"We are interested in experimenting with the MOOC format to design a course that engages people with the intersection of popular culture and education."
technology is determined by the political and economic structures of society. Questions about ownership and control are key in this orientation
technology is shaped and takes meaning from how individuals and groups choose to use it
Which of these perspectives do you lean towards in your understanding of the relationship between technology and pedagogy? Can you point to instances in society or in your own context where this stance is necessary or useful?
Which of these perspectives do you lean towards in your understanding of the relationship between technology and pedagogy? Can you point to instances in society or in your own context where this stance is necessary or useful?
technology could solve the three most pressing problems of education: access, quality and cost
in all parts of the world evolving technology is the main force that is changing society
a model technological determinist position,
what observations can you make about his utopian arguments about education? What currency do they continue to have in this field?
the orientation here is clearly dystopic
‘administrators and commercial partners’ as being in favour of ‘teacherless’ digital education,
‘teachers and students’ as being against it
these divisions have never been clear, and they certainly aren’t now.
Why does Noble say that technology is a ‘vehicle’ and a ‘disguise’ for the commercialization of higher education? How can we relate this early concern with commercialism to current debates about MOOCs, for example? And how are concerns about ‘automation’ and ‘redundant faculty’ still being played out today?
the consequences of digital education
What kind of determinist position do they take? To what extent are they utopic or dystopic visions of the future? Why have the ideas they represent been so readily taken up and distributed within all educational sectors?
metaphor of the native and the immigrant
Prensky warns ‘immigrant’ teachers that they face irrelevance unless they figure out how to adapt their methods and approaches to new generations of learners.
how does the language he uses work to persuade the reader? Who are ‘we’ and who are ‘they’? What associations do you have with the idea of the ‘native’ and the ‘immigrant’, and how helpful are these in understanding teacher-student relationships?
What is being left out of the story of the internet here, and from what position is this story being constructed?
technological determinism,
Dahlberg, L (2004). Internet Research Tracings: Towards Non-Reductionist Methodology. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9/3
This paper conducts a critical visual analysis of an online learning resource, exploring the potential of visual methodologies for reading and analysing the media through which pedagogy is constructed and
expressed. by Jen Ross, Sian Bayne, Zoe Williamson. UofEdinburgh
is the belief (as Kolowich suggests) that increasing the “human” element of an online course is best done by either showing the face/voice of the teacher
Asynchronous communication links with my local time, my skills, my preferences, my interests, my agenda. So it is focuses on ME. Synchronous communication links with teachers and other learners, it is spontaneous and lets you know how is your GROUP.”
In our survey, convenience was one of the main reasons people preferred asynchronous learning