Group items tagged

"The Responses to 'Why I Refuse to Vote for Barack Obama'"

"We Say Fight Back"

To explore about the patent insurance coverage policies comprehensively, feel free to approach the industry experienced professionals at Unified Patents. We have the expertise to serve you with the best possible solutions.

On May 19, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed a petition for inter partes review, IPR2016-01060, against claims 1-4, 9, 10, and 21 of U.S. Patent 8,933,945, directed to a method for optimizing memory requests by dividing them.

To get a better protection, it is important to focus on the unique aspects of your invention. A patent search plays a key role in identifying these unique aspects. In this blog, you will learn about the benefits of patent search and review of patent search report.

On June 22, 2016, pursuant to a settlement agreement, Unified Patents Inc. filed a motion to terminate their petition for inter partes review, IPR2016-00836, against claims 1-3, 5-7, 9-16 and 19 of U.S. Patent 8,285,648 (owned and recently asserted by Verify Smart Corp.). A copy of that public filing can be found here.

On September 7, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed a petition for inter partes review against all claims of a patent owned and asserted by Digital Stream IP, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas. The challenged patent, 6,757,913, discusses the wireless transmission of digital data. A copy of the proceeding can be found below.

On September 8, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed its 55th petition for inter partes review, challenging all claims of U.S. Patent 6,442,261 as unpatentable over multiple grounds. The patent, related to identifying dropped telephone calls, had been asserted against automotive companies. A copy of the petition can be found below.

To protect an invention, it is important for an inventor to be familiar with different available rights. This blog is an introduction to patent and you will also learn about other rights such as trademark and trade secret.

Overview: Although overall patent disputes in the district courts have decreased, PTAB filings continue to be stable and NPEs continue to account for more than half of new cases. For PTAB analytics and case information please go to portal.unifiedpatents.com Fig. 1: So far in 2016, 4,532* new patent infringement disputes were filed in district courts or at PTAB.

On September 2, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed a petition for IPR against all claims of U.S. 7,490,037, a patent ostensibly owned and asserted by Digital Audio Encoding Systems, LLC against 28 companies since June 2016. A copy of the petition is found below. Unified Patents Inc. v.

On August 31, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed against a patent owned by Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC. The patent, U.S. 6,466,983, has not been asserted in any district court to date. A copy of the petition can be found below. Unified Patents Inc. v. Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC, IPR2016-01644, Paper 1 (Aug.

There was a time when the technology industry was the only industry that had to bother about patent litigation. Competitors and manufactures had to battle in the court room over the ownership and rights to inventions and the returns obtained from that invention. However, in the present scenario, the entire world has experienced the influence...

Patent is the set of exclusive rights given to the inventor of anything that no other person or company has invented earlier. In case any other person starts making that particular product, without the consent of original patent holder or inventor, then it is categorized as infringement.

On November 2, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Division of Corporation Finance released two new compliance and disclosure interpretations ("C&DIs") addressing eligibility to use Form S-3 registration statements and submission of annual reports to the SEC.

On July 11, 2016, Unified petition for inter partes review in IPR2016-01404 on claims 1, 2, 13-15, 33, 34, 39, 46 and 48 of patent 6,968,459, assigned to Intellectual Ventures II, LLC. The patent discusses restricting access to data storage devices, i.e., limiting data storage to read/write or read-only access privileges.