Skip to main content

Home/ Math Coffee/ Group items tagged review

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
1More

科学网-SCI投稿常用英语 - 0 views

www.sciencenet.cn/...user_content.aspx mail-module
shared by arithwsun arithwsun on 11 May 08 - Cached
  • arithwsun arithwsun on 11 May 08
     
    1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML: I am sending a manuscript entitled "" by - which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - . Yours sincerely 2. Dear Dr. A: Enclosed is a manuscript entitled "" by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal's readers. 3. Dear Dr. A: Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, "" by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source. We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. 二、询问有无收到稿件 Dear Editors, We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help. 三、询问论文审查回音 Dear Editors， It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible. 四、关于论文的总体审查意见 1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below. 2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a numb
3More

What might an expository mathematical wiki be like? « Gowers's Weblog - 0 views

gowers.wordpress.com/...tory-mathematical-wiki-be-like trick featured 治学之道 strategy
shared by arithwsun arithwsun on 27 Aug 08 - Cached
  • trick, that can be used in many mathematical situations. With such tricks, it is usually difficult, and in any case not desirable, to formalize them as lemmas: if you try to do so then almost certainly your formal lemma will not apply in all the situations where the trick does.
  • Of course, in many cases, the devil really is in the details, but nevertheless knowing the overall strategy of proof is extremely valuable when trying to read that proof.
  • Yong-Hui Says: November 3, 2008 at 5:57 pm | Reply I am in MSRI for the cofference discrete Rigity. Green will give the first lecture. I just happen to find a question for that tricki wiki: Whether is there a common-shared refference system for that tricki wiki? Similar to that of Mathscinet of ams math review It will be a basic instrument for a mathematical website.
1More

科学网-在法国作博士后 (二) - 0 views

www.sciencenet.cn/...user_content.aspx mathcoffee
shared by arithwsun arithwsun on 25 May 08 - Cached
  • 那时候我还不知道Physics Review Letters是物理学中最好的杂志，觉得这么简单的东西就可以发表，我也可以做到。幸亏那时只是在心里想，要是在搞物理的人面前这么说，还不被人家笑话死。
3More

Amazon.com: Complex Analysis (Princeton Lectures in Analysis): Elias M. Stein, Rami Sha... - 0 views

www.amazon.com/...ref=pd_bbs_sr_1 eng-study essay
shared by arithwsun arithwsun on 13 May 08 - Cached
  • In reviewing a textbook, one should consider the background of the book's audience. I believe that this text by Stein and Shakarchi on complex analysis is outstanding, and is appropriate for a student who has the background of a course in real analysis at the level of Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis".
  • The text has a number of strengths. Some of these are the following: 1. The choice of material and the order of presentation are superb. Just to give you a sample, within the first 100 pages, the authors cover Runge's Theorem, the Schwarz Reflection Principle, Riemann's Theorem on Removable Singularities, the Casorati-Weierstrass Theorem, Rouche's Theorem, and the homotopy version of Cauchy's Integral Theorem. The novice is thus treated to some beautiful mathematics very quickly.
  • 3. The proofs are very clear and elegant. The main ideas are emphasized, and just enough details are given so that a diligent student with the background stated above will be able to grasp the arguments.
2More

科学网-金拓的博客-北京生命科学研究所的示范作用与说服力缺憾 - 0 views

www.sciencenet.cn/...user_content.aspx 特区 北京生命所 金拓 大学建设 哲学探讨 抽象名词 featured
shared by arithwsun arithwsun on 10 Aug 09 - Cached
  • 博主回复：我对你最不能接受的地方在于：明明我在谈具体和现实的问题，你不对具体的问题回应，却一再脱离具体问题，纠缠在几个中文词汇上。明明自己在玩抽象，还一再批评别人用词抽象。除了自己外没有人在抽象地谈自由和公平。你再仔细review一下我们的对话，应该不难发现我所说的是否属实。 不说这些 了。当前中国的问题的根本原因在于政治权利的垄断导致了经济利益的垄断（这是与改革开放初期最大的不同之处），学术研究资源的垄断、甚至信息的垄断（或曰不对称）其实包括在广义的经济利益垄断之中。现实地说（即除了政治权利的竞争开放以外），当前中国社会的稳定取决于如何切断政治权利垄断和经济利益垄断之间的联系，使前者不导致后者。作为科学家群体，从学术资源的垄断中突围，打开社会结症的突破口，未尝不是对全体社会的贡献。
  • 可能我没有把自己的意思表达清楚，所以让你没搞清楚我对你此文的攻击方向，让我重新组织一下自己的语言：“自由”，“公正”都是属于人类社会中最抽象的形容词，很难有一个清晰明确的定义。当然，确实有可能在言辞中给这些形容词一个比较清晰的定义，但是往往却会因此在现实中找不到对应物，在现实中不存在的定义，即使言辞清晰也毫无意义。那么为了让它起码覆盖到一定范围的现实对应物，如美国科学界的科研评审体制，就必须将其定义适当的模糊化。但是，一经模糊化之后，我们能用一个模糊化的概念，来批评另一个具体的现实吗？即使这个现实可能确实有问题，但这种思维下的批评并不符合科学的思维方法，即要求出发点（基础）一定要足够的清晰明确。再具体来讲，很简单的一个问题，相应美国大学评审体制而生成的“自由”“公正”定义的适当模糊，能直接拿来用到中国科学体制上吗？答案应为否，应该是既无必然性也无必要性的吧。------------------------------------------------------------关于信息不对称，从这个角度，可以避开那些腐败等说不清道不明的东西。削弱信息不对称，就大大地削弱了腐败的根基。世界上总会存在说不清道不明的东西的，我博文中的一个认识是，让行政系统达到完全透明化（或者说最大可能的），而把那些说不清道不明的东西，放到议会。
1More

科学网-邢志忠的博客-中青年科学家成名的几个国际标准 - 0 views

www.sciencenet.cn/...user_content.aspx SCI 科研评价体系 邢志忠
shared by arithwsun arithwsun on 30 Jun 09 - Cached
  • 1） 发表过一篇或几篇非常有影响力的学术文章（有的很快被证明是对的，有的则很难被证明是对的或错的），引用率在几年之内突破500次，甚至1000次。 2） 应邀在国际重要专业期刊发表过一篇或几篇专题综述性文章，标志着在某个领域或者研究方向成为可以通览全局的专家。 3） 应邀在该学科或者该领域的顶级或次顶级国际大会上做过大会综述报告（plenary review talk），甚至大会总结报告（summary talk）。 4） 在国际一流大学或研究所拿到终身教授（或副教授）职位。 5） 获得享有国际盛誉的政府部门、学术机构或者基金会颁发的纯学术的大奖。
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20▼ items per page