Skip to main content

Home/ transhumanism/ Group items tagged ideas

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Danila Medvedev

Sentient Developments: TransVision 2007: the good, the bad and the ugly - 0 views

  • Even more disturbing is how some of the most important ideas and thinkers of our time are largely being ignored by the general public. Watching Aubrey de Grey explain to a small audience how he’s going to conquer death created no small amount of cognitive dissonance in my brain; the room should have been packed. Hell, the room should have had people lined-up out front pounding at the door demanding to be let in.
  • A good option at this point might be to employ a full-time speaker to travel the college circuit. Young, educated minds are the most amenable to the transhumanist cause. This could involve lectures or debates with other people about the merits of transhumanist technologies. It's useful to have someone with charisma.
  • TransVision just needs to get over its schizophrenia and choose a modus operandi.
Danila Medvedev

H+ Cafe - Upload Your Thoughts - 0 views

  •  
    Yeah, this is REALLY bright idea. But I hope to see more quality on similar networks in very near future.
Dmitry Borisoglebsky

Accelerating Future - 0 views

  •  
    Блог Михаила Аниссимова. AI & nano и иже с ними
Danila Medvedev

Welcome to the UKH+ Idea Torrent | ukhplus.org - 2 views

shared by Danila Medvedev on 25 Jan 10 - No Cached
  •  
    Сайт английских трансгуманистов
Matvey Ezhov

How to Understand Everything (and why) - 0 views

  • Formal education in science and engineering centers on teaching facts and problem-solving skills in a series of narrow topics.
  • It is true that a few topics, although narrow in content, have such broad application that they are themselves integrative: These include (at a bare minimum) substantial chunks of mathematics and the basics of classical mechanics and electromagnetism, with the basics of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics close behind.
  • By knowing the outlines of a field, I mean knowing the answers, to some reasonable approximation, to questions like these: What are the physical phenomena? What are their magnitudes? What are their preconditions? How well are they understood? How well can they be modeled? What do they make possible? What do they forbid?
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • And even more fundamental than these are questions of knowledge about knowledge: What is known today? What are the gaps in what I know? When would I need to know more to solve a problem? How could I find it?
  • It takes far less knowledge to recognize a problem than to solve it, yet in key respects, that bit of knowledge is more important: With recognition, a problem may be avoided, or solved, or an idea abandoned.
  • This sort of knowledge is a kind of specialty, really — a limited slice of learning, but oriented crosswise. Because of this orientation, though, it provides leverage in integrating knowledge from diverse sources.
  •  
    Дрекслер о понимании
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page