J. L. Higbee (ed.). (2003). Curriculum transformation and disability: implementing universal design in higher education. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
The NCAC was estabished with the support of the US Dept of Ed's Office of Special Ed Programs to improve access, participation and progress within the general curriculum for students with disabilities through Universal Design for LEarning, advanced teaching practices, ed policy and consensus building. The NCAC site offers a wealth of resources including case stories, literature reviews, and examples of best classroom practices.
Meo, G. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: applying universal design for learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52(2)/ Winter 2008, 21-30.Retrieved October 17, 2010 from
Lieber, J., Horn, E., Palmer, S., & Fleming, K. (2008). Access to the general education curriculum for preschoolers with disabilities: Children's school success. Exceptionality, 16(1), 18-32.Retrieved October 17, 2010 from
Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved October 17, 2010 from http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_diffinstructudl.html
The TES Web site provides educators a comprehensive presention of the principles and applications of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). TES offers model lessons, interactive activities, tutorials, curriculum resources, and other tools. It also includes a full-text digital editon of the book, Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning, by David Rose and Anne Meyer.