The whole site is really interesting, I like this article. The author, Tony Wagner, has a new book out about what he calls "The Global Achievement Gap" and what to do about it.
Just as journalists must become more curator than creator, so must educators.
we need to move students up the education chain. They don’t always know what they need to know, but why don’t we start by finding out? Instead of giving tests to find out what they’ve learned, we should test to find out what they don’t know. Their wrong answers aren’t failures, they are needs and opportunities.
Google, he said, is looking for “non-routine problem-solving skills.
“In the real world,” he said, “the tests are all open book,
We must stop looking at education as a product – in which we turn out every student giving the same answer – to a process, in which every student looks for new answers.
Why shouldn’t every university – every school – copy Google’s 20% rule, encouraging and enabling creation and experimentation, every student expected to make a book or an opera or an algorithm or a company
Rather than showing our diplomas, shouldn’t we show our portfolios of work as a far better expression of our thinking and capability?
education serves a unique role in society of preparing individuals for the “vital combat for lucidity”.
This article also appeared in the Charlotte Observer. The question I have is "how can we teach students to read deeply online?" Because online text isn't going away.
he Associate Dean of Faculty Development & Human Resources at my workplace has asked me to recommend five readings (e.g., books, articles, blogpost, etc.) that would help inform his understanding of current changes regarding social networks, knowledge, and technology in education. Rather than develop the list alone, I thought it appropriate to (at least attempt to) crowdsource responses from individuals in my network.
So, what readings would you recommend to an educational leader in charge of faculty development in a teacher education program? Any responses are greatly appreciated.
he broke his content presentations into less than ten minute
streaming video clips, and he interspersed his mini-lectures with
student-centered problem-solving activities.
As I was reviewing information from Brain Rules to confirm my recollection about the 10 minute rule, I found the following quote from Medina that also seems signficant with regard to a possible hybrid course advantage. He says the most common communication mistake is "relating too much information with not enough time devoted to connecdting the dots. Lots of force feeding, very little digestion." Might this be an advantage of presenting information online in a content-heavy course? Maybe the logistics of breaking up a 45 minute period that don't work well face-to-face might work better by presenting some content online. My gut says yet, but I'd like to see real examples of this.
This is interesting because it is consistent with the research report in the book Brain Rules by John Medina. Brain Rules reported that students attention in a class drops a significant amount after 10 minutes and that you need to change gears to get another 10 minutes. So breaking up a video lecture into 10 minutes segments seperated by releveant problem sovling fits right in with that.
Hybrid instructors
should allow six months lead time for course development.
Lesson #3: Start
small and keep it simple.
"Integrate online with face-to-face,
so there aren't two separate courses."
"The emphasis is on pedagogy, not technology.
Ask yourself what isn't working in your course that can be done differently
or better online."
Lesson #4: Redesign
is the key to effective hybrid courses to integrate the face-to-face
and online learning.
, instructors need to make certain that the
time and resources required to create a hybrid course are available
before they commit to the process.
Students need to have strong time management skills in hybrid courses,
and many need assistance developing this skill.
Participation in an online course might be an authentic way to provide high-school (and maybe older middle-school) students the opportunity to practice time management skills in an authentic way. However, this would need to be handled carfully so students who are not successful at first are not completey lost or so far behind that they can't be successful later after learning from their mistakes.
Contrary to many
instructors' initial concerns, the hybrid approach invariably increases
student engagement and interactivity in a course.
Lesson #6: Students
don't grasp the hybrid concept readily.
Lesson #5: Hybrid
courses facilitate interaction among students, and between students
and their instructor.
Surprisingly,
many of the students don't perceive time spent in lectures as "work",
but they definitely see time spent online as work, even if it is time
they would have spent in class in a traditional course.
Lesson #7: Time
flexibility in hybrid courses is universally popular.
Lesson #8: Technology
was not a significant obstacle.
Lesson #9: Developing
a hybrid course is a collegial process.
Lesson #10: Both
the instructors and the students liked the hybrid course model.
They stated that the hybrid
model improved their courses because
Student interactivity
increased,
Student performance
improved, and
They could accomplish
course goals that hadn't been possible in their traditional course.
So what should children be able to do by age 12, or the time they leave elementary school? They should be able to read a chapter book, write a story and a compelling essay; know how to add, subtract, divide and multiply numbers; detect patterns in complex phenomena; use evidence to support an opinion; be part of a group of people who are not their family; and engage in an exchange of ideas in conversation.