Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged college

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

Doctors' watchdog can't police itself; College of Physicians slow to censure medical st... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Tue Apr 14 2015
  • We heard more rich evidence yesterday that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario can't be trusted to police themselves. Case in point: Dr. George Doodnaught is still a doctor. He's not practising, since he's in jail for sexually assaulting no fewer than 21 patients who were strapped to operating tables and semi-conscious from the anesthetic he'd given them, before slipping his penis or tongue into their mouths or rubbing their breasts. After a 76-day trial, Superior Court Justice David McCombs found the evidence of his guilt "overwhelming," convicted him of 21 counts of sexual assault and sentenced him to 10 years in prison last year.
  • What has the college done? Nothing. Doodnaught has appealed the case, and the college is waiting for the outcome before scheduling its own hearing on whether or not Doodnaught should be stripped of his licence - which, by the way, is mandatory under the "zero tolerance" Regulated Health Professions Act. Does the college think its doctor-led panel will better understand the case than an Ontario Court judge? Two of Doodnaught's victims spoke before the two-member task force examining the sexual assault of patients, yet again, for the Ontario government. The downtown hotel conference room where the hearings are held was embarrassingly empty, again. The women who spoke were angry and upset.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • They were angry that victims like them had not been personally informed about the hearings (good point). They were upset that previous patient complaints of sexual assault about Doodnaught had not been investigated years before they were assaulted (also, good point). And they were furious that doctors who sexually assault their patients are treated differently than bakers who sexually assault their customers, or city staff who sexually assault their colleagues, or anyone else for that matter (I hear you sisters!). "Take it out of the hands of a group of doctors and contact the police like you would do for any other profession in the real world. Medical staff are not gods. They are being treated like gods," said Eli Brooks, who was assaulted by Doodnaught while undergoing liposuction in 2009. "What has happened over and over will continue to happen until they are made criminally responsible." Brooks had the publication ban on her lifted, so I can tell you her name. She believes naming herself as a sexual assault victim will help weaken the crime's stigma. I applaud her for that.
  • I can't tell you the second victim's name. During the preliminary hearings of Doodnaught's trial, she was known simply as D.S. Her case was not, in the end, included among the 21 charges, so has not been proven in court. She tells the story that was the trial's refrain: Doodnaught was the anesthesiologist during her surgery at North York General Hospital in 2009. A screen was raised at her midsection, preventing her from seeing the doctors and nurses working below, but also preventing them from seeing Doodnaught at her head. She was barely conscious when she protested him touching her breasts, she said. She awoke to the sight of his penis, she said.
  • During the trial, it emerged that no fewer than four of Doonaught's colleagues at North York General Hospital had received complaints from patients who said Doodnaught had sexually assaulted them while they were in semi-conscious states. The complaints started in 2006 - four years before Doodnaught was charged. The four were surgeons and anesthesiologists. Not one had reported the complaints to anybody - the head of the hospital, the police, the college. North York General's then-chief of anesthesiology, Dr. Stephen Brown, testified that when police came calling about Doodnaught in 2008, he didn't tell them about two previous complaints by patients. Once police finally laid charges, he sent out an email to staff, entered as evidence, that stated: "We have to support George in any way we can during the investigation." (He said in court he had not meant for them to interfere with the police probe.)
  • "He didn't protect us," D.S. said. "Had he come forward, we might have saved many of us." She called on the task force to implement penalties for bystanders - doctors who hear about the sexual assault of patients by other doctors, but do nothing. Brooks went further: "Anyone who covers it up should be legally charged with aiding and abetting a crime." Later, the task force's ever-patient chair, Marilou McPhedran, informed the still-barren room that such a provision already exists. Under the Regulated Health Professions Act of Ontario, health professionals with "reasonable grounds ... to believe that another member of the same or a different college has sexually abused a patient" must file a complaint to their college registrar within 30 days - unless they think the accused will continue sexually abusing patients. Then there is "urgent need for intervention."
  • The penalty for failing to do this is "not more than" $25,000 the first time. The second, it goes up to "not more than $50,000." So, were those four doctors fined by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, you might be wondering - particularly since they testified in criminal court about their failure to alert their college to patients' complaints about Doodnaught sexually assaulting them? No.
  • "The College has not commenced prosecutions ... in relation to a physician failing to make a mandatory report in this matter," CPSO spokesperson Prithi Yelaja wrote me in an email. In fact, in the history of the college, it has never prosecuted any physician for failing to make a mandatory report, she confirmed. Not once. See what I mean? The rules don't need to be changed, they simply have to be enforced by people who can be better trusted: the police. The task force hearings continue on May 8. Catherine Porter can be reached at cporter@thestar.ca.
Govind Rao

College denies being lax on accessory fees - Infomart - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Wed Dec 16 2015
  • The Quebec College of Physicians is defending itself against charges by two researchers that the professional order has been lax on the growing use of accessory fees in private clinics. The researchers, Guillaume Hébert and Jennie-Laure Sully, accused the College of failing to crack down on abusive fees that some physicians in private practice are billing patients.
  • "Over the years, doctors have gradually inflated the amounts they charge to the point of demanding significant sums from their patients for unjustified reasons," they wrote in a research paper published by the Institut de recherche et d'informations socio-économiques (IRIS). "After years of procrastination, the College of Physicians clarified its code of ethics by reminding Quebec physicians that they cannot place themselves above the law. Despite this directive, doctors have continued to impose accessory fees and the College did not choose to enforce its own code of ethics, preferring instead to negotiate reimbursements for patients who have made complaints."
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • The Quebec government has negotiated with the medical federations a list of fees that are permitted, such as the use of liquid nitrogen to remove moles ($10) or the use of a topical anesthetic for a minor eye wound (also $10). Over the years, many physicians in private practice have started billing for many more items and services, occasionally prompting investigations by the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ).
  • In a statement made public Tuesday, College president Charles Bernard countered that the researchers based their conclusions on "impressions and partial data ... without taking the time to analyze in depth an issue so complex." Bernard noted that the College produced a report on accessory fees in 2011, and in January, it modified its code of ethics warning doctors that they cannot bill patients "disproportionately high" fees and that they must produce detailed invoices.
  • In April, the College called on the provincial government to modernize its system of accessory fees. In November, the National Assembly adopted Law 20, which gave the health minister the power to expand the range of fees now charged in private practice and to limit certain amounts. "We need to calibrate the expectations of pressure groups that would wish that the College - through its code of ethics - defend the public coverage of fees for medical services," Bernard added.
  • The number of Quebecers filing complaints about excessive fees soared by 374 per cent during the past five years, according to a report by the College in April. The complaints jumped from 31 in 2010-11 to 147 in 2014-15. To date, two cases over abusive fees have gone before the College's disciplinary board. In one of those cases, a Westmount physician was fined $10,000 in 2013 for charging patients "excessive and unjustified fees."
  • An Oct. 1 report by Quebec's Ombudsman found that some private clinics have billed patients $300 for eye drops; $100 to freeze offa wart; $40 to apply a four-centimetre bandage; and $200 to insert an intrauterine device. aderfel@montrealgazette.com Twitter.com/Aaron_Derfel
  • Dr. Charles Bernard, left, president of the Quebec College of Physicians, seen at a February news conference with college secretary Dr. Yves Robert, says researchers based their conclusions about accessory fees on "impressions and partial data."
Govind Rao

"National Checkup" panel debates the pros, cons and questions surrounding a universal d... - 0 views

  • THE NATIONAL Thu Mar 19 2015,
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): All that medicine isn't cheap either. Canadians spent an estimated 22 billion dollars a year on prescriptions in 2013, almost twice what they spent in 2001. One in ten struggle to afford it. It's big business and big drug companies know it, spending billions marketing it right back to you. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) Ask your doctor if Lunesta is right for you. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • So are we over- or under-medicated? Is the high cost of prescription drugs failing to help Canadians in need? And what should we be watching for next? So we'll start with that middle question, like, who is not covered? Who is falling through the cracks? You must all see this in your practices? Danielle, what are you seeing? DANIELLE MARTIN (FAMILY PHYSICIAN, WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): In fact, millions of Canadians have no drug coverage whatsoever and millions more don't have adequate coverage for their needs. In my practice I see it all the time among the self-employed, people who are working in small businesses, people who are working part-time and don't have employer-based coverage. It's the taxi drivers, it's the people who are working in a part-time job, but it's also middle-income people who are consultants or working in small businesses who don't have coverage. So this isn't just a problem for the poor. It's a problem for people across socioeconomic lines.
  • ...20 more annotations...
  • DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Well, I think it's probably not divided properly and I also think that we need to be very mindful of the ways in which advertising and marketing, whether it's direct to patients or consumers as we often consume from the American media on our television screens, or whether it's direct to physicians. So, you know, in fact, even in the U.S. under the Affordable Care Act, physicians are now required to declare any amount of money that they take from the pharmaceutical industry. We have no such sunshine law here in Canada. Don't Canadian patients want to know if your doctor has had their vacation or their last meal or their speakers' fees paid by the company that makes the drug they have just prescribed for you? WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Well, we saw in those ads they'll say: Ask your doctor. Is there a lot of pressure and is that contributing to the number of pills on the market? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK):
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): What are you seeing, David? DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): I think this is right and it's a surprise to somebody from outside of Canada to find that in a country with a good comprehensive care system, there is not drug coverage. So patients with chronic disease, for instance diabetics, ironically in the city where insulin was discovered, are relying on free handouts from their physicians to provide what is really an essential medication; it's keeping them alive. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Who do you think is falling through the cracks? What are you seeing?
  • CARA TANNENBAUM (GERIATRIC PHYSICIAN, PHARMACY CHAIR, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL): The vulnerable population in my mind are older adults with multiple medical conditions who are taking 5, 10, 15 medications at the same time and have to pay the deductible on that. And that adds up for a lot of them who don't have a lot of money to begin with, so they start making choices about will I take my drugs until the end of the month? Will I take every single medication that I have to? Do I really need those three medications for my high blood pressure, or can I let one go? And that could have effects on their health. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Well, you mentioned diabetes, David. We heard earlier on "The National" this week from a woman in B.C. She has diabetes. That's a life-threatening disease if it's not looked after. This is what she said.
  • SASHA JANICH (PHON.) (DIABETES PATIENT): Roughly about 600 to 800 bucks a month. I don't get any help until I spend at last 3500 a year and then they'll kick in, you know, whatever portion they decide to cover. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): So, David, that's really common? People on diabetes aren't fully covered?
  • DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): Well, they're covered to a degree in B.C., but it's what we call the co- payment level that they have to make even under an insurance program. In Ontario, they don't have any insurance at all. They're going to pay the full market price if they don't have insurance through their employer, and they may lose that if they're out of work. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): What are you seeing? What's not covered? Give me an example. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL):
  • Well, actually, one thing that I think is surprising to a lot of people is the variability in coverage among public drug plans in Canada. So something that's covered, even if you're covered under a public drug plan, for example if you have cancer and you have to take chemotherapy outside of the hospital, in many Canadian provinces that's taken care of. In Ontario, for example, it's not. And I think that many Canadians are surprised to discover, imagine the, you know, enormous stress of a cancer diagnosis, that on top of that you're going to have to pay out of pocket at least to very… sometimes to very, very high levels, in fact. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Samir? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): And even just the other day, I just was debating with a pharmacy about the cost of some vitamin D. I have a person who's under house, he's on social assistance, and they said: We'll give you a free blister pack, you know, so he can sort his meds. We'll give you this. And we were actually, you know, working out a pricing system so this guy could even afford something so that he wouldn't break bones and actually have a fracture down the road. So it's amazing how some of the basic things we think are important aren't even covered. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • Well, we saw that the drug costs have almost doubled in the last 11, 12 years. Is part of the problem… there's only so much, it seems, money to go around for prescription drugs. Is part of the problem that there's too many… some drugs are too easily available while people who really need them are not getting them? And there's marketing playing into that. We see a lot of ads in the last ten years. Check this out. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) We know a place where tossing and turning have given way to sleeping, where sleepless nights yield to restful sleep. And Lunesta can help you get there.
  • UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: (Advertisement) Anyone with high cholesterol may be at increased risk of heart attack. I stopped kidding myself. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2 (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) Talk to your doctor about your risk. VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN (ANNOUNCER): (Advertisement) Ask your doctor if Lunesta is right for you.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): It's funny, you know, we hear our health plan discussed in the United States and now you talk about our socialized medicine and it's sort of until you have a health problem, you assume everything is covered. But who falls through the cracks that you see, Samir? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): Yeah, I mean, I treat a lot of older patients and those who are 65 and older generally are covered by a provincial drug plan. But, you know, I'm seeing more and more, especially after the recent recession, we have people who are closer to that age who lose their jobs and if they lose their jobs and they were relying on private drug coverage plans, they are not covered. And then they find themselves they can't afford their medications, they get sicker and they literally have to wait and be sick until they can actually get their medications.
  • Well, it's a huge amount of pressure, I think, you know, for… you know, if you're a doctor that relies on information or supports from pharmaceutical representatives, for example, then there is that pressure that you're put under, there is that influence that you have. But also, we know that if your patient asks you specifically and says, you know, what about this medication, you may say, well, it's easier to prescribe you that medication if that's what you really want. But there's actually five things you can do to improve your sleep and actually avoid being on that medication, but we don't get asked for that. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): But I want to be like the lady with the wings.
  • SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): And that's what I hear: Why can't I be like that? But I think it's important to think about the other options. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): David, what do you think? DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): I would like to focus a little bit on the prices that are being paid. We talked about usage and whether drug use is appropriate. There's also the price that is paid. Canada is paying too much. And if we can just return for a second or two to the idea of a national program, there's a huge advantage in being the sole purchaser on behalf of 35 million people, as it would be with a national program in Canada. And we know from experience you can reduce drug prices by 30, 40 percent. That's billions of dollars a year. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • That's a political debate that you have launched and I hope that it gets taken up by the politicians. Who is buying these drugs? We have seen that there are more people having trouble getting drugs, more people using drugs. Who is it? DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): That are taking prescription drugs in Canada? WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Yeah. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL):
  • Well, you know, interestingly over the last decade, we have seen an increase in prescription drug use in every single age category. So the answer is we all are. We're all taking more drugs than our equivalent people did a decade ago and I think… WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Teenagers? DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Absolutely, teenagers and the elderly and everybody in between. And so the question really becomes: Are we any healthier as a result? You know, in some cases we're talking about truly life-saving treatment that are medical breakthroughs and, of course, we all want to see every Canadian have unfettered access to those important treatments. In other cases we may actually be talking about overdiagnosis, overprescription and as you say, Cara, sort of chemical coping of all different kinds. And I think that's what we need to kind of get at and try to tease out. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • Well, and the largest group of all on prescription drugs right now, Cara, are the seniors. CARA TANNENBAUM (GERIATRIC PHYSICIAN, PHARMACY CHAIR, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL): The seniors, yes, and I'm very passionate about this topic because sometimes I see patients come into my office on 23 different drug classes, and that's when we don't talk about what drugs should we add but what drugs can we take away, and the concept of de-prescribing. And imagine if we could get people who are on unnecessary drugs, because as you get older you get added this drug and a second drug and this specialist gives you this and that specialist gives you that, but then there starts to be interactions between the different drugs that could cause side effects and hospitalization. And maybe it's time to start asking, well, what's the right drug for you at this time, at this age, with these medical conditions? And personalized medicine is something that we have been talking about. It would be nice if we could introduce that conversation into therapy and not just drug therapy, but all therapy. Maybe the drug isn't needed. Maybe physiotherapy is needed or a psychologist or better exercise or nutrition. So I think it's really a bigger question. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Samir?
  • SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): Exactly. I mean, in my clinic the other day I had a patient who was on eight medications when she came with me, and… WENDY MESLEY (HOST): This is a senior? You deal with seniors as well. SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): Absolutely. And when she left my office, she was thrilled because she was only on two medications, mainly because some of the medications are prescribed to treat the side effects of other medications, for example, or the indications for those medications were no longer valid in her. But we added some vitamins and we just balanced things out appropriately. And she was thrilled because, as Cara was saying before, the co-pays, the other payments that one needs to pay for medications you don't want to take, that's a problem as well. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): We're going to take a short break, but we have one more discussion area which is: What are the next challenges that Canadians might face with prescription drugs? We'll be right back.
  • (Commercial break) WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Welcome back to our "National Checkup" panel. Danielle Martin, Samir Sinha, Cara Tannenbaum and David Henry are all here to talk about the next frontier. So we're hearing all of this exciting new science marches on and there's all of these new drugs, new treatments. Everyone wants them or everyone who needs them wants them, but they're expensive, right, Danielle? DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): They can be extremely expensive. So, you know, what we call these blockbuster drugs coming onto the market, some of them truly do represent breakthroughs in medical treatment and in some cases they can cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. So they really are very expensive. But what I think many people may not realize is that the number of drugs coming out, even the expensive ones that are truly breakthroughs, is still a very small portion of the drugs coming out on the market. Many, many drugs that are being released and are expensive are marginally, if at all, really any better than their predecessor. So just because it's new and fancy and costs a lot doesn't necessarily mean that it's all that much better.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): So what's going to happen, David? DAVID HENRY (PROFESSOR, DALLA LANA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO): We need to find a plan. These drugs may cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Nobody can afford that individually. Tens of thousands, rich people can afford them but the average person cannot. So there's really no way we can cope with these unless we've got a plan and, in my view, it has to be a national plan. And the advantage of that are that when you're buying or you're subsidizing on behalf of 35 million people, you're going to get better prices and your insurance pool that covers these costs is much greater. So the country can afford drugs that individuals can't.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Samir, what do you see as the new frontier here? SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): I think the new frontier is going to be more personalized treatments in terms of how do we actually treat cancers, how do we treat certain rare conditions with more personalized treatments. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Because it's very exciting, right? You have this cancer that's not that common and then you hear that there's a treatment for it and you want it. SAMIR SINHA (GERIATRICIAN, MOUNT SINAI/UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK): And it has the possibility of alleviating a lot of suffering from unnecessary treatments that may not actually be… you know, be effective. But I think this is the challenge. If we want to be able to afford these, if we actually work together we're actually more able to afford them when we bulk-buy these medications. But the key is going to be that, you know, this is where the future is going and we're going to have to figure out a way to pay for them.
  • WENDY MESLEY (HOST): What are you looking forward to? CARA TANNENBAUM (GERIATRIC PHYSICIAN, PHARMACY CHAIR, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL): I'm really looking forward to seeing all these new treatments that we have spent decades researching. You know what the investment in health research has been in order to find new targets for drugs, in order to increase quality of live, in order to cure cancer, and then to send a message, oh, sorry, we're not going to give them to you or you can't afford to pay for them, then I think there is a lack of consistency in the messaging that we're giving to Canadians around equity for health care. So you could get your diagnosis and you could see a physician, but we way not be able to afford treating you. So I think this is something we need to think about it. It's very exciting, I think we live in exciting times, and looking at different funding strategies to make sure that people get the appropriate care that they need at the right time to improve their health is really what we're going to be looking forward to. WENDY MESLEY (HOST):
  • Tricky, though. It's a provincial jurisdiction, you've got to get all the provinces to agree to a list, and the list is getting longer. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Absolutely. I mean, I think actually one of the big myths out there about drug plans is that higher-quality plans are the ones that cover everything. And, in fact, that's not true. You know, we can use a national plan or a pan- Canadian plan or whatever you want to call it to target our prescribing and guide our prescribing in order to make it more appropriate, and that's another way that we're going to save money in the long run. WENDY MESLEY (HOST): Well, I learned a lot tonight. I hope our audience did too. Thanks so much for being with us. DANIELLE MARTIN (WOMEN'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL): Thank you.
Govind Rao

Expansion of surgeries at private clinics faces delays; Many details must be worked out... - 0 views

  • Vancouver Sun Thu Jun 11 2015
  • A provincial proposal to shrink surgical waiting times by letting private surgery clinics do more complex operations could take up to two years to implement, says the registrar of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC. That's because of changes to legislation that may be required to allow private facilities to keep patients for up to three nights and other changes to ensure they are more like hospitals, with security guards, full meals, a variety of health professionals, labs, imaging suites and even intensive-care units. Currently, the college allows private facilities to do procedures requiring a maximum one-night stay. "We applaud the minister of health for thinking outside the box to address the issue of access to care," said the registrar, Dr. Heidi Oetter, referring to the idea of expanding publicly funded access to private facilities. The proposal is in a Health Ministry discussion paper.
  • In an interview, Oetter said expanding the types of surgeries the province pays for at private clinics is not easy to sort out quickly. "There's a role for the private facility sector. But this requires an extensive review," said Oetter, adding it could take from 18 to 24 months. The government has set up a Surgical Services Secretariat that will work with the college on changes to laws and procedures to enable longer stays in private facilities, if that direction is chosen.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • While private facilities like the Cambie Surgery Centre and the Centric Health Surgical Centre (formerly False Creek Surgical Centre) consider themselves hospitals, the college makes a distinction and Oetter said private facilities are inspected and accredited for one-night stays only. "We think of them as private facilities, not hospitals. When you think of hospitals, you think of 24-hour staff, security guards, meals and so on," she said.
  • Cambie has five operating rooms plus a dental procedure suite and seven private post-op recovery rooms. He said whether the facility is a hospital or not is really a matter of semantics. "Think about all the tiny community hospitals around B.C. and you can see that we are far more advanced and closest to the best hospital in B.C. Our staff are all the best you can get." Day said Cambie has been inspected and approved not only by the college but by the national body that audits and accredits hospitals - Accreditation Canada. Such accreditation isn't mandatory, but college approval is required.
  • About 50,000 people pay for their procedures themselves each year in private facilities. Renee Hourigan, spokeswoman for Centric, declined to comment. Dr. Brian Day, owner of the Cambie Surgery Centre, said it would be easy to accommodate patients for longer periods and to meet any new requirements. "We're not going to hire a chef, but we already provide snacks and meals to patients. We give them menus and they choose what they want and the food is delivered."
  • There are nearly 80,000 adults and children waiting for surgery in B.C. hospitals and median waiting times have not changed in several years despite reforms. According to the policy paper, 90 per cent of elective surgery patients got their surgery within 40 weeks in 2013/14, while the rest waited longer. In 2013/14, 5,503 publicly funded operations were performed in private facilities, down from the 7,839 cases performed in private clinics the year before. Another 541,886 scheduled (elective) operations were done in B.C. public hospitals. There are about a dozen private surgery centres in B.C. offering a range of operations, general anesthetics and overnight stays.
  • About 700 B.C. surgeons have privileges to work at private surgery centres. Under B.C. law, any facility where surgeons work must be inspected and accredited by the college to ensure high standards of care and patient safety. Sarah Plank, a spokeswoman for the Health Ministry, said the government is analyzing what kind of cases might be suitable for funded private surgery centres. The process is in the early stages so a timeline of up to two years is "not unreasonable," she said.
Govind Rao

Giroux warns against P3 model - Infomart - 0 views

  • The North Bay Nugget Sat Jan 24 2015
  • The president of the North Bay and District Labour Council is warning against a proposed public-private partnership that could see a new sports facility constructed in North Bay. Henri Giroux issued a release Friday responding to a request for expressions of interest recently issued by Canadore College seeking a private-sector company to build, finance and operate a multi-purpose sports facility at its Commerce Court Campus. A wise per-s on studies history to avoid repeating costly mistakes," said Giroux, pointing to a recent report by Auditor- General Bonnie Lysyk. It's truly stunning that Canadore College and the city seem to have learned nothing from Ontario's P3 mistakes, even though the $8-billion history lesson just came out in November's auditor-report." Lysyk's report found that public- private partnerships have cost Ontario taxpayers nearly $8 billion more on infrastructure over the past nine years than if the government had successfully built the projects itself.
  • The report indicated companies pay about 14 times what the government does for financing, and that they receive a premium from taxpayers in exchange for taking on the project. The college proposes a public- private partnership to build a new sports facility. Sounds nice -a great facility without the cost and risk of building and running it yourself," said Giroux. But that myth and our reality with P3s is very different." He suggested North Bay is learning about the costs of P3s first-hand via cuts at North Bay Regional Health Centre. He said the hospital is closing beds and slashing services, in no small part because of long-term P3 agreements for mortgage payments and maintenance fees." If Canadore goes ahead with a P3 sports complex, it is the students who will pay for it through high user and tuition fees," said Giroux. If we want public infrastructure, let's do it right from the beginning and not waste money on the same old mistakes."
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Interested proponents have have until Jan. 28 to submit their expressions of interest to the college. Canadore president and chief executive officer George Burton could not be reached for comment Friday afternoon. But the 14-page request issued earlier this month indicates the city is supporting the P3 initiative. The Corporation of the City of North Bay wishes to investigate a partnership with Canadore College through a private-public partnership in relation to a twin-pad arena option," the document states. With the support from the City of North Bay, Canadore College is seeking a partner to build, finance and operate a multi-purpose sports facility. The successful proponent is expected to enter into a long-term land lease arrangement where a multipurpose facility would be constructed." The college is looking for the facility to offer a turf field, twin ice pads, rubberized flooring, a walking or jogging track, concessions and change rooms. Some of the activities Canadore would like these facilities to accommodate include soccer, hockey, figure skating, ringette, rugby, touch football, ultimate Frisbee, basketball, volleyball, baseball, tennis, weight room and golf. The facility would service the local and regional communities, as well as Canadore College students.
Govind Rao

Most paramedics don't want college: CUPE - Infomart - 0 views

  • Orillia Packet & Times Fri Mar 4 2016
  • Re: "No standard for Ontario paramedic investigations," Feb. 26 Ontario patients are protected by the current triple oversight and controls on paramedic professionals. Contrary to the opinion pushed by those quoted in the story, the majority of paramedics are opposed to a regulatory college. They clearly understand that another bureaucratic layer of oversight through a new regulatory regime will actually allow others who are not working as paramedics into the college.
  • Front-line paramedics have consistently directed us, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), the largest organization of paramedics in the province, representing nearly 6,000 paramedics, to oppose the creation of a regulatory college and the additional layer of bureaucratic control that comes with it. Working paramedics are already overseen by three separate organizations that can fire and discipline them.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • After a very lengthy review, where all parties had a chance to make their case, the province's Health Professions Advisory Council agreed with CUPE and other front-line paramedic organizations to recommend to the minister of health that a regulatory college not be created. It vexes many of us why the motives of top managers of paramedic services who have consistently advocated for a regulatory college as an additional means of discipline and control over paramedics are not questioned.
  • Why the provincial government would allow them to interject and upend the current goodwill that exists between the province's paramedics who overwhelmingly oppose a college is also a mystery.
  • Equally confounding is why a small voluntary group that does not represent the vast majority of paramedics in the workplace with employers or at the government level is pushing for a regulatory college. That they could support a proposal that would open up the profession to workers operating pretend ambulances is not in the best interest of the public or the paramedic profession.
  • Ontario needs dedicated paramedic services exclusively focused on providing top-notch emergency medical response. We do not need a backdoor attempt to undermine the profession and we are saddened that some wish to revive this issue yet again. Fred Hahn President, CUPE Ontario JeffVan Pelt Chair, CUPE Paramedic Committee of Ontario
Govind Rao

Toronto researcher 'manipulated' findings; Resigns from Women's College after disputed ... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Tue Oct 27 2015 Page: A1
  • A senior physician at Women's College Hospital who has garnered international recognition for her research on osteoporosis "manipulated" data of a study published in a leading medical journal, according to an investigation by the facility.
  • Dr. Sophie Jamal, who until recently served as research director at the Centre for Osteoporosis and Bone Health, and the division head of endocrinology and metabolism at the hospital, misrepresented findings of a 2011 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the hospital said after an investigation that wrapped up earlier this month.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • "There was unequivocal systematic manipulation of data on the part of this researcher," hospital president Marilyn Emery told the Star in an interview. The study in question found "significant" improvement in the bone density of post-menopausal women who applied nitroglycerine ointment to their arms every evening for two years.
  • "The findings were made to look more positive than they were," explained Dr. Paula Rochon, vice-president of research at Women's College. Jamal, an endocrinologist, resigned her clinical privileges at the hospital last month, prior to the conclusion of the probe. She stepped down from the senior positions she held at the facility last June.
  • She also recently resigned as an associate professor of medicine at the University of Toronto. JAMA, the most widely circulated medical journal in the world, is now considering whether to run a retraction. "JAMA is aware of the concern of Women's College and will make a decision about (a) retraction in the coming weeks," editor Dr. Howard Bauchner said in an email. Jamal declined an opportunity to comment through her lawyer, Jennifer McKendry. "We do not have instructions to make any comments on your story," McKendry said.
  • The investigation found there were no deficiencies in any institutional systems or processes at the hospital, which adheres to nationally accepted research standards. "Despite that, it is still very important that we look at how we can review everything that we are doing and how we can work to raise the bar to learn from this experience," Rochon said.
  • The hospital learned from the University of Toronto last March that something might be amiss with Jamal's research, and the two bodies together commenced an inquiry. A formal investigation was then launched in June. Some 243 post-menopausal women participated in the study, with some receiving the ointment and some receiving a placebo. They have been sent registered letters, informing them that they may have received inaccurate information about the research.
  • "There is no evidence of negative outcomes for any of these research participants," Emery said. Research papers published in JAMA are peer-reviewed. It's unclear how allegations of wrongdoing by Jamal first surfaced. U of T spokesperson Althea Blackburn-Evans said the university received an allegation of research misconduct, which it passed along to the hospital, where Jamal had her primary appointment. Asked if Dr. Jamal explained what happened with the research findings, Emery responded: "No, we haven't been in that kind of conversation with (her)."
  • However, Emery acknowledged there is pressure among researchers to get good results on studies and to get them published. "Having said that, there is pressure in many roles (and) we wouldn't be looking to that as a rationale necessarily," Emery said. Jamal has impressive credentials. She graduated from U of T's medical school in 1991 and specialized in general internal medicine. She then did a two-year post-doctoral fellowship in biostatistics and epidemiology at the University of California, San Francisco.
  • That was followed by the completion of a Ph.D. in clinical epidemiology at the University of Toronto. Jamal's research has also focused on the treatment of fractures among patients with impaired kidney function. She has been the first or senior author on about 50 published papers, some of which are editorials and the others systematic reviews. Most were done prior to her work at Women's College.
  • Asked if her previous work is now being called into question, Emery said that's a "natural question" and one the hospital is now reflecting upon with regard to any work done under the name of Women's College. Jamal's public profile on the website of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario shows her now working for the Appleby Medical Group on Lake Shore Blvd. W. in Toronto.
Doug Allan

Hospital pharmacies also operating without regular Ontario College of Pharmacists inspe... - 0 views

  • But hospital pharmacies, which also mix and supply cancer drugs to patients every day, are not subject to regular inspections by the college.
  • College Registrar Marshall Moleschi said outdated legislation in Ontario’s Drug and Pharmacies Regulation Act exempts hospitals and other health institutions from having to follow the same rules and regulations as community retail pharmacies.
  • “I was very surprised when I started working in hospitals that the college does not have any role in the pharmacy side in hospitals, especially given the types of products that are made and handled and utilized within hospitals,” Froude told the committee.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Moleschi said the process to begin legally inspecting hospital pharmacies is a lengthy one that can take a year or two as it moves through Ontario’s legislative assembly.
  • Health ministry spokeswoman Zita Astravas told the Star that hospital pharmacies are “subject to oversight on a number of levels” and that “it’s incorrect to suggest otherwise.”
  • She pointed to subsections of the Public Hospitals Act: one that allow an investigator to be appointed to report on the quality of care and treatment of patients in a hospital; another that allows for a hospital supervisor to be appointed “where it is in the public interest to do so.”
  • Those measures aren’t enough, Yurek said. College oversight “should go across the board, that way there is one overseer of anything that is a pharmacy,” he said.
Govind Rao

Work can take awful toll on paramedics; Public safety a priority as we treat practition... - 0 views

  • Edmonton Journal Tue May 12 2015
  • An encounter with a paramedic is something you rarely plan on, but in your scariest moments, the excellent care these health-care professionals provide can be the difference between life and death. Brave, committed, educated and adaptable, these women and men are vital to Alberta's health-care system. There are almost 10,000 registered paramedicine practitioners in Alberta. These dynamic practitioners now permeate all environments in which Albertans receive medical treatment. About one-third of these professionals are employed publicly; the rest work for private contractors, natural resource industries and in dozens of other work settings.
  • As is the case for other first responders, this daily work can take its toll. A practitioner's work is primarily defined by helping others in need, while having to ignore their own. Victims of car accidents, domestic abuse, and incidents involving children can have lasting impacts on paramedics. In Canada, it is tragically true that some first responders have committed suicide and many more struggle with depression. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has always been a health risk inherent to paramedicine.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Some recent media reports seem to paint the Alberta College of Paramedics as an uncaring institution. Nothing could be farther than the truth. Our paramedic registration process contains a series of checkpoints similar in rigour to that which physicians and nurses face. Aspiring paramedics must first complete their education at an approved school and then pass a provincial registry examination before the College issues registration - proof they are legally allowed to practise.
  • As a regulatory body, our goal is to be a driving force behind excellence in Alberta paramedicine care. Committed to the public interest, we strive to govern the profession with compassion and awareness of the issues valued by practitioners. We are currently preparing for consultation to invite feedback from paramedics on how our processes are working and what we can change to better serve both practitioners and the public.
  • The Alberta College of Paramedics exists to ensure Albertans receive high quality patient care from professional paramedicine practitioners, which starts with ensuring paramedics are capable of providing that care.
  • The college's primary function is to ensure that paramedic practice occurs in the best interest of the public. The college is not a union. It does not participate in collective bargaining. Nor are we an association. The college does not put the rights and privileges of paramedics above the needs of the public. For the Alberta College of Paramedics, the public comes first.
  • he regulator
Irene Jansen

CUPE Ontario | EMS employers' "interference unwelcome" say paramedics opposed to a regu... - 0 views

  • is inappropriate for emergency service (EMS) employers to weigh-in to support college regulation for paramedics "when it is an issue for paramedics themselves to settle.
  • This is in addition to the oversight of the ministry of health, base hospitals and EMS employers.
  • The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) and the Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU) collectively represent 6500 certified Ontario paramedics already extensively regulated under the Ambulance Act
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • OPSEU and CUPE paramedic members have directed the unions to oppose a regulatory college as it would mean a fourth level of regulatory oversight for the profession.
  • Despite the existing regulatory regime and widespread opposition from paramedics to a regulatory college, an association that does not legally represent paramedics (in collective bargaining) has filed an application with the Health Professions Regulatory Advisory Council (HPRAC) for a new fee-based college covering paramedics.
Govind Rao

Contracting out of surgical preparation and delivery - 2 views

  • Contracting Out Hospital Work to Private Clinics – Backgrounder For years CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility some years ago with a tour of the province by British Health Secretary Frank Dobson who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics.Unfortunately, the provincial Liberal government has now moved in this direction. The door opened a few years ago with the introduction of fee for service hospital funding (sometimes called Activities Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization, with the government finally announcing Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014.
  • Hospitals are the main focus of the government’s health care cuts. They do not see community hospitals as providing a broad range of services to the local ... [Read More]population, but instead wish to remove an untold range of services from local hospitals and transfer them to specialized private clinics. The proposal would remove the most lucrative, high volume and easiest procedures from community hospitals. The remaining community hospitals would be left with the most difficult services. If they chose to compete with the private clinics, they would have to specialize in a narrow range of services. The government’s plan is the opposite of one-stop, integrated public health care. This proposed privatization of surgeries and diagnostic tests is in addition to the aggressive attempts to remove non-acute care services from hospitals (e.g. outpatient clinics, complex continuing care, rehabilitation, long-term care, primary care, etc.). As acute care currently accounts for only about 1/3 of current hospital funding, these attacks are a grave threat to the viability of community hospitals, and in fact we are now seeing a wave of hospital shut-downs that is somewhat reminiscent of the Mike Harris era. Despite the government’s rhetoric about keeping care non-profit, services that are being cut from local hospitals now are being privatized to for-profit owned corporations. Even if the private clinics did start out as non-profit (which has not been the case so far) the whole system of private clinics could be privatized with a stroke of a pen.
  • Ontario Health Care Privatization: The push for health care privatization in Ontario picked up in 2001 when Ontario Health Minister Tony Clement announced two privatized P3 hospital projects, the Royal Ottawa and the Brampton Civic (part of William Osler Health Centre). Spirited community-based campaigns, including P3 plebiscites in many towns, forced the Liberal government to greatly narrow the scope of the privatization of support jobs (i.e. CUPE jobs) in subsequent P3 hospitals. Nevertheless privatization of the hospital financing continues, despite revelations by the provincial Auditor General that confirmed claims by CUPE and others that the Osler project cost hundreds of millions more due to the P3.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • MRI and CT Clinics: The PC government also tried to set up private MRI and CT clinics outside of hospitals. Community/labour campaigns however were able to stop this. A key factor was that, to increase their revenue, the private clinics were allowed to bill private patients for a certain number of hours each week (with the rest of the week dedicated to patients paid for by the public system). As the public insurance system must pay for all ‘medically necessary’ hospital services, the government was left to try to explain why any reputable clinic would allow patients to subject themselves to such tests for medically unnecessary reasons. Since this episode, private clinics have been in the news – but mostly for the wrong reasons. Private surgical and diagnostic clinics: Initially, the government let the emerging industry slip entirely free of public reporting and oversight. However, after the September 2007 death of Krista Stryland, a young mother who underwent liposuction at a Toronto cosmetic clinic, the government required the industry to face some modest oversight in 2010. Unfortunately this was not by a public authority, but through self-regulation by the doctors (even though the doctors themselves had lobbied to expand this private industry).
  • Then in the fall of 2011, following disclosure that 6,800 patients would have to be notified that faulty infection control procedures at a private clinic could have exposed them to HIV or hepatitis, the then Health Minister, Deb Matthews, declined to introduce oversight by a public authority, despite public pressure. Instead she comments, “Government can’t do everything. A professional (regulating body) like the College of Physicians and Surgeons, they take responsibility for their members....At this point I am delighted the College is taking that responsibility seriously and has found a problem that we need to fix.” Eventually the College of Physicians and Surgeons released a report on the private clinics that mentions that some 29% of the private clinics fall short in some way – but the College would not indicate which ones – or how they fell short. This caused public uproar, with the Toronto Star playing a leading role (as it would continue to do). Again, the government promised improvements. In the last two months however, the Star has followed up and revealed (after our urging) that the public reports from the College of Physicians and Surgeons fall far short. They also ran a series of often front page stories on serious quality problems at private clinics.
Irene Jansen

Hospital investigates surgeon accused of taking cash for operation - 0 views

  • She said she didn't realize at the time that the doctor was not entitled to charge for the services.She's not alone. Two of her friends say they also paid $10,000 to the same surgeon to fast-track the same procedure. Their surgeries were also done at the Royal Victoria Hospital.
  • All three women fear reprisals and losing access to medical care.
  • None of the women have complained to the Quebec College of Physicians.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • The College says its investigations are hampered because patients are not coming forward with complaints. Also, there's often no paper trail.
  • A 14-month investigation by the Quebec College of Physicians led to a disciplinary hearing for two cardiologists accused of accepting bribes in exchange for preferential treatment.
  • After The Gazette first reported 14 months ago that doctors at several Montreal hospitals routinely accepted bribes from patients to fast-track services to publicly funded health care, Quebec Health Minister Yves Bolduc demanded the Quebec College of Physician's disciplinary board, as well as the provincial health insurance board, investigate allegations of black-market medicine.
  • many people to write and call The Gazette offering personal anecdotes of giving doctors payoffs to expedite consultations and surgeries in publicly funded health care
  • "For the College to say that they don't know what's going on, that's bulls--t."
Govind Rao

CJAD 800 - News. Talk. Radio. :: College of Physicians speaks out against health reform... - 0 views

  • Posted on 2/3/2015 1:30:00 PM by Tina Tenneriello
  • Just a few days before Quebec's health minister Gaetan Barrette is expected to rush in Bill 10 Friday, the College of Physicians says it has concerns with the new health care reform. At a press conferenceTuesday morning it presented 5 key issues.  The first, transparency. "We want to know the big picture of the reform, that's the main thing we are asking for, transparency," Dr. Yves Robert, the secretary of the College of Physicians said. Dr. Robert said they're not as concerned about Bill 10.
  • "It's more about saving money by taking off a slice of bureaucratic administration, that's less our business, once it's set up, we don't want the quality of services to be affected, that we'll check, that's my job, but for Bill 20 and 28 it concerns us because it's about the quality of practice," Dr. Charles Bertrand, the head of the College said. He says Bill 20 will impose quotas on family doctors, which Quebec has tried before and it didn't fix the problem.  "It is another coercive measure, we've faced many in the past also with incentives and it didn't solve the problem.  We want every stakeholder to find solutions," Dr. Robert said.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Bill 20 would also mean paid in vitro fertilization. As for Bill 28, Dr. Robert says it would give the government power to choose what medical services would be insured or not. He says it would also allow the minister to make secret arrangements with pharmaceuticals, to get draw backs, but citizens would pay the same price for their drugs. Minister Barrette said his critics have their own agendas.
Govind Rao

Doctor reinstated after court ruling; Critics say case shows why College of Physicians ... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Wed Apr 15 2015
  • An Ajax obstetrician and gynecologist who was twice found guilty of professional misconduct for sexually abusing female patients had his medical licence reinstated by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario Tuesday. It's a case that exemplifies why the medical regulatory body should report potentially criminal cases to police, critics say. Dr. Sami Karkanis's licence was revoked nearly two years ago when a disciplinary committee found he had committed an act of professional misconduct by sexually abusing a Toronto-area woman he treated between 2002 and 2006. Those allegations were formally withdrawn by the College Tuesday, months after a divisional court judge overturned the committee's decision.
  • "The complainant in this matter ... has informed the College she is not willing to participate in a second hearing," prosecutor Amy Block told the College's current disciplinary committee at a short hearing Tuesday morning. It was the second time Karkanis had been disciplined by the College; in 2010, his licence was suspended for six months and he had a gender-based restriction put on his practice after he admitted to a consensual sexual relationship with a different patient. A third allegation of sexual abuse in 2007 was never heard by a disciplinary committee. Karkanis's lawyer, Jenny P. Stephenson, told the Star her client currently lives in Sudan. She would not say whether he has plans to return to Canada, but said he welcomes the College's decision. "We're happy the allegations are being withdrawn. He's pleased."
Govind Rao

Patients fight excess fees; Complaints over extra charges by doctors spike in Quebec - ... - 0 views

  • Montreal Gazette Fri Apr 17 2015
  • The number of Quebecers filing complaints about excessive fees charged by doctors in private practice has soared by 374 per cent during the past five years, according to newly-released figures by the Quebec College of Physicians. In some cases, ophthalmologists have charged hundreds of dollars for eye drops that should cost as little as $20. Increasingly, physicians who perform vasectomies outside of hospital are invoicing patients "accessory" fees that are not permitted under the law. In one flagrant example, the disciplinary board of the College of Physicians suspended a Westmount physician for three months and fined him $10,000 in 2013 after ruling that he charged patients "excessive and unjustified" fees.
  • Dr. Charles Bernard, president and executive director of the College, acknowledged that some physicians have "exaggerated" in the amounts they bill patients. But he blamed the problem on the provincial government for not updating the list of fees that are allowed in private practice since 1970. "The College is receiving more and more complaints about fees charged by doctors," Bernard said Thursday, citing statistics that the number of such grievances has jumped from 31 in 2010-11 to 147 in 2014-15. About 80 per cent of the complaints were resolved after mediation between the physician and patient. But nearly 30 complaints in 2014-15 were not settled to the patients' satisfaction. "What we believe is that the accessory fees should be clear," Bernard told reporters following a news conference. "We don't want (doctors) to exaggerate and that's why we want detailed invoices. "Although the College has taken steps to modify its Code of Ethics, the problem is not entirely resolved," he added.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • "It's now up to the government to act and decide whether it will cover the cost of certain services and the use of medical equipment in private practice, or if it wants to revise the agreement on the accessory fees with the medical federations." Under the Quebec Health and Social Services Act, doctors who work in hospitals cannot bill patients for medically necessary services. These same physicians must abide by certain conditions in their private practice, since they have not opted out of medicare. They can only charge for "medications and anesthesia agents" in private, and they are not allowed to bill patients for the use of medical equipment. However, there is one exception to the rule: private radiology clinics in Quebec can bill patients for MRI scans - a sore point with Health Canada, which has argued that the exception violates the accessibility provisions of the Canada Health Act. In addition, Quebec did negotiate with the medical federations a list of fees that are permitted, such as the use of liquid nitrogen to remove moles ($10) or the use of a topical anesthetic for a minor eye wound (also $10). Over the years, many physicians in private practice have started billing for many more items and services, sometimes prompting investigations by the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ).
Doug Allan

Diluted chemotherapy supplier regulations are unclear - Toronto - CBC News - 0 views

  • "Marchese Hospital Solutions does not have a licence," as an accredited pharmacy, Lori DeCou, manager of communications for the Ontario College of Pharmacists, said Wednesday.
  • There also questions about federal jurisdiction regarding whether Marchese was operating as a drug manufacturer.
  • "We're looking into the activities that Marchese Hospital Solutions performs, and we're looking to see which activities of which part of this company actually falls under provincial versus federal jurisdiction," said Dr. Supriya Sharma, a senior medical advisor at Health Canada in Ottawa. "We're still in the process of finding that out."
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • "This is a new way of doing business so we need to sort which activities are being done and then who has the overall oversight over them."
  • "My reaction was, 'I can't believe this happened to me'," Kaiman said from her dress shop in Woodstock, Ont. "They told me my chemo was watered down and that basically he thinks it may not affect me, but there are no guarantees."
  • Marchese has said the problem arose not from how the bags were prepared but in how they were administered at the hospitals.
  • We need answers and I am going to make sure the College of Pharmacists gets the tools they need."
  •  
    "Marchese Hospital Solutions does not have a licence," as an accredited pharmacy, Lori DeCou, manager of communications for the Ontario College of Pharmacists, said Wednesday.
Doug Allan

Printer Friendly - Infomart - 1 views

  • Both the college and Health Minister Deb Matthews say they want to change the bylaw under the Regulated Health Professions Act. Fair enough, but the loophole never should have existed in the first place, and it should be correctly immediately. It won't happen, however. Not with the legislature prorogued until sometime in the new year.
  • The situation becomes more urgent because the Liberals have been encouraging physicians to provide these services in clinic settings, and they've been only too happy to oblige.
  • "That's the direction that health care is clearly going," Windsor Regional Hospital CEO David Musyj said. "If that's the direction its going to go, you have to make sure the oversight of these out-of-hospital services is beefed up."
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • It makes no sense that clinics are inspected every five years when hospitals must apply for accreditation every three years. And it is irresponsible for the college and government to protect those that fail at the expense of public safety.
  • Consumers of health care have the right to transparency. A sanctioned physician is named on the college website. It should be no different for clinics in violation of government standards. The law must be rewritten to allow the college to name names.
Doug Allan

Hepatitis C outbreaks at three Toronto colonoscopy clinics kept secret | Toronto Star - 0 views

  • Toronto Public Health, which revealed the outbreaks when pressed by the Star, said 11 patients were infected and tainted sedative injections were the “possible” cause in all cases.
  • By: Theresa Boyle Health, Published on Sat Sep 27 2014
  • Three Toronto colonoscopy clinics have had hepatitis C outbreaks since 2011, the Star has learned.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • Three Toronto colonoscopy clinics have had hepatitis C outbreaks since 2011, the Star has learned.
  • The authorities responsible for investigating the spread of infection and inspecting the clinics — TPH and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, respectively — kept the outbreaks secret.
  • She is calling on the province to remove the CPSO as regulator of such clinics — known as “out-of-hospital premises” — charging that the outbreaks show the organization is failing in its duties to uphold quality of care and to be transparent, and is placing patients at risk.
  • The MPP for Nickel Belt also wants the province to suspend the downloading of hospital services into the community and place a moratorium on the creation of any new clinics until a new oversight body is created to ensure public safety.
  • “The minister of health has to realize that this push into the community is not safe. It won’t be safe until we have in place much more robust oversight,” she said.
  • None of the clinics offered up anyone to be interviewed, but all three provided written statements. They all expressed concern for the health and recovery of the patients, said they co-operated fully with investigations and emphasized that they are committed to ensuring outbreaks never occur again.
  • Tom Closson, former president of the Ontario Hospital Association and a supporter of moving some services from hospitals to community clinics, is in agreement that outbreaks should be made public. “I believe that public confidence in the health-care system will improve faster if people know that patient safety is being addressed in an open and transparent manner rather than through keeping errors hidden,” he said.
  • Gélinas called on the province to suspend the movement of hospital services to the community clinic sector. “To me, it rings alarm bells as loud as can be. Minister, you cannot continue down this path until you put in place strong oversight, strong accountability and strong transparency,” she said in an interview, referring to Hoskins and his government’s ongoing expansion of the community sector.
  • Gélinas said the NDP is not opposed to community care as long as it is provided in not-for-profit facilities that have strong oversight, accountability and transparency. “We are a long way from this in Ontario and good people are paying the price, most often with their health and well-being,” she warned.
  • On Friday afternoon, the Star was informed by the CPSO that the college is now in the process of inspecting the three colonoscopy clinics. Earlier in the day, it posted on its public register of out-of-hospital premises that results of the inspections are “pending.”
  • Asked what the college is doing to stop the multi-dose vial error from repeating itself, Clarke said medical directors of clinics are made aware that compliance with college program standards for out-of-hospitals premises is expected. Among the standards is this requirement: “Multi-dose injectable medications are used for only one patient. If they are not, the rubber septum must be disinfected with alcohol prior to each entry.”
Govind Rao

More palliative care specialists is not enough - 0 views

  • CMAJ February 17, 2015 vol. 187 no. 3 First published January 12, 2015, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4972
  • Dane Wanniarachige
  • In light of Quebec legalizing euthanasia and Canada’s aging population, the quality and availability of palliative care is emerging as a crucial issue, say experts in the area. But while the conversation has often centred on the number of palliative care specialists, that’s only part of the solution.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • The authors of a 2013 commentary in Canadian Family Physician take issue with the “widely cited” claim that only 16%–30% of those who need palliative care receive it. “The fallacy in this claim is the implication that all Canadians approaching the end of life should be cared for by specialist palliative care teams,” state the authors.
  • Shadd says all health care providers should possess basic palliative care knowledge pertinent to their discipline. “It’s not just physicians… . The nurses, personal support workers, social workers and all of the people supporting that person need to have that education.”
  • In November 2014, the Canadian Medical Association partnered with the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, and the Technology Evaluation in the Elderly Network to obtain a snapshot of the palliative medicine workforce today. They emailed a survey to members of the two colleges and to members of the Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians who didn’t belong to either college. The results will be available in May 2015.
Govind Rao

Some Quebec doctors let suicide victims die though treatment was available: college | N... - 0 views

  • March 17, 2016
  • Quebec’s College of Physicians has issued an ethics bulletin to its members after learning that some doctors were allowing suicide victims to die when life-saving treatment was available.
  • The bulletin says the college learned last fall that, “in some Quebec hospitals, some people who had attempted to end their lives through poisoning were not resuscitated when, in the opinion of certain experts, a treatment spread out over a few days could have saved them with no, or almost no, aftereffects.”
1 - 20 of 171 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page