Skip to main content

Home/ transhumanism/ Group items tagged Engineering

Rss Feed Group items tagged

evo ata

Future Human Evolution - 0 views

  •  
    Scientific and speculative articles about the future of human evolution regarding to artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, transhumanism, nanotechnology, space colonization, time travel, life extension and human enhancement
Danila Medvedev

A quiet death for bold project to map the mind - 0 views

  • A About $9.5 million was earmarked to chart a game plan, the brain project's first phase. But the next stage -- a five-year, $50 million to $100 million push to design and test brainlike software -- never got launched.
  • Pentagon quietly has killed a project to "reverse-engineer" the human brain
  • map the complex workings of the brain
Danila Medvedev

Данила Медведев - т. н. «Инженерия рая» - 0 views

  •  
    Лекторий на пикнике Афиши
Danila Medvedev

Order of Cosmic Engineers - 0 views

  •  
    Типа новая организация. Джулио, Наташа, Макс, Филипп...
Matvey Ezhov

How to Understand Everything (and why) - 0 views

  • Formal education in science and engineering centers on teaching facts and problem-solving skills in a series of narrow topics.
  • It is true that a few topics, although narrow in content, have such broad application that they are themselves integrative: These include (at a bare minimum) substantial chunks of mathematics and the basics of classical mechanics and electromagnetism, with the basics of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics close behind.
  • By knowing the outlines of a field, I mean knowing the answers, to some reasonable approximation, to questions like these: What are the physical phenomena? What are their magnitudes? What are their preconditions? How well are they understood? How well can they be modeled? What do they make possible? What do they forbid?
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • And even more fundamental than these are questions of knowledge about knowledge: What is known today? What are the gaps in what I know? When would I need to know more to solve a problem? How could I find it?
  • It takes far less knowledge to recognize a problem than to solve it, yet in key respects, that bit of knowledge is more important: With recognition, a problem may be avoided, or solved, or an idea abandoned.
  • This sort of knowledge is a kind of specialty, really — a limited slice of learning, but oriented crosswise. Because of this orientation, though, it provides leverage in integrating knowledge from diverse sources.
  •  
    Дрекслер о понимании
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page