Paley avoided traditional film distribution deals and instead released the film under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license, writing:
You don't need my permission to copy, share, publish, archive, show, sell, broadcast, or remix Sita Sings the Blues. Conventional wisdom urges me to demand payment for every use of the film, but then how would people without money get to see it? How widely would the film be disseminated if it were limited by permission and fees? Control offers a false sense of security. The only real security I have is trusting you, trusting culture, and trusting freedom
3More
Sony Sued For Not Protecting Leaked Movie From Pirates - TorrentFreak [# ! Note] - 0 views
2More
El nuevo Grooveshark va a dar guerra a la industria discográfica | Industria ... - 0 views
1More
Can you defame someone with a hyperlink? - 0 views
1More
RIAA-Approved File-Sharing Service Hacked, 51m User Details Leaked - TorrentFreak - 0 views
3More
Google bulges old time news archive | The Register - 0 views
1More
Beware: Piracy Defense Lawyers Can Be "Trolls" Too - TorrentFreak [# ! Note] - 1 views
1 - 13 of 13
Showing 20▼ items per page