Group items tagged

"It seems only fitting to explore the role of questions in education by asking questions about the process of doing so. I propose that we start with the customary way of framing this topic and then proceed to questions that are deeper and potentially more subversive of traditional schooling. 1. WHICH QUESTIONS? To begin, let's consider what we might ask our students. The least interesting questions are those with straightforward factual answers. That's why a number of writers have encouraged the use of questions described variously as "true" (Wolf, 1987), "essential" (Simon, 2002), "generative" (Perkins, 1992; Perrone, 1998), "guiding" (Traver, 1998), or "fertile" (Harpaz & Lefstein, 2000). What the best of these share is that they're open-ended. Sometimes, in fact, no definitive right answer can be found at all. And even when there is one - or at least when there is reason to prefer some responses to others - the answer isn't obvious and can't be summarized in a sentence. Why is it so hard to find a cure for cancer? Do numbers ever end? Why do people lie? Why did we invade Vietnam? Grappling with meaty questions like these (which were among those generated by a class in Plainview, NY) is a real project . . . literally. A question-based approach to teaching tends to shade into learning that is problem- (Delisle, 1997) and project-based (Kilpatrick, 1918; Blumenfeld et al., 1991; Wolk, 1998). Intellectual proficiency is strengthened as students figure out how to do justice to a rich question. As they investigate and come to understand important ideas more fully, new questions arise along with better ways of asking them, and the learning spirals upwards. Guiding students through this process is not a technique that can be stapled onto our existing pedagogy, nor is it something that teachers can be trained to master during an in-service day. What's required is a continual focus on creating a classroom that is about thinking rather

"Según Kolb, a la hora de aprender se ponen en juego cuatro capacidades diferentes: Capacidad de Experiencia Concreta (EC): ser capaz de involucrase por completo, abiertamente y sin prejuicios en experiencias nuevas. Capacidad de Observación Reflexiva (OR): ser capaz de reflexionar acerca de estas experiencias y de observarlas desde múltiples perspectivas. Capacidad de Conceptualización Abstracta (CA): ser capaz de crear nuevos conceptos y de integrar sus observaciones en teorías lógicamente sólidas. Capacidad de Experimentación Activa (EA): ser capaz de emplear estas teorías para tomar decisiones y solucionar problema David A. Kolb y Roger Fry crearon el conocido como "Círculo del aprendizaje a través de la experiencia". Los autores argumentan que el aprendizaje puede comenzar en cualquiera de los cuatro puntos, aunque los más habitual sea comenzar por una experiencia concreta. Igualmente señalan que más que un círculo, debe entenderse la progresión cognitiva como una espiral que va pasando sucesivamente por cada uno de los cuatro tipos de actividades. Como desarrollo de este modelo, los autores propusieron un cuadro de estilos cognitivos: dado que no era habitual que los distintos individuos fueran igualmente capaces en los cuatro tipos de actividad, podían distinguirse cuatro estilos según sus competencias se inclinasen más por un tipo de actividad u otro."