Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ SMART Department
Ted Curran

Welcome to the Shared Digital Future | www.hathitrust.org - 0 views

shared by Ted Curran on 24 Mar 11 - Cached
  •  
    HathiTrust
Ted Curran

Foundations of Education and Instructional Assessment - Wikibooks, open books for an op... - 0 views

  •  
    A wikibook on education, created by ed. students.
Ted Curran

Health Education Assets Library - Home - 0 views

  •  
    An Open Health Sciences repository
Ted Curran

ClassroomCaptureTechnology - Keck qwiki wiki @USC - 0 views

  •  
    Classroom Capture Technology by RayMosteller - EducationalResources Webcasting and Podcasting Camtasia Relay - Lecture capture and presentation by TechSmith Camtasia Relay Pricing - One time licensing fee Echo 360 - Platform for campus-wide lecture capture, bought by Blackboard Kaltura - Open-source online video platform Kaltura community Mediasite - Global leader for enterprise webcasting and knowledge management Smart Encode - Smart PiP Encoder (used by DEN at USC) Tegrity - Automatically capturing, storing and indexing every class on campus, bought by McGraw-Hill Education Video Capture Software WM Recorder, Capture, Converter - The Ultimate Toolkit to Download, Capture and Convert ANY Streaming Video SDP Downloader - Download mms stream as wmv file WebVideoCap v1.33 - Capture Flash video and RTSP/MMS streams by Nir Sofer Freemake Video Downloader - Download videos from YouTube, Facebook, MTV, other sites in HD, 4K, MP4, FLV, 3GP Video Conversion Software AMV Video Converter - Converts avi, mpeg, mpg, wmv, rm, mov, qt Freemake Video Converter - Convert video between formats, rip DVD, convert to devices, burn DVD, cut, join, rotate, and upload video, photos, MP3 Video Player Software Any FLV Player - play FLV files (MPEG-4 encoded video files for Flash) on the internet Applian FLV Player GOM Media Player - includes XviD, DivX, FLV1, AC3, OGG, MP4, H263 Related: WebTwoTechnologies LearningManagementSystems - OnlineCollaborationTools - FacultyBlackboardCommittee
Ted Curran

AlternativeCopyrightOptions - Keck qwiki wiki @USC - 0 views

  •  
    Lists and Comparison of Licenses Comparison of free software licences - on Wikipedia Free Software Foundation (FSF) List of Licenses Free Software Foundation (FSF) approved software licences - On Wikipedia GNU List of Various Licenses and Comments about Them - see GNU Project below Alternative Licenses Apache Software Foundation Licenses - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Foundation On Wikipedia Creative Commons License - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons On Wikipedia Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guidelines On Wikipedia Free Software Foundation (FSF) - On Wikipedia GNU Project Licences GNU Project - On Wikipedia GNU licenses GNU General Public License (GPL) - On Wikipedia GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) - On Wikipedia GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) - On Wikipedia GNU Free Documentation License (FDL) - On Wikipedia "The rule made by the owners of proprietary software was, 'If you share with your neighbor, you are a pirate. If you want any changes, beg us to make them.'" - by Richard Stallman, originally published in the book "Open Sources". See The GNU Project None: AlternativeCopyrightOptions (last edited 2011-03-23 14:16:34 by RayMosteller)
Ted Curran

AcademicCopyrightInformation - Keck qwiki wiki @USC - 0 views

  •  
    Academic Copyright Information Disclaimer: The purpose of this wiki webpage is to provide links to information about copyright and "fair use" to help faculty and students make informed decisions about copyright issues. Nothing on this page is intended to serve as legal advice. If you have legal questions about copyright, you should consult a lawyer or the general counsel's office in your institution. Nothing on this page should be construed as representing the policy or opinion of the University of Southern California. Please send comments to RayMosteller Related: CopyrightInformation - AlternativeCopyrightOptions - UscCopyrightInformation - EducationalResources Copyright and Fair Use Case Law Academic Publishers vs. Georgia State University - Lawsuit filed April 15, 2008 Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphics Corp. - 758 F.Supp. 1522 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, INC. - No. 94-1778 6th Cir. 1996 decision vacated Key Court Case Summaries on Fair Use Columbia University Copyright Advisory Office - Columbia University Libraries / Information Services Fair Use Checklist Copyright Scenarios Court Case Summaries - Regarding Fair Use Fair Use Resources Cornell University Copyright Information Center Cornell Copyright Policies, Guidance, and Policy Interpretations Cornell Electronic Course Content Copyright Guidelines - Press release Cornell Electronic Course Content Copyright Guidelines - (PDF) Course Reserves Copyright Guidelines - (PDF) Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States Copyright Resources Cornell Copyright Decision Tree - (PDF) Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis (IUPUI) Copyright Management Center Fair-Use Issues Fair-Use: Overview and Meaning for Higher Education Fair-Use Guidelines Key Court Case Summaries on Fair Use Teach Act and Distance Learning North Carolina State University Intellectual Property Student Privacy Law (FERPA) Penn State Uni
Ted Curran

Wanna Work Together? - Creative Commons - 0 views

  •  
    This video is a great succinct explanation of the difference between Copyright and Creative Commons. 
Ted Curran

Educational Vodcasting - 0 views

shared by Ted Curran on 14 Mar 11 - No Cached
  •  
    Sams and Bergmann, pioneers of the "Flipped" classroom. 
Ted Curran

openbiomed.info - 0 views

shared by Ted Curran on 14 Mar 11 - Cached
Ted Curran

Top 6 Teacher Tasks - What Teachers Do - Top Teacher Tasks - 0 views

  •  
    These are the top 6 "teacher tasks" that faculty employ. What percentage of these tasks do we spend our time on, and how many of those tasks could be automated?
Ted Curran

To Share or Not to Share: Is That the Question? (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE - 0 views

  • The use of open materials by faculty is something of a continuum, with those who closely guard their intellectual property and privacy on one end, with faculty who seek out and use open content and technologies in the middle, and with those who actively contribute to open content on the other end.
  • All the faculty I spoke to could think of at least a few contexts in which they would not be willing and/or able to share or participate openly.
  • For example, few faculty are willing to embark on large, time-intensive projects, such as writing textbooks, without some guarantee that they will be compensated for their personal investment (time
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Research faculty may need to closely guard patentable research under the terms of their institutional contracts, even if their inclination drives them to share openly
  • Science faculty, for example, often publish their research with multiple authors and may be more used to a collaborative model, whereas humanities faculty write for publications that favor a single-author model.
  • Commonly, faculty will lock down some content (research or texts) under intellectual property laws but feel morally obligated to share in another aspect of their field.
  • Two factors delineate a faculty member's attitude toward openness: a nature influence and a nurture influence.
  • the strength of a person's inclination toward sharing
  • On the one end are the keepers, faculty who ask themselves: "Why would anyone outside my course want to know what I think?" At the other extreme are the sharers, faculty who believe that their contribution to the conversation, content, and/or community is invaluable.
  • The second factor that influences attitude toward openness is how strongly the person feels a moral responsibility to share freely with his or her community.
  • Many said something to the effect that they felt it was their duty as an educator to share
  • that everyone in education should share
  • Open faculty see sharing their ideas and expertise as a way to quickly validate or refute ideas, to promote important academic programs, and/or to mentor those instructors with less experience or to be mentored by those with greater experience or more creative ideas. Open faculty value the ideas and content shared by others in their networks and feel an obligation to share alike. This sense of moral responsibility to share is so strong in some faculty that it bothers them when ideas and content are closely guarded. They see this as an affront to their values.
  • In the category of faculty who are strong sharers and strongly open, we find project leaders and thought leaders.
  • What's the difference between those faculty who share with colleagues locally and those who share on the web? Technology skills.
  • Open faculty are learning some of these technology skills from formal workshops and professional training, but many spoke of learning technology skills from other open faculty (or even students) during on-the-fly informal learning sessions.
  • Many of the faculty I spoke to suggested (strongly) that participation in open digital activities (e.g., blogging, writing open-source software, being a curator of open-source materials) should count toward tenure and promotion.
  • Naturally, administrators worry about open digital faculty. What if they say something the institutional leaders don't agree with? What if their work with students on the web creates a liability? Administrators can do three simple things to minimize these issues: If a faculty member writes or shares content openly on the web, using space provided by the college, the inclusion of a simple disclosure statement can provide some separation between the individual and the institution (for example, "These views/materials are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my institution"). To guard against liability, administrators can make sure that open faculty receive training on copyright issues with materials used, privacy issues with students, and security issues with web technologies. These days, most campus activities involve the potential for liability. All administrators can do is make a good-faith effort to protect the institution by ensuring that faculty have a solid grounding in the potential risks. Today's students live much of their lives in the digital world. Faculty have the potential to model and promote good Internet behavior to future workers and leaders. Administrators can support open digital faculty by making an effort to understand what the faculty do: read some of what they write; take them to lunch and discuss their latest projects; try to understand that these faculty are public ambassadors of the institution and stealth faculty developers on campus. In gaining the trust of open digital faculty, administrators will more likely be seen as advisors than as adversaries.
Ted Curran

Previewing Microsoft's Office 365 | Microsoft - CNET News - 0 views

  • Lync's planned client for Windows Phone 7 and the iPhone.
    • Ted Curran
       
      No Android, and not as ubiquitous as GTalk for Apps (which runs on ALL platforms).
  • It's also one of the places where Office 365 shows its strengths, since you can get into a shared group of documents and very quickly give them a read and an edit in the same place without leaving the page to go off to some other property
  • This is what a cohesive Web office experience should feel like, though like we mentioned earlier, it still feels like its on its own island instead of being more tightly knit with the Office 365 start page, and Outlook client.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • While really impressive, there are still some questions over Microsoft's vision of making Office 365 less of a jump-off point for its software and more of a one-stop solution for getting things done from any computer, anywhere.
  • it's worth looking at Office 365 for what it is, which is Microsoft continuing to move some of the very complicated pieces of its Office software ecosystem into the cloud--in part to make it easier for businesses large and small to get going. The Office software itself is a separate part of the equation--one that's well on its way in that direction.
  • Notably absent from Office 365's overall interface is Microsoft's suite of Office Web Apps, which is where many of those comparisons to Google Docs have centered
  • The first thing we should say up front is that Google Apps this is not.
  • The good news is that in our brief testing, everything worked as advertised. The bad news is that you can't get it right now, and it's still a long ways off from something that lets you every feature out of the Office ecosystem without installing software.
  • If you actually want to create something, there's still a reliance on having to have the Office software, or go off to the Office Web apps site itself, where users can save to their SharePoint.
  • The net result of all of this is that Office 365 is not yet quite the true jump to a cohesive set of all of Microsoft's services, gone online and tied together in a way where you can hop from task to task between different 365 components.
  • There is still an incredible reliance on the software itself, which is bound to change down the road, but for now makes basic workflows like creating a document and getting feedback from team members a hybrid experience, or one that involves juggling products.
  • In our preview with it, the Web client of Outlook was fast loading and had a few nice tricks up its sleeve, like letting you open up Office attachments in a pop-up Window--something that's quite useful if you're on a public computer that does not have Office installed.
  • Lync is Microsoft's an instant messaging system with presence; an audio and video conferencing tool; and a voice call service. By design this is something that users install and run locally,
  • How Lync translates to the Web experience is that users can get a slightly less capable version of it inside a browser window--all without having to install the software client
Ted Curran

First look: Office 365 beta shows promise but lacks polish | Cloud Computing - InfoWorld - 0 views

  • From what we've seen of the Office 365 beta, it still has a long way to go before it can be considered a true turnkey solution for business.
  • The most attractive tiers bundle a full license to Office Professional Plus 2010 for each user, which is arguably Microsoft's greatest advantage over online-only competitors such as Google Docs. You can save a little money if you already have your own Office licenses or if you plan to conduct all your document management in the Office Web Apps -- but we think the latter is unlikely.
  • [ Also on InfoWorld: Dueling demos of Microsoft Office 365 and Google Cloud Connect bring the two titans' larger-than-life struggle into sharp relief. See "Microsoft and Google launch new assaults on the cloud." ]
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Office 365 users have immediate access to email, calendar, contacts, and chat via Outlook Web Access, and access to SharePoint sites via Web browser. For rich client access, they can download and install the Microsoft Online Services Connector, Lync client, and Office 2010 Professional Plus suite directly from the portal home page (above). The admin main page (below) is the first stop for managing Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, Lync Online, and their users. 
Ted Curran

10 reasons why Microsoft Office 365 rocks | TechRepublic - 0 views

  • IE 7/8, Firefox 3, or Safari 3.1.2 and through mobile devices including Windows Mobile 6.5.x, Windows Phone 7, Apple iPhone 2.0 and above, and Nokia E and N series.
    • Ted Curran
       
      So SharePoint online doesn't work with Android (AKA "the most popular smartphone OS on earth")? Odd choice.
  • the most popular Web browsers. There is a Light version that supports older and alternative browsers.
    • Ted Curran
       
      I'm interested to know how they define "the most popular web browsers". On our system, that means "IE", while Firefox, Safari, and Chrome fall into the "alternative browsers" category. 
  • Also supported is PowerPoint broadcasting, which lets you broadcast your slide shows across the Internet even to people who don’t have PowerPoint.
    • Ted Curran
       
      does this require you to be online while you're "broadcasting"?
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • With the Lync 2010 client software
    • Ted Curran
       
      How is this considered "cloud-based" if it requires desktop software to work? "Cloud" means "web-based" or "not dependent on desktop software". Confounding.
  • using the Lync client
    • Ted Curran
       
      again-- client, not web. What happens if you don't have the client?
  • Lync Online directly over the Internet (without having to be on the corporate network via VPN or RAS)
    • Ted Curran
       
      does this mean "connect to Lync Online VIA THE CLIENT or THROUGH A BROWSER"?
  • Opera Mobile 8.65
    • Ted Curran
       
      So Android users would have to install Opera Mobile?
Ted Curran

David Wiley: Open Teaching Multiplies the Benefit but Not the Effort - Wired Campus - T... - 0 views

  • In 2004 I began asking my students to post their homework on their personal, publicly accessible blogs.
  • By changing their homework assignments from disposable, private conversations between them and me (the way printed or e-mailed assignments work in students’ minds) into public, online statements that became part of a continuing conversation, we realized very real benefits.
  • The result was a teacher’s dream — the students’ writing became a little longer, a little more thoughtful, and a little more representative of their actual intellectual abilities.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • When the visits and comments from professionals around the world started coming in, students realized that the papers they were writing weren’t just throw-away pieces for class – they were read and discussed by their future peers out in the world.
  • I began posting my syllabus on a publicly available wiki and doing my best to select only readings that were also publicly available and that I could link to from the syllabus.
  • I needed to find online articles and materials that my students would be able to get with a single click at no cost.
  • As I began blogging about my online teaching materials, people from around the world began to see and make use of them in their own courses. Others outside universities started using them to guide their personal study.
  • Introduction to Open Education.
  • Do we professors, who live rather privileged lives relative to the vast majority of the planet’s population, have a moral obligation to make our teaching efforts as broadly impactful as possible, reaching out to bless the lives of as many people as we can? Especially when participatory technologies make it so inexpensive (almost free) for us to do so? I believe the answer is yes. —David Wiley
Ted Curran

An Intellectual Property Primer for Online Instructors - 0 views

  •  
    OCW Course on Intellectual Property from UC Irvine. Great work
Ted Curran

Why Bother Being Open? « iterating toward openness - 0 views

  • I’ve always been an “argue by describing the benefits” kind of guy as opposed to an “argue on grounds of moral superiority” kind of guy (which is why I end up in the open camp more often than the free camp).
  • a free-to-access, online “digital publication of high quality university-level educational materials… organized as courses, and often includ[ing] course planning materials and evaluation tools as well as thematic content” that does not use an open license is not an OpenCourseWare.
  • MIT OCW, the website says, “Each course we publish requires an investment of $10,000 to $15,000 to compile course materials from faculty, ensure proper licensing for open sharing, and format materials for global distribution.”
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • 25% of the per-course publication costs (not technology infrastructure or external outreach costs – I’m talking about costs directly related to publishing a course) derive specifically from the desire for the final publication to employ an open license.
  • what is the return on this investment? What benefit are users deriving from open licensing that they could not derive if MIT published these materials online with a default copyright statement?
  • Would users still receive this benefit if MIT OCW were posted online with a traditional, full copyright statement?
Ted Curran

Diigo - Web Highlighter and Sticky Notes, Online Bookmarking and Annotation, Personal L... - 0 views

  • If you want more than a simple bookmarking tool, Diigo is for you! Compared with other bookmarking tools, Diigo enables you to do so much more. Period.
  • If you read a lot digitally, Diigo is for you! Compared with other information management tools, Diigo is differentiated by its focus on e-reading.
    • Ted Curran
       
      Diigo is an excellent way for groups of people to collaboratively annotate a website online. All notes, annotations, and bookmarks go into a socially comment-able feed that allows users to co-construct knowledge.
« First ‹ Previous 41 - 60 of 315 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page