Group items tagged

" Dubroo is a crowd sourced Online Platform for Dubbing Enthusiasts,both the consumers and creators Consumers Users can view youtube videos with different audio files. Dubroo provides youtube videos in multiple audio files helping people of various languages to understand the original video. On Dubroo you can watch videos dubbed by our talented dubbing artists and get knowledge and also enjoy some amazing spoofs . Creators Anybody interested in dubbing can use our recording studio and start recording your audio directly speaking through your browser(Mozilla firefox is preferred). Dubroo makes 'tedious dubbing process' easy by providing a simple option(Check 'Instructions' to record).Users need not download videos,install softwares and then record and merge both audio and video files, then upload a new video. Dubroo eliminates all these tedious process and allows creators to dub directly speaking through your browser. Dubroo's Motto Dubroo encourages people to create existing Youtube videos into multiple languages, helping people of their language to understand the original video. Dubroo believes that language should not be a barrier to access knowledge from the online videos. Instructions Contact Us + Add Video Dubroo Gallery "

Strumento semplice per aggiungere una pista audio doppiata a un video, a quanto ho capito (non l'ho ancora provato)

Andreas Formiconi, 23 gennaio 2016 "...Ma che senso ha parlare di individuazione di tecnologie sostenibili e di scambio di innovazioni fra scuole se allo stesso tempo prepariamo il terreno a quella che è una vera e propria colonizzazione da parte delle multinazionali IT?"

"Fair Use, MOOCs, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Frequently Asked Questions In October 2015 the Librarian of Congress issued new rules permitting certain teachers of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) to break encryption on DVDs, Blu-Ray discs and streaming videos to create short clips for use in their teaching. It's a major step forward for MOOC teachers and their students. This document, prepared by Professors Peter Decherney and Brandon Butler, answers some of the most common questions you might have about the new rule."

(Per il contesto, vedi http://infojustice.org/archives/35654 e http://ipclinic.org/2016/01/22/fair-use-moocs-and-the-digital-millennium-copyright-act-frequently-asked-questions/) Parti problematiche: Coursera and Udacity are for profit companies. Can they take advantage of the exemption? Coursera and Udacity are the platforms. Colleges, universities, museums, and other nonprofit organizations offer courses through these platforms. The organization that creates the course must be an accredited nonprofit educational institution, but the provider of the software platform may be for-profit . So a university course offered through Coursera may take advantage of the exemption. How can the material be restricted to students enrolled in the course? We believe that use of passwords provided only to enrolled students will sufficiently limit access to the course content to students or learners. How can redistribution be prevented? Offering streaming rather than downloadable versions of the course content should reasonably limit unauthorized redistribution of the work. Unfortunately, this unfairly disadvantages learners with slower internet access" Cioè l'autorizzazione a far saltare i blocchi anticopia vale soltant per i MOOC che non sono MOOC perché non sono Open ma protetti da password. E l'argomento secondo il quale il fair use vale per i video di corsi Coursera e Udacity, a patto che gli enti che elargiscono il corso non siano a scopo di lucro, anche se le piattaforme lo sono, è dubbio. in effetti Coursera e Udacity traggono profitto dai materiali proposti da questi enti. Quanto all'offerta dei video in solo streaming per impedirne lo scaricamento: almeno nei corsi Coursera dove il link di scaricamento è stato t

"Last week, the University made its decision final, and announced that it will begin the process of removing all the content on March 15th. To add insult to injury, it turns out that removing this digital library will ultimately end up requiring about five months worth of work- a cost UC Berkeley will be forced to pay."

Articolo "anti-stato" sulla disputa tra Berkeley e il Dipartimento della Giustizia US (DoJ) in merito all'accessibilità dei corsi pubblici di Berkeley. L'autrice ignora deliberatamente diversi fatti: il riconoscimento da parte del DoJ degli sforzi di Berkeley per implementare l'accessibilità, il fatto che i video inaccessibili non verranno cancellati, ma il loro accesso verrà per ora ristretto, ecc,