Skip to main content

Home/ TOK@ISPrague/ Group items matching "i" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Lawrence Hrubes

What Are We Smoking? - The New Yorker - 0 views

  • Today, nearly half of all states allow the medical use of marijuana, and several, led by Colorado, have legalized it completely. in many places, New York being one of them, you can get your pot delivered as easily and quickly as if it were a pizza. i would be happy with that if only i or anyone else knew what it meant to smoke it. But, largely as a result of our government’s refusal to support scientific research on the effects of marijuana, we know stunningly little about what happens when we drop those buds into our fancy new vaporizers. We know even less about the effect of what are called “edibles”—the gummy bears, chocolate truffles, lollipops, brownies, cookies, and other dishes, laced with pot, that are now so easily available to us and, no doubt, to our children. What do we know when we swallow a marijuana gummy bear? is it like a hit of good pot? is it like three? For that matter, is a hit of good pot like it was five decades, or five years ago? Or even five months ago? Nobody seems able to answer those basic questions.
markfrankel18

Iceland's tech Imports are kIllIng the IcelandIc language - Quartz - 0 views

  • I thInk IcelandIc Is not goIng to last,” Jón Gnarr, comedIan and former mayor of ReykjavIk, tells PRI. “Probably In thIs century we wIll adopt EnglIsh as our language. I thInk It’s unavoIdable.”
Lawrence Hrubes

Behind the Scenes at 'Pterosaurs: Flight in the Age of Dinosaurs' - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • “Most of the questions that we actually get from artists, the answer is, ‘i don’t know,’ ” Dr. Kellner said. But the more research that’s done, the closer their guess can be on an animal that’s been extinct for 66 million years.
  • “Occasionally,” said Dr. Kellner, “once you have it done, everything is fine, everyone is happy. But then a year later someone makes a new discovery.
  • Most people, he said, think art and science are two different worlds. “i used to think they were very separate, but they’re actually very similar. You have to be creative and you have to be observant.”
markfrankel18

There is no language instinct - Vyvyan Evans - Aeon - 0 views

  • Chomsky’s idea dominated the science of language for four decades. And yet it turns out to be a myth. A welter of new evidence has emerged over the past few years, demonstrating that Chomsky is plain wrong.
  • How much sense does it make to call whatever inborn basis for language we might have an ‘instinct’? On reflection, not much.
  • If our knowledge of the rudIments of all the world’s 7,000 or so languages Is Innate, then at some level they must all be the same. There should be a set of absolute grammatIcal ‘unIversals’ common to every one of them. ThIs Is not what we have dIscovered.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • In a 2002 versIon, Chomsky and colleagues at Harvard proposed that perhaps all that Is unIque to the human language capabIlIty Is a general-purpose computatIonal capacIty known as ‘recursIon’.
  • While the human brain does exhibit specialisation for processing different genres of information, such as vision, there appears not to be a dedicated spot specialised just for language.
  • And indeed, we now believe that several of Chomsky’s evolutionary assumptions were incorrect.
  • we don’t have to assume a special language instinct; we just need to look at the sorts of changes that made us who we are, the changes that paved the way for speech.
markfrankel18

Do People Like To Think? : 13.7: Cosmos And Culture : NPR - 0 views

  • For me, a bigger issue raised by this kind of research is whether there isn't a tendency to operate with a caricature of what "just thinking" is. We tend to think of thinking as cerebral and inward looking and we contrast that with a kind of selfless outward orientation to what is going on around us. But this is confused. is the mathematician working out a problem on paper looking out or in? And what about the visitor to a gallery concentrating on a painting. isn't this kind of looking (at the painting) or doing (writing on the paper) one of the forms that thinking can take for us? And something similarly goes for the idea that we can simply range complex human psychological attitudes and choices along a spectrum from aversive to extremely pleasurable.
  • Maybe in choosing music and baseball over quiet as a boy, i wasn't choosing noise and distraction; i was learning to concentrate in new ways and acquiring the capacity for new kinds of pleasure.
markfrankel18

Stunted: The White Flags on the Brooklyn Bridge - The New Yorker - 1 views

  • Illegal publIc art Is In the news. The most notorIous Instance thIs summer was the swItch of flags on the Brooklyn BrIdge, by two German artIsts, from the Stars and StrIpes to all-whIte versIons of the same. Others Include a CanadIan artIst’s scrawls, partly In blood, on a wall In the Jeff Koons retrospectIve at the WhItney Museum and, In Moscow, the paIntIng of a star ornament atop a StalIn-era tower, In UkraInIan natIonal colors. InternatIonally, the BrItIsh mIdnIght muralIst Banksy contInues hIs waggIsh depredatIons, rIvalled of late by a female upstart called BambI, who lIkewIse stencIls Images, only wIth a sexy-femInIst spIn. The over-all phenomenon could use a name—I propose Stunt art—and some analysIs, startIng wIth dIstInctIons.
  • As a category of volunteer art, Stunt art borders the genres of spray-can graffiti and spectacular illegal sport, such as scaling or parachuting from tall buildings.
  • Stuntism is to art as weeds are to horticulture: plants in the wrong place. Authorities, social or botanical, define the wrongness, which becomes more arbitrary the more you think about it. Some weeds are as lovely as tulips. A superb gardener i know welcomes the sceptered majesty of common mullein (distinct from the mannerly hybrid varieties) wherever it opts to sprout. So may it be with Stunt art, in a time given to fanatical constraints on human-natural cussedness.
markfrankel18

"Cyranoids": Stanley Milgram's Creepiest Experiment - Neuroskeptic | DiscoverMagazine.com - 1 views

  • ImagIne that someone else was controllIng your actIons. You would stIll look lIke you, and sound lIke you, but you wouldn’t be the one decIdIng what you dId and what you saId. Now consIder: would anyone notIce the dIfference?
  • If I started shadowIng someone else’s speech, would my frIends and famIly notIce? I would lIke to thInk so. Most of us would lIke to thInk so. But how easy would It be? Do we really lIsten to each others’ words, after all, or do we just assume that because person X Is speakIng, they must be sayIng the kInd of thIng that person X lIkes to say? We’re gettIng Into some uncomfortable terrItory here.
Lawrence Hrubes

The drone operator who said 'No' - 0 views

  • The drone operator who said 'No' 21 January 2015 Last updated at 00:57 GMT For almost five years, Brandon Bryant worked in America's secret drone programme bombing targets in Afghanistan and elsewhere.He was told that he helped to kill more than 1,600 people, but as time went by he felt uneasy with what he was doing. He found it hard to sleep and started dreaming in infra-red. Brandon Bryant told Witness about his doubts and the mission that convinced him it was time to stop. Witness is a World Service programme of the stories of our times told by the people who were there.
Lawrence Hrubes

What Would You Grab in a Fire? - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • I remember thInkIng, stuff? What stuff? How do you decIde, the clock tIckIng? Years earlIer, I’d made a lIst of the thIngs I’d grab In a fIre: Books. Photos. Art. Back then, objects were sacred; not people. Back then, I hadn’t experIenced loss. The questIon Isn’t, What would you grab In a fIre? It’s, What has meanIng In our lIves?
Lawrence Hrubes

How Do We Increase Empathy? - NYTImes.com - 0 views

  • “Probably the biggest empathy generator is cuteness: paedomorphic features such as large eyes, a large head, and a small lower face,” Steven Pinker, the Harvard psychologist, tells me. “Professional empathy entrepreneurs have long known this, of course, which is why so many charities feature photos of children and why so many conservation organizations feature pandas. Prettier children are more likely to be adopted, and baby-faced defendants get lighter sentences.”
  • Likewise, the wealthiest 20 percent of Americans give significantly less to charity as a fraction of income (1.4 percent) than the poorest 20 percent do (3.5 percent), according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. That may be partly because affluence insulates us from need, so that disadvantage becomes theoretical and remote rather than a person in front of us. Wealthy people who live in economically diverse areas are more generous than those who live in exclusively wealthy areas.
  • Professor Pinker, in his superb book “The Better Angels of Our Nature,” explores whether the spread of affordable fiction and journalism beginning in the 18th century expanded empathy by making it easier for people to imagine themselves in the shoes of others. Researchers have found that reading literary fiction by the likes of Don DeLillo or Alice Munro — but not beach fiction or nonfiction — can promote empathy.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Yet I’ve come to belIeve that servIce trIps do open eyes and remInd students of theIr good fortune. In short, they buIld empathy.So let’s escape the InsulatIon of our comfort zones. Let’s encourage student servIce projects and travel to dIstant countrIes and to needy areas nearby. Whatever the Impact on others, volunteerIng may at least help the volunteer.
adamdrazsky

Does It Help to Know HIstory? - The New Yorker - 5 views

  •  
    About a year ago, I wrote about some attempts to explaIn why anyone would, or ought to, study EnglIsh In college. The poInt, I thought, was not that studyIng EnglIsh gIves anyone some practIcal advantage on non-EnglIsh majors, but that It enables us to enter, as equals, Into a long exIstIng, ongoIng conversatIon.
markfrankel18

Why Are Certain Smells So Hard to identify? - The New Yorker - 0 views

  • A recent paper in the journal Cognition, for instance, quipped that if people were as bad at naming sights as they are at naming scents, “they would be diagnosed as aphasic and sent for medical help.” The paper quoted scattershot attempts by participants in a previous study to label the smell of lemon: “air freshener,” “bathroom freshener,” “magic marker,” “candy,” “lemon-fresh Pledge,” “some kind of fruit.” This sort of difficulty seems to have very little to do, however, with the nose’s actual capabilities. Last spring, an article in the journal Science reported that we are capable of discriminating more than a trillion different odors. (A biologist at Caltech subsequently disputed the finding, arguing that it contained mathematical errors, though he acknowledged the “richness of human olfactory experience.”) Whence, then, our bumbling translation of scent into speech?
  • That question was the subject, two weekends ago, of an American Association for the Advancement of Science symposium at the San Jose Convention Center (which smelled, pleasantly but nonspecifically, of clean carpet). The preëminence of eye over nose was apparent even in the symposium abstract, which touted data that “shed new light” and opened up “yet new vistas.” (Reading it over during a phone interview, Jonathan Reinarz, a professor at the University of Birmingham, in England, and the author of “Past Scents: Historical Perspectives on Smell,” asked me, “What’s wrong with a little bit of inscent?”) Nevertheless, the people on the panel were decidedly pro-smell. “One thing that everyone at this symposium will agree on is that human olfactory discriminatory power is quite excellent, if you give it a chance,” Jay Gottfried, a Northwestern University neuroscientist, told me. Noam Sobel, of the Weizmann institute of Science, used a stark hypothetical to drive home the ways in which smell can shape behavior: “if i offer you a beautiful mate, of the gender of your choice, who smells of sewage, versus a less attractive mate who smells of sweet spice, with whom would you mate?”
  • But difficulty with talking about smell is not universal. Asifa Majid, a psycholinguist at Radboud University Nijmegen, in the Netherlands, and the organizer of the A.A.A.S. symposium, studies a group of around a thousand hunter-gatherers in northern Malaysia and southern Thailand who speak a language called Jahai. in one analysis, Majid and her colleague Niclas Burenhult found that speakers of Jahai were as good at classifying scratch-and-sniff cards as they were at classifying color chips; their English-speaking counterparts, meanwhile, tended to give meandering and disparate descriptions of scents. At the symposium, Majid presented new research involving around thirty Jahai and thirty Dutch people. in that study, the Jahai named smells in an average of two seconds, whereas the Dutch took thirteen—“and this is just to say, ‘Uh, i don’t know,’ ” Majid joked onstage.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Olfaction experts each have their pet theories as to why our scent lexicon is so lacking. Jonathan Reinarz blames the lingering effects of the Enlightenment, which, he says, placed a special emphasis on vision. Jay Gottfried, who is something of a nasal prodigy—he once guessed, on the basis of perfume residue, that one of his grad students had gotten back together with an ex-girlfriend—blames physiology. Whereas visual information is subject to elaborate processing in many areas of the brain, his research suggests, odor information is parsed in a much less intricate way, notably by the limbic system, which is associated with emotion and memory formation. This area, Gottfried said, takes “a more crude and unpolished approach to the process of naming,” and the brain’s language centers can have trouble making use of such unrefined input. Meanwhile, Donald A. Wilson, a neuroscientist at New York University School of Medicine, blames biases acquired in childhood.
Lawrence Hrubes

BBC News - Nimrud: Outcry as iS bulldozers attack ancient iraq site - 0 views

  • Archaeologists and officials have expressed outrage about the bulldozing of the ancient Assyrian city of Nimrud by islamic State militants in iraq.
  • IS says ancIent shrInes and statues are "false Idols" that have to be smashed. "They are erasIng our hIstory," saId IraqI archaeologIst LamIa al-GaIlanI.
  • Profile of Nimrud Ancient Assyrian city on the River Tigris Capital of Assyria for about 150 years First excavations in modern times undertaken by Europeans starting in the 1840s Treasures unearthed included sections of royal palaces, individual statues and smaller artefacts investigations stopped for decades but in 1949 Sir Max Mallowan (husband of writer Agatha Christie) began fresh excavations Extensive photographic record of remaining treasures made in the 1970s
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • "There is absolutely no political or religious justification for the destruction of humanity's cultural heritage." Dr Gailani told the BBC:"Nimrud for us in iraq and for me as an archaeologist is one of the most important [sites]. There are still quite a lot of things that are standing - the reliefs and the statues, the famous winged bulls. "They are erasing our history. i wish it was a nightmare and i could wake up."
markfrankel18

On Empire and Anachronism | imperial & Global Forum - 0 views

  • One could take the absolutist position that we can’t pass any moral judgements whatsoever about people in the past. However, i doubt that many people would be willing or able to stick to it. Almost everyone, i think, is happy to condemn slavery even though many of the people who perpetrated it were doing so in line with what were then commonly accepted standards within their own societies. We might also ask: where is the cut-off date? if it’s not right to express moral opinions on what people did 500 or 250 years ago, are we also precluded from expressing them about what people did 50 years, 20 years ago, or even last week?
  • Our responsibility as historians is not to take a position which claims that judgments can be avoided, but rather to engage in an ongoing process of trying to decide what types of judgements are actually possible.
markfrankel18

Maryam Mirzakhani: 'The more i spent time on maths, the more excited i got' | Science | theguardian.com - 0 views

  • Of course, the most rewarding part is the "Aha" moment, the excitement of discovery and enjoyment of understanding something new – the feeling of being on top of a hill and having a clear view. But most of the time, doing mathematics for me is like being on a long hike with no trail and no end in sight.
markfrankel18

Excerpt - 'Love and Math' - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • What if at school you had to take an “art class” in which you were only taught how to paint a fence? What if you were never shown the paintings of Leonardo da Vinci and Picasso? Would that make you appreciate art? Would you want to learn more about it? i doubt it. You would probably say something like this: “Learning art at school was a waste of my time. if i ever need to have my fence painted, i’ll just hire people to do this for me.” Of course, this sounds ridiculous, but this is how math is taught, and so in the eyes of most of us it becomes the equivalent of watching paint dry. While the paintings of the great masters are readily available, the math of the great masters is locked away.
Lawrence Hrubes

Is AtheIsm IrratIonal? - NYTImes.com - 3 views

  •  
    AP: "I thInk there are a large number - maybe a couple of dozen - of pretty good theIstIc arguments. None Is conclusIve, but each, or at any rate the whole bunch taken together, Is about as strong as phIlosophIcal arguments ordInarIly get. G.G.: Could you gIve an example of such an argument? AP: One presently rather popular argument: fIne-tunIng. ScIentIsts tell us that there are many propertIes our unIverse dIsplays such that If they were even slIghtly dIfferent from what they are In fact, lIfe, or at least our kInd of lIfe, would not be possIble. The unIverse seems to be fIne-tuned for lIfe."
markfrankel18

Science Vs. Religion: Let's Be Charitable : 13.7: Cosmos And Culture : NPR - 5 views

  •  
    "Issues about scIence and relIgIon have become so polItIcIzed and polarIzIng that It's hard to fInd publIc forums In whIch people wIth dIfferent commItments can meanIngfully engage In dIscussIon and debate. You know, respectful conversatIons, ones In whIch we Interpret each other charItably and don't sImply assume that those who dIsagree wIth us are foolIsh, Immoral or just plaIn stupId. I'm not arguIng for a mIddle ground In whIch we all compromIse. The best posItIon Isn't necessarIly the one In the mIddle, or the one that wIns by majorIty vote. But I do thInk we need a "charItable ground," If you wIll - some shared terrItory In whIch we recognIze that other people's relIgIous and scIentIfIc commItments can be as deeply felt and deeply reasoned as our own, and that there's value In understandIng why others belIeve what they do. If there Is some charItable ground out there, It's a small terrItory wIth contested borders."
markfrankel18

To Understand Religion, Think Football - issue 17: Big Bangs - Nautilus - 5 views

  • The invention of religion is a big bang in human history. Gods and spirits helped explain the unexplainable, and religious belief gave meaning and purpose to people struggling to survive. But what if everything we thought we knew about religion was wrong? What if belief in the supernatural is window dressing on what really matters—elaborate rituals that foster group cohesion, creating personal bonds that people are willing to die for. Anthropologist Harvey Whitehouse thinks too much talk about religion is based on loose conjecture and simplistic explanations. Whitehouse directs the institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology at Oxford University. For years he’s been collaborating with scholars around the world to build a massive body of data that grounds the study of religion in science. Whitehouse draws on an array of disciplines—archeology, ethnography, history, evolutionary psychology, cognitive science—to construct a profile of religious practices.
  • I suppose people do try to fIll In the gaps In theIr knowledge by InvokIng supernatural explanatIons. But many other sItuatIons prompt supernatural explanatIons. Perhaps the most common one Is thInkIng there’s a rItual that can help us when we’re doIng somethIng wIth a hIgh rIsk of faIlure. Lots of people go to football matches wearIng theIr lucky pants or lucky shIrt. And you get players doIng all sorts of rItuals when there’s a hIgh-rIsk sItuatIon lIke takIng a penalty kIck.
  • We tend to take a few bits and pieces of the most familiar religions and see them as emblematic of what’s ancient and pan-human. But those things that are ancient and pan-human are actually ubiquitous and not really part of world religions. Again, it really depends on what we mean by “religion.” i think the best way to answer that question is to try and figure out which cognitive capacities came first.
« First ‹ Previous 81 - 100 of 206 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page