Skip to main content

Home/ Ethique à WIC 5/ Group items tagged to

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Mira Marhaba

On Liberty by John Stuart Mill : chapter three - 0 views

  • Among the works of man, which human life is rightly employed in perfecting and beautifying, the first in importance surely is man himself. Supposing it were possible to get houses built, corn grown, battles fought, causes tried, and even churches erected and prayers said, by machinery--by automatons in human form--it would be a considerable loss to exchange for these automatons even the men and women who at present inhabit the more civilized parts of the world, and who assuredly are but starved specimens of what nature can and will produce. Human nature is not a machine to be built after a model, and set to do exactly the work prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires to grow and develop itself on all sides, according to the tendency of the inward forces which make it a living thing.
  •  
    This quote gives an example that goes along the lines of this (my interpretation): if we were able to replace anything that humans are doing, with machinery, and in doing so, increase our efficiency, shouldn't we? Well let me ask you this, isn't that what we're already doing? We let the computers and phones and websites and machines take over our whole lives. It may not be very clear how this relates to our topic, but in my opinion, the author worded it in a way to challenge the reader. He asks the question in a way to make the reader respond "Of course not. Why would we replace ourselves with something like a robot?" before they realize that we have, in fact, partially replaced ourselves with these "robots". I think this is important  because it shows how sometimes, just by hearing the theory of an argument, some people will say that it is wrong wrong wrong, but when actually faced with that problem, they would realize that there may be some exceptions to some moral rules. (argument should be used if they show statistics about more people agreeing that torture should not be used)
Nighat Ali

Defending Christmas: It's "Merry Christmas," not "Happy Holidays" |... - 2 views

    • Nighat Ali
       
      Je trove que cette point de vue de l'auteure est très intéressant...
  • It's that time of year again - the buildup to the holiday whose name so many people are afraid to say. "Merry Christmas." Why do these two words offend so many people? Why is this greeting such a big problem? Why are their retail stores that insist their employees say "Happy Holidays"? Of course, some have even dropped the 's', and wish people a "Happy Holiday." What holiday are they talking about? Why can't they just say it!? Why are there so many offices that are afraid to have a "Christmas" party? Why are public schools forbidden to utter the word "Christmas" and, in some cases, not allowed to even have red and green decorations or visits from Santa Claus? What's the problem with Christmas? In truth, there should be NO problem with Christmas - and there should be no problem , thankfully, some retail stores like Wal-Mart are wising up to this fact.
  • tmas" party? Why are public schools forbidden to utter the word "Christmas" and, in some cases,
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • While the United States is officially and culturally committed to religious freedom, the overwhelming majority of the American people respect Christmas as it has traditionally been understood and observed. Here are some facts to prove this: According to the well-known polling firm Zogby, 95% of Americans are NOT offended when they hear "Merry Christmas" and over half are "bothered" by the greeting "Happy Holidays." A FOXNEWS poll in 2005 suggests that 95% of Americans celebrate Christmas - that's "Christmas" specifically as in the holiday on December 25 Another FOXNEWS poll that same year said that 83% of respondents believed nativity scenes were appropriate for public propertyA 2004 Newsweek poll revealed that 79% of Americans believe in the virgin birth of Jesus Christ as depicted in the BibleNinety percent of respondents to a 2000 Gallup poll affirmed the birth of Jesus Christ as the purpose of Christmas
  • This author will grant that it's unethical and socially wrong to deliberately provoke and offend someone who is of a different faith. But this does not mean - nor should it mean - that we have to censor out any public, visible displays of Christmas for the comfort of the few who might be offended. The First Amendment guarantees the free exercise of religion. It does NOT - and read this carefully - it does NOT guarantee one the right to NOT be offended. It does NOT guarantee the right of one to be free of any social discomfort.
Mira Marhaba

SparkNotes: Utilitarianism: Chapter 5: Of the Connection between Justice and Utility (P... - 1 views

  • Mill begins by trying to pin down the meaning of justice, by coming up with a list of those things that are commonly classified as just or unjust. First, it is considered unjust to deprive someone of his legal rights. However, this concept has exceptions. For example, a person may have legal rights he should not have--his rights may be the provision of a bad law. While people vary on whether bad laws can be justly disobeyed, all people agree that laws can be unjust. Therefore, law cannot be the ultimate standard of justice. A second form of injustice comes from depriving someone of something he has a moral right to possess. Third, it is considered just that a person receive what he "deserves," and unjust that he obtain something he doesn't deserve; people are thought to deserve good things if they have done right, and evil things if they have done wrong. A fourth form of injustice is to violate an agreement with someone or disappoint expectations that one knowingly nurtured. Fifth, it is considered unjust to show favoritism and preference in inappropriate circumstances. However, it is not generally necessary to be impartial; for example, one doesn't have to be impartial in the selection of friends. The claim is rather that a person should only be influenced by those considerations that should apply in a given circumstance. Finally, the idea of equality is seen by many to be a component of justice; some people may make an exception for the sake of expediency, however.
  •  
    This quote is a bit on the big side (understatement), but i highlighted it all to show the connection between utilitarianism and justice. It shows all the exceptions to some laws that may be made, and WHY they should be made. So basically it shows that just because there is a law, it doesn't mean that it is necessarily right.
  •  
    Legal does not equal moral. "Therefore, law cannot be the ultimate standard of justice. "
Matthew Rodin

Animal Experimentation: Debatabase - Debate Topics and Debate Motions - 4 views

  • Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      Encore une fois, la valeur de l'égalité même entre des espèces différentes!
  • the end of cruelty to animals
  • animals are not routinely treated well by animal experimenters
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • millions of animals die each year in experiments, others are often not adequately anaesthetised and are abused by handlers and experimenters.
  • ew breakthroughs have been made as a result of animal experimentatio
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      Ca montre que l'expérimentation animale produit une pourcentage minimale de succès!
  • There has been a catalogue of errors and failures in animal testing,
  • Human beings share about 99% of their genes with chimpanzees and only slightly fewer with other monkeys. As a result, the reactions of these creatures are a very good guide to possible reactions of human patients. Even lower down the scale, other animals share the same basic physiology with humans. Furthermore, it would be immoral to risk the life of a human being when a medicine or procedure could instead be tested on a non-human animal. In fact, most animal experiments are done on animals that are nothing like hum
  • Scientifically, as well as morally, most animal experimentation is to be rejected - the reaction of a mouse to a substance is no guide to human reactions
  • The advent of genetic technologies has made possible all sorts of new and horrific acts of animal exploitation
  • t is only acceptable to test human medicines on human beings if they give their consent. Non-human animals are never able to give such consent
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves" -L'égalité!!!! C'est une bonne valeur pour l'argumentation. Besoin de plus de statistiques...
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "Millions of animals die each year in experiments, others are often not adequately anaesthetised and are abused by handlers and experimenters" -C'est LE point le plus concrète du débat CONTRE l'expérimentation animale. Besoin de faits avec sources, par contre.
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "The advent of genetic technologies has made possible all sorts of new and horrific acts of animal exploitation" -Le fait que la technologie évolue continuellement est un bon point pour nous car il y a plusieurs méthodes ou les animaux ne doivent pas être mal traités!
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      "There has been a catalogue of errors and failures in animal testing." -Le fait qu'il y a une très grand nombre de fautes dans l'expérimentation animale est un argument qui va caser tous ceux de l'autre équipe. Si vous voulez tester des médicament POUR les humains, tester-les SUR les humains, et non pas sur d'autres espèces qui vont réagir différemment!
  • There has been a catalogue of errors and failures in animal testing,
  •  
    C'est une bonne outil pour les deux équipes qui sont en débat contre ou pour l'expérimentation animale.
Matthew Rodin

Considering the pros and cons of "torture" » Columns » Rush... - 3 views

  • But just for the sake of discussion, let’s bring the whole issue closer to home. Suppose your son or your daughter is, for some reason, the target of kidnappers and that they’ve put your child in a hidden location with a bomb scheduled to go off if you don’t pay them a million dollars. Now, suppose you have one of the kidnappers in custody. What would you be willing to do, assuming you couldn’t get the money, to find out where your child was being held and get him or her away from the bomb? Whoops, you can’t slap the kidnapper! That would be torture! You can’t even threaten to shoot him if he doesn’t tell you what you need to know! Again, that would be torture! Do you think you might be inclined to take whatever action necessary to save your child? Or would you let your child die to avoid torture? The world is, and always has been, a vicious place and its fine and grand and noble to talk about never using torture or the threat of torture – in the abstract. I would contend, however, that if the life of your child or your spouse or your best friend was on the line, you might not look on a slap as the unlawful infliction of severe physical pain in quite the same light. In the abstract, we can call it torture. When the lives of loved ones are at stake, I submit that being slapped around seems relatively mild – but I could be wrong.
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      La plupart de l'article est pour le groupe de Hagit et Marie-Lise mais il y a des bonnes points pour le coté "pour" (notre côté) aussi!
    • Hagit Malikin
       
      matthew, cette article est vraiment pour votre groupe. il n'y a pas d'element pour la notre , je crois
Mira Marhaba

Should prostitution be legal? - Prostitution - ProCon.org - 0 views

  • "One cannot support the reduction of AIDS infections and support legal prostitution at the same time. Prostitution remains one of the leading vectors for AIDS infection. This is true in the case of both legal and illegal prostitution... Prostitutes, because of their many partners, have a greatly increased risk of exposure to HIV. They are likewise able to spread HIV to many other partners...
    • Mira Marhaba
       
      Dans notre société, on essaie de reduire le sida et tous les autres "STD". En légalisant la prostitution, on va surement élever les taux de STD.
  • There are a multitude of studies to show the high level of abuse that prostitutes suffer. Women are literally bought and sold as property. The incidence of drug addiction is high among women, partially explaining why they became prostitutes to begin with. The argument for legalization goes something like this. Prostitution will happen anyway but legalization and regulation will help stem the abuses. The argument has 50,000 foot appeal. Using the same logic, slavery (which still exists in many places) should be legalized so underground slaves can be given some measure of human rights. The fact that the ACLU and the bevy of left-wing international groups don't argue for the legalization of slavery shows the logical inconsistency of their position. Further, the legalization of abortion has shown that it lead to a radical increase in abortion. The legalization will lead to an untold number of women being forced into sex slavery. Make no mistake, women will be forced into commercial sex work in greater numbers if it were legalized."
    • Mira Marhaba
       
      Les femmes vont faire face a une grande quantité d'abus. Le plus qu'on a de prostitution, le plus qu'on va avoir d'abus de femmes.
  • Legalized prostitution creates the same problems that legalized marijuana does. While prostitution is legal, forced prostitution is not. The latter occurs, and the new German law unintentionally makes it harder to hunt down human traffickers, especially from Eastern Europe and Africa. Similarly, it is harder to combat under-aged prostitution. With legalized marijuana and prostitution, Amsterdam became a magnet for human traffickers, drug traders and petty criminals. This is not the world legalization’s proponents envisioned, but it happened."
    • Mira Marhaba
       
      ABUS!! Ca va être beaucoup plus difficile de trouver des criminels (qui forcent des autres a se prostituer) si on a cette loi
Daryl Bambic

The Pursuit of Happiness | Psychology Today - 0 views

  • Both the happiness and anti-happiness forces actually agree on something important—that we Americans tend to grab superficial quick fixes such as extravagant purchases and fatty foods to subdue any negative feelings that overcome us. Such measures seem to hinge on a belief that constant happiness is somehow our birthright. Indeed, a body of research shows instant indulgences do calm us down—for a few moments. But they leave us poorer, physically unhealthy, and generally more miserable in the long run—and lacking in the real skills to get us out of our rut.
    • Daryl Bambic
       
      Blog Rubric for _________________ Element - Criteria 12345Vocabulary. language + conventions (minimum 150-500)5pts Quality of expression(clear sentences and writing)5pts Relevance and quality of hyper link (at least 1) link is smoothly integrated into text(5pts) 246810Demonstrates understanding of issue/topic Shows awareness of other perspectives (10pts)                   Ideas are well developed and effectively defended(use of writing techniques, logic, information, etc)(10 pts)               Pain is part of happiness too.   
  •  
    This can be added to your arguments that might still be building on the document!  It is long but easy to read because of the subtitles.
Matthew Rodin

Scientific Argument Against Animal Testing - 1 views

  • Animals not only react differently than humans to different drugs, vaccines, and experiments, they also react differently from one another. Ignoring this difference has been and continues to be very costly to human health.
  • Thalidomide tragedy of the 1960s and 1970s
  • Clioquinol
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      Les deux exemples en haut sont deux évènements très tragiques qui se sont arrivées ou les médicaments ont été expérimentés sur les animaux et tout été correcte. Cependant, quand les humains l'on essayé, cela a causé beaucoup de complications!
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that 100,000 people every year are killed and more than 2 million are hospitalized as a result of prescription drugs used as prescribed
  • The British Medical Journal recently reported that 4 out of every 10 patients who take a prescribed drug can expect to suffer severe or noticeable side effects, while numerous clinical observers agree that the incidence of iatrogenesis (medically induced disease) is now so great that approximately 1 in every 10 hospital beds is occupied by a patient who has been made ill by their doctor.
  • Human medicine can no longer be based on veterinary medicine
  • There are endless examples of the differences between humans and non-human animals. PCP is a sedative for chimps Penicillin kills cats and guinea pigs but has saved many human lives. Arsenic is not poisonous to rats, mice, or sheep. Morphine is a sedative for humans but is a stimulant for cats, goats, and horses. Digitalis while dangerously raising blood pressure in dogs continues to save countless cardiac patients by lowering heart rate.
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      Les 5 exemples en haut sont essentiel pour notre argument. Ca montre que les tests devraient être faites sur le humains pour voir 100% les effets que les médicaments vont avoir sur NOTRE espèce et non pas une autre.
  • Animal research is not aiding the fight against cancer. In fact, it is diverting resources from effective research and from the most obvious solution which is prevention
  • According to the National Cancer Institute, 80% of all cancers are preventable.
    • Matthew Rodin
       
      C'est une excellente site pour décrire scientifiquement que l'expérimentation animale n'aide pas les humains, et au contraire nous endommage. À la fin, il y a un liste de 5 exemples de différences entre les humain et les "non-humains". Je pense que ça résume bien l'idée de l'article qui finalement veut prouver avec beaucoup de statistiques (en jaune) que les expérimentation sur les animaux sont faux non pas seulement parce que les humains réagissent différemment des animaux aux médicaments mais aussi parce que les animaux réagissent les unes aux autres différemment!
  •  
    C'est un lien qui donne des grands points pour l'argument CONTRE l'expérimentation animale pour des raisons médicales
Teen Turtle

Celebrating Christmas in Public - 4 views

  • The question: How can we celebrate our diversity of holiday celebrations? How can we enjoy and magnify this aspect of American greatness? Bill Press's answer is that, among other things, we should say "Happy Holidays" rather than "Merry Christmas" when we're in diverse company. (I assume Press thinks it's okay for me to say "Merry Christmas" to other Christians.) Is he right? Does this reflect and celebrate our diversity?
    • Teen Turtle
       
      Cet article offre un point de vue non-religieux sur la célébration national de certaines fête. Il remet aussi en question ce qu'est réelement la diversité culturelle.
  • So, "Happy Holidays" really isn't so much a matter of celebrating diversity as it is a means to squelch diversity. It masks and diminishes the genuine variety of cultures in America. One might argue that genuine religious diversity ought to ignored or hidden away. But please don't try to fool me with a plea to diversity if you're going to argue for non-specific sameness.
Mira Marhaba

A 20th Century Habit - 0 views

  • The twenty years from 1920 to 1940 saw a tripling in consumption with 182 billion cigarettes sold for a per capita number of 1,976.  Not coincidentally these twenty years saw the explosive growth of the new entertainment medium, the movies.  It was a rare move produced in those days that did not have smoking on screen.  WWII created another upsurge in smoking, as millions of GIs picked up the habit to temper the boredom and stress of combat. The 1945 numbers jumped to 341 billion and 3,449 per capita, or roughly half a pack a day for every person over the age of 18.
  •  
    These statistics are just to prove that: 1) just because a majority is voting, most certainly does NOT mean that they are right. they could be completely wrong (as they were about the smoking before the 1930's) 2) even if the majority KNOWS that what theyre voting for or doing is bad, they may CONTINUE TO DO IT ANYWAY
Matthew Rodin

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights - 0 views

shared by Matthew Rodin on 31 Oct 11 - Cached
  • Article 1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
  • Article 5. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
  • Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
  •  
    La déclaration des droits humaines des Nations Unis
Elior Yona

Discovery Institute - Bioethics - Articles/News - Pro-Animal or Anti-Human?: - 0 views

  • While it is true that medical researchers have developed some alternatives to animal use in recent years, such as computer simulation and the use of human-cell lines, these tools are merely useful supplements and complements - not replacements - to research with animals.
    • Elior Yona
       
      This is a very good point for my group. Here we can clearly see that other forms of medical and scientifical testing can never be seen as replacements.
  • prevent a pandemic
  • As a result of these animal studies, WHO researchers have announced that the coronavirus is, without a doubt, the cause of SARS.
    • Elior Yona
       
      Obviously, since the scientists didn't even know what caused SARS, testing on animals let them figure this out. With an epidemic like SARS you can save millions, and this was the case.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • which means that either animals or humans must be used
  • what does honesty matter when the cause of ending human hegemony over animals is so important and just?
  • . While it is true that medical researchers have developed some alternatives to animal use in recent years, such as computer simulation and the use of human-cell lines, these tools are merely useful supplements and complements - not replacements - to research with animals.
  • ent years, such as computer simulation and the use of human-cell lines, these tools are
naomi suissa

Active euthanasia versus passive euthanasia - India News - IBNLive - 0 views

  • You cannot prosecute someone for failing to save a life
    • naomi suissa
       
      Ce fait, selon moi, est très important, fort et intéressant en discutant l'euthanasie passive car il a un lien à l'acte de sauver une vie.
  • Active euthanasia entails the use of lethal substances or forces to kill a person such as with lethal injection given to a person with terminal cancer who is in terrible agony. Passive euthanasia entails withholding of medical treatment for continuance of life
  • Voluntary euthanasia is where the consent is taken from the patient, whereas non voluntary euthanasia is where the consent is unavailable
    • naomi suissa
       
      Avec les définitions données par ce site, nous pouvons plus facilement comprendre le sujet et trouver de très bonnes exemples. La bonne compréhension nous donne aussi l'opportunité d'utiliser la logique de la définition comme un point en se défendant!
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • in active euthanasia, something is done to end the patient's life' while in passive euthanasia, something is not done that would have preserved the patient's life.
    • naomi suissa
       
      Cette phrase nous montre une distinction très claire entre l'euthanasie active et passive; ce qui est très important pour bien se défendre durant un débat!
  •  
    Ce site est parfait pour bien comprendre les faits de base du sujet de l'euthanasie. C'est un site qui nous explique très bien les différents types d'euthanasie et nous donne aussi des exemples!
Hagit Malikin

The Ethics of Prostitution « A Philosopher's Blog - 1 views

  • immoral is that it tends to involve coercion. In most cases, people do not freely decide to become prostitutes. In some cases, they are driven to the profession by desperation and a lack of other opportunities for employment. In other cases, they are forced into prostitution by others. In some cases, people are enslaved and forced to be prostitutes.
    • Hagit Malikin
       
      immoral: forcé de le faire. raisons donnés comment la prostitution est forcé sur des gens. pour la plupart des personnes la prositution n'est pas un choix mais une force
Giuliano Musacchio

BBC - Ethics - Animal ethics: Experimenting on animals - 0 views

  • Against animal experiments: Experimenting on animals is always unacceptable because: it causes suffering to animals the benefits to human beings are not proven any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways
    • Giuliano Musacchio
       
      Des raisons pourquoi ceci devrait être illégal!
  • The equivalent case against is that the level of suffering and the number of animals involved are both so high that the benefits to humanity don't provide moral justification.
    • Giuliano Musacchio
       
      Immoral! 
  • The three Rs are: Reduction, Refinement, Replacement.
    • Giuliano Musacchio
       
      Idées pour arrêter ses actions
Elior Yona

Animal Testing Pros - 0 views

    • Elior Yona
       
      we can use this sentence as an example to diseases that have been cured with the help of animal testing.
  • helped in the refinement of procedures
  • But it usually starts to make more sense when someone in the family or you yourself start suffering from a life-threatening disease.
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Elior Yona
       
      we can use the example with the family members for the rebuttal.
Elior Yona

The good in animal testing - 3 views

    • Elior Yona
       
      a good example for cures
  • The scientists do all they can for the animals when it comes to actually testing on them. If they think that it will be uncomfortable for the animal they give them painkillers to relieve stress and the pain if pain is even involved. They also will test the product on an alternative before they test they product on an animal.
    • Elior Yona
       
      This is a great example and fact. It shows us that the scientists try to cause the least amount of harm as possible to the animals. They even verify the product on alternatives before testing them on animals.
  •  
    Are your sticky notes public? How can you establish the credibility of this site? Who is the author/publisher?
Giuliano Musacchio

Chris Gardner - 0 views

  • an American entrepreneur, investor, stockbroker, motivational speaker, author, and philanthropist who, during the early 1980s, struggled with homelessness while raising his toddler son, Christopher, Jr.[1] Gardner's book of memoirs, The Pursuit of Happyness, was published in May 2006.[2]
    • Giuliano Musacchio
       
      This is a great example that the pursuit of happiness leads to happiness because this man grew up with nothing and lived on the streets, his goal was to succeed at something and he became an entrepreneur and CEO. It is truly a rag to riches story
anonymous

Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays? : Debatabase - Debate Topics and Debate Motions - 2 views

  • Christmas has no religious meaning for people who do not share a Christian background
  • We should be more sensitive to the feelings of those around us and keep any Christian celebration for family and church.
  • “Happy Holidays” is a much more appropriate greeting
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • it is wrong to send cards that assume all of their employees have a Christian faith and wish to share it
    • anonymous
       
      We can use the Cons to rebut againt the other team
  •  
    Cette site a des argument pour les deux côté. Alors on peut l'utiliser pour notre aventage.
naomi suissa

Can the Pursuit of Happiness Make You Unhappy? « peer-reviewed by my neurons - 0 views

  • paradoxical effects
    • naomi suissa
       
      Those who expect to reach a certain level of happiness rarely reach that goal because this level of happiness often has standards that are much too high
  • failed to achieve your goal of being happy
  • negative effects of valuing happiness are most likely to occur in situations where people feel they should be happy
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • The researchers hypothesized that although there would be no differences among those who watched the sad clip, the participants watching the happy clip who valued happiness would be less happy than those who did not value happiness. In the end, this is exactly what happened.
    • naomi suissa
       
      After this study, the researchers came to the exact conclusion that they were expecting!!
    • naomi suissa
       
      I consider this site useful because the author is elaborating on my side of the debate and giving me hints on how I could convince my opponent that I truly believe that the pursuit of happiness makes you unhappy 
  •  
    Article by Eric Horow; his perspective of the pursuit of happiness
  •  
    Interesting blog and author...not the most credible for your cause but still interesting.
1 - 20 of 45 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page