Skip to main content

Home/ Media & Culture @ HM/ Group items tagged times

Rss Feed Group items tagged

shinil kim

The iPhone Jailbreak: A Win Against Copyright Creep - 0 views

  •  
    4. Date Issued: Wednesday, Jul. 28, 2010. An article from the TIME magazine written by Adam Cohen. Cohen, a lawyer, is a former TIME writer and a former member of the New York Times editorial board. The article focuses on the jail breaking being legal or illegal and the fight between Apple and customers who rebels against all the rules Apple has chosen for them; unfairly. But the Liberty of congress has concluded that jail breaking is a fair use. Also The Electronic Frontier Foundation mentioned that they asked the Copyright Office to give a green light to the people who jailbreaks their iPhones. But of course there are others who go against jail breaking and say that it is indeed illegal. The author here is unbiased and informative even though he is 'one of those iPhone maniacs' because he shows both point of views equally.
Adam Kenner

Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon's Hidden Hand - New York Times - 0 views

  •  
    To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as "military analysts" whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world. Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration's wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.
Adam Kenner

Media - News - Times Topics - The New York Times - 0 views

  •  
    News about media, including commentary and archival articles published in The New York Times.
Mike .

Copyright Challenge for Sites That Excerpt - 0 views

  •  
    Issued: March 2009. Big companies are starting to crack down on copyright infringements. With over 15 lawsuits in 2007, the number of lawsuits targeted against blogs has started to rapidly rise. The author, Brian Stelter, is a writer for New York Times who's main focus is on television and the digital media. This article seems to be aimed at the big companies who the author believes are unfairly digging into to copyright laws. The article mentions a lot of disputes such as the ones between New York Times and Gate House Media, Silicon Alley Insider and The Wall Street Journal, Associated Press and All Headlines News and others. Most of the websites getting sued were blogs or newspaper websites that quoted other people's works, assuming it would be okay under the "fair use" statute of copyright laws.
  •  
    i went to the New York Times online to search the term, "copyright" to get an article relating to copyright issues or infringement. this article by Brian Stelter was published on March 1st, 2009. Stelter is a journalist for the New York Times. Stelter sides with the people who claim to be getting copyrighted. He bases the majority of his article against the bloggers and other online publishes "who seem to be on the rise." He also questions when excerpting from an article becomes illegal copying. Although he mostly sides with the people claiming to be copyrighted he also sheds light on those bloggers and online publishers whom give credit to those sites they excerpted information from. Statler keeps bringing up the issue of "excerpting to find value" in which online publishers combine articles to validate their thesis. In the end, Statler shows both sides of the story and doesn't leave out any information regarding the thoughts of both parties.
  •  
    By BRIAN STELTER Published: March 1, 2009 Brian Stelter focuses on a quotation from the Silicon Alley Insider which quoted a quarter of Peggy Noonan's Wall Street Journal. "We thank Dow Jones in advance for allowing us to bring it to you." The editor added "in advance" because Dow Jones, the publisher of The Journal, had not given the blog permission to use the column. With this particular instance of copyright infringement and others, Stetler brings light to the fact that permission isn't being given between different industries when taking direct quotations or titles from that industries publication. "Some media executives are growing concerned that the increasingly popular curators of the Web that are taking large pieces of the original work - a practice sometimes called scraping - are shaving away potential readers and profiting from the content." He also brings up the numerous lawsuits that arise because of copyright infringement.
Adam Kenner

Text - Text - Obama's State of the Union Address - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it's time to try something new. Let's invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let's meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let's try common sense. (Laughter.) A novel concept.To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust -– deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we have to take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue -- to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; to give our people the government they deserve. (Applause.)That's what I came to Washington to do. That's why -– for the first time in history –- my administration posts on our White House visitors online. That's why we've excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs, or seats on federal boards and commissions.But we can't stop there. It's time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my administration or with Congress. It's time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office.With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests –- including foreign corporations –- to spend without limit in our elections. (Applause.) I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. (Applause.) They should be decided by the American people. And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems.I'm also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. Applause.) Democrats and Republicans. (Applause.) Democrats and Republicans. You've trimmed some of this spending, you've embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. (Applause.) Tonight, I'm calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single Web site before there's a vote, so that the American people can see how their money is being spent. (Applause.)
  •  
    See highlighted section on the Supreme Court decision just past halfway
Adam Kenner

Album tells the story of the first Jeopardy! 3-way tie (set in ancient Greece) Boing Boing - 0 views

  •  
    "On March 16, 2007, a great thing happened in Culver City, California. For the first time ever, all three contestants of the game show Jeopardy, without ending in a score of zero, tied. At the time, at least two incorrect interpretations of this event were made; one being that it was a chance occurrence, the other that it was caused by mistake."
india art n design

The Time Stairs at Markthal - winning historical beats! - 0 views

  •  
    Witness Rotterdam's history like never before on The Time Stairs at Markthal
Andrew Silberstein

Copyright Time Bomb Set to Disrupt Music, Publishing Industries Read More http://www.w... - 1 views

  •  
    This article discusses the chance of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976 coming back to create tumult in the musical business. This could be caused due to provisions that allow authors or their heirs to terminate copyright grants.The Copyright Act includes two sets of rules which are If an artist or author sold a copyright before 1978, they or their heirs can take it back 56 years later. If the artist or author sold the copyright during or after 1978, they can terminate that grant after 35 years.
Maia S-H

http://www.dentyne.com/index.php?cat=ads&ad=tv&p=1 - 0 views

  •  
    Dentyne's Make Face Time ad campaign.
india art n design

'Left Out' or 'Trapped Inside'?! - 0 views

  •  
    Many a time art becomes the via media to evoke responsiveness in the numbed disposition called mankind! Check out artist Maxwell Rushton's installation that put the thoughts back into you cap!!
india art n design

Highly Desirable Boulevard - 0 views

  •  
    Many a time, just one striking feature becomes the identity of the architect and the building. Check out the Das Gerber shopping mall in Stuttgart and leave us your views…
india art n design

Graphically Dynamic! - 0 views

  •  
    The Grafiosi introduces itself for the first time at the 2015 London Design Festival and officially launches its latest retail brand OriginOne. Check it here and leave us your comments…
Adam Kenner

TV at heart of multi-billion-dollar US election industry | Raw Story - 1 views

  •  
    In the last 60 years paying for advertising time has become the prevailing issue for anybody seeking elected office in the United Stares.
Alexandra Stein

In Digital Age, Advancing a Flexible Copyright System - 2 views

  •  
    Date Issued - June 26, 2006. This article is about Creative Commons and how people are trying to enforce it so that artists don't necessarily have to sign off on having their work as being copyright. Larry Rohter (the author) is a journalist who was a South American bureau chief of the New York Times but was originally born in Illinois. Rohter is for Creative Commons because everyone he quotes in his article supports this new idea. This article shows the good side of Creative Commons and how much of an advantage it could be for artists who like to make remix's, or use other artists work for a different type of art.
Kelvin Rhee

U.S. court orders Limewire shut down due to copyright infringement - 1 views

  •  
    An article from BNO News has recently reported that LimeWire has been shut down by a U.S. court on claims that the site was used for infringement. LimeWire is notorious for allowing its users to download music without paying for the file, which begs the question, is this legal? The Recording Industry Association of American, which represents several important record labels such as Sony, EMI, Universal, and Warner filed a lawsuit against LimeWire in 2006 stating that the company was allowing downloading of illegal music, violating the terms of the music's copyright. Since these record labels own the copyrights to the majority of the music that was being distributed, they were losing money and business because they were not getting paid for the use of their music. Lime Group, the company that owns LimeWire, continues to function otherwise, it is just this subsidiary that has been ceased to conduct business. Although the future seems bleak for LimeWire, its CEO remains optimistic.
  •  
    On October 27, 2010 a very popular music sharing application called Limewire was shut down due to copyright infringement. BNO news reported the story to wireupdate.com and the a few record labels like SOny, EMI, Universal and Warner filed a lawsuit against Limewire in 2006 so this is nothing new for the file sharing company. The Lime Group CEO and owner of Limewire George Searle said "challenging time, we are excited about the future." So he seems to have a good outlook on the future eeven though his company is going through this touch time.
Carolyn Rheinstein

Visual Artists to Sue Google Over Vast Library Project - 0 views

  •  
    Issued on April 6, 2010 in San Francisco. This article was written by Miguel Helft in the New York Times. He is a well known author for the New York Times that covers Internet companies such as Google or Yahoo. This article discusses how photographers and other artists filed a lawsuit against google for the mass copying their work. The artists claimed that they were not adequately compensated by google for the use of their work. Google was given permission from the visual artists to scan their work onto the website, however the artists feel that this partnering program with Google turned out to be unfair. Google is now being sued for copyright infringement. This article is informative to all people because it shows that even largely popular websites like Google may not be as trustworthy as perceived.
Sinai Cruz

Copyright Risks in Embedding Youtube Clips - 0 views

  •  
    Embedding Youtube videos into your website can be a dangerous thing, as it might not be you that's uploaded a copyright infringing video, but it can be you that accidentally embeds a Youtube clip that is infringing made by someone else, into your website. The law against this is: Any time you incorporate a copyrighted work into a site without the rightsholders' consent, you're potentially liable to be sued. Because people are seeing that on your website, it doesn't matter if it's on Youtube or not, or whether you made it or not, you embedded it somewhere else. It also does not matter whether the person knew it was copyright infringement or not. If an innocent embedder were to be taken to court, they could still be fined up to $30,000. However, because of Youtube's copyright infringement policy, it can remove the copyrighted work from Youtube and the websites it was embedded in. Also, there would be little gain for the rightsholder if the person with the website they sued couldn't afford a lawsuit, which would hardly be worth their time. Also, there are precautions that the embedder should take as well, to ensure that even if they do post copyrighted material, they won't really be potential candidates to be sued.
Adam Kenner

State of the Art - From Netflix, a Step Toward Any Movie, Anytime - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    Any movie, any time. Is that too much to ask?
Maia S-H

Show Me the Money: Find Your Unclaimed Funds | NBC New York - 0 views

  •  
    There's a Website set up where you can check on your unlaimed funds. Related Stories Soundcheck: Hangin' Out With Paper Route Fashion Week: Not Dead! Super Bowl Planner: Drink Specials to Special Sandwiches You can also go to the State's website or call 1-800-221-9311. If you find a lot of money, NBCNewYork.com wants to know. Leave your comments below, and then let us know your story by emailing here. Post a Comment Print Email Share Share Del.icio.us Buzz up! MySpace Digg Fark Facebook First Published: Feb 5, 2009 4:17 PM EST Business News Most Commented Most Viewed Most Recent Specialized TV Stations Feb 5, 2009 6 Comments Average Gas Price in NJ Up to $1.75 Feb 4, 2009 1 Comment Time Warner to Layoff 1,250 Workers Feb 4, 2009 3 Comments Wells Fargo - NOT Blowing Your Bailout Bucks in Vegas Feb 3, 2009 62 Comments Show Me the Money: Find Your Unclaimed Funds 4 hours ago Take a Tour of the New Site! Nov 18, 2008 33 Comments Stocks Plunge as Gov't Unveils Financial Plan Feb 10, 2009 18 Comments Nine-Year-Old Whiz Kid Creates iPhone App Feb 5, 2009 8 Comments Five Reasons the Markets Don't Like the Bank Bailout Feb 10, 2009 1 Comment Secret KFC Recipe Gets New Hi-Tech, Secure Digs Feb 10, 2009 3 Comments AC Casino Revenues Down 9.4 Percent in January Feb 10, 2009 Smith: Ratner's Atlantic Yards Stimulus Shakedown 3 hours ago
Maia S-H

Super Bowl remains a big bash, but ads toned down - NFL - Yahoo! Sports - 0 views

  •  
    Most ads have sold for about $3 million per 30-second spot-an all-time high price for the Super Bowl, which is the most watched event in the nation, with about 100 million U.S. viewers.
1 - 20 of 57 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page