Group items tagged

This article looks at the Elasticity of Demand and Supply for oil. The increased costs of the production and higher prices are not leading to a fall in demand, but instead a fall in the elasticity of demand.

This article fits in my opinion very well to the topic of elasticities. It deals with price elasticity of both supply and demand for oil. The author is concerned with the increasing inelasticity of supply: "reserves we're now exploiting are not only more expensive to develop, but they also take much longer between the time the first well is drilled and the when the first oil is produced". There's also a graph in the article which shows the constant fluctuations of both supply and demand for oil, and how the American oil supply struggles to adjust itself to American demand for oil.

This article addresses the changes that have occurred in the oil market over the past ten years. The author claims that changes in the demand of oil have increasingly been playing a role in maintaining the supply/demand balance. He argues that these changes will be burdensome to our economy unless the demand for oil is made more flexible. According to the article, there is not a shortage of oil. Today, due to rising oil prices, we are able to exploit oil reserves which were previously too expensive to exploit. Since these new oil reserves are more expensive to develop and take longer to access, the time it takes for oil supply to respond to changes in price is increasing as well. This means that "...the oil is becoming less elastic..." meaning that "a large change in price produces a small change in supply." In regards to the elasticity of demand, "the elasticity of oil reflects the options we have to using oil for our daily needs." Our ability to reduce oil consumption is fairly limited in the short term, but increases over the long term. However options for reducing oil consumption over any time period are often inconvenient. Reductions in demand due to high prices can be called demand destruction (a permanent move down the demand curve toward reduced demand) which can be detrimental to the economy. This is why people such as the media and politicians wish to have supply adapt to changes in demand instead. However, "there are also limits to the ability of oil supply to adjust." Oil is not easily accessible. Because oil supply has become less elastic, prices has had to become more volatile to force market adjustments. The author concludes by suggesting ways that the elasticity of oil demand can be increased and the pain of demand destruction decreased.

In economy we always say food is always inelastic, diaries such as cheese, cheese, butter are considered necessity for people and the price should be inelastic with PED less than 1. As time is changing, the raise of price will cause less revenue, it's not as inelastic as it use to be. The government use to be the biggest clients and they have control over the elasticity of the product, which they aren't any more. There are also a lot more alternative to fluid milk as well. This is also relating to the FDA's view on butter, it use to be vilified and now it seem to be the best product available, people are buying butter, but as the price increase, they buy a little less. We see this change in restaurants as well, McDonald's are moving away from cheeseburger and pizza restaurant are putting less cheese on their product.

I think this shows how time also has an effect on elasticity. In the past dairy has been typically seen as an inelastic product but it is now viewed as an elastic product. There have also been growing amounts of substitutes to dairy products especially milk product substitutes.

This article looks into the reasons while dairy demand has become more elastic in recent years. In the past, demand for dairy products was fairly inelastic. However, that has changed. In the past, the US government purchased a large amount of dairy products which kept prices stable but that is no longer the case which has caused prices to destablize. Additionally, there are now many alternatives to fluid milk with more stable price. As a result, it has become the most elastic dairy product. Butter and cheese are less elastic. The article also mentions that restaurants and fast food restaurants drive the fluctuation in dairy demand.

This article speaks about the Supper Bowl and how it is inelastic. Because the quantity demanded for seats is inelastic, they decided to increase the price to gain more revenue. This is strange because this seems to be a luxury item more than a necessity, but I guess some see it as a necessity.

this article talks about how NfL owners price there tickets inelasticity so they put their tickets cheaply so they can fill up the stadium. Owners know that they will take a hit in ticket revenue but make up the difference with complimentary goods that are sold in the stadium.

It's interesting how the teams take advantage of elasticity. As Ricardo said, the owners expect to make a loss on the seats with lower prices, but also expect to make it up with the purchase of complimentary goods. Because of elasticity, the decrease in the price of seat leads to higher demand and the stadium is filled up. As a result, revenue for complimentary goods also increases, leading to more revenue overall.

Raise in market price of soda in Chicago is discussed. Will it result in an increase in revenue and reduction in consumption? The PED suggests so. A similar policy was introduced in Mexico, and the soda there had a PED of 0,6, making it inelastic. Will the same happen in Chicago? Demand, elasticity and the PED are discussed in this article.

How exactly has this affected the elasticity? You should elaborate on price and its relation to demand and the PED. I agree that the raise in price would increase revenue and reduce consumption. However you contradict your previous point by stating that soda will become inelastic. I don't agree with you because soda is not a necessity and it is not healthy so if there is a raise in price and PED which will cause demand to decrease meaning it is elastic.

This article shows that a limited liability company named Linn Energy had their stocks lose value heavily, as well as a massive revenue decrease. This happened because of the oil bust, which was a massive decrease in demand for oil. Since the oil demand was becoming elastic due to the fact that it was a necessity for which alternative methods had been or started to be found (coal, solar energy, etc.), there was not much that could be done about the decrease in demand, which in turn took a toll on Linn Energy.

The oil bust definitely would cause a decrease in demand but it would also cause a decrease in supply because a bust is a "decrease in economic growth and production." I however have to say that u probably misunderstood the concept of elastic and inelastic. Oil demand would be inelastic because oil is a product that is necessary for a lot of human activities and since it is a necessity, demand would be inelastic and not elastic.

The Russian recession has caused sales for luxury goods to drop. Many companies that sell luxury or tourism goods have seen the demand for their product significantly decrease since the recession. This is because these products have a negative income elasticity so as income decreases so does the demand for these products. The demand for tour groups and hotels has also decreased because of the recession. Since all of theses products have a negative elasticity once the income of the buyers in Russia decreases then so will the demand for them.

This article discusses the impact of the Russian recession on demand for luxury goods. The recession has decreased the income and spending power of many Russians which has resulted in a decrease in a demand for luxury goods (clothing, jewelry, etc.) and services (airfare, hotels, etc.). The demand for luxury goods is very elastic. This is because luxury goods are not necessities and consumers can survive without them. These goods often have a reasonable number of substitutes. They also require a relatively high proportion of income to be spend on them and are used over a long period of time. The Russian recession has impacted firms across the globe but especially in Europe where Russian consumers account for a large percentage of customers.

In the economy we see that the Milk is a need and it will be consumed by the people, no matter what the cost is. If this scenario, was based in the city then the increase of price would not matter, as it has many substitutes such as packaged milk and that too from different companies. This makes the PED elastic. But in the village, as the access to the packaged milk is less. They need the milk and therefore making the PED inelastic.

Forbes business prediction for the prices of US steel, published September 17th, 2015. US steel market is elastic, as many alternatives are available (steel from China, and other imports), causing the author to predict that US firms will reduce prices in an attempt to increase sales (and thus revenue). Also deals with government involvement in steel market.

This article, published by Fortune Magazine on October 3, 2015, describes how the decline in global commodity prices has led to economic problems in developing countries. Also, these falling prices have impacted sellers of valuable primary sector goods such as the Middle East's Gulf States, which supply oil to much of the world.

Chipotle's supply of avocados have reduced and because of this the price of their food has increased. This involves a non-price determinant which is because it became harder to obtain a product its price increased which also caused the price of another product to increase.

I also choose this article because it was a good article about supply and i also like to eat at chipotles

P3.01 Favorite Article. Temitopes article is my favorite article because its about chipotle. This article covers pretty much all the aspects that we have learned so far. It shows demand, reply and elasticity all because of how chipotle increased the price because of the low supply of avocado.

One of the main things we talked about or that stood out to me was how the income of the indivisible affected demand of a good and it seems we all came to a consensus that luxury goods are most affected by changes in income. In the article a BMW car company speaks out it's total revenue has been decreasing as the economy is slowing down . Over the past 5 years China has been experiencing periods of economic downturn and car sales were declining drastically people were even canceling orders, however, increased government action led to a period of economic growth in the third year which increased sales by 4% or so. But things slowed down again this year and Song ( an owner of the company ) talked about how he had to cut prices even further from 4%- 20% just to increase consumer demand even though it only made a slight difference because people's income have decreased they can't spend as much money as they used to on luxury products such as BMW cars or multiple cars, they are now focused on saving money.

I agree that the demand for luxury cars has declined as a result of decreased economic growth in China. Shares of some luxury car companies have dropped by more than 30% in the last year while shares of an inexpensive compact car manufacturer have increased more than 20%. The demand for luxury cars is very elastic. These cars are a luxury, not a necessity. Luxury goods take up a relatively large proportion of income and are used over a long period of time. There are a relatively high number of substitutes for luxury goods. In China, customers are choosing to purchase inexpensive cars rather than luxury vehicles in order to save money.

Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL) and state-run Oil & Natural Gas Corp. (ONGC), India's biggest natural gas producers, plunged in Mumbai after India's cabinet deferred a move to increase natural gas prices by three months. Reliance dropped 3.7 percent to 1,011.90 rupees, the biggest decline since Sept.

Starbucks has raised its prices by 8%. Even though only about 20% of Starbucks consumers will be affected by these price increases they will not reduce demand. This is because Starbuck's coffee is a very popular and addictive product. A price increase barely has an effect on inelastic products like Starbucks packaged grocery coffee and K-cup single serve products.

Several prominent articles this year that have taken a position against energy efficiency have attracted enough press attention to require formal refutations. But these articles all have something in common: an ideological belief that markets work best unconditionally, and therefore that a carbon pollution fee is the "first-best" economic solution to climate change.

Switzerland Considers Banning Volkswagen Diesel Car Sales Because there the scandal relating to the Volkswagen's pollution in diesel engines, Thomas Rohrbach, spokesman for the Swiss federal office of roadways decides he should ban all cars with diesel engine in the "Euro 5 emission category" including all VW cars. This could affect  180,000 unsold cars in the country

Investment firm, Bernstein, reaffirmed its Outperform rating on Apple, along with a price target of $135. The firm has noted the first weekend sales of the newest iPhone, which the company declared to surpass 13 million units. Its predecessor iPhone 6 managed to reach over 10 million sales volume in the opening weekend, which was a record back then.

With the lower prices less oil production falls. The lower prices also leads to less capital into the market and smaller companies with loans will struggle to pay back due to less revenue and profit. Some may have to declare bankruptcy. It is almost impossible to increase prices, because then other firms will offer cheaper oil and win your customers. The PED of oil is close to infinity and the XED between the oil of two different companies are a very high positive value

This article talks briefly about how commodities are traded between different places. It talks about how the goods are traded for a specific price then how "many traders use commodity futures to speculate on future price movements." in which they product will be sold on the market

The head of a US pharmaceutical company has defended his company's decision to raise the price of a 62-year-old medication used by Aids patients by over 5,000%. Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired the rights to Daraprim in August. CEO Martin Shkreli has said that the company will use the money it makes from sales to research new treatments. The question here is whether it is morally defendable to increase revenue by increasing prices to an amount poor people cannot afford. He says the extra money will go to research, but is it worth making the medicine too expensive for poor people?