Skip to main content

Home/ Legal KM/ Group items tagged social-computing

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Lars Bauer

R.I.P. Enterprise RSS - ReadWriteWeb - 0 views

  • For me the absence of Enterprise RSS (and perhaps along with other key infrastructure, like Enterprise Search and social tagging tools) in environments where we find wikis, blogs and social networking tools is a sign of tactical or immature implementations of enterprise social computing. We are just at the beginning of this journey.
  • n this respect, I can actually see many opportunities for integrating Enterprise RSS features into Enterprise Search solutions or into existing portal platforms (actually, Confluence is a great example of a feed friendly wiki platform - both to create and consume).
  • that people are talking too much about technology and products and not enough about real-world use cases. Simply stating how great RSS is and that it could be very useful won't get you much buy-in, not from management nor most importantly end-users.
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • In two of our projects with large law firms we included an RSS feedreader in the social software mix (among wiki, blogs, social bookmarking). We introduced it primarily to Knowledge Management Lawyers (KML) that needed to gather a lot of content from various sources. They also use it to subscribe to updates from the wiki and blogs. They appreciate the fact that it is much easier to plow through a stream of updates rather than going from email to email and deleting every one of them.
  • Have a look at two case studies: Dewey & LeBoeuf and Allen & Overy
  • In our company, we had a survey in April (2008), asking managers if they needed a RSS Reader. Some figures: 72 managers responded, 68 managers subscribed to more than one (company) blog. 9 managers already used iGoogle or a RSS Reader, 13 managers replied they did not need a RSS Reader, 50 managers replied they need a RSS Reader. As a result we planned a project to select and deliver a company RSS Reader. The project will be executed mid 2009.
  • Once CRM, DMS, Intranet and other proprietary system vendors thoroughly implement RSS functionality, it will get a big push.
  • I think a tipping point might come if ERP apps providers (SAP, Oracle, etc.) started publishing RSS feeds of ERP data!
  • In another project with a large law firm we took a very close look at the production (and consumption) of current awareness material. Current awareness included for example information on current developments within legal practices, latest court decisions etc. The firm made extensive use of newsletters to disseminate that kind of information. There was a multitude of newsletters available, some of them covering similar grounds. Maintaining email lists was very time-consuming and frustrating. Consumers did not know which newsletter were available. Also, newsletters were not personalised nor very timely, as they had a specific publishing date. We therefore recommended using RSS as delivery format, which would make the process of producing and consuming content more efficient and in the end more cost-effective as shown in a business case
  • It's with a heavy heart and a sense of bewilderment that we conclude that the market for enterprise-specific RSS readers appears to be dead. Two years ago there were three major players offering software that delivered information to the computers of business users via RSS. Today it looks to us like the demand simply never arose and that market is over.
  • It's insane - a solid RSS strategy can be a huge competitive advantage in any field. We have no idea why so relatively few people see that.
  • Neglecting RSS at work seems to us like pure insanity.
  • If dashboards take off, then maybe RSS will gain traction as the wiring? This probably requires: secure feed displaying widgets, good filters.
  • Enterprises are scared to disrupt their own structure and command lines by introducing uncontrolled information flows both internally (which can route around management) and externally (which can route around the official PR outputs and sales inputs of the company)
  • Look at the headline you used.. RIP Enterprise RSS. Now read that from the point of view of a manager in an enterprise. WTF does "Enterprise RSS" mean? What are the business reasons to care? What does it do for them? People don't care adopt RSS, just as people don't adopt XHTML, Javascript etc. They adopt products that use technology to do something that they value. No one cares about the technologies used to display this page... they want to read the page.
  • Enterprise RSS doesn't mean much. When RSS companies start talking about secure communications channels that intelligently and automatically route relevant information to the people who need/want it, light bulbs start lighting up.
  • I think Microsoft SharePoint could be the killer app for RSS in the enterprise. SharePoint has RSS built in and uses it to syndicate changes that happen within the SharePoint ecosphere and notify enterprise workers that something significant has happened. Of course, SharePoint RSS could work with third-party RSS readers, but it's really designed to be used with Microsoft's Office Suite, where enterprise workers can interface with SharePoint, through RSS and other means, directly
  • One thing missing from this (great) post is the cost of these tools. Looking at Newsgator & Attensa, these are expensive enterprise tools and trying to sell them to IT managers that don't fully understand RSS is next to impossible. Imagine saying to a CIO, who barely understands what RSS is, that you need $175,000 for Enterprise RSS software... it isn't an easy sell.
  • In this part of the world (SE Asia) we're seeing more & more top management wanting tools for themselves and their teams to connect to "Facebook and these social network things". Feeds and aggregation/search tools are the perfect wiring for this. But the front end? There's a lot of choice and individual needs vary. A decently setup igoogle/netvibes page can work wonders..so why pay?
  • Also, reading RSS is likely viewed as not work related, and so its frowned upon within the enterprise (remember, those enterprise folks have "real" work to do, they don't get paid to read BoingBoing all day long).
  •  
    Jan. 12, 2009
Lars Bauer

Andrew McAfee: Enterprise 2.0, version 2.0 - 0 views

  • I'm not satisfied with my earlier definition of Enterprise 2.0, so let's propose a refinement (I'm sorry if this feels a bit pedantic, but clear constructs are important to academics): Enterprise 2.0 is the use of emergent social software platforms within companies, or between companies and their partners or customers.
  • Social software enables people to rendezvous, connect or collaborate through computer-mediated communication and to form online communities. (Wikipedia's definition).
  • Platforms are digital environments in which contributions and interactions are globally visible and persistent over time.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Emergent means that the software is freeform, and that it contains mechanisms to let the patterns and structure inherent in people's interactions become visible over time.
  • Freeform means that the software is most or all of the following: Optional Free of up-front workflow Egalitarian, or indifferent to formal organizational identities Accepting of many types of data
  •  
    May 27, 2006
Lars Bauer

Can the IT department survive Web 2.0? | by Jim Mortleman, ComputerWeekly, Aug 25, 2009 - 0 views

  •  
    Risk-averse IT departments that are too cautious in their approach to Web 2.0 technologies such as social networking, online applications and cloud computing could be signing their own death warrants.
Lars Bauer

Nachlese zum ECM-Summit 2008 in Offenbach | Von Dirk Röhrborn | Atlassian, Co... - 0 views

  • Dieser Beitrag fasst einige der Vorträge aus meiner Sicht zusammen, die ich besucht habe. Enthalten sind die Keynotes von Ulrich Kampffmeyer, Dieter Rappold und LeeBryant sowie Anwenderberichte von der Schweizerischen Post, MLP Finanzdienstleistungen und REVACOM GmbH.
  • Keynote von Ulrich Kampffmeyer zu Human Impact
  • Was ändert Web 2.0 Marketing an Internet Management ? Diesem Thema widmet sich Dieter Rappold von Knallgrau Media aus Wien
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Content is made of people: from ECM to E2.0 Der Vortragende Lee Bryant ist CEO von Headshift aus London. Sein Vortrag beschäftigt sich mit der Transition von Enterprise Content Management zum Enterprise 2.0.
  • Bryants Herangehensweise an Enterprise 2.0 fasst er mit folgenden Punkten zusammen: Public feeds & flows: internal and external RSS, feeds based on subjects, persons, group or search Bookmarks & tags: people store, share, tag, vote or comment on useful links and news Blogs & social bookmarks: social objects shared within networks and discussed in blogs Group collaboration: intimate groups/teams organize knowledge in wikis and group systems personal tools: organise your “stuff” by tags; arrange in a portal; manage networks and feeds Dabei geht es ihm vor allem auch darum, diese Dinge als Stimulanz für die pragmatische Umsetzung der alltäglichen - geschäftskritischen - Aufgaben einzusetzen.
  • Lee Bryant stellt kurz die wichtigsten Vertreter der Enterprise 2.0 Tools vor, die wir auch hier beschrieben haben. Dabei spielt auch Atlassian Confluence eine Rolle. Microsoft Sharepoint kommt bei ihm aber eher schlecht weg, was die Akzeptanz als Enterprise 2.0 Plattform angeht.
  • Post Wide Web: Das Intranet der Schweizerischen Post
  • Social Computing bei MLP Finanzdienstleistungen
  • Einsatz eines Unternehmens-Wikis für das Wissensmanagement am Beispiel von IT-Delivery-Prozessen der REVACOM GmbH
  •  
    Nov 12, 2008
Lars Bauer

Headshift - smarter, simpler, social tools for the enterprise - 0 views

  • Headshift is Europe's leading enterprise social computing consultancy. We have over 5 years' experience in designing, implementing and growing next generation social software solutions. Based in London, we also operate in New York, Paris, Sydney, Rome and Zurich to serve the needs of international companies and local markets alike.
Lars Bauer

Web 3.0 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  • Web 3.0 is one of the terms used to describe the evolutionary stage of the Web that follows Web 2.0. Given that technical and social possibilities identified in this latter term are yet to be fully realized the nature of defining Web 3.0 is highly speculative.
  • Views on the next stage of the World Wide Web's evolution vary greatly, from the concept of emerging technologies such as the Semantic Web transforming the way the Web is used (and leading to new possibilities in artificial intelligence) to the observation that increases in Internet connection speeds, modular web applications, and advances in computer graphics will play the key role in the evolution of the World Wide Web.
Lars Bauer

The Connectbeam Social Computing Blog: Four Enterprise 2.0 Prognostications for 2009 by... - 0 views

  •  
    Jan 09, 2009
Lars Bauer

NewsGator - Press Archive: Ten definitive strategies for Enterprise Social Networking s... - 0 views

  • Are you thinking of deploying something like Facebook as a business tool in your enterprise? Many companies are: Enterprise spending on Web 2.0 technologies will surge over the next five years to reach $4.6 billion globally, predicts Forrester Research. The following strategies will help ensure your initiative flourishes, says social computing company NewsGator in a white paper authored earlier this year.
  •  
    Sept 24, 2008
Lars Bauer

The Connectbeam Social Computing Blog: Three Silos That Enterprise 2.0 Must Break - 0 views

  • why haven't companies instituted better ways to allow expertise to be emergent? Historically, the tools haven't been up to the job. The nature of most business applications is to focus your attention on executing a specific task. It's efficient, but the idea of making what workers know and do accessible to a wider audience was really never part of the plan.
  • Traditional work has three silos which limit companies' ability to realize the full value of emergent expertise: Information silos Knowledge silos Connection silos Addressing these three silos is a key responsbility of Enterprise 2.0 if it is to drive meaningful improvements inside companies.
  •  
    Jan 16, 2009
Lars Bauer

Enterprise 2.0 CEOs Speak Out | SocialComputingMagazine.com - 0 views

  • I thought it was a good time to go straight to the source and speak with the visionary CEOs leading the E2.0 charge.
  • In this four-part CEO series, we'll look at one shortcoming the industry has faced so far and work to rectify it with Defining Collaboration in 2009.
  • From there, we're identifying the Top 5 Challenges facing Enterprise 2.0 in 2009 and looking at the ways these firms plan to survive the coming storm.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • we'll look at one of the new technologies that you could see a lot more of in, Where is Enterprise 2.0 Technology headed in 2009?
  • And finally, for the folks who are planning to move forward with E20 implementations in the coming year, heed the advice of those who have seen the successes and the failures, as they share their Top Enterprise 2.0 Tips for improving workforce collaboration in 2009.
  • Defining Collaboration in 2009
  •  
    Jan 20, 2009
1 - 11 of 11
Showing 20 items per page