Group items tagged

It's a nice article about the consumption in India. The consumption do durable and non-durable goods in India is decreasing at the same time as the inflation is increasing. The value of money is not the same as it was before, so the consumer can't buy the same quantity of products and this reduce the output of the consumers. The interest rates are relatively high so the households prefer to save money at a higher interest rate than loan money from the bank. The decrease of the consumption is real problem for the industrial production, according to the author I think that lower interest rates and reform measures may be able to revive the consumption. Also in my opinion the government should think about new monetary policies to reduce the inflation because the inflation at 10.8% is a serious problem.

This article talks about how Indias consumption is straining. Since the inflation is so high at a level of 10.8% the money has begun to lose its value and therefore the consumption of durable and non-durable goods has decreased as we can see in the article by 8.2% and 1.4%. Causingg the production to decrease by 0.6% further more making the economy suffer more. Although in the article it states that low interest rates and reform measure might be able to increase the consumption of the economy and therefore decrease the already hight inflation rate.

This article might not be as relevant to fiscal policies as the ones from my peers. But I think it is important how the government distributes the money received from the taxes. In the article the author talks about the money that the US government allocates for the aid projects in Afghanistan. Millions tax of dollars were ate up with no results. Those money ended up in the Talibans' hands. It is interesting to read and understand that not always the money received from taxes are effectively used.

House prices in the UK have fallen for the third month in a row. Although the government has supported in mortgage borrowing, but the consumer's uncertainty surrounding the economy and their ability to afford the houses still causes the decrease in price in the market. The increase in demand is believed to be driven by seasonal factors compounded by the Olympics. It is believed that the house prices will continue to decrease slowly over the remainder of the year. There is also the first decline in supply in September after seven months of growth. I think this article fits perfectly under the topic of demand. The basic law states that as price falls, the quantity demanded of the product will usually increase. However, this does not fall under the basic law behind the demand curve, but it indicates that price of houses have fallen as a result of an increase in demand. The Europe's economy isn't doing very well at the moment and it causes more hesitant in how they consumers choose to spend their money. Price may be low, but they may choose to spend their money elsewhere. This does, however, support the supply law. As price falls, the quantity supplied is dropped. Suppliers wouldn't want to produce or supply to any products that isn't very well demanded.

I choose this article because it's surprising that the countries in Africa are experimenting a big economic growth. The article reports that Economic growth in East Africa, including Kenya, is expected to remain among the fastest in Africa this year aided by natural resource discoveries, improved agricultural performance, and economic diversification, a new report showed. The main reason for this economic growth are the natural resources, we have to remember that in Africa there are huge quantities on natural resources. In Africa the main problem is the inequality because the power and the resources are in the hand of few. There are international companies that controls the big parts of the resources. Another issue to take into consideration is that I some Africans countries the government aren't working properly because they use the money to buy weapons or they use the money for they own benefit.

I found a similar article that talked about Africa's situation at the moment, many countries in Africa are having a rapid economic growth, people are becoming wealthier and even a middle class is emerging. Africa in general has got plenty of resources to ensure an econoic growth for many years. However, as you say, inequality is the biggest problem as a minor group within the country owns everything, there is still cheap labour and many people starving to death. I totally agree with you, the governments in Africa don't function properly as they dont allocate the money for people's benefit and they keep it for themselves in order to have more power and become wealthier.

I think they shouldn't increase the tax on the medical device. because if the medical device have higher price. It would be bad for all people, patient might have to pay more money(even though normally is still expensive), they might buy the low quality medical device to save some money to buy another medical device they have to use as well. If the government want to increase the tax they should increase on wine, beer,cigarette, algohols, and kind of that better than the nessessary things like medical device.

this article talks about if we are going to have carbon tax as the increasing of using resource such like fuel by the companies, and the companies made a lot of pollution, it give us a negative externality as a whole. all the people on earth has a bad effect by the pollution, increasing of the carbon is one of the thing companies made, in order to stop companies from keeping producing carbon, let's think about put the carbon tax.

i really like this article as it focuses on the fact of global warming. Also its a new point of view to stop Global warming which could be very effective as they would raise alot of money, to use in the further research of non polutent enegery sources. What they havent realised in this article that Methan has a ration 20:1 to carbon in the field of damage causing global warming and although you dont think there is a lot of methane in the world there is. Every decomposing organic material releases methane and just think about all those decomposing plant matter at the bottom of dams with a huge accumulation of methan waiting to be released.

i really like this article as it focuses on the fact of global warming. Also its a new point of view to stop Global warming which could be very effective as they would raise alot of money, to use in the further research of non polutent enegery sources. What they havent realised in this article that Methan has a ration 20:1 to carbon in the field of damage causing global warming and although you dont think there is a lot of methane in the world there is. Every decomposing organic material releases methane and just think about all those decomposing plant matter at the bottom of dams with a huge accumulation of methan waiting to be released.

A negative externality is a cost incurred by a comapny or a party that did not agree to whatever action caused the extra cost. This article discusses the negative externalities that we incur when we use fossil fuels etc. The cost of production and damage caused by the use of fossil fuels is not included in the price we pay for 1 gallon of gasoline. This is the negative externality. A lot of the government involvement in the private sectors is actually aimed at reducing such negative exteranlities concerned with environmental pollution. Several companies also try to reduce externalities by introducing policies. For example, SAP AG has policies that its employees cannot buy cars that have carbon emissions beyond a certain limit.

Your article is very interesting. In the end the writer talks about the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, two weeks ago or something like that I read that BP (they were the owners of the deepwater Horizon) will pay $4.5 billion in fines and other payments, the largest of its kind in US history. It is a lot of money but how can we estimate the value of million animal life's and the destruction of a big part of the Gulf of Mexico. The worst is that we could avoid it because the BP company saved money in the security systems in these Deepwater. I think that after this disaster the government should check all the deepwaters in order to reduce the possibilities of new cases.

A negative externality is an action of a product on consumers that imposes a negative side effect on a third party. Many negative externalities are related to the environmental consequences of production and use. for example the emmisions of green house gases. in this article it explains that when i company creates negative externalities neither the company nor the consumer pays for them so there the government has to step in to stop it by ptting regulations which increases the cost of the comapanies decreasing the negative externalities. but national companies complain because they say if regulations are set they cant compete with international firms like in china where there are no regulations for fuel negative externalities. for example a negative externality was the gulf of mexico oil spill where BP oil prices didnt rise to clean up the mess but the taxes did

This article talks about the tragedy of commons. The governments are ignoring that instead of reducing the costs and the money used in the public sector they could try to cause an economic growth. This would be better for everybody because the economic growth reduces the deficits better than spending cuts. If we are doing spending cuts in the future we will have to spend a lot of money to fix the common resources and facilities used by all, including our air, water, and public infrastructure. If the problem amount then we will have more difficulties to solve them in the future, we can't leave them for the future generations because we have created those problems and we must solve them.

The British Columbian government has stated in its newest budget a tax increase for incomes over 150,000 dollars and a permanent 1 percent increase for corporate taxes. In the 1990s, the NDP government has implemented a similar tax hike in the hopes of increasing revenue, yet the opposite happened as the rich found ways to evade taxes and even worse found no incentive to work harder. However in 2001, the liberal party slashed taxes and revenue slowly, but surely increased. It is a period of waiting as the new tax increases take effect and to see if past still holds true, or if the future will be brighter.

Obama suggests US can reduce deficit by closing tax loopholes. Deficit is when expenses exceed income. This will allow the US to fund things for the economy's growth without having to raise tax. Obama also says that he wants a fair and transparent tax system and further health care reforms. He says that since US spends a lot, they need additional revenue and also smart spending reductions. This relates to cash inflow and outflow of the economy. US have been dealing will the excess of outgoing money over the incoming money. This becomes public debt for the national. This could possibly slow the the efficiency of how the government can support different sector of the country, such as the economy.

In the past week, the Canadian government has officially stopped making and distributing pennies. This is a strategy on their behalf to save money. No longer will pennies be given back in "change" but instead the price will be rounded off to the nearest 5 cents. Other forms of coins are much cheaper to produce also. It will save the government approximately 11 million dollars a year.

This article demonstartesh how shops are closing because there is not a high enough demand for there products, therefore meaning not enough money is being made.

This article describes the effect of raising taxes on the people. Tax payed by the rich can be used by the government for man reasons such as implementing new policies, improving public amenities, and to benefit the poor. The article says that raising taxes has two main effects, one that people work less since work is now less rewarding. It also may cause people to feel the need to work longer hours because the might need to make some more money to keep the household running. One important determinant of the effect of tax rates is the relative position compared to other countries. Another is the international mobility. This mobility occurs because people believe that in other countries with lower taxes their pay will be greater and they can live a better life. The greater the mobility, the greater the elasticity of supply with respect to changes in taxes.

This article relates directly to the concept of income elasticity of demand and cross elasticity of demand . McDonald's monthly sales fall for the first time in almost 10 years. Its revenue fell by 1.8% last month. This happens because of the various reasons. One results from the unstable economy. People are more cautious about spending their money. A lot of people choose to "eat in", simply because they cannot afford it. This applies a lot to the younger consumers, who have been facing unemployment. The company has also been affected by Europe's economy since the market of Europe counts for 40% of the company's revenue. European economy has been facing recession. There has been a tremendous amount of unemployment, which means a decrease in the general population's income. This directly relates to income elasticity of demand. As income falls, the quantity demanded for products fall as well. In this case, people choose to eat at home to be more frugal. I believe this contradicts a little to the idea of inferior goods. McDonald's may be considered as "inferior goods" to the majority. It is often said that as income decreases, inferior goods will likely benefit from it. However, in this case, McDonald's do not. People choose other alternatives instead, which is eating in. So it is just not McDonald's that has been affected, but a lot of other restaurants and fast food chains too. Furthermore, fierce rivals have also came up with strategies to out compete its competitors. For example, Wendy's Co. has decided to upgrade their menus and offer discounts. This relates to cross elasticity of demand. Obviously, as other rivals offer discounts and as well as an upgrade on their menus, consumers will shift to consuming those products that are slightly cheaper.

According to this article, the recession has induced Americans to reevaluate their spending and adopt cost-saving strategies such as using coupons or taking advantage of sales. Many people have reduced the amount of money they spend, over the last couple of years, especially those who have incomes of under $45,000. "The consumer mindset has changed (…) they've become used to being careful about what they buy and where they buy it." However, while price is a major factor, consumers said that quality was still a top priority. The article indicates that there are certain items that consumers will not go without: The first item on the list was animal protein: 10 percent [of consumers] said they refuse to give up meat, poultry, fish and seafood. Also, 8 percent saying they would not forgo alcohol, tobacco; coffee, tea; milk, juice, or household and laundry supplies. As expected, "38 percent say they're purchasing less clothing and 20 percent said they're buying less expensive brands." Therefore, items such as proteins, alcohol, tobacco, coffee, tea, milk, juice, and household supplies are relatively inelastic goods with regard to income. On the other hand, clothing is an inelastic good during this recession.

In 2009 there was a sharp appearance of the virus H1N1. South America was seriously affected by this virus. That led to sudden demand for vaccine. But some people usually try to get a profit from everything even from someone's misfortune. So that happened in South America too, prices for vaccines went up, but people needed a cure and some of them didn't have so much money for that. Therefore government was compelled to put price ceiling on the vaccine to make it available for infected. "(We) establish a commitment to not buy individually, above the prices set by the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) ... to prevent commercial interests from taking advantage of pandemic panic," she said, summarizing the conclusions of a meeting of the region's health ministries, called to map out a strategy to fight the pandemic.

In this article author talks about excise tax and specificly about excise tax that was imposed in 1898 and survived till nowadays. The purpose of that taxation was to pay for the Spanish-American War. The war was over in 6 months but tax stayed. The amount received from taxation was about $300 billion, and the amount spend on war was $6 billion. This tax is very unfair to customers, "This is a 19th-century tax on a 21st-century technology," says Jim Cicconi, AT&T's general counsel. The original purpose of the tax was to raise revenue for a specific purpose, and to do so in a way that would not be noticed by the average consumer. Today, the purpose is gone, and consumers are definitely feeling the pinch. Businesses and consumers pay the same: 3% of the total. On a $100 phone bill, that works out to $3. On a $10,000 bill - not uncommon for businesses - the tab is about $300. Another important fact pointed in that article is that phones were luxury during XIX century, but now they are almost necessities. Seven federal courts have so far declared the tax to be illegal.

The NHL (national hockey league) is locked out and the whole season is in jeopardy as players and the owners are fighting over who gets the bigger pie of the 3.3 billion in revenue per year. The negative externality resulting from this is that the fans of NHL is left out and may not see a single game until the talks are resolved.

There was a similar case with NBA last year . This is the problem with the sport nowadays, the teams, the athletes and other players are trying to earn more and more money. The sportsmanship is disappearing, there no place for great athletes, for example Lance Armstrong, he was a great racing cyclist, an example of hard work, he had millions of funs and now we know that he was the best .... cheater. In Spain there is a problem now with the TV rights, the main clubs (Real Madrid y Barcelona) are earning the biggest part of television transmissions of the BBVA league (about 70 millions) and the rest of the clubs earn from 2 to 35 million (5-8 clubs are in state of bankruptcy). Nobody thinks that the fans are the most harmed (It is a negative externality).

In this article author talks about the economical influence of immigrant, the burden they bring to the taxpayers and the way one of the leading economists Gordon Haston proposes to solve that problem. So the Haston's idea is to impose taxes on employer for hiring immigrants, thus burden would be on employers and it would ease up the political opposition for immigration, and regular people's taxes will be lower. But in this way the employment of low-skilled immigrants is generating an externality, and that the employer who make up one side of these exchanges are not internalizing the cost of this externality. So the question is who's supposed to pay for immigrants? That question causes the huge discussions in political life of countries, especially this year during the election in US. A lot of people were arguing whether they choose Barack Obama who helps poor people, or to decrease the amount of money they get and choose Romney. It's an important question for any family that pays tax, so I choose that article.

The ocean is one example of a common access ground. It's not exactly owned by anyone. The ocean is being explored more and more everyday. One way is through fisheries. The rapid increase in demand for fishes has led to the sudden decline of the fish populations. Take Bluefin tuna as an example. The increase in demand for tuna sushi has led to a huge depletion worldwide for the past 15 years. This has also led to an increase in price as the populations are becoming more rare. A Bluefin tuna once sold for more than £1m at a Tokyo auction. It is said that most of the tuna caught are shipped to Japan for consumption. Since the ocean has international access, coming up with regulations need to be communicated among many countries. 48 member nations of International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic came out and voted to maintain strict catch quotas. This relates to the tragedy of the common. Anyone can access the ocean and catch as much fishes as they like. They only take into account the money they can gain from catching more tunas. This shows a lack of consideration of the generation where some are only concerned about themselves. Without strict regulations, the population of tunas may become extinct in the near future.

It is a very interesting article because many people doesn´t know about the problem with the fish population. We are depleting all the oceans and we don´t think about the consequence of our acts. The problem is that we are really selfish because no one care about the future generation. We will leave them a completely depleted world (this idea is very present in the film Avatar) However it is very difficult to control the people from capturing too many or too small fishes or other animals. It is a tragedy of commons because it is the depletion of a shared resource by individuals, acting independently and rationally according to each one's self-interest, despite their understanding that depleting the common resource is contrary to the group's long-term best interests.