Group items tagged

Value creation generates wealth

Any business has three levels of value definition - value defined by shareholders, customers and employees/partnership. Shareholder value is the primary value component no business can survive without and provides for the long term agility of an organisation. Customers provide medium term liquidity and employees the operational cash flow to ensure the continued operation of an enterprise. An enterprise architect must have a good understanding of wealth creation formula like economic value add to assess the contribution of IT to Wealth Creation

3. Growth PlatformsThis area of focus refers to the selection, prioritization and communication (both internal and external) of new growth platforms and business concepts that promise to deliver long-term, sustainable competitive advantage. It is here, most especially, that high performers begin separating themselves from the pack by making the strategic distinction between effective innovation in general and the effective commercialization of innovation. Accelerating growth through innovation requires becoming more disciplined at identifying a company's innovation "center," as it were. For some companies, such as Apple, innovation generally flows from its products and services. Other companies, such as Wal-Mart, fuel growth through operational innovations. Business model innovation has helped drive companies such as eBay and Skype. Companies must manage growth from that innovation center, rather than from the periphery. Part of that commitment to innovation involves embracing new and disruptive ideas. Another important aspect is leveraging open innovation and open sourcing methods that bring together suppliers, partners, employees and management. Companies that effectively commercialize innovation also develop more risk tolerance when scanning for opportunities outside their immediate business environment. They become more willing to cannibalize products and services when investigating new growth platforms. They become more adept at the operational requirements of their winning concepts, leveraging current partners, networks, assets and distinctive capabilities to help drive growth through innovation (see "Leading by imitation," Outlook, January 2007). Finally, these companies know how to communicate their growth and innovation strategy, both within their company and to the marketplace. Like the old story of the tree falling in a deserted forest, future value that is not communicated effectively to the marketplace doesn't make any noise.

40 of the Best Twitter Brands and the People Behind Them

We all know brands are using Twitter — whether or not you want them around. Some of them don’t quite get the medium and just tweet self-serving links or marketing speak, but you won’t find any of those brands here. We’ve handpicked 40 of the best brands experimenting with the micro-blogging platform, and asked them a few short questions about how they’re using Twitter. If some of their responses seem short, well that’s because they are. I asked each brand correspondent to answer our queries in 140 characters or less. Most of them got the point, a few rambled on a bit too long, and only asked me if “u” was acceptable in lieu of “you.” All in all, we’ve found some amazing people, doing some pretty powerful things at big companies, and all via Twitter. Smart brands use Twitter in meaningful ways, and most of them use their brand name as a way to make sure customers can find and recognize them. This piece, and the knowledge I learned from the incessant hours invested, demonstrate why brands do belong on Twitter. No other medium gets you inside a business or brand quiet like Twitter. And if you’re a brand that didn’t make our list, let us know why your tweets deserve consideration in the comments.

Chevrolet

The arrival of sustainable sustainability?

A little late I know, but just before the end of the year, we were fortunate enough to be a part of the Sustainable Life Media conference in Miami.  As is often the case, the event was full of interesting people extolling the virtues of more sustainable practices - from large MNC’s such as J&J through to some fantastically nimble social start-ups. But more than that, there was a real sense of change in the air. A sense that for the first time we were looking at making businesses sustainable, rather than bringing sustainability into business. In other words, for the first time I sensed that sustainability was being recognised as a key piece of DNA architecture for business, rather than some fan-fared adjunct.The ramifications of this are profound: for a start, this is what Peter Salmon from Moxie (who I had the pleasure to share a plenary session with) has labelled Sustainability 2.0. Or even 3.0. It also suggests an exciting trend that sees sustainability becoming near-impossible to focus on within the firm. That is not to say that it is absent, but rather just invisible.  Or rather, inherent. We are constantly hearing clients and colleagues citing an economic downturn as the worst possible time to embark on initiatives under the sustainability banner. But to make this criticism is to make the mistake that sustainability remains an annexe to the firm - an incidental anecdote to be told when appropriate.

This is most certainly wrong; instead, sustainability offers the best chance for firms to remain in business, as they redefine boundaries of influence and re-stock reserves of trust.This sounds absurd, but for too long, I really do not think the majority of firms have actually viewed sustainability as being linked in any way to their…..well, sustainability. And as such, it has been a nice-to-have appendage.So maybe this is now changing? Maybe Sustainability 2.0 and the crushing re-evaluation of business in the current climate marks the arrival of sustainable sustainability?  Based on the clear exodus of freshly-empowered CMOs and CEOs from large MNCs at the Miami conference, keen to demonstrate their new-found independence via boutique consulting efforts and old business cards with biro’d new titles and cell phone numbers, it seems so. Which also means sustainability could be finally becoming less about guilt, burden and ‘doing what’s right’ and much more about opportunity, energy and doing what’s exciting. Which would be very exciting indeed.G