Otis Faculty

“information coaches”

synoptic case study of the Visible Knowledge Project (VKP), a five-year project looking at the impact of technology on learning, primarily in the humanities, through the lens of the scholarship of teaching and learning. 

Learning for adaptive expertise: the role of new media in making visible the thinking processes intrinsic to the development of expert-like abilities and dispositions in novice learners; Embodied learning: the impact of new media technologies on the expansion of learning strategies that engage affective as well as cognitive dimensions, renewed forms of creativity and the sensory experience of new media, and the importance of identity and experience as the foundation of intellectual engagement; and Socially Situated learning: the role of social dimensions of new media in creating conditions for authentic engagement and high impact learning.

As Michael Wesch puts it in his commentary on the meaning of these changes, “Nothing good will come of these technologies if we do not first confront the crisis of significance and bring relevance back into education.

ePortfolios

A key element in this transformation is shifting the unit of analysis from the learner in a single course to the learner over time, inside and outside the classroom.

This idea is useful for helping scholars of teaching and learning think through the impact of new media technologies on the practice of capturing and representing evidence of student learning and drawing conclusions from it.

Thinking with clarity about the role of technology is key when research focuses on the use of technology in the classroom and when the presentation of that research takes advantage of new media technologies.

The results of this study are available in print (see AHHE Forum on Digital Storytelling, Vol. 7.2, 2008) and also online at the Digital Storytelling Multimedia Archive.2

There is a somewhat familiar relationship between research and writing which underpins student work; however, because students are working towards a digital end, they are already thinking about their work as being different—more visual, more compressed, and more public than traditional writing products.

Thus, the grid designates a liminal space between the protocols of database and linear narrative in a multimedia environment.

The tension between grid and linear Web site as two related, yet fundamentally different ways to represent evidence of student learning is one of the most challenging aspects of our meta-study.

hese publications follow the hermeneutics of linear, hierarchical, cause-and-effect narratives.

the database is the privileged narrative of the computer age, and its logic is fundamentally different from that of linear print narratives

his absence of hierarchy is symptomatic of the database as “cultural form:”

reducing complexity through categorization works well only if certain criteria are met. First, in terms of the domain of knowledge to be organized, classification is dependent on a “small corpus, formal categories, stable and restricted entities, and clear edges.” Second, successful classification assumes “expert catalogers, an authoritative source of judgment,” as well as “coordinated” and “expert users.”8 One of our goals for this study is to make our findings publicly available in an online archive, accessible to the scholarship of teaching community and beyond. For such an environment, Shirky adds, reducing complexity through stable categories is a “bad strategy:”

Users have a terrifically hard time guessing how something they want will have been categorized in advance, unless they have been educated about those categories in advance as

Through collaborative coding/tagging and the production of further metadata in a collaborative effort with the academic community, we aim to push the limits of analyzing and representing student learning in Web 2.0 environments.

periodic reflections on learning by students are critical components of an education.

ntegrative Learning Metarubric

Creative Thinking Metarubric

Critical Thinking Metarubric

metarubrics

We hope that the VALUE project will be able to demonstrate several things:  that faculty across the country share fundamental expectations about student learning on all of the Essential Learning Outcomes deemed critical for student success in the 21st century; that rubrics can articulate these shared expectations; that the shared rubrics can be used and modified locally to reflect campus culture within this national conversation; and that the actual work of students should be the basis for assessing student learning and can more appropriately represent an institution’s learning results.

e have an environment in which we need to be able to encompass a wider variety of modes for students to demonstrate their learning processes and achievements. By definition this forces us to encompass audio and video, Web 2.0, hard copy and virtual learning.

that different knowledge sets and ways of knowing result in learning outcomes being demonstrated in different ways. But in the deconstruction of the demonstrated learning, we tend to find similarity in the core components or criteria of learning, e.g. for critical thinking.

student learning is something that the entire campus community is engaged with; each person on the campus participates in the learning, but no one is responsible for all of the learning.

rubrics and e-portfolios does not have to create more work--it requires working differently, shifting my time and focus a bit--but it is richer and more rewarding than what I used to struggle with in trying to communicate my expectations for learning and how students could more readily succeed in meeting those expectations. There is a transparency and communication ability that enriches the conversations both with students and with colleagues.

function popEditor1(map) { if(!map || map == null || map == void(0)) var map = 'false'; var spanWidth = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetWidth; var boxWidth = spanWidth+30; if (boxWidth < 600) boxWidth = 600; popBox('box.textEditor', 'boxID=13472&spanWidth='+spanWidth+'&boxWidth='+boxWidth+'&displayMap='+map, 850, 650); } function getBoxStats1() { var spanWidth = getObjectRef('boxTable_1').offsetWidth; var spanHeight = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetHeight; alert('width = '+spanWidth+', height = '+spanHeight); } archive screenshots + descriptions of student projects: viewI have been examining student work in three different modes (formal argumentative essay with bibliography; Flash movie; informal reflective commentary), performed in the course of a single assignment. The assignment called for students (working in groups) to interpret a literary text that was related to the core subject matter of the course. I drafted the assignment, then refined it following consultation with the class, in the context of the spring 2003 course. I repeated it with slight modifications in the fall 2004 course. function popEditor1(map) { if(!map || map == null || map == void(0)) var map = 'false'; var spanWidth = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetWidth; var boxWidth = spanWidth+30; if (boxWidth < 600) boxWidth = 600; popBox('box.textEditor', 'boxID=13471&spanWidth='+spanWidth+'&boxWidth='+boxWidth+'&displayMap='+map, 850, 650); } function getBoxStats1() { var spanWidth = getObjectRef('boxTable_1').offsetWidth; var spanHeight = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetHeight; alert('width = '+spanWidth+', height = '+spanHeight); } questions working questions1. Do distinct modes of apprehension and interpretive practice become visible when we examine student work in different media?2. If so, what are the relationships between or among these modes? 3. If not , what does that tell us about received notions about the relative efficacy of traditional and emergent forms of scholarly practice? function popEditor1(map) { if(!map || map == null || map == void(0)) var map = 'false'; var spanWidth = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetWidth; var boxWidth = spanWidth+30; if (boxWidth < 600) boxWidth = 600; popBox('box.textEditor', 'boxID=13467&spanWidth='+spanWidth+'&boxWidth='+boxWidth+'&displayMap='+map, 850, 650); } function getBoxStats1() { var spanWidth = getObjectRef('boxTable_1').offsetWidth; var spanHeight = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetHeight; alert('width = '+spanWidth+', height = '+spanHeight); } 472site course website for english 472: view&nbsp; function popEditor1(map) { if(!map || map == null || map == void(0)) var map = 'false'; var spanWidth = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetWidth; var boxWidth = spanWidth+30; if (boxWidth < 600) boxWidth = 600; popBox('box.textEditor', 'boxID=13469&spanWidth='+spanWidth+'&boxWidth='+boxWidth+'&displayMap='+map, 850, 650); } function getBoxStats1() { var spanWidth = getObjectRef('boxTable_1').offsetWidth; var spanHeight = getObjectRef('box_1').offsetHeight; alert('width = '+spanWidth+', height = '+spanHeight); } finally...

Lessons and assignments are sequenced, in a scaffolding fashion, so that each assignment builds on the last. A scaffold provides support for the student and is structured so that one level builds upon the other. For instance, instead of a single introduction to searching online, the introduction to search engines can be a starting point for progressively more complex assignments building on previous knowledge. Lessons are delivered at regularly scheduled intervals throughout the course, so that learning is evenly distributed. Lessons balance the transfer of information about technology and research skills. Critical thinking concepts, which provide an essential framework for research evaluation, are incorporated into class and practiced regularly through such means as textual annotation, concept mapping, and research logs. Reading skills are adapted to the online environment; students learn to “read” search results, database information, and Web sites. Reading Web sites in particular requires that students read vertically, horizontally, and through multiple layers and that they recognize the key words that most Web sites use to guide the reader (such as “about us” which often leads to publication information). One student comment was typical about the course: “I learned how to read a site and how to read the hits.”

Research challenges students conceptually. Consider the complexity of the metaphorical language we use about areas of research: the “search” and the metasearch (a truer search?) sound mystical, a kind of archetypal quest (especially when combined with geographical terms like “mapping” and “logging”); the term keyword has a metaphysical promise; other terms invoke complex spatial images such as Web, network, and links; and finally “operators” (as in Boolean operators) echo with the lingering implication of agency. Given this profusion of rich terminology and complex skill building, students need to be grounded in regular, persistent sequencing of lessons and activities that encourage meta-cognition.

As we teach research skills, fostering that sense of amazement at discovery develops students as thoughtful researchers capable of handling the serendipitous moment online.

My goal for this course was to increase effective instruction on Internet research and improve the quality of Web-based sources used in student papers. I focused on developing a series of lessons in research methods, analytical reading, and critical thinking, all in the context of Internet research. Moreover, I wanted students to develop a better sense of the “art” of research, of finding good sources by sheer work, good judgment, and a bit of serendipitous luck.

nformation Gathering: students appreciated a wide range of options and felt that the Internet allowed them more choices. They also expressed awareness of the pitfalls of searching the Web and cautioned against gathering too much information without focusing their topic or evaluating their results as they progressed in their research. Discovery: students appreciated the exposure to new perspectives and areas of research--essentially the increased opportunity for serendipitous events.&nbsp;&nbsp; Connectivity: students liked the brainstorming aspect of Web searches and how they would return to their searching strategy as new information appeared. Students also made connections in terms of sequencing tasks and developed a sense of the connections emerging between their sources. Evaluation: students want to read a lot of articles to find the “best ones.” They expressed awareness of practicing more caution in their choices and understood the need to look at sites for the publisher’s bias.2