Group items tagged

The price of coffee has been going up and will keep at it but this doesn't seem to affect demand as demand is still increasing. Now quality is not affected by price. These can be based on the fact that the product is addictive and not many substitutes will suffice. Some even think of it as a ritual every morning.

I agree that coffee is inelastic because it is typically contains caffeine which is an addictive drug. People are addicted to coffee and depend on it as part of their daily lives. They cannot function without it, or are at least unwilling to. Therefore, consumers will continue to purchase coffee despite rising prices. Coffee drinkers also enjoy the last of coffee and are not willing to switch to other caffeine filled drinks such as tea or soda because they are not close enough substitutes. In fact, coffee consumption has actually increased despite rising prices. Consumers will not change their tastes unless prices become drastically higher.

i agree with the point that the change in qunatity demanded is not very significant. This is due to the fact the coffee is a habit forming good and addictive to most coffee addicts. However it also depends on the proportion of income spent on the good. Coffee prices can range from being dirt cheap at hawker centres to expensive at cafes like Starbucks. Hence even if the consumer is not a coffee addict, and only a small proportion of income ( if it is 'insignificant' ) is spent on the good, then a change in price will not affect the spending behaviour ; demand is price inelasic

This article speaks about the Supper Bowl and how it is inelastic. Because the quantity demanded for seats is inelastic, they decided to increase the price to gain more revenue. This is strange because this seems to be a luxury item more than a necessity, but I guess some see it as a necessity.

this article talks about how NfL owners price there tickets inelasticity so they put their tickets cheaply so they can fill up the stadium. Owners know that they will take a hit in ticket revenue but make up the difference with complimentary goods that are sold in the stadium.

It's interesting how the teams take advantage of elasticity. As Ricardo said, the owners expect to make a loss on the seats with lower prices, but also expect to make it up with the purchase of complimentary goods. Because of elasticity, the decrease in the price of seat leads to higher demand and the stadium is filled up. As a result, revenue for complimentary goods also increases, leading to more revenue overall.

This article looks at the Elasticity of Demand and Supply for oil. The increased costs of the production and higher prices are not leading to a fall in demand, but instead a fall in the elasticity of demand.

This article fits in my opinion very well to the topic of elasticities. It deals with price elasticity of both supply and demand for oil. The author is concerned with the increasing inelasticity of supply: "reserves we're now exploiting are not only more expensive to develop, but they also take much longer between the time the first well is drilled and the when the first oil is produced". There's also a graph in the article which shows the constant fluctuations of both supply and demand for oil, and how the American oil supply struggles to adjust itself to American demand for oil.

This article addresses the changes that have occurred in the oil market over the past ten years. The author claims that changes in the demand of oil have increasingly been playing a role in maintaining the supply/demand balance. He argues that these changes will be burdensome to our economy unless the demand for oil is made more flexible. According to the article, there is not a shortage of oil. Today, due to rising oil prices, we are able to exploit oil reserves which were previously too expensive to exploit. Since these new oil reserves are more expensive to develop and take longer to access, the time it takes for oil supply to respond to changes in price is increasing as well. This means that "...the oil is becoming less elastic..." meaning that "a large change in price produces a small change in supply." In regards to the elasticity of demand, "the elasticity of oil reflects the options we have to using oil for our daily needs." Our ability to reduce oil consumption is fairly limited in the short term, but increases over the long term. However options for reducing oil consumption over any time period are often inconvenient. Reductions in demand due to high prices can be called demand destruction (a permanent move down the demand curve toward reduced demand) which can be detrimental to the economy. This is why people such as the media and politicians wish to have supply adapt to changes in demand instead. However, "there are also limits to the ability of oil supply to adjust." Oil is not easily accessible. Because oil supply has become less elastic, prices has had to become more volatile to force market adjustments. The author concludes by suggesting ways that the elasticity of oil demand can be increased and the pain of demand destruction decreased.

Due to the bad weather in France, the quality of wheat used to make bread have been affected leading to an increase in the price of flour. Other factors that lead to the increase in prices include the Ukrainian crisis and the Russian ban on wheat exports. Because flour and wheat have many uses, the demand for these products will hardly be affected which makes them inelastic. Supply on the other hand will decrease because of the bad harvest faced by farmers.

Some key words "like determinants of price" of price which we learned in that week could have been used to explain why season affected the price of flour. With demand steadily increasing and supply diminishing Fonge could've talked about PED which she brought up but never used the term. In her comment she said wheat and flour being inelastic are not affected by any change in price so wheat has a low PED.

Chipotle's supply of avocados have reduced and because of this the price of their food has increased. This involves a non-price determinant which is because it became harder to obtain a product its price increased which also caused the price of another product to increase.

I also choose this article because it was a good article about supply and i also like to eat at chipotles

P3.01 Favorite Article. Temitopes article is my favorite article because its about chipotle. This article covers pretty much all the aspects that we have learned so far. It shows demand, reply and elasticity all because of how chipotle increased the price because of the low supply of avocado.

In the fourth quarter, New Zealand's terms of trade declined as weaker prices for dairy and meat saw export prices falling more than import prices. The merchandise goods terms of trade fell 2% in the fourth quarter, export prices fell 5.7%, and import prices dropped 3.7%. Terms of trade measure the buying power of New Zealand's exports abroad. In the fourth quarter dairy export prices fell 13% while volumes fell 0.9% and the value of exports fell 6.7% to $2.9 billion. The average price for while miles power has dropped 18% at the four fortnight Global Dairy Trade actions this year to US$1890 as global milk supply continues to outweigh demand and weaker dairy has hit the broader economy.

Raise in market price of soda in Chicago is discussed. Will it result in an increase in revenue and reduction in consumption? The PED suggests so. A similar policy was introduced in Mexico, and the soda there had a PED of 0,6, making it inelastic. Will the same happen in Chicago? Demand, elasticity and the PED are discussed in this article.

How exactly has this affected the elasticity? You should elaborate on price and its relation to demand and the PED. I agree that the raise in price would increase revenue and reduce consumption. However you contradict your previous point by stating that soda will become inelastic. I don't agree with you because soda is not a necessity and it is not healthy so if there is a raise in price and PED which will cause demand to decrease meaning it is elastic.

In economy we always say food is always inelastic, diaries such as cheese, cheese, butter are considered necessity for people and the price should be inelastic with PED less than 1. As time is changing, the raise of price will cause less revenue, it's not as inelastic as it use to be. The government use to be the biggest clients and they have control over the elasticity of the product, which they aren't any more. There are also a lot more alternative to fluid milk as well. This is also relating to the FDA's view on butter, it use to be vilified and now it seem to be the best product available, people are buying butter, but as the price increase, they buy a little less. We see this change in restaurants as well, McDonald's are moving away from cheeseburger and pizza restaurant are putting less cheese on their product.

I think this shows how time also has an effect on elasticity. In the past dairy has been typically seen as an inelastic product but it is now viewed as an elastic product. There have also been growing amounts of substitutes to dairy products especially milk product substitutes.

This article looks into the reasons while dairy demand has become more elastic in recent years. In the past, demand for dairy products was fairly inelastic. However, that has changed. In the past, the US government purchased a large amount of dairy products which kept prices stable but that is no longer the case which has caused prices to destablize. Additionally, there are now many alternatives to fluid milk with more stable price. As a result, it has become the most elastic dairy product. Butter and cheese are less elastic. The article also mentions that restaurants and fast food restaurants drive the fluctuation in dairy demand.

The above article is about the price mechanism and how it is used to price oil. It talks about how the price is allocated depending on other companies as well as demand, which is why i think that this article is very appropriate as a real life example of what I am studying on this chapter.

Starbucks has raised its prices by 8%. Even though only about 20% of Starbucks consumers will be affected by these price increases they will not reduce demand. This is because Starbuck's coffee is a very popular and addictive product. A price increase barely has an effect on inelastic products like Starbucks packaged grocery coffee and K-cup single serve products.

Dairy prices have seen a drop lately because of high demand farmers increased the number of cows that produce milk, then again dairy is a primary product and as we learned this week, there is only so much a population can consume of a primary good, and too much supply with an un-proportional demand calls for a decrease in price in order to form another equilibrium.Although the PED for milk is inelastic, it's still a limited primary good and the supply of this having increased creates high PEs especially since season does not affect cows.

This article, published by Fortune Magazine on October 3, 2015, describes how the decline in global commodity prices has led to economic problems in developing countries. Also, these falling prices have impacted sellers of valuable primary sector goods such as the Middle East's Gulf States, which supply oil to much of the world.

The global oil equilibrium has become extremely fragile and the price of oil has been rising without stopping. Which has been causing the supply to increase but the demand to decrease significantly. Throwing it off its equilibrium

This article is really interesting because oil is so important to us in so many ways. As with the example of the couple in Iowa, everything from transportation to feeding animals is affected by the changes in price. The smallest increase in price could cause a shift in equilibrium and could leave hundreds, if not thousands, of people facing shortages.

I have found this article suprisingly amusing as I am a chocolate lover. The article talks about the fact that the world demand for chocolate is outgrowing the cocoa beans available. Therefore the prices are rising dramatically, especially in Asia. The author assumes that by 2020 the prices will be extremely high, because the demand is becoming unsustainable. I believe that this is a great article to illustrate what I have learnt in the past chapter because it illustrates a real world situation where the price rises with the supply.

Forbes business prediction for the prices of US steel, published September 17th, 2015. US steel market is elastic, as many alternatives are available (steel from China, and other imports), causing the author to predict that US firms will reduce prices in an attempt to increase sales (and thus revenue). Also deals with government involvement in steel market.

With the lower prices less oil production falls. The lower prices also leads to less capital into the market and smaller companies with loans will struggle to pay back due to less revenue and profit. Some may have to declare bankruptcy. It is almost impossible to increase prices, because then other firms will offer cheaper oil and win your customers. The PED of oil is close to infinity and the XED between the oil of two different companies are a very high positive value

("This market is trying to...) In a chat with ET Now, Anup Maheshwari, Head of Equities and Corporate strategy, DSP BlackRock Investment Managers Pvt Ltd, shares his views on the market and certain sectors.

This article relates to the topic about Market Equilibrium because firms are ready to fic prices at where they hope will be the market equilibrium. Price mechanism is important because the article mentions that prices aree high which means that if prices are high then th eproducers will incentive to create more goods.

This article speaks about the increase in demand for oranges because weather conditions have damaged the harvest of other fruit, such as apples and bananas. These weather conditions have caused the fruits to increase in price because of the lack of supply available. As a result oranges became the number one choice because of its lower price, so people were able to get more for their money. However, the wealth of the company producing the oranges hasn't been shared with the people due to the cost of transportation. They will see if these result will change depending on the next harvest.

The head of a US pharmaceutical company has defended his company's decision to raise the price of a 62-year-old medication used by Aids patients by over 5,000%. Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired the rights to Daraprim in August. CEO Martin Shkreli has said that the company will use the money it makes from sales to research new treatments. The question here is whether it is morally defendable to increase revenue by increasing prices to an amount poor people cannot afford. He says the extra money will go to research, but is it worth making the medicine too expensive for poor people?

The biggest long-term factor in the oil price is the cost of replacing oil wells as they run out ("deplete" in industry parlance). Rising oil prices will not decrease demand , as oil is a necessity and it has a price inelastic demand.