Skip to main content

Home/ ErgodicPNT/ Group items matching "IT" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
arithwsun arithwsun

Structure and randomness in the prime numbers « What's new - 0 views

  • 2 July, 2008 at 6:28 pm Terence Tao It unfortunately seems that the decomposItion claimed in equation (6.9) on page 20 of that paper is, in fact, impossible; It would endow the function h (which is holding the arIthmetical information about the primes) wIth an extremely strong dilation symmetry which It does not actually obey. It seems that the author was relying on this symmetry to make the adelic Fourier transform far more powerful than It really ought to be for this problem.
  • 3 July, 2008 at 3:41 am Gergely Harcos I also have some (perhaps milder) troubles with the proof. it seems to me as if Li had treated the Dirac delta on L^2(A) as a function. For example, the first 5 lines of page 28 make little sense to me. Am I missing something here?
  • 4 July, 2008 at 5:15 am Lior Silberman The function defined on page 20 does have a strong dilation symmetry: it is invariant by multiplication by ideles of norm one (since it is merely a function of the norm of ). In particular, it is invariant under multiplication by elements of . I’m probably missing something here. Probably the subtlety is in passing from integration over the nice space of idele classes to the singular space . The topologies on the spaces of adeles and ideles are quite different. There is a formal error in Theorem 3.1 which doesn’t affect the paper: the distribution discussed is not unique. A distribution supported at a point is a sum of derivatives of the delta distribution. Clearly there exist many such with a given special value of the Fourier transform. There is also something odd about this paper: nowhere is it pointed out what is the new contribution of the paper. Specifically, what is the new insight about number theory?
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • 4 July, 2008 at 6:09 am Emmanuel Kowalski A remark concerning Lior’s remark: the function h(u) in the current (v4) version of the paper is _not_ the same as the one that was defined when T. Tao pointed out a problem with it. This earlier one (still visible on arXiv, v1) was defined in different ways depending on whether the idele had at most one or more than one non-unit component, and was therefore not invariant under multiplication by . (it is another problem with looking at such a paper if corrections as drastic as that are made without any indication of when and why).
  • 4 July, 2008 at 8:15 am Terence Tao Dear Lior, Emmanuel is correct. The old definition of h was in fact problematic for a large number of reasons (the author was routinely integrating h on the idele class group C, which is only well-defined if h was -invariant). Changing the definition does indeed fix the problem I pointed out (and a number of other issues too). But Connes has pointed out a much more serious issue, in the proof of the trace formula in Theorem 7.3 (which is the heart of the matter, and is what should be focused on in any future revision): the author is trying to use adelic integration to control a function (namely, h) supported on the ideles, which cannot work as the ideles have measure zero in the adeles. (The first concrete error here arises in the equation after (7.13): the author has made a change of variables on the idele class group C that only makes sense when u is an idele, but u is being integrated over the adeles instead. All subsequent manipulations involving the adelic Fourier transform Hh of h are also highly suspect, since h is zero almost everywhere on the adeles.)
  • More generally, there is a philosophical objection as to why a purely multiplicative adelic approach such as this one cannot work. The argument only uses the multiplicative structure of , but not the additive structure of k. (For instance, the fact that k is a cocompact discrete additive subgroup of A is not used.) Because of this, the arguments would still hold if we simply deleted a finite number of finite places v from the adeles (and from ). If the arguments worked, this would mean that the Weil-Bombieri positivity criterion (Theorem 3.2 in the paper) would continue to hold even after deleting an arbitrary number of places. But I am pretty sure one can cook up a function g which (assuming RH) fails this massively stronger positivity property (basically, one needs to take g to be a well chosen slowly varying function with broad support, so that the Mellin transforms at Riemann zeroes, as well as the pole at 1 and the place at infinity, are negligible but which gives a bad contribution to a single large prime (and many good contributions to other primes which we delete).)
  • Emmanuel Kowalski That’s an interesting point indeed, if one considers that the RH doesn’t work over function fields once we take out a point of a (smooth projective) curve — there arise zeros of the zeta function which are not on the critical line.
  • 6 July, 2008 at 5:28 pm Chip Neville Terence, I have a question about your comment: “Because of this, the arguments would still hold if we simply deleted a finite number of finite places v from the adeles (and from k^*). … (basically, one needs to take g to be a well chosen slowly varying function with broad support, so that the Mellin transforms at Riemann zeroes, as well as the pole at 1 and the place at infinity, are negligible but which gives a bad contribution to a single large prime (and many good contributions to other primes which we delete).)” Does this mean that you would be considering the “reduced” (for lack of a better name) zeta function \prod 1/(1-1/p^{-s}), where the product is taken over the set of primes not in a finite subset S? If so, this “reduced” zeta function has the same zeroes as the standard Riemann zeta function, since the finite product \prod_S 1/(1-1/p^{-s}) is an entire function with no zeroes in the complex plane. Thus the classical situation in the complex plane seems to be very different in this regard from the situation with function fields over smooth projective curves alluded to by Emmanuel above. Does anyone have an example of an infinite set S and corresponding reduced zeta function with zeroes in the half plane Re z > 1/2? A set S of primes p so that \sum_S 1/p^{1/2} converges will not do, since \prod_S 1/(1-1/p^{-s}) is holomorphic in the half plane Re z > 1/2 with no zeroes there. Perhaps a set S of primes P thick enough so that \sum_S 1/p^{1/2} diverges, but thin enough so that \sum_S 1/p converges, might do. This seems to me to be a delicate and difficult matter. I hope these questions do not sound too foolish.
  • 6 July, 2008 at 7:44 pm Terence Tao Dear Chip, Actually, the product has a number of poles on the line , when s is a multiple of . Li’s approach to the RH was not to tackle it directly, but instead to establish the Weil-Bombieri positivity condition which is known to be equivalent to RH. However, the proof of that equivalence implicitly uses the functional equation for the zeta function (via the explicit formula). If one starts deleting places (i.e. primes) from the problem, the RH stays intact (at least on the half-plane ), but the positivity condition does not, because the functional equation has been distorted.
  • The functional equation, incidentally, is perhaps the one non-trivial way we do know how to exploit the additive structure of k inside the adeles, indeed I believe this equation can be obtained from the Poisson summation formula for the adeles relative to k. But it seems that the functional equation alone is not enough to yield the RH; some other way of exploiting additive structure is also needed, but I have no idea what it should be. [Revised, July 7:] Looking back at Li’s paper, I see now that Poisson summation was indeed used quite a few times, and in actually a rather essential way, so my previous philosophical objection does not actually apply here. My revised opinion is now that, beyond the issues with the trace formula that caused the paper to be withdrawn, there is another fundamental problem with the paper, which is that the author is in fact implicitly assuming the Riemann hypothesis in order to justify some facts about the operator E (which one can think of as a sort of Mellin transform multiplier with symbol equal to the zeta function, related to the operator on ). More precisely, on page 18, the author establishes that and asserts that this implies that , but this requires certain invertibility properties of E which fail if there is a zero off of the critical line. (A related problem is that the decomposition used immediately afterwards is not justified, because is merely dense in rather than equal to it.)
  • 7 July, 2008 at 9:59 am javier Dear Terence, I am not sure I understand your “philosophical” complain on using only the multiplicative structure and not the additive one. This is essentially the philosophy while working over the (so over-hyped lately) field with one element, which apparently comes into the game in the description of the Connes-Bost system on the latest Connes-Consani-Marcolli paper (Fun with F_un). From an algebraic point of view, you can often recover the additive structure of a ring from the multiplicative one provided that you fix the zero. There is an explanation of this fact (using the language of monads) in the (also famous lately) work by Nikolai Durov “A new approach to Arakelov geometry (Section 4.8, on additivity on algebraic monads). By the way, I wanted to tell you that I think you are doing an impressive work with this blog and that I really enjoy learning from it, even if this is the very first time I’ve got something sensible to say :-)
  • 7 July, 2008 at 11:01 am Terence Tao Dear Javier, I must confess I do not understand the field with one element much at all (beyond the formal device of setting q to 1 in any formula derived using and seeing what one gets), and don’t have anything intelligent to say on that topic. Regarding my philosophical objection, the point was that if one deleted some places from the adele ring A and the multiplicative group (e.g. if k was the rationals, one could delete the place 2 by replacing with the group of non-zero rationals with odd numerator and denominator) then one would still get a perfectly good “adele” ring in place of A, and a perfectly good multiplicative group in place of (which would be the invertible elements in the ring of rationals with odd denominator), but somehow the arithmetic aspects of the adeles have been distorted in the process (in particular, Poisson summation and the functional equation get affected). The Riemann hypothesis doesn’t seem to extend to this general setting, so that suggests that if one wants to use adeles to prove RH, one has to somehow exploit the fact that one has all places present, and not just a subset of such places. Now, Poisson summation does exploit this very fact, and so technically this means that my objection does not apply to Li’s paper, but I feel that Poisson summation is not sufficient by itself for this task (just as the functional equation is insufficient to resolve RH), and some further exploitation of additive (or field-theoretic) structure of k should be needed. I don’t have a precise formalisation of this feeling, though.
  • 7 July, 2008 at 1:22 pm Gergely Harcos Dear Terry, you are absolutely right that Poisson summation over k inside A is the (now) standard way to obtain the functional equation for Hecke L-functions. This proof is due to Tate (his thesis from 1950), you can also find it in Weil’s Basic Number Theory, Chapter 7, Section 5.
  • 15 July, 2008 at 7:57 am michele I think that the paper of Prof. Xian-Jin Li will be very useful for a future and definitive proof of the Riemann hypothesis. Furthermore, many mathematics contents of this paper can be applied for further progress in varios sectors of theoretical physics (p-adic and adelic strings, zeta strings).
  • Babak Hi Terrance, A few months ago I stumbled upon an interesting differential equation while using probability heuristics to explore the distribution of primes. it’s probably nothing, but on the off-chance that it might mean something to a better trained mind, I decided to blog about it: http://babaksjournal.blogspot.com/2008/07/differential-equation-estimating.html -Babak
arithwsun arithwsun

科学网-SCI投稿常用英语 - 0 views

  •  
    1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML: I am sending a manuscript entitled "" by - which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - . Yours sincerely 2. Dear Dr. A: Enclosed is a manuscript entitled "" by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal's readers. 3. Dear Dr. A: Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, "" by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source. We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. 二、询问有无收到稿件 Dear Editors, We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help. 三、询问论文审查回音 Dear Editors, it is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible. 四、关于论文的总体审查意见 1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below. 2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a numb
arithwsun arithwsun

Lie groups - 0 views

  • Hall, Brian C. Lie groups, Lie algebras, and representations. An elementary introduction. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 222. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003. This is only a recommended text, but it is highly recommended. By emphasizing matrix groups, the book covers most of the important examples occuring in nature while avoiding a lot of the technical difficulties necessary in a more general treatment. it gives an excellent presentation of most of what we'll talk about. I think it will be a great book to read to supplement the lectures. Looking around on the web, I found many copies that were very reasonably priced.
  • Humphreys, James E. Introduction to Lie algebras and representation theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 9. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1978. A classic. Would have been my choice for a textbook, but unfortunately only covers Lie algebras.
  • Fulton, William; Harris, Joe. Representation theory. A first course. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 129. Readings in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. A beautiful book to read. Very useful for self-study. Bump, Daniel. Lie groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 225. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004. Perhaps too hard for beginners, but it contains an excellent collection of topics in the final part.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Varadarajan, V. S. Lie groups, Lie algebras, and their representations. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 102. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984. Another classic. Very comprehensive. Representation theory of Lie groups. Proceedings of the SRC/LMS Research Symposium held in Oxford, June 28--July 15, 1977. Edited by G. L. Luke. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York, 1979. See especially the articles by Macdonald and Bott.
  • Onishchik, A. L.; Vinberg, E. B. Lie groups and algebraic groups. Translated by D. A. Leites. Springer Series in Soviet Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990. Written with a more algebraic flavor. Takes the unusual approach of omitting almost all proofs and presenting the material as a series of exercies. (This is not as crazy as it sounds. In fact it's a very pleasant read.)
  • Knapp, Anthony W. Lie groups beyond an introduction. Second edition. Progress in Mathematics, 140. Birkhauser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2002. Contains a lot of material with complete proofs. Thorough, but difficult to read if this is your first exposure. Springer, T. A. Linear algebraic groups. Second edition. Progress in Mathematics, 9. Birkhauser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1998. Sure, it's a textbook on algebraic groups, but there's plenty of relevance for the study of Lie groups. Freudenthal, Hans; de Vries, H. Linear Lie groups. Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 35 Academic Press, New York-London 1969. Bizarre and fascinating.
arithwsun arithwsun

The mean distance to the nth neighbour in a uniform distribution of random points - 0 views

  • Abstract. We study different ways of determining the mean distance rn between a reference point and its nth neighbour among random points distributed with uniform density in a D-dimensional Euclidean space. First, we present a heuristic method; though this method provides only a crude mathematical result, it shows a simple way of estimating rn. Next, we describe two alternative means of deriving the exact expression of rn: we review the method using absolute probability and develop an alternative method using conditional probability. Finally, we obtain an approximation to rn from the mean volume between the reference point and its nth neighbour and compare it with the heuristic and exact results.
arithwsun arithwsun

The divisor bound « What's new - 0 views

  • Gergely Harcos The precise bound was first proved by Wigert in 1906 using the prime number theorem, while Ramanujan in 1914 observed its elementary character. In fact we can prove the inequality even without knowing unique factorization! All we need to know is that and imply . This property implies as one can inject the set of divisors of into the set of pairs formed of a divisor of and a divisor of : to assign the pair . Once we know we can see for any positive integer that . it follows that , whence also . Now the second exponent changes by a factor less than 2 whenever is increased by 1, so we can certainly find a with . This choice furnishes Wigert’s estimate upon observing that .
arithwsun arithwsun

The Large Sieve and its Applications - Cambridge University Press - 0 views

  • Among the modern methods used to study prime numbers, the ‘sieve’ has been one of the most efficient. Originally conceived by Linnik in 1941, the ‘large sieve’ has developed extensively since the 1960s, with a recent realisation that the underlying principles were capable of applications going well beyond prime number theory. This book develops a general form of sieve inequality, and describes its varied applications, including the study of families of zeta functions of algebraic curves over finite fields; arithmetic properties of characteristic polynomials of random unimodular matrices; homological properties of random 3-manifolds; and the average number of primes dividing the denominators of rational points on elliptic curves. Also covered in detail are the tools of harmonic analysis used to implement the forms of the large sieve inequality, including the Riemann Hypothesis over finite fields, and Property (T) or Property (tau) for discrete groups.• Explores new and surprising applications of the large sieve method, an important technique of analytic number theory • Presents applications in fields as wide ranging as topology, probability, arithmetic geometry and discrete group theory • Motivated, clear and self-contained discussions introduce readers to a technique previously confined to one fieldContentsPreface; Prerequisites and notation; 1. Introduction; 2. The principle of the large sieve; 3. Group and conjugacy sieves; 4. Elementary and classical examples; 5. Degrees of representations of finite groups; 6. Probabilistic sieves; 7. Sieving in discrete groups; 8. Sieving for Frobenius over finite fields; Appendix A. Small sieves; Appendix B. Local density computations over finite fields; Appendix C. Representation theory; Appendix D. Property (T) and Property (τ); Appendix E. Linear algebraic groups; Appendix F. Probability theory and random walks; Appendix G. Sums of multiplicative functions; Appendix H. Topology; Bibliography; Index.
arithwsun arithwsun

Unconditional pseudorandom generators for low degree polynomials - 0 views

  • We give an explicit construction of pseudorandom generators against low degree polynomials over finite fields. We show that the sum of 2d small-biased generators with error ε2O(d) is a pseudorandom generator against degree d polynomials with error ε. This gives a generator with seed length 2O(d) log(n/ε). Our construction follows the recent breakthrough result of Bogadnov and Viola. Their work shows that the sum of d small-biased generators is a pseudo-random generator against degree d polynomials, assuming the Inverse Gowers Conjecture. However, this conjecture is only proven for d=2,3. The main advantage of our work is that it does not rely on any unproven conjectures.
arithwsun arithwsun

Blomer: Non-vanishing of class group L-functions at the central point - 0 views

  • Résumé - AbstractLet K=ℚ(-D) be an imaginary quadratic field, and denote by h its class number. it is shown that there is an absolute constant c>0 such that for sufficiently large D at least c·h∏ p∣D (1-p -1 ) of the h distinct L-functions L K (s,χ) do not vanish at the central point s=1/2.
arithwsun arithwsun

[math/0610021] The principle of the large sieve - 0 views

  • We describe a very general abstract form of sieve based on a large sieve inequality which generalizes both the classical sieve inequality of Montgomery (and its higher-dimensional variants), and our recent sieve for Frobenius over function fields. The general framework suggests new applications. We get some first results on the number of prime divisors of ``most'' elements of an elliptic divisibility sequence, and we develop in some detail ``probabilistic'' sieves for random walks on arithmetic groups, e.g., estimating the probability of finding a reducible characteristic polynomial at some step of a random walk on SL(n,Z). In addition to the sieve principle, the applications depend on bounds for a large sieve constant. To prove such bounds involves a variety of deep results, including Property (T) or expanding properties of Cayley graphs, and the Riemann Hypothesis over finite fields. it seems likely that this sieve can have further applications.
arithwsun arithwsun

What might an expository mathematical wiki be like? « Gowers's Weblog - 0 views

  • trick, that can be used in many mathematical situations. With such tricks, it is usually difficult, and in any case not desirable, to formalize them as lemmas: if you try to do so then almost certainly your formal lemma will not apply in all the situations where the trick does.
  • Of course, in many cases, the devil really is in the details, but nevertheless knowing the overall strategy of proof is extremely valuable when trying to read that proof.
  • Yong-Hui Says: November 3, 2008 at 5:57 pm | Reply I am in MSRI for the cofference discrete Rigity. Green will give the first lecture. I just happen to find a question for that tricki wiki: Whether is there a common-shared refference system for that tricki wiki? Similar to that of Mathscinet of ams math review it will be a basic instrument for a mathematical website.
arithwsun arithwsun

Book: Made to Stick - 0 views

  • Solving Mathematical Problems: A personal perspective. 2nd Edition, Terence Tao. Oxford University P ?The Journey of a thousand miles begins with one step? ? Lao Tzu Every so often, you come across a book that really stands out. I have recently been very fortunate to come across several such books, this being one of them. ?Solving mathematical problems? was written by Terence Tao when he was a 15 year old student and has now been slightly revised in this second edition. Like another of the reviewers at Amazon, I also came across this book after reading an article about Terence Tao winning the Fields medal (a bit like the Nobel prize for mathematics). Not only does it give a wonderful insight into the mind of a young Terence Tao, but also into the techniques used to elegantly solve some reasonably difficult problems, such as those posed as questions for the Maths Olympiad contests. [Terence competed in these challenges in his teens, winning bronze, silver and then gold.] Mathematical researchers are not always great e\ucators. Thankfully, Prof. Tao is.Mainly assuming only basic high-school pure mathematics, worked solutions to the problems are clearly and expertly described. Not only does he solve the problems but he also examines the steps, false starts and other solution possibilities that are part of the general approach to problem solving. I was only slightly disappointed that there were a handful of corrections in this second edition (available at Prof Tao?s blog here); one or two could perplex an unwary reader who might expect the work to be flawless. If you have an interest in mathematics, either as a high school student or a hobbyist, I would highly recommended reading this book. In the preface, Prof Tao remarks that if he wrote a book on the subject of competition problem-solving now, it would very different; now that is definitely a book I would like to read!….
  • Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die by Chip and Dan Heath helps us understand why our users (or our coworkers) can repeat the latest web hoax, but can’t remember anything about our projects. What we need to do is to create “sticky messages.” Sticky messages are not necessarily creative messages. In fact, there is formula that the brothers Heath have discovered that will help us to create sticky, memorable messages. That formula is:
    • arithwsun arithwsun
       
      I like this book
arithwsun arithwsun

Introductory Lectures on Siegel Modular Forms - Cambridge University Press - 0 views

  • From their inception, Siegel modular forms have been studied extensively because of their significance in both automorphic functions in several complex variables and number theory. The comprehensive theory of automorphic forms to subgroups of algebraic groups and the arithmetical theory of modular forms illustrate these two aspects in an illuminating manner. The author’s aim is to present a straightforward and easily accessible survey of the main ideas of the theory at an elementary level, providing a sound basis from which the reader can study advanced works and undertake original research. This book is based on lectures given by the author for a number of years and is intended for a one-semester graduate course, though it can also be used profitably for self-study. The only prerequisites are a basic knowledge of algebra, number theory and complex analysis.Contents
  • Preface; 1. The modular group; 2. Basic facts on modular forms; 3. Large weights; 4. Small weights; 5. Modular functions; 6. Dirichlet series; Bibliography; Index.
arithwsun arithwsun

Number Theory and Polynomials - Cambridge University Press - 0 views

  • Many areas of active research within the broad field of number theory relate to properties of polynomials, and this volume displays the most recent and most interesting work on this theme. The 2006 Number Theory and Polynomials workshop in Bristol drew together international researchers with a variety of number-theoretic interests, and the book’s contents reflect the quality of the meeting. Topics covered include recent work on the Schur-Siegel-Smyth trace problem, Mahler measure and its generalisations, the merit factor problem, Barker sequences, K3-surfaces, self-inversive polynomials, Newman’s inequality, algorithms for sparse polynomials, the integer transfinite diameter, divisors of polynomials, non-linear recurrence sequences, polynomial ergodic averages, and the Hansen-Mullen primitivity conjecture. With surveys and expository articles presenting the latest research, this volume is essential for graduates and researchers looking for a snapshot of current progress in polynomials and number theory.• An invaluable resource to both students and experts in this area, with survey articles on the most important topics in the field • Expository articles introduce graduate students to some problems of active interest • The inclusion of new results from leading experts in the field provides a snapshot of current progress
arithwsun arithwsun

AIM math: GL(3) Maass forms and L-functions - 0 views

  • wo researchers from the University of Bristol exhibited the first example of a third degree transcendental L-function.
  • "This work was made possible by a combination of theoretical advances and the power of modern computers." During his lecture, Bian reported that it took approximately 10,000 hours of computer time to produce his initial results.
arithwsun arithwsun

Milliman Lecture I: Additive combinatorics and the primes « What's new - 0 views

  • However, it turns out that if one of the sets, say A, is sufficiently “uniform” or “pseudorandom”, then one can always solve this Goldbach-type problem, regardless of what the other two sets are. This type of fact is often established by Fourier-analytic means (or by closely related techniques, such as spectral theory), but let me give a heuristic combinatorial argument to indicate why one would expect this type of phenomenon to occur.
  • quares Primes Lagrange’s four square theorem: For every positive integer N, there exists a pattern in of the form . Vinogradov’s theorem: For every sufficiently large integer N, there exists a pattern in of the form . Fermat’s two square theorem: For every prime number , there exists a pattern in of the form . Even Goldbach conjecture: For every even number , there exists a pattern in of the form . Fermat’s four square theorem: There does not exist any pattern in of the form with . Green-Tao theorem: For any , there exist infinitely many patterns in of the form with . Pell’s equation: There are infinitely many patterns in of the form . Sophie Germain conjecture: There are infinitely many patterns in of the form .
arithwsun arithwsun

Pseudorandom number generation by p-adic ergodic transformations. arXiv Mathematics - CiteSeerX - 0 views

  • Abstract. The paper study counter-dependent pseudorandom number generators based on m-variate (m> 1) ergodic mappings of the space of 2-adic integers Z2. The sequence of internal states of these generators is defined by the recurrence law xi+1 = H B i (xi) mod 2 n, whereas their output sequence is zi = F B i (xi) mod 2 n; here xj, zj are m-dimensional vectors over Z2. It is shown how the results obtained for a univariate case could be extended to a multivariate case. 1.
  • Foundations of Cryptography. Basic Tools. Cambridge Univ – Goldreich - 2001
  • 129 Uniform distribution of sequences – Kuipers, Niederreiter - 1974
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • 22 The art of computer programming. Vol. 2: Seminumerical Algorithms – Knuth - 1981
  • 8 Uniformly distributed sequences of p-adic integers – Anashin - 1994
arithwsun arithwsun

E. Kowalski's blog » Averages of singular series, or: when Poisson is everywhere - 0 views

  • I have recently posted on my web page a preprint concerning some averages of “singular series” (another example of pretty bad mathematical terminology…) arising in the prime k-tuple conjecture, and its generalization the Bateman-Horn conjecture. The reason for looking at this is a result of Gallagher which is important in the original version of the proof by Goldston-Pintz-Yildirim that there are infinitely many primes p for which the gap q-p between p and the next prime q is smaller than ε times the average gap, for arbitrary small ε>0.
arithwsun arithwsun

talks.cam : A new norm related to the Gowers U^3 norm - 0 views

  • A new norm related to the Gowers U^3 norm Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal Pablo Candela Pokorna Monday 16 February 2009, 16:00-17:00 MR12, CMS, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WB. If you have a question about this talk, please contact Anton Evseev. The uniformity norms (or U^d norms, for d>1 a positive integer) were introduced about ten years ago by Gowers in his effective proof of Szemerédi’s theorem, and have played an important role in arithmetic combinatorics ever since. The U^2 norm is naturally related to Fourier analysis, and a very active trend in current research aims to develop an analogue of Fourier analysis for each U^d norm with d>2. The body of results of this research for d=3 is known as quadratic Fourier analysis. After an introduction to this area we will consider a new norm related to the U^3 norm, and discuss some of its applications in quadratic Fourier analysis, including a strengthening of a central theorem of Green and Tao (the inverse theorem for the U^3 norm), and how this stronger version of the theorem can be used to give a new proof of a recent decomposition-theorem of Gowers and Wolf. This talk is part of the Junior Algebra/Combinatorics/Number Theory seminar series.
arithwsun arithwsun

Conference update, part II « The Accidental Mathematician - 0 views

  • In the second lecture (based on Gowers’s joint work with Julia Wolf) we were introduced to decomposition theorems. A decomposition theorem for the norm can be stated as follows: if is a function (on either or ) with , there is a decomposition , where are “generalized quadratic phase functions” and are error terms with and small. This can be deduced from the inverse theorem of Green-Tao; in fact a similar statement was already implicit in their work, based on the energy increment argument. Tim presented a different approach to deducing decomposition theorems from inverse theorems, based on functional-analytic arguments involving the geometry of normed spaces (specifically, a variant of the Hahn-Banach theorem).
  • This can be applied to the question of counting solutions to systems of linear equations in sets. Let’s say that we are interested in finding sensible conditions under which a set will have the “statistically correct” number of solutions to a system of linear equations. For instance, if it is 4-term arithmetic progressions that we are concerned with, then uniformity is sufficient (and, in general, necessary). Green and Tao prove a more general result of this type: they define the complexity of a system of linear forms, and prove that systems of complexity are controlled by norms.
  • Gowers and Wolf, however, do not stop there. Suppose that, instead of 4-term progressions, we are interested in configurations of the form, say, . The complexity of this system in the sense of Green-Tao is 2, hence a set uniform in the norm will contain the “right” number of such configurations. Gowers and Wolf, however, can prove that uniformity already guarantees the same conclusion! The difference between the two examples? The squares are linearly dependent, whereas are not. Gowers and Wolf prove that such “square independence” is in fact both sufficient and necessary for a system of complexity 2 to be controlled by the $U^2$ norm. The proof is based on the decomposition theorem described earlier.
arithwsun arithwsun

Fermath - The Prime Numbers and Their Distribution - 0 views

  • The Prime Numbers and Their Distribution User Rating: / 5 PoorBest  Written by Giulia Biagini    Sunday, 14 January 2007 Basic Information Title: The Prime Numbers and Their Distribution Authors: Gérald Tenenbaum and Michel Mendès France Paperback: 115 pages Publisher: American Mathematical Society (May 2000) Language: English ISBN-10: 0821816470 ISBN-13: 978-0821816479
  • This book gives a general and pleasing overview on many topics about the distribution of prime numbers. Its goal is to provide insights of different nature on that theme and this is performed through the illustration of conjectures, methods, results and even (very concise) proofs.   The volume is divided into five chapters, they are: Genesis: from Euclid to Chebyshev; The Riemann Zeta Function; Stochastic Distribution of Prime Numbers; An Elementary Proof of the Prime Number Theorem; The Major Conjectures. All of them are almost independent one to another, so you may skip the ones you are not interested in wIthout any problem. The first one consists of
1 - 20 of 24 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page