Skip to main content

Home/ SHU17/ Group items tagged analysis

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Kelly OLeary

Single-Sex Education Unlikely to Offer Advantage Over Coed Schools, Research Finds - 0 views

  •  
    Analysis questions common assumption single-sex schools improve educational environment, achievement
Michael Mannino

INDEX | Independent School Data Exchange | Data, analysis, research, and information fo... - 0 views

  •  
    INDEX Mission Skills Assessment
meredith fox

Prism | Home - 0 views

  •  
    Whole class input analysis with visuals
  •  
    Tool for CCSS--close reading
chuck sampson

Huffington post education - 1 views

  •  
    Varied site containing in depth analysis of education issues.
chuck sampson

Marzano research lab - 0 views

  •  
    Link to resources in Marzano lab.
Lois Whipple

Think Twice Think Tank Review Project | National Education Policy Center - 0 views

  • The Privatization Infatuation In 2007, the second year of our Think Tank Review Project (thinktankreview.org), we reviewed 18 think tank reports about education policy. Time after time, our reviewers identified analyses that led inexorably to a privatization prescription. Even reports that offered a reasonable analysis of the No Child Left Behind Act or the dropout problem suddenly and groundlessly identified as the key policy implication of their findings the need for vouchers or other forms of privatization. ... See the full article by clicking on the above link
  •  
    provides the public, policymakers, and the press with timely, academically sound reviews of selected think tank publications. Reviewers for the project apply academic peer review standards to reports from think tanks and write brief reviews for the project website. They are asked to examine the reports for the validity of assumptions, methodology, results, and strength of links between results and policy recommendations.
  •  
    The Think Twice Think Tank Review Project provides the public, policymakers, and the press with timely, academically sound reviews of selected think tank publications.  Reviewers for the project apply academic peer review standards to reports from think tanks and write brief reviews for the project website. They are asked to examine the reports for the validity of assumptions, methodology, results, and strength of links between results and policy recommendations. The reviews, written in non-academic language, are intended to help policy makers, reporters, and others assess the merits of the reviewed reports. 
Barbara Powers

Dedoose - 0 views

  •  
    A cross-platform app for analyzing qualitative and mixed methods research with text, photos, audio, videos, spreadsheet data and so much more.
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page