In order to better understand faculty attitudes and practices regarding usage of library-specific tools and roles in a university
learning management system, log data for a period of three semesters was analyzed. Academic departments with highest rates
of usage were identified, and faculty users and non-users within those departments were surveyed regarding their perceptions
of and experience with the library tools. Librarians who use the tools were also surveyed to compare their perceptions of
faculty tool and role use. While faculty survey respondents showed high levels of positive perceptions of librarians, they
also exhibited low awareness of the library tools and little understanding of their use. Recommendations for encouraging wider
adoption and effective usage are discussed.
In order to better understand faculty attitudes and practices regarding usage of library-specific tools and roles in a university learning management system, log data for a period of three semesters was analyzed. Academic departments with highest rates of usage were identified, and faculty users and non-users within those departments were surveyed regarding their perceptions of and experience with the library tools. Librarians who use the tools were also surveyed to compare their perceptions of faculty tool and role use. While faculty survey respondents showed high levels of positive perceptions of librarians, they also exhibited low awareness of the library tools and little understanding of their use. Recommendations for encouraging wider adoption and effective usage are discussed.
@alexpickett Also, I find this article interesting: Alessio, H.M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., Bailer, A.J. and Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores. Online Learning Journal, 21(1). https://t.co/gUIhyNIi6c"
Karen Swan is the James Stukel Distinguished Professor of Educational Leadership at the University of Illinois Springfield and an expert on online and blended learning.
One study, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education, did a meta-analysis of 51 reports on online instruction comparing student outcomes in online, blended and/or face-to-face environments. It found that students who took all or part of their classes online performed better, and that the effectiveness of online and blended instruction was broad across variations in students, types of programs and content areas.
Answers from 31,000 students at 58 institutions revealed that even after controlling for age, gender, major, type of institution and number of fully online courses taken, technology use was positively related to categories of engagement measured by NSSE benchmarks (for example, active and collaborative learning and student-faculty interaction), deep approaches to learning and self-reported learning outcomes.
An integral part of nearly all online classes is the threaded discussion-it is where students interact on a nearly daily basis, posting their thoughts and information on main discussion topics, your postings, and the postings of other students. While you have measured control over the content, length, and tone of student postings, you have full control over your own.
The CoI framework, with its emphasis on critical thinking and collaboration, provides a well-structured model and a set of guidelines to create effective learning communities in online and blended learning environments (Garrison & Anderson, 2003; Garrison & Vaughan, 2008).
Faculty participating in quality course reviews have the added benefits of learning from others' course design and teaching practices. Translating their findings from a review of their own courses and others, with expert advisement from an instructional designer, they can put into practice design and facilitation modifications to reduce online students' experiences of transactional distance.