This group is briefly mentioned in the chapter on Pranks in this week's reading. The fired game designer for the SIms helicopter game left and joined this group-- pretty much pranksters of an online nature. While it has little to do with video games, it has everything to do with ethos in an Internet age.
Augmented reality means that " . . . our reality is both technological and organic, both digital and physical, all at once." This short post was referenced in both "The Myth of Cyberspace" and "Picture Pluperfect," so I thought I'd bookmark it here in case anyone was interested.
Computers have been grading multiple-choice tests in schools for years. To the relief of English teachers everywhere, essays have been tougher to gauge. But look out, teachers: A new study finds that software designed to automatically read and grade essays can do as good a job as humans — maybe even better.
My last day teaching was Friday and already they're trying to make it so I can't come back :( Though, I've seen computer poetry and I'm not sold on the idea that computers can gauge quality...
Consider Mcluhan's concept that electronic media creates a construct of the human nervous system. Here you'll see it in its literal form as the mapped out Internet.
"Adopted by the NCTE Executive Committee, February 15, 2008 Literacy has always been a collection of cultural and communicative practices shared among members of particular groups. As society and technology change, so does literacy. Because technology has increased the intensity and complexity of literate environments, the twenty-first century demands that a literate person possess a wide range of abilities and competencies, many literacies."
From about page: "We make it easy and attractive for the web generation to give back through our Fellowship, which connects technologists with cities to work together to innovate; our Accelerator, which will support disruptive civic startups; and our Brigade, which helps local, community groups reuse civic software."
Are Wikipedians good historians? As in the
old tale of the blind men and the elephant, your assessment of Wikipedia as history depends a great deal on what part you touch. It also depends, as we shall see, on how you define “history.”
A parable often used to describe the different interpretations of religion.
You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially,
provided … you add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License.”
Wikipedia as History
online historical writing
Part of the problem is that such broad synthetic writing is not easily done collaboratively.
Yet what is most impressive is that Wikipedia has found unpaid volunteers to write surprisingly detailed and reliable portraits of relatively obscure historical figures—for
example, 900 words on the Union general Romeyn B. Ayres.
whatever-centric,” they acknowledge in one of their many self-critical
commentaries.
Wikipedia can act as a megaphone, amplifying the (sometimes incorrect) conventional wisdom.
great democratic triumph of Wikipedia—its demonstration that people are eager for free and accessible information resources.
Even Jimmy Wales, who has been more tolerant of “difficult people” than Sanger, complained about “an unfortunate tendency
of disrespect for history as a professional discipline.”
Wikipedia's view of history is not only more anecdotal and colorful than professional history, it is also—again like much popular history—more
factualist.
the problem of Wikipedian history is not that it disregards
the facts but that it elevates them above everything else and spends too much time and energy (in the manner of many collectors)
on organizing those facts into categories and lists.
also affect how scholarly work is produced, shared, and debated
This is an article that discusses the views of professional historians regarding wikipedia. I think it makes a number of interesting claims both regarding the management or historical data and wikipedia's role in promoting a particular historical paradigm.