Group items tagged

1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Incredibly so. It not only had links to the web article but also links and information on the entire company. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Not directly but through links to the company's press releases. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. The time stamp on the article is March 12, 2014. It doesn't appear to be revised after that date. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Not really. This one is pretty good because it covers not only basic information about the company but also links to the content I was looking for directly. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. No but it does have the page it is from. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. Not for the person who wrote the article but the financial institution that it came from. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes from Reuters Knowledge Direct. 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. This site is often updated. In this case mostly in a timely fashion. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. It still isn't real time but it is pretty close. This article was uploaded just a couple days ago. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes. At least as it relates to the discussion of gay rights. This article has more information on the whole company. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. This article is factual instead of guiding towards a particular view. Because it focuses on the company as a whole and not the current debate it maintains its neutrality. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not within the scope of this article. Because this article just dic

Article discusses the strategies for copyright lawmakers.

8 During the 112th Congress,  the House and Senate considered two competing measures, the Stop  Online Piracy Act ("SOPA")29 and the Protect IP Act of 2011 ("PIPA").30  SOPA and PIPA were designed to target foreign websites that engage in  copyright violations.31 The bills would allow the Justice Department to seek  court orders requiring U.S. websites to block access to foreign sites offering  pirated material, and would allow copyright owners to seek court orders  preventing such sites from receiving payment services from the U.S.32

8 During the 112th Congress,  the House and Senate considered two competing measures, the Stop  Online Piracy Act ("SOPA")29 and the Protect IP Act of 2011 ("PIPA").30  SOPA and PIPA were designed to target foreign websites that engage in  copyright violations.31 The bills would allow the Justice Department to seek  court orders requiring U.S. websites to block access to foreign sites offering  pirated material, and would allow copyright owners to seek court orders  preventing such sites from receiving payment services from the U.S.32

Ten C's Rating: Currency: 14 Content:11 Authority:9 Navigation:9 Experience:10 Multimedia:5 Treatment: 10 Access:5 Miscellaneous:10 Total: 83 Good The article displays different ways the film industry is struggling.

This is a credible article. It is printed in a professional journal. It is peer reviewed. It has good references and well identified authors. It is written as a research paper.

This article is credible. It is a research paper measuring how students actually use their information literacy skills. It contains many scholarly references and conclusions seem to be well supported. The authors are identified and the article is from a professional journal.

great definition