some of the offenses with which he was charged could not have led him to change his plea and to win acquittal."
Nye Frank

Homicide Cover up Riverside County District Attorney, Legislation, Judge - 0 views

www.diigo.com/nyefrank

Dimaggio judge probate courts Riverside Inland Empire Floyd Reddish Pa

shared by Nye Frank on 22 Dec 09 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 22 Dec 09
     
    Homicide of Nye Frank Elder 68, Lee Frank a victim of stalking by a family who is well connected to the DA and Judge of Riverside County. During the day the Reddish family stalked Lee Frank and neighbors with the DA, Sheriff, Internal Affairs, Supervisor knowledge. At night probate judge and husband that is attorney at stalkers home. Property transfered to Reddish family through the Judge who was a attorney giving it to the grocery girl instead of the victims daughter as he planned. DA office neglected to investigate the claimed illegal transfer, now refuses to investigate the homicide, closed behind doors with all records removed.Current Prosecutor, DA Victim Advocate, Supervisors, judge, Coroner put a false statement of fact into court. The Frank family got it stopped by having legal council of the county get notice direct. Possible conflicts through personal relationships of the DA.
Nye Frank

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. - 0 views

www.youtube.com/video_response_view_all

Rod Pacheco Corruption Riverside County Legislative Brian Floyd homicide cover up

shared by Nye Frank on 24 Dec 09 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 24 Dec 09
     
    Brian Floyd and Rod Pacheco in Homicide of Nye Frank cover up. Audio and sheriff video show very clearly the corruption and in the connection to Probate courts. But that is a group that the Judge in Riverside County told Lee Frank I doubt if you can find a attorney, doubt if you can afford a attorney, and if you pursue this can lose everything including your house. Then the Supervisors, Coroner, APS, Prosecutor, D Victim Advocates, Chief DA Mike Rushton promoted to made a false statement of fact into court. We were prevented from filing a Lemine by the clerk but was able to get internal affairs misconduct department to serve the County Council directly. Rod Pacheco claimed privacy in a whistle blower case. Elder victims are a easy target when the DA does not give crime case numbers to the crime in a abuse of his position. This is what DA Nefong got removed for not showing all evidence. This case is also one in that FBI rules to close cases and seal them rules violated. Hold officials accountable and the newspapers to report real news. "These are not the masterminds," District Attorney Rod Pacheco said Tuesday in a phone interview. "These are the folks who helped the masterminds." http://www.pe.com/localnews/rivcounty/stories/PE_News_Local_S_websj.2219fc8.html
Nye Frank

Santa Barbara Sheriff's Blog: Riverside DA Corruption: Clearing Bolanos - 0 views

santabarbarasheriffblog.blogspot.com/...de-da-corruption-clearing.html

Riverside DA Scam Corruption County Nye Frank Elder Victims

shared by Nye Frank on 29 Dec 09 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 29 Dec 09
     
    Like in our case the facts do not match what is written down. Riverside investigators conflict of interest in parties that were the judicial party and Legislative party that helped cover up the homicide Brian Floyd per Phil Reddish the killers father
  • Nye Frank on 29 Dec 09
     
    Victims need to be told what are the statutes, how it pertains to the crimes
Nye Frank

California Victim Rights Amendment | Facebook - 0 views

webcache.googleusercontent.com/search

penal code civil rights

shared by Nye Frank on 23 Mar 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 23 Mar 10
     
    Use of Prior Convictions. Any prior felony conviction of any person in any criminal proceeding, whether adult or juvenile, shall subsequently be used without limitation for purposes of impeachment or enhancement of sentence in any criminal proceeding. When a prior felony conviction is an element of any felony offense, it shall be proved to the trier of fact in open court. As used in this article, the term "serious felony" is any crime defined in Penal Code, Section 1192.7(c).
Nye Frank

top politics - Riverside County DA False Statement of Fact - - 0 views

digg.com/d3175G1

da false statement of fact corruption

shared by Nye Frank on 13 Oct 09 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 13 Oct 09
     
    Corruption in homicide cover up in DA staff
Nye Frank

evidence-character - 0 views

74.6.146.127/...cache

victim appellate court summaries self defense evidence

shared by Nye Frank on 24 Nov 09 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 24 Nov 09
     
    Character" for purposes of evidence means a person's propensity to engage or not to engage in certain types of behavior. A person may have a character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, peaceableness or violence, recklessness or care, lawfulness or unlawfulness. The purpose for which character evidence is being offered must be identified to determine it's admissibility. Possible uses:
  • Nye Frank on 24 Nov 09
     
    Character" for purposes of evidence means a person's propensity to engage or not to engage in certain types of behavior. A person may have a character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, peaceableness or violence, recklessness or care, lawfulness or unlawfulness. The purpose for which character evidence is being offered must be identified to determine it's admissibility. Possible uses:
Nye Frank

Federal Bureau of Investigation - Civil Rights Statutes - 0 views

www.fbi.gov/...statutes.htm

fbi federal law

shared by Nye Frank on 17 Mar 10 - Cached
  • Nye Frank on 17 Mar 10
     
    Contact Us Your Local FBI Office Overseas Offices Submit a Crime Tip Report Internet Crime More Contacts Learn About Us Quick Facts What We Investigate Natl. Security Branch Information Technology Fingerprints & Training Laboratory Services Reports & Publications History More About Us Get Our News Press Room E-mail Updates News Feeds Be Crime Smart Wanted by the FBI More Protections Use Our Resources For Law Enforcement For Communities For Researchers More Services Visit Our Kids' Page Apply for a Job Civil Rights Statutes Civil Rights Home Federal Civil Rights Statutes Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 - Federally Protected Activities Title 18, U.S.C., Section 247 - Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 248 - Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act Title 18, U.S.C., Section 844(h) - Federal Explosives Control Statute Title 42, U.S.C., Section 3631 - Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or
1 - 20 of 20
Showing 20▼ items per page