Group items tagged

The funny thing about duplicate content is that you don't really have to have it for it to appear as if you do have it. But whether you have duplicate content on your site or not, to the search engines appearances are everything . The engines are pretty much just mindless bots that can't reason. They only see what is, or appears to be there and then do what the programmers have determined through the algorithm. How you set up your internal linking structure plays a significant role in whether you set yourself up to appear if you have duplicate content on your site or not. Some things we do without thinking, setting ourselves up for problems ahead. With a little foresight and planning, you can prevent duplicate content issues that are a result of poor internal link development. For example, we know that when we link to site.com/page1.html in one place but then link to www.site.com/page1.html in another, that we are really linking to the same page. But to the search engines, the www. can make a difference. They'll often look at those two links as links to two separate pages. And then analyze each page as if it is a duplicate of the other. But there is something we can do with our internal linking to alleviate this kind of appearance of duplicate content. Link to the www. version only Tomorrow I'll provide information on how to set up your site so when someone types in yoursite.com they are automatically redirected to www.yoursite.com. It's a great permanent fix, but as a safety measure, I also recommend simply adjusting all your links internally to do the same. Example of not linking to www. version. In the image above you can see that the domain contains the www., but when you mouse over any of the navigation links, they point to pages without the www. Even if you have a permanent redirect in place, all the links on your site should point to the proper place. At the very least you're making the search engines and visitors NOT have to redirect. At best, should y

I noticed CNN uses some capital letters and sometimes whole words in capital in their URL. Here is what I thought of the advantages and disadvantages and please feel free to share some more ideas. The advantages: # You make the word stand out # Some search engines might put more emphasis on those words The disadvantages: # It makes it more difficult for users to type in the URL or suggest the link via phone. # It may confuse users, making them think URL's like domains are not case sensitive at all. webing #:3652026 6:04 pm on May 16, 2008 (utc 0) i thought urls were not case sensitive? i just tried my domain name in capital letters and it redirected me to the non capital letters so i do think domains are not case sensitive. sorry if i'm completly wrong ^^. pageoneresults #:3652029 6:10 pm on May 16, 2008 (utc 0) You know, its funny you should start this topic. I was just getting ready to do a full blown topic on Pascal Casing and "visual" marketing advantages. I started a topic back in 2007 September here... Domain Names and Pascal Casing http://www.webmasterworld.com/domain_names/3457393.htm No, domain names are not case sensitive. These past 12 months I've been on a mission and changing everything to Pascal Casing when it comes to domain names. Its much easier to read and separate words and it just looks nicer. I've been experimenting with this and it works. Google AdWords is a great place to test the effectiveness of Pascal Casing. What's really cool is that you can literally change your hard coded references to Pascal Casing and when you hover over them, they show lower case. Its a browser feature I guess. I never gave it much thought until this past year when I started my changes. I've also gone one step further and use Pascal Casing in full addresses. We have a rewrite in place that forces lower case so we can do pretty much whatever we want with the URI and file naming. [edited by: pageoneresults at 6:11 pm (utc) on May 16, 2008] ted

Google Says Domain Registrations Don't Affect SEO, Or Do They? Sep 9, 2009 at 2:01pm ET by Matt McGee Over at Search Engine Roundtable today, Barry Schwartz writes about the latest comments from Google about domain registration and its impact on SEO/search rankings. In this case, it's Google employee John Mueller suggesting in a Google Webmaster Help forum thread that Google doesn't look at the length of a domain registration: A bunch of TLDs do not publish expiration dates - how could we compare domains with expiration dates to domains without that information? It seems that would be pretty hard, and likely not worth the trouble. Even when we do have that data, what would it tell us when comparing sites that are otherwise equivalent? A year (the minimum duration, as far as I know) is pretty long in internet-time :-). But let's look at some more evidence. Earlier this year, Danny spoke with Google's Matt Cutts about a variety of domain/link/SEO issues. In light of the claims from domain registrars that longer domain registrations are good for SEO, Danny specifically asked "Does Domain Registration Length Matter?" Matt's reply: To the best of my knowledge, no search engine has ever confirmed that they use length-of-registration as a factor in scoring. If a company is asserting that as a fact, that would be troubling. But wait, there's more! Shortly after the Q&A with Danny that we posted here, Matt published more thoughts on the matter in a video on the Google Webmaster Central Channel on YouTube. If you don't have time to watch the video, Matt says, "My short answer is not to worry very much about that [the number of years a domain is registered], not very much at all." He reiterates that the domain registrar claims "are not based on anything we said," and talks about a Google "historical data" patent that may or may not be part of Google's algorithm. He sums it up by saying, "make great content, don't worry nea

Google Says Domain Registrations Don't Affect SEO, Or Do They? Sep 9, 2009 at 2:01pm ET by Matt McGee Over at Search Engine Roundtable today, Barry Schwartz writes about the latest comments from Google about domain registration and its impact on SEO/search rankings. In this case, it's Google employee John Mueller suggesting in a Google Webmaster Help forum thread that Google doesn't look at the length of a domain registration: A bunch of TLDs do not publish expiration dates - how could we compare domains with expiration dates to domains without that information? It seems that would be pretty hard, and likely not worth the trouble. Even when we do have that data, what would it tell us when comparing sites that are otherwise equivalent? A year (the minimum duration, as far as I know) is pretty long in internet-time :-). But let's look at some more evidence. Earlier this year, Danny spoke with Google's Matt Cutts about a variety of domain/link/SEO issues. In light of the claims from domain registrars that longer domain registrations are good for SEO, Danny specifically asked "Does Domain Registration Length Matter?" Matt's reply: To the best of my knowledge, no search engine has ever confirmed that they use length-of-registration as a factor in scoring. If a company is asserting that as a fact, that would be troubling. But wait, there's more! Shortly after the Q&A with Danny that we posted here, Matt published more thoughts on the matter in a video on the Google Webmaster Central Channel on YouTube. If you don't have time to watch the video, Matt says, "My short answer is not to worry very much about that [the number of years a domain is registered], not very much at all." He reiterates that the domain registrar claims "are not based on anything we said," and talks about a Google "historical data" patent that may or may not be part of Google's algorithm. He sums it up by saying, "make great content, don't worry nea

Funny, I shared and highlighted this article 10 days ago