Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged pharma

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Heather Farrow

Walgreens Partners With Big Pharma to Sell More Psychiatric Drugs - 0 views

  • May 12, 2016
  • by Martha Rosenberg
  • Just as the public is digesting the fact that former chairman and CEO of drug giant Genentech, Art Levinson, is now the CEO of a new Google life sciences venture with Big Pharma and that he also serves as chairman of Apple Inc., there are more insidious “partnerships” between Pharma and top corporations. Walgreens has now announced a “partnership” with Mental Health America, an advocacy group so steeped in Pharma money, it was investigated by Congress.
Govind Rao

The Pharma Drug That Is Bankrupting America | Alternet - 0 views

  • How can Gilead Sciences charge $84,000 for a drug that costs less than $300 to produce?
  • February 17, 2015
  • America is the land of breakthrough science -- and health care scams. The two seem to go hand in hand in the case of the new hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure named sofosbuvir, sold under the brand name Sovaldi by the drug company Gilead Sciences. There is no question that Solvadi is a godsend -- a lifesaver for millions of Americans, and perhaps someday for hundreds of millions of people around the world infected by Hepatitis C. Yet Sovaldi is also the poster child of a U.S. health care system that is being bankrupted by greed, lobbying and indefensible policies on drug pricing.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • According to researchers at Liverpool University, the actual production costs of Sovaldi for the 12-week course is in the range $68-$136. Indeed, generic sofosbuvir is currently being marketed in India at $300 per treatment course, after India refused to grant Gilead a patent for the Indian market. In other words, the U.S. price-cost markup is roughly 1,000-to-1!
Irene Jansen

An End to Blank Cheques. Getting More Value Out of Employer Drug Plans. June 2011 - 0 views

  •  
    Helen Stevenson (the former head of the Ontario Drug Plan who made major changes) has written a short piece on how employer-based plans should staunch the loss of money to big pharma.
Govind Rao

Big pharma's relationship with your doctor needs some U.S.-style sunshine - The Globe a... - 0 views

  • Mar. 26 2014
  • By the end of this year, President Barack Obama’s Sunshine Act will have drug companies report virtually every transfer of value to doctors and academic hospitals. With payments of as little as $10 dollars to be listed on a public website, this marks a serious undertaking in the world’s most sophisticated pharmaceutical market.
  • To be sure, it will take strong provincial leadership to hold pharmaceutical companies to account. We are calling on the Ontario Ministry of Health to make disclosures of payments to doctors compulsory for any pharma companies with drugs listed on the Ontario Drug Benefit Program. By making this information publicly available on a website, it will no longer fall on the patient to ask whether their physician has been paid by drug makers. This is efficient from a taxpayer’s perspective as it would not involve spending much public money, while it also leverages the bulk buying of drugs to put patients directly in the centre of care.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • In Canada, it’s time we start betting on patients over pharma.
Govind Rao

Seeing healthy returns in health-care shares - Infomart - 0 views

  • National Post Wed Dec 9 2015
  • Even bottom-up stock pickers need to pay attention to the bigger picture. So when global equities sold off last week after the European Central Bank failed to deliver as much stimulus the markets were hoping for, Dennis Mitchell was happy to step in and add to positions in his favourite companies. "One of the things that started the rout was the disconnect between the ECB's outlook and the market's," the portfolio manager at Sprott Asset Management said.
  • Unilever PLC is one example of a name that sold off with the rest of the market, but that Mitchell boosted his position in. One sector that's been beaten up of late is U.S. health care, whether biotech stocks that came under pressure due to their lofty valuations, only to recover and then pull back again, or pharma companies that are facing scrutiny from politicians due to drug pricing. This has prompted Mitchell to add to his exposure in the Sprott Global Focused Balance Class, and three other recently-launched funds he manages.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • You want to look at companies that are primarily taking costs out of the system, payers rather than providers," he said. "Providers such as hospitals and other facilities aren't necessarily adding to the problem, but they are in the cost bucket that are trying to be taken out of the system in the U.S." Mitchell aims to build concentrated portfolios (35 to 45 names) of high-quality businesses that generate high returns on invested capital, strong recurring free cash flow, have a portfolio of irreplaceable assets, and finance their operations with low leverage.
  • Valuation itself is not a catalyst," he said. "It makes more sense to buy high-quality business that have generated strong returns historically, and offer enough return for the risk you're taking." For example, Mitchell only buys stocks that offer a total return of 15 per cent of more. Another holding, Medtronic PLC, a medical device company that typically grows its revenues between four and six per cent, appears to fit the bill.
  • Although its spine business is in a secular decline, the company is innovating and developing new therapies around catheters and drugcoated balloons. As a result, Mitchell expects it will grow its revenue at 10 per cent over the next three to five years. The company is also benefiting from a tax inversion following its purchase of U.K.-domiciled Covidien PLC, which freed up US$9 billion of cash that was outside the U.S. this past quarter. Medtronic thinks it can generate US$40 billion of free cash flow in the next five years, roughly half of which is set to be returned to investors in the form of dividend increases, share buybacks or special dividends.
  • They can allocate capital to other businesses and grow," Mitchell said. "It's also trading at a discount to its health-care peers, so it offers great upside." The portfolio manager also has a position in Novartis AG, which is still the largest pharma company in the world until the merger between Pfizer Inc. and Allergan PLV is complete. Like many names in the sector, Novartis faces pressure from generic drugs entering the market. That's the case with its cancer drug Gleevec. However,
  • Mitchell noted that Novartis has taken steps to replace its sales with another drug. But what's most compelling about this story is its pipeline of other drugs, including Entresto, which treats heart conditions and has shown strong efficacy and improvement versus existing drugs. Mitchell noted that it has "blockbuster" potential, with revenue potential of US$5 billion annually at peak. Similarly, Cosentyx, which treats severe cases of psoriasis that can cause arthritis, could be another big winner for Novartis. Mitchell also sees opportunity in Daimler AG, which is held in his global portfolios. While many people point to the auto industry as a sign of strength in the U.S. economy, Mitchell looked to Europe to find a German auto maker that has performed well.
  • He noted that China, a key market for many luxury auto makers, recently reduced taxes on small and mediumsized businesses, and Daimler has resolved a dispute it had with local dealerships there. "They've also put a number of their vehicles on a common platform with common parts, which brings down costs and boosts margins," Mitchell said. "With a better mix of highermargin, higher-value vehicles, I expect sales to pick up."
  • yler Anderson, National Post / Portfolio manager Dennis Mitchell sees a steady path to growth in biotech, pharma and other health-care stocks.
healthcare88

Big Pharma's "Stranglehold" on Congress Worsening Opioid Epidemic | Common Dreams | Bre... - 0 views

  • October 31, 2016
  • Former DEA official tells the Guardian how hundreds of millions are being spent to protect pharmaceutical industry
  • byLauren McCauley, staff writer
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • If it seems like Big Pharma has escaped accountability for its role in perpetuating the nation's deadly opioid epidemic, those suspicions are not unfounded. According to a former top Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) official, the industry's influence over Congress has successfully quashed efforts to regulate the pharmaceutical drug market aiding an unprecedented addiction to legal drugs.
Heather Farrow

Bayer and Monsanto: a Marriage Made in Hell - 0 views

  • May 27, 2016
  • by Martha Rosenberg – Ronnie Cummins
  • If Monsanto, perhaps the most hated GMO company in the world, joins hands with Bayer, one of the most hated Big Pharma corporations on Earth (whose evil deeds date back to World War I and the Nazi era), the newly formed seed-pesticide-drug behemoth would have combined annual sales of $67 billion.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • In the 1980s, Bayer sold Factor VIII concentrate, a blood-clotting medicine acquired from Cutter Laboratories in 1978. Though Factor VIII carried a high risk of transmitting AIDS and Bayer knew, Bayer continued to sell the drug in Asia and Latin America while selling a new, safer product in the West.
  • takeover would dilute Bayer’s core drug business currently flush with sales of its blood-thinner Xarelto and Eylea, a drug to treat blindness.
  • Coalition Against Bayer Dangers
  • Bayer, a history of unsafe drugs
  • Monsanto’s first entry into Big Pharma.
  • Blood clotting drug spread AIDS
  • all three proposed mergers face antitrust reviews by agencies in the U.S., Europe and China,
  • In Hong Kong and Taiwan alone, more than 100 hemophiliacs got H.I.V. and “many have since died,” reported the New York Times. 
  • Statin Baycol recalled
  • In 2001, Bayer withdrew its lucrative new statin drug Baycol because more than 50 people had died and more than six million patients were at risk from the deadly side effects of rapidly dissolving of muscle tissue.
  • Yaz birth control pill causes deaths
  • Xarelto, shady approval of a dangerous drug
  • underreported bright side: Industries that are doing well generally spin off; industries that are performing poorly generally merge and consolidate.
  • Millions Against Monsanto movement,
  • Not a chance, On October 14-16, merged or not with Bayer, the OCA and the global grassroots will expose Monsanto’s crimes against humanity and the environment at the Monsanto Tribunal, a citizens’ tribunal which will take place in The Hague, Netherlands.
Govind Rao

Canadian Medical Association Journal: CETA: A win for Canada or European pharma? - 0 views

  • September 24, 2014
  • A technical summary of CETA released by Canadian trade negotiators in October 2013 revealed the deal's potential to substantially increase drug costs by extending patent protection for new drugs two years beyond the 20 years currently provided, delaying the introduction of lower-cost generic drugs.
  • The deal will also allow drug companies to sue Canada using a legal mechanism known as investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), which relies on private arbitration tribunals rather than domestic courts. This also has the potential to inflict heavy costs. Using ISDS-type provisions in the North American Free Trade Agreement, Eli Lilly sued Canada for $500 million in June 2013 over court rulings invalidating patents on drugs for schizophrenia and hyperactivity.
Govind Rao

Americans Don't Like Pharma And Think They're Getting Ripped Off | Physicians for a Nat... - 0 views

  • By Jeffrey Young The Huffington Post, August 20, 2015
  • WASHINGTON -- Americans use prescription drugs and they know these medicines help people, but they still don't care much for pharmaceutical companies and think the industry is too money-hungry, according to a new survey. More than seven in 10 Americans think prescription drug prices are unreasonable, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation reported Thursday. And nearly eight in 10 people who actually take those drugs feel the same way.
Govind Rao

The costs of vilifying pharma - 0 views

  • CMAJ September 8, 2015 vol. 187 no. 12 First published July 27, 2015, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5112
  • Roger Collier
  • The practice of medicine is more transparent today than it was even a decade ago. Clinical trial registration, disclosure of physician–industry relationships at continuing medical education events, the Physician Payments Sunshine Act in the United States — these and other efforts have shed light on conflicts of interest and exposed potential biases. Though many transparency advocates say even more should be done, some doctors aren’t so sure.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • An anti-pharma bias may be steering bright young doctors away from areas of medicine in need of innovation, worries Dr. Jeffrey Drazen, editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Govind Rao

Michael Smyth: Lawsuit targets big pharma in firings of B.C. health ministry workers - 0 views

  • By Michael Smyth, The Province June 23, 2015
  • Did big pharmaceutical companies play any role in the B.C. government’s decision to fire eight provincial drug researchers?That’s the possibility suggested in a lawsuit filed by one of the fired workers, Bill Warburton, who sued the government for defamation and breach of contract.
  • “That’s a lot of money for them — to have their drugs listed on the PharmaCare program,” Colleen Fuller, president of the watchdog group PharmaWatch Canada, told me Monday.“The industry has a lot more influence over public policy than it used to,” Fuller said. “They spend a lot of time lobbying to make sure their drugs are listed.”
Govind Rao

Canadian Blood Services | OPSEU Diablogue - 0 views

  • Posted on April 25, 2014
  • The current debate over paid plasma donation has brought out a number of patient groups – including those funded by big-pharma – that are suggesting Canada has no choice but to pay for plasma donation owing to a world-wide shortage.
Govind Rao

25 Facts About the Pharmaceutical Industry, Vaccines and "Anti-Vaxers" | Global Research - 0 views

  • By Julie Lévesque Global Research, February 25, 2015
  • During the recent measles outbreak, the mainstream media blamed the epidemic solely on non vaccinated children, even though people who were vaccinated caught the disease and some vaccines have proven to be inefficient in the past.
  • In reality, many so-called “anti-vaxers” are not ALL totally against vaccines.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Why is the media so keen on portraying Big Pharma critics as crazy, uneducated, unscientific and irresponsible people?
  • Dr Marcia Angell worked for over two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.  She was fired after criticizing the pharmaceutical industry, which had exerted an overriding and negative influence on the scientific literature. She said: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published.”
  • China has measles outbreaks but 99% are vaccinated
  • Mandatory Chickenpox Vaccination Increases Disease Rates, Study Shows
  • In a 2012 measles outbreak in Quebec (Canada) over half of the cases were in vaccinated teenagers
  • Seasonal Flu Shots still contain thimerosal.
Govind Rao

Big Pharma's Nefarious Control of Health Care. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ... - 0 views

  • By Dr. Gary G. Kohls Global Research, March 02, 2016
  • For-profit corporate influences on for-profit medicine and for-profit “blue ribbon panels” explains much of what is regarded as the very profitable “standard of care” in medicine today. It also explains the prescribing habits and politics of many of us physicians.
  • Big Business, Big Pharma, Big Insurance and Big Medicine Aren’t Necessarily Good for Your Health
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Some Unwelcome Truths About Gardisil
  • prevent cancer of the cervix
  • Gardisil applies to only four of over a hundred known strains of HPV
  • No Guarantee of Vaccine Efficacy and Lots of Risks
  • nobody in America can sue vaccine companies
Govind Rao

It's time to examine pharma funding of doctors' education - Healthy Debate - 0 views

  • by Sheryl Spithoff, Joel Lexchin & Carol Kitai (Show all posts by Sheryl Spithoff, Joel Lexchin & Carol Kitai) December 2, 2015
  • The pharmaceutical industry seeks to increase sales by influencing how doctors prescribe medications. To help achieve this goal, it sponsors the education and ongoing training of doctors. The College of Family Physicians of Canada – the organization responsible for accrediting continuing medical education and certifying all family doctors in Canada – has expressed concern about industry’s influence over doctor education. In 2010, the College commissioned a taskforce to determine how much the sponsorship money was affecting the content of the educational programs it accredits. The College stated it did this with the intent of maintaining the “trust of its members, their patients and the Canadian public.”
Heather Farrow

[Friends of Medicare urge provincial government to legislate against private donor-paid... - 0 views

  • Prairie Post West Fri Sep 23 2016
  • Friends of Medicare urge provincial government to legislate against private donor-paid plasma collection By Rose Sanchez Southern Alberta Officials with the Friends of Medicare and BloodWatch.org were on a five-city tour of Alberta last week, in an effort to raise awareness about private, for-profit donor-paid plasma collection in the country. Both organizations would like to see a voluntary plasma collection system in Canada done through Canadian Blood Services, and provincial and territorial governments pass legislation to ensure private, for-profit donor-paid plasma "brokers" can't set up shop. About 40 people were in attendance at the Lethbridge stop on Sept. 12, while only a half dozen made it out to the Medicine Hat meeting Sept. 13. "It's sad that we have to have this discussion after what we've learned from the tainted blood scandal of the 1980s. We need to remind Canadians the importance of what happened back then," said Sandra Azocar, executive director of the Friends of Medicare (FOM). "Blood and plasma collection must remain voluntary and public and not be contracted out to anyone else."
  • Earlier this year, officials with FOM caught wind that Canadian Plasma Resources (CPR) was exploring the possibility of opening private, for-profit donor-paid plasma clinics in Alberta. CPR attempted to open a clinic in Ontario a few years ago, until the provincial government there, after a strong public lobby, introduced legislation to stop it from setting up shop. Friends of Medicare officials took their concerns about this to the provincial health minister. "We've been asking since that initial meeting, for (the provincial government) to put in legislation banning the practice for paid-for-plasma clinics," said Azocar. "We all know (free) markets work well, but it does not work well in health-care ... Friends of Medicare supports a publically-regulated, not-for-profit voluntary blood collection system in Canada." Azocar said private for-profit, donor-paid plasma collection needs to be banned in provincial law across Canada, as it has already been in both Ontario and Quebec.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Kat Lanteigne, executive director for BloodWatch.org and writer of the play Tainted based on three-years of research about the tainted blood scandal, travelled to Alberta to help spread the message about concerns about private, donor-paid plasma collection. Lanteigne said these types of clinics had started to show up in Ontario in the last few years. "This is a big-pharma push," she said. "If they can build a clinic and get a licence from Health Canada then they can open without the province's permission." She said that the private sale and collection of blood and plasma introduces risk into the system. She also dispelled another myth that plasma is being imported into the country. She said that is not the case, as about 70 per cent of the drugs produced from plasma is what is being imported. When successful in the fight to get Ontario to legislate against private, donor-paid plasma collection at the end of 2014, and because Quebec has a similar law, Lanteigne said they made the mistake of thinking that because the largest provinces in Canada had done this, the rest of the provinces would follow suit.
  • Instead, as part of one of her first decisions, the new federal Liberal Health Minister approved CPR opening a clinic in Saskatchewan. Lanteigne says the Saskatchewan government, led by Premier Brad Wall, then approved the private, donor-paid plasma collection business to open in Saskatoon, "in between a pawn shop and a pay-day loan company." "This collection facility is a blood broker. They are literally a middle man Ñ a source to get profits. "We're asking the provinces and territories to pass voluntary blood donation acts which adds blood and plasma to their existing human tissue acts ..." Lanteigne explained. There is a lot of information on the BloodWatch.org website about the issue, including an informative timeline. The organization also has a Heart Watch rating system. Alberta currently has three hearts and Lanteigne would like to see that increase to five. "Saskatchewan has broken our hearts," she adds.
  • Kim Storebo, CUPE Local 46 president who works with Canadian Blood Services (CBS), also spoke at the event. She said CUPE supports a public, voluntary-based blood system in Canada, adding CBS needs to increase the number of its own plasma collection sites. The organization has been slowly closing locations since 2012. "There is no evidence the collection of plasma from paid donors will create self-sufficiency," she said. "Under no circumstances should there be payment of blood plasma donors with cash or cash-in-kind equivalents." The union wants to see blood and plasma collection remain the sole responsibility of Canadian Blood Services and for the organization to expand its plasma collection and its work hours and ensure stable and consistent hours for its employees. As part of the wrap-up of the Alberta tour officials with FOM, BloodWatch.org and CUPE presented an online SumOfUs petition with more than 15,000 signatures to provincial health minister Sarah Hoffman asking for all provincial governments to "implement legislation that ensures no for-profit, donor-paid blood plasma collection clinics are allowed to operate in Canada." Azocar assured those at the meetings that Friends of Medicare would continue to lobby the Alberta government this fall and next spring during the Legislature sittings.
Irene Jansen

CHSRF - Commissioned Research > Financing models for non-CHA services in Canada: Lesson... - 0 views

  •  
    Financing models for non-CHA services in Canada: Lessons from local and international experiences with social insurance
Irene Jansen

Progress Report 2011: Health Care Renewal in Canada. Health Council of Canada May 2011 - 0 views

  •  
    Today, the Health Council of Canada releases Progress Report 2011: Health care renewal in Canada, which provides a pan-Canadian view on key government commitments in the 2003 First Ministers' Accord on Health Care Renewal and the 2004 10-Year Plan to Stre
Irene Jansen

CHSRF Oct 2011 What if: A sliding scale were used to reimburse generic drugs to effecti... - 0 views

  •  
    Aidan Hollis, Department of Economics, University of Calgary Because generics offer no quality advantages over their branded counterparts, generic drugs compete for market share by offering low prices. The Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) program, the largest drug plan in Canada, plays an important role in determining generic drug reimbursement prices. The ODB has set its generic drug reimbursement at 25% of the price of the reference branded drug. This has created unwanted consequences. In general, the price will be either too high or too low for any given drug, since this price-setting mechanism is arbitrary. If too high, payers are paying too much, and the excess profits will be divided between the pharmacies and the manufacturers. Excessive prices may also drive excessive
Irene Jansen

Universal Drug Coverage lecture Hamilton Oct 5 2011 - 0 views

  •  
    22 Sep 2011 A researcher with expertise in pharmaceutical policy will describe how the changing market for generic drugs presents a unique opportunity for Canadian governments to introduce universal coverage, at the 20th Annual Labelle Lectureship. Michael Law, a faculty member with the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at UBC, will be the guest lecturer at the event on Oct. 5, from 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. While Canadian medicare has historically provided universal first-dollar coverage for physician and hospital services, public coverage for prescription drugs is limited. This mix of public and private insurance left Canadians paying $4.6 billion out of their own pockets for prescription drugs last year. Law will share his recent research that estimates this expense resulted in more than two million Canadians not taking their medications as prescribed.
1 - 20 of 48 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page