Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or urlKing's Evaluation toolkit - 0 views
A scholarly basis for teaching practices in higher education | Explore Taylor & Francis Online - 0 views
Vol 10, No 2 (2016) - 0 views
1994 group - latest news - 1 views
STEM funding embedding good practice - 0 views
Fibreculture Journal Issue 14 - 0 views
-
Coauthored by Ien Ang who is a scholar whose work I like. From the intro: "This paper emerges out of an interest in exploring the possible implications of Web 2.0 for the practice of humanities research. Scholars in the humanities have traditionally been dependent on the written word - on the production of intellectually dense discourse - and, in this producerly mode, they tend to be individualist, sole researchers. How can they respond to the challenges posed by Web 2.0 and its seemingly irresistible promotion of a participatory, expressive, and highly visual mode of cultural production?"
Don't let them in to watch them sink | Angela Phillips | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk - 0 views
-
Quick commentary piece on working-class students being disadvantaged at universities that made me think of the Transitions project. Also of interest to the Graduate Attributes project: Goldsmiths' mission statement. It offers "a transformative experience, generating knowledge and stimulating self-discovery through creative, radical and intellectually rigorous thinking and practice."
-
Immediately made me think about someone in a College department, which will remain nameless, who proudly proclaims that they fail a large number of students...like it's some kind of badge of honour! This article would appear to hit the nail on the head but unfortunately it's a problem that's doesn't have a "simple" solution like lowering entrance standards or handing out more Oxbridge scholarships.