Skip to main content

Home/ Digital Civilization/ Group items tagged philosophy

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Katherine Chipman

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/linguistics-and-philosophy/24-00-problems-of-philosophy-fall... - 1 views

  •  
    A great paper exploring relativism.
kristina cummins

Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy - 1 views

  •  
    Rene Descartes is important to the Enlightenment Period. He is known as The Father of Philosophy. Meditations on First Philosophy is one of his greatest works.
Kristi Koerner

Descartes, René: Overview [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] - 0 views

  •  
    Rene Descartes as the "Father of Modern Philosophy"
Sean Watson

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  • In 1672, the journal published Newton's first paper New Theory about Light and Colours
  • it has remained in continuous publication ever since, making it the world's longest running scientific journal
  • The use of the word "philosophical" in the title derives from the phrase "natural philosophy", which was the equivalent of what we would now generically call "science
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Oldenburg published the journal at his own personal expense and seems to have entered into an agreement with the Council of the Royal Society allowing him to keep any resulting profits
  • He was to be disappointed, however, since the journal performed poorly from a financial point of view during Oldenburg's lifetime
  • Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday, and Charles Darwin
Jake Corkin

Dreaming and reality - 0 views

  •  
    This blogger (i think this is a blog) poses the question "are dreams extensions of reality?" she uses descartes philosophy "i think therefore i am" to prove they are.
Danny Patterson

John Locke Philosophy: English Philosopher, First of British Empiricists - 0 views

  •  
    Brief yet condensed summary of John Locke and his life
James Wilcox

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding by John Locke - Reviews, Discussion, Bookclubs,... - 0 views

  •  
    John Locke's philosophy on Nature vs Nurture.  He concludes that its all based off of observation and our environment in which we live and grow.
Erin Hamson

Bacon, Francis [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] - 0 views

shared by Erin Hamson on 18 Sep 10 - Cached
  • Bacon to his credit accepted the judgment against him without excuse. According to his own Essayes, or Counsels, he should have known and done better.
    • Erin Hamson
       
      If this (highlighted) is the purpose of science then why do companies make millions, through keeping their research locked up? I would like to see knowledge like atomic weapons locked up but the rest of it?
  •  
    Insight into political/professional life. Not taught regularly in school
anonymous

Tabula rasa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

shared by anonymous on 20 Sep 10 - Cached
    • anonymous
       
      I think this philosophy fits well with the idea that a person can determine hi own future. A very humanistic view
Brian Earley

Rene Descartes perceptions of philosophy - 0 views

  • As Descartes said, “Those who set about giving precepts must esteem themselves more skilful than those to whom they advance them”
  • In other words, someone might alter the truth solely so they could come up with something to say, while the real truth might not be capable of being expressed so easily, it can only be observed. Some things in life are too complicated to express, but however there are going to be people who believe they can express those things, even though they cannot accurately do so.
    • Brian Earley
       
      I have read scientific journals wherein the author reports on complex interactions or relationships on the molecular level. Often I believe that they really cannot accurately do so. Perhaps scientific journals would be better if they were accompanied by videos. That would make them more like blog posts.
  • ...16 more annotations...
  • are the emotions which are based off of your opinions even real, since they are based off of opinions?
  • Your perception is going to determine what it is that you feel, that is, your conscious and unconscious perception of what is going on is
  • For it seemed to me that I might meet with much more truth in the reasonings that each man makes on the matters that specially concern him, and the issue of which would very soon punish him if he made a wrong judgment, than in the case of those made by a man of letters in his study touching speculations that lead to no result, and that bring about no other consequences to himself excepting that he will be all the more vain the more they are removed from common sense, since in this case proves to him to have employed so much more ingenuity and skill trying to make them seem probable.
  • More especially did I reflect in each matter that came before me as to anything that could make it subject to suspicion of doubt, and give occasion for mistake, and I rooted out of my mind all the errors that might have formerly crept in. Not that indeed I imitated the skeptics, who only doubt for the sake of doubting, and pretend to by always uncertain; for, on the contrary, my design was only to provide myself with good ground for assurance, and to reject the quicksand and mud in order to find the rock or clay.”
  • since emotional intelligence is not completely concrete, it can be subject to skeptics
  • “how do I know that anything is even real”
  • Accordingly I shall now suppose, not that a true God, who as such must be supremely good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant genius exceedingly powerful and cunning has devoted all his powers in the deceiving of me; I shall suppose that the sky, the earth, colors, shapes, sounds and all external things are illusions and impostures of which this evil genius has availed himself for the abuse of my credulity…”
  • I am, I exist. This is certain. How often? As often as I think. For it might indeed be that if I entirely ceased to think, I should thereupon altogether cease to exist. I am not at present admitting anything which is not necessarily true; and, accurately speaking, I am therefore [taking myself to be] only a thinking thing, that is to say, a mind, an understanding or reason-terms the significance of which has hitherto been unknown to me. I am, then a real thing, and really existent. What thing? I have said it, a thinking thing
  • So it really is thought that makes him who he is, since he is thinking about himself all of the time, in addition to thinking about and in regular life.
  • Thought determines who someone is because your thoughts are controlled, and all your thoughts over your lifetime caused your emotional development, which causes you to be who you are.
  • So it is easy to say that your thoughts understand and/or control who you are, but it is much harder to say that your emotions understand and/or control who you are.
  • I recognize it is impossible that He should ever deceive me, since in all fraud and deception there is some element of imperfection. The power of deception may indeed seem to be evidence of subtlety or power; yet unquestionably the will to deceive testifies to malice and feebleness, and accordingly cannot be found in God.
    • Brian Earley
       
      I think people in "The Matrix" would love Descartes
  • “To laugh often and much; To win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; To earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; To appreciate beauty, to find the best in others; To leave the world a bit better, whether by a healthy child, a garden patch, or a redeemed social condition; To know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded”
  • conclusive as to whether or not pleasing other people infinitely is going to be self-beneficial, it could be considered a perfect thing to do since it is positively contributing to life.
    • Brian Earley
       
      The conclusion for me from this commentary is that thoughts are what make us who we are. Therefore, we must put a lot of our energy into controlling our thoughts so we can become what we want to be.
    • Brian Earley
       
      On my mission, I taught a lady that was offended to the point of tears when a member called the Prophet, the 'mouthpiece' of the Lord. She thought it as a very degrading term to call such a respectable man. Perceptions determine feelings.
  •  
    This commentary explains the unique observations that Rene Descartes made of observations. I feel like I have had similar thoughts at times. I feel comforted knowing a dead French guy thought the same way that I think.
Jake Corkin

Renee Descartes and His philosophy - 0 views

  •  
    Just a basic informational guide to Decartes and his beliefs. similar to a wikipedia entry.
Jake Corkin

Descartes Quotes - 0 views

  •  
    here are 26 or so quotes by descartes.
Kristi Koerner

Descartes' Life and Works > Descartes' 1616 Law Thesis -- English Translation (Stanford... - 0 views

    • Kristi Koerner
       
      Why did Descartes see Law as the way to explore rationality?
  •  
    Descartes Law Thesis
Katherine Chipman

Margaret Cavendish: Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy - 0 views

  • In short, Magnifying-glasses are like a high heel to a short legg, which if it be made too high, it is apt to make the wearer fall, and at the best, can do no more then represent exterior figures in a bigger, and so in a more deformed shape and posture then naturally they are; but as for the interior form and motions of a Creature, as I said before, they can no more represent them, then Telescopes can the interior essence and nature of the Sun, and what matter it consists of; for if one that never had seen Milk before, should look upon it through a Microscope, he would never be able to discover the interior parts of Milk by that instrument, were it the best that is in the World; neither the Whey, nor the Butter, nor the Curds. Wherefore the best optick is a perfect natural Eye, and a regular sensitive perception, and the best judg is Reason, and the best study is Rational Contemplation joyned with the observations of regular sense, but not deluding Arts
Katherine Chipman

George Boole (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) - 0 views

  • George Boole (1815–1864) was an English mathematician and a founder of the algebraic tradition in logic. He worked as a schoolmaster in England and from 1849 until his death as professor of mathematics at Queen's University, Cork, Ireland. He revolutionized logic by applying methods from the then-emerging field of symbolic algebra to logic. Where traditional (Aristotelian) logic relied on cataloging the valid syllogisms of various simple forms, Boole's method provided general algorithms in an algebraic language which applied to an infinite variety of arguments of arbitrary complexity.
  • Starting at the age of 16 it was necessary for Boole to find gainful employment, since his father was no longer capable of providing for the family. After 3 years working as a teacher in private schools, Boole decided, at the age of 19, to open his own small school in Lincoln. He would be a schoolmaster for the next 15 years, until 1849 when he became a professor at the newly opened Queen's University in Cork, Ireland. With heavy responsibilities for his parents and siblings, it is remarkable that he nonetheless found time during the years as a schoolmaster to continue his own education and to start a program of research, primarily on differential equations and the calculus of variations connected with the works of Laplace and Lagrange (which he studied in the original French).
  •  
    More about George Boole.
  •  
    This is fascinating that he began his career as a school teacher.
1 - 20 of 24 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page