the Abolition of the Slave Trade and Slavery in East Africa since the Date of Sir Bartle Frere's Visit, 1872-73.
207420.pdfnb.pdf - 1 views
America.pdf - 1 views
mn-compressed.pdf - 0 views
ZULU KINGDOM.pdf - 0 views
-
Shaka, a legendary Zulu monarch, founded the Zulu Kingdom, a significant African empire in southern Africa, at the beginning of the 19th century. Shaka built a formidable army that subdued surrounding tribes and widened the Zulu Kingdom's domain through the use of his military prowess and astute strategic leadership. The Zulus were able to establish a centralized form of governance and a very effective military structure under Shaka's direction. He transformed the conventional tribal formations into regimental groups called impi, which might number up to 5,000 men. A formidable force on the battlefield, these regiments were taught to fight in a disciplined and coordinated manner. Not only did Shaka leave the Zulu Kingdom with a strong military, but he also ushered in a new social and cultural order. In order to efficiently organize society, he devised an age-graded social organization system that divided societies into various age groups. This system improved social cohesiveness.
ZULU WAR - 5 views
Nova Web - 0 views
gale source.pdf - 1 views
-
-
The abolition of the Slave Trade and Slavery in East Africa since Sir Bartle Frere's visit in 1872-73 was a crucial period in the fight against the exploitation of human beings. Sir Bartle Frere was a British colonial administrator who visited East Africa and became a vocal advocate for freeing slaves. The Arab slave trade was still prevalent in the region, particularly in Zanzibar, and Frere's visit helped to initiate anti-slavery measures. The British continued to purchase and free slaves, and treaties were established with local leaders to restrict the slave trade. Naval forces were used to intercept slavers, causing a decline in the number of ships involved in the slave trade. The establishment of Christian missions in the region also played a part in the spread of abolitionist ideas. By the early 20th century, the slave trade in East Africa was considerably reduced, largely due to the work of anti-slavery campaigners and the actions taken following Sir Bartle Frere's visit.
-
The East African Slave Trade, 1861-1895: The "Southern" Complex.pdf - 0 views
-
Madagascar was traditionally an exporter of slaves, but a market for imported African slaves developed in the nineteenth century in the Merina empire, which covered approximately one-third of the is
-
Madagascar has a long history of involvement in the slave trade, with the island traditionally exporting slaves to other parts of the world. However, in the 19th century, a market for imported African slaves developed within the Merina empire, which covered approximately one-third of the island. This development was driven by various factors, including a desire to increase agricultural production and expand the empire's control over other parts of the island. However, the increasing demand for African slaves also contributed to a rise in conflicts and violence within Madagascar, as various groups vied for control over resources and territories. Today, the legacy of slavery in Madagascar, as well as its impact on contemporary social and economic structures, continues to be a topic of research and discussion among scholars and policymakers.
-
The 'Freeing' of slaves in German East Africa: The statistical record, 1890-1914.pdf - 0 views
-
it appears that the incidence of household slavery had been to some extent exaggerated in the official portrayal of slavery in East Africa at the time, probably because it allowed slavery to be painted as a 'mild' and 'patriarchal' institution whose abolition was not required for humanitarian reasons. 27
-
Household slavery in East Africa was a widespread practice, which involved women and children who were bought, traded or inherited by slave owners. While official portrayals of slavery at the time may have downplayed its prevalence, recent research suggests that it was a common occurrence, particularly in coastal regions where the demand for domestic labor was high. Despite evidence of physical and sexual abuse, proponents of slavery argue that it was a form of social and economic exchange, rather than a coercive and exploitative practice. The debate around the legacy of slavery in East Africa is ongoing, with some seeking to recognize and address past injustices, while others argue that the institution provided benefits both to slave owners and to the enslaved individuals themselves.
-
Mirador Viewer - 3 views
ZULU WAR 2.pdf - 0 views
-
In the four major expeditions mounted against the Zulu during I839, there is no evidence in the published sources that the Zulu either departed from their conventional tactics as a response to their enemies' use of firearms, or made use of firearms themselves. At the battle of Blood River the Boers proved that the Zulu numerical superiority was not sufficient in itself to overcome heavy fire from a strongly defended position. It is said that 3,000 Zulu died while the Boers did not lose a man. Traders and hunters made many journeys into Zululand during Mpande's reign (I840-72), and there can be no doubt that a number of
-
Zulus lost this war to Boers that proves that they were not ready for the war . The Boers were using firearms while the zulus were using spears and shield to fight and protect themselves. Lots of Zulu warriors died during the war while no Boer died, that means the zulus were not fully prepared for the war or they didn't do the proper planning.
-
-
weapons found their way into the possession of the Zulu. Records o
-
events in Zululand during this period are scarce, although the information we have on the battle between Mpande's sons, Cetshwayo and Mbulazi, shows that the firearms used were in the hands of white adventurers and their followers
- ...2 more annotations...
-
The war was fought between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom. The conflict was sparked by the British attempts to expand their influence and territory in the region. At the time, the Zulu Kingdom was one of the most powerful African states, with a well-trained military and a powerful king, Cetshwayo. The British, on the other hand, had a superior technological advantage, including the use of firearms. In the early stages of the war, the Zulu army was able to defeat the British forces at the Battle of Isandlwana, causing a significant loss of life on the British side. However, the British were eventually able to regroup and launch a counter-attack, resulting in a series of victories for the British forces, including the Battle of Rorke's Drift. The British were eventually able to overcome the Zulu resistance and annexed the kingdom, ending the war and consolidating their influence over the region. The conflict had significant consequences for both sides, with the Zulu people losing their independence and suffering a loss of life and the British further consolidating their colonial power in South Africa.
The Making of Mission Schools in Kenya: A Microcosmic Perspective on JSTOR - 2 views
-
Incorrectly tagged - all your entries are incorrectly tagged. -
You have the required number of it3ems, but incorrectly tagged. Your T & F article does not load, it is a front page. Othewrise see mark in Blackboard.
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 1981
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page
