Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

This article is credible. It is a research paper measuring how students actually use their information literacy skills. It contains many scholarly references and conclusions seem to be well supported. The authors are identified and the article is from a professional journal.

The score for this article was an 76 -Average based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received:  Currency (0 to 15 Points)  The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes  The site has been updated recently. Yes  Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No  Total: 10  Content (0 to 15 Points)  The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes  This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No  The information on the topic is thorough. No  The information is accurate. Yes  The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes  The information is in good taste. Yes  The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes  Total: 10.7  Authority (0 to 10 Points)  The authors are clearly identified. Yes  The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. No  There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No  You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes  Total: 5  Navigation (0 to 10 Points)  You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes  The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes  The links are easy to identify. Yes, on the physical page there are hyperlinks provided that correspond to different topics relating to the article.  The links are logically grouped. Yes  The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes  There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes  The links are relevant to the subject. Yes  The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes  Total: 10  Experience (0 to 10 Points)  The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes  The page is worth the time. Yes  The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes  The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes  Total: 10 

1) Content - The content on this page is good. It can be easily read and understood. The layout allows it to be read while still adding adds for other related articles. It was uploaded 3/15 and updated later the same day. 2) Credibility - The Author itself I'm not familiar with, but it also appears to be an article by Reuters. Reuters is an organization that a lot of news agencies use and are widely trusted. 3) Critical Thinking - Because of their references and ties to Reuters you can with most certainly use critical thinking to assume this page is legitimate. 4) Copyright - The website it's self only says 2014 for the copyright. But this article itself was uploaded 3/15/14. Because of their copyright it can be assumed that this article is covered by it. 5) Citation - They do use some outside images and the text itself is from Reuters. But they credit them on the page so there is no infringement. 6) Continuity - This page can only be physically edited by the Huffington Post staff. So the continuity is withheld without errors. 7) Censorship - Because this page is moderated by Huffington post themselves there is a chance that it is edited. Also the comments system seem to be moderated in the regard that you can post what you want but if you offend someone the site admin can take it down. 8) Connectivity - The connectivity to the page is good. Many users can access it at the same time and it can be used as a jumping off point to either paid supported products or additional articles written by Huffington Post. 9) Comparability - You could take the information on this page and check it against numerous sources. I checked Google and came up with many results that either cite the beginning article or copy this article directly. 10) - Context - The context of this page is really good. They maintain the stance that Heineken and Sam Adams are taking without passing judgment, in support or not, for either the companies or the parade organize

Misleading information.

false information that is intended to mislead.[8 minutes ago] false information that is intended to mislead.[8 minutes ago]

The knowledge of wha your digital identity actually is.

I think our digital identity represents how we behave, intercact, and portray ourselves in the digital world.

very good search criteria here. explains how to narrow your search and validify information

using technology in school is helping the growth of children and developing a stronger learning process and technique. Utilizing these applications helps to keep the children more interested in their school work and the tend not to lose focus

Interesting!

Good examples!

digital identity; is online identity describes a person or a thing and contains information

1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Incredibly so. It not only had links to the web article but also links and information on the entire company. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Not directly but through links to the company's press releases. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. The time stamp on the article is March 12, 2014. It doesn't appear to be revised after that date. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Not really. This one is pretty good because it covers not only basic information about the company but also links to the content I was looking for directly. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. No but it does have the page it is from. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. Not for the person who wrote the article but the financial institution that it came from. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes from Reuters Knowledge Direct. 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. This site is often updated. In this case mostly in a timely fashion. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. It still isn't real time but it is pretty close. This article was uploaded just a couple days ago. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes. At least as it relates to the discussion of gay rights. This article has more information on the whole company. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. This article is factual instead of guiding towards a particular view. Because it focuses on the company as a whole and not the current debate it maintains its neutrality. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not within the scope of this article. Because this article just dic

Note 1: Widespread access to the Internet and other electronic media has served as something of a double-edged sword with respect to plagiarism; the Web allows students to plagiarism with cut-and-paste ease, but also allows academics to more easily identify the source of the plagiarized material when plagiarism is suspected(Lyon, Barrett, and Malcolm 2006). Note 2: The Internet allow suspicious student writing to be more quickly compared to other sources using a standard internet search engine, leaving the detection of suspicious writing as the principle challenge. Note 3:  given that some systems now permit students to upload their own writing to check for plagiarism in advance of submitting assignments, rates of unintentional plagiarism may drop, making the remaining intentional plagiarism easier to detect. Note 4: Others argue that the adoption of a plagiarism-detection system will not only aid faculty in detecting plagiarism, but will serve as a deterrent to plagiarism in the first place. Note 5: For example, Kraemer (2008) has argued that students who are made aware that plagiarism-detection technologies are in use should, at a minimum, avoid intentionally copying from other sources because of the near certainty that they will be caught. Further, for those students who may unintentionally plagiarize out of ignorance about the rule of citation, the use of plagiarism-detection software may motivate them to better inform themselves about citations and to double-check their own papers for unintentional plagiarism.

This article defines Digital Immigrants & Digital Natives.