Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged Hoskins

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

Falling short on fixing Ontario's home-care mess - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Sun May 17 2015
  • At last, Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins seems to get it. After nearly a year of insisting Ontario's much-criticized home-care system is performing just fine, Hoskins is now admitting the system is an utter mess and in desperate need of fixing. Hoskins made the concession last week in unveiling a 10-point "road map" to improve home- and community-care delivery across Ontario. The program is a small, first step in the right direction, but lacks real details and falls far short of what is required to reform a system in such disarray.
  • The most important step was taken by Hoskins when he adopted a new attitude toward home care, a key part of the overall health-care system that has suffered for years from severe underfunding, political neglect and too much bureaucracy. Indeed, Hoskins could actually become the new home-care champion.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • That's because home care needs a leader who cares deeply about a system that for too long has seen patients struggle to receive basic services they deserve, suffer when their therapy sessions or personal support visits are cut off or reduced, or who are sent home from hospitals with false promises of services to come to their door. "We know from the feedback that we have received from literally thousands of individuals and families that the care that they are currently receiving is patchy, uneven and fragmented," Hoskins admitted last week. It was just six months ago that Hoskins was refusing even to acknowledge that any patients had their services terminated or reduced because of cutbacks by Community Care Access Centres, which oversee home- and community-care services. In fact, those cuts affected thousand of sick and elderly patients across the province.
  • Encouragingly, Hoskins unveiled several new measures last week that potentially could help patients receive better and more cost-efficient care. One pilot program would give patients money to hire their own home-care services and health professionals to provide care in their homes. For example, hospitals might be able to work with discharged patients in regards to co-ordinating community supports. Ultimately that could spell the demise of CCACs, which now co-ordinate community care, usually through private companies and non-profit organizations. As good as such steps are, Hoskins could have done so much more to truly improve home care.
  • First, Hoskins should radically reform the overall bureaucratic structure of home and community care. Gail Donner, former dean of nursing at the University of Toronto who headed a recent government-appointed panel on home care, has called the issue of structure "the elephant in the room" when it comes to poor delivery and co-ordination of services to patients. The most obvious starting point is the 14 CCACs across Ontario. These government agencies, which are filled with many hard-working and dedicated staffers, have been rightly criticized as being too bureaucratic, inefficient and top heavy with high-paid executives. Hoskins said last week he will wait until Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk releases two reports on CCACs before making any moves. The first report looking into CCACs' financial operations, which was requested by an Ontario all-party legislative committee in March 2014, was to have been ready this spring. It now won't be ready until late fall. The second report, which will look into other aspects of home care, will be included in the auditor general's annual report, tentatively set for early December.
  • Second, Hoskins should demand more money for rehab services, such as physiotherapy and speech-language pathology. This growing area of need has been effectively gutted over the years in the name of cost-saving, with patients getting as few as two visits from front-line health professionals after being sent home from hospitals. At the same time, hospitals have closed in-patient and outpatient rehab clinics, forcing patients to fight for limited home-care services or pay privately. Third, Hoskins should reverse a unilateral decision by CCACs that forbids charitable non-profit home-care organizations to fundraise among former clients.
  • Such a move would open the door for not-for-profit organizations to provide vital home-care services that are not now being met or are being under-delivered by CCACs. Low-income and aboriginal groups would be among those most likely to benefit from such a move. If non-profit hospitals can fundraise among former patients, it seems logical that not-for-profit home-care organizations should be allowed to do the same thing. Home-care patients can draw some encouragement from Hoskins' small steps forward. But now is the time for bolder steps that will make a real difference in the lives of patients and caregivers around the province. Bob Hepburn's column appears Thursday. bhepburn@thestar.ca.
Govind Rao

What's holding up home-care reform? - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Sun Dec 6 2015
  • After months of planning and false starts, Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins finally has all the proof he needs to push ahead at full speed with sweeping changes to the province's troubled home-care system. So what's holding him up? For weeks, Hoskins has been signalling he will release a "discussion document" outlining radical reforms, including scrapping the beleaguered 14 Community Care Access Centres (CCACs) that co-ordinate home-care delivery across the province.
  • He received even more evidence this past week that it's time to transform the system with the release of auditor general Bonnie Lysyk's annual report. Lysyk listed a wide range of mismanagement, poor oversight and horror cases in which patients failed to get services such as nursing, physiotherapy and personal support on time or in enough quantity to make a lasting difference in their health. In many instances patients had to wait almost a year just for an initial assessment. In recent days, Hoskins has been telling key health-sector players he will release his discussion paper "before the holidays."
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • The document is expected to propose shifting much of the CCACs' home-care planning and oversight roles to the 14 Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) that now are responsible for overall regional planning, funding and health-care integration. The job of co-ordinating face-to-face services, which now falls to CCAC staffers, may be moved to primary care agencies, such as hospitals or community health clinics led by doctors or nurse practitioners. The goal is to save more than $200 million by eliminating the bureaucracy-heavy CCACs, with their high-paid executives, and directing the savings to front-line services.
  • More than 700,000 Ontario residents receive care annually at home or in community settings. The province spends $2.5 billion a year on home and community care, about 4 per cent of its total health budget. Despite overwhelming evidence that the system is in dire need of reform, Hoskins seems reluctant to move ahead with any speed. Two months ago his office cancelled a private lock-up for home-care stakeholders at which they were to discuss a "white paper" on reforms. Hoskins also scrapped plans for a special home-care task force on the grounds it would be viewed as just another stalling tactic. Still, Hoskins is indeed moving, albeit slowly.
  • On Nov. 20, he spoke privately with the board chairs and chief executive officers of the 14 CCACs about the coming changes. On Nov. 30, Bob Bell, the deputy health minister, met with the same CCAC bosses and while he didn't share any "concrete plans," he did suggest health ministry officials will consult with CCACs and other agencies about the proposed changes "in the new year." And on Dec. 1, Hoskins wrote to the CCAC bosses to explain that his ministry has every intention of "working together with CCACs to build a health care system that truly responds to the needs of patients and their families." Again, no specifics were mentioned. Clearly, Hoskins is dealing with a health-care establishment that is reluctant to change. That includes the CCACs, LHINs, doctors and his own bureaucrats.
  • LHIN officials, for example, don't want to be in charge of direct delivery of care. They have few staffers who actually know how to run a big health system on a day-to-day basis. At the same time, the LHINs have their own troubles, as Lysyk noted in her report. She said their "marching orders are not clear enough" and performance gaps are widening, especially on wait times. In the weeks ahead, Hoskins must address whether the LHINs are ready to assume greater duties, whether they should be in the health-care delivery sector at all and how to achieve better integration of hospitals, public health, primary care and home-care agencies. Also, he should look at whether all - not just some - home-care delivery should be left to private and non-profit service providers. Hoskins and his bureaucrats may be delaying the reform push until they develop "the perfect plan."
  • But Hoskins, who has shown true vision in this initiative, should view the document as the starting point - not the end point - for wholesale reforms that cut out an entire layer of costly bureaucracy and that improve the delivery of services that patients need and deserve. Everyone in the health-care sector is primed and ready to act, although not eagerly in all cases. Just as important is the fact that more delays and more wasted tax dollars won't fix the broken system. So it's time for Hoskins to end the needless holdups and move swiftly and boldly on behalf of the people who really matter - Ontario patients. Bob Hepburn's column appears Sunday. bhepburn@thestar.ca
  • Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins may be delaying action until his team develops "the perfect plan" for home-care delivery, Bob Hepburn writes. • Chris Young/THE CANADIAN PRESS file photo
Govind Rao

Urgent need for home-care task force - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Sun Sep 27 2015
  • In the wake of the latest major report that blasts the way Ontario looks after home care in this the province, it is time for Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins to take immediate action to fix a system that is clearly broken. The latest horror-filled report, released last week by auditor general Bonnie Lysyk, outlined a system that is utterly confusing, often mismanaged, lacking in oversight and filled with inconsistencies in how patients are treated. Lysyk took particular aim at the 14 Community Care Access Centres (CCACs), the publicly funded organizations that co-ordinate nursing, therapy and personal support services for patients outside of hospitals.
  • Basically, her report described a troubling situation where Queen's Park champions the huge CCAC bureaucracy that costs too much money and does nothing very well. Among her findings was the stunning revelation that more than $900 million of the $2.4 billion that CCACs receive annually to deliver for home- and community-care services actually go for administration and overhead - not direct patient care.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • In fact, barely 62 cents of every $1 goes to actual direct patient care. For years, CCAC bosses have being boasting - falsely it turns out - that 92 cents of every dollar went to direct patient care. Lysyk's audit also found that barely half of the complex-needs patients discharged from hospitals receive the care they are supposed to get within 24 hours, often because CCAC nurses don't work on weekends or rarely after 5 p.m.
  • The audit was requested by the Ontario legislature's standing committee on public accounts in March 2014 after a series of news stories and columns in the Toronto Star in 2013 and early 2014 detailed the beleaguered state of the home-care system, particularly when it comes to the CCACs. The Star described how CCAC executives were getting massive pay raises despite the system being starved for money with patients suffering as their services and many front-line workers were overworked and without a wage increase in years. The auditor general's report comes six months after a report by the Liberal government's own expert panel, chaired by Gail Donner, a former dean of nursing at the University of Toronto that called for "urgent action" to fix the chaos in the system.
  • Despite these two major reports and similar reports in years gone by, the Liberal government has done nothing to address the troubles within the CCACs. Now it's up to Hoskins to act boldly and quickly to fix the system.
  • As a first step, Hoskins should immediately create a powerful task force that can review the CCACs and look for a better way of co-ordinating home-care in Ontario. Ultimately, that could mean scrapping the CCAC system, which as Lysyk's report finds, is simply not working. The task force should be composed of experts from all sectors of the health area, including representatives of hospitals, patient advocacy groups, nurses, therapists such as speech language pathologists, personal support workers, CCACs and the 14 Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) that oversee and fund CCACs, hospitals and other community health services. Also, Hoskins should give the task force a short deadline to report its recommendations, ideally within six months. That's a tight schedule, but it should be possible given that so much investigation has been done over the last five years into the flaws in the system. One specific mandate that Hoskins should give the task force is to determine if all planning and monitoring roles for home care now performed by CCACs can be transferred to beefed-up LHINs.
  • Also, the task force should study whether care co-ordination now handled by CCACs can be transferred to the primary-care sector. Hoskins, who has talked of wanting "bold and transformative change," has hinted broadly that he is willing to look in this direction. He has taken great efforts to point out the auditor's recommendation that the government revisit the current model of delivering home and community care. "We endorse this recommendation and see it as a catalyst not only to continue but to deepen our reform process," he said. The auditor general will release two more reports on home care in 2015, both to be included in her annual report to be filed likely in early December. One is on the CCAC's home-care program focusing on personal support services and the other on the performance of the 14 LHINs. But Hoskins doesn't need to wait for these reports before acting.
  • The evidence that the home-care system is a mess and that the CCACs are a big reason for that sorry state is overwhelming. It's time for Hoskins to appoint a task force with a mandate to propose real reforms that will improve the lives of all Ontario patients who need treatment at home. Bob Hepburn's column appears Sunday. bhepburn@thestar.ca
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Hoskins quietly works on pharmacare - 0 views

  • By almost any measure, Eric Hoskins has had a rough time over the past few months. A chorus of doctors is demanding he be fired as Ontario's health minister because their fees are being trimmed; patients are staging protest rallies over cuts at local hospitals; health-care stakeholders are resisting his plans to dramatically reform the home-care system; political opponents are attacking him for the government's handling of the suicide crisis in the remote First Nations community of Attawapiskat. The list goes on.
  • The reasons Canada is nowhere close to implementing such a plan are simple: stiff opposition from private insurance companies and skittish politicians who don't want anything to do with raising any taxes — even for a sensible and fiscally solid cause — for fear of voter backlash. Over the past year, Hoskins has quietly pushed the pharmacare agenda with provincial and federal health ministers. As a start, he convinced his colleagues at a meeting in January to set up a working group to look into the issue. Now he's stepping up his efforts as Ottawa turns its attention towards the coming negotiations later this year on a new federal-provincial health accord. He wants pharmacare to be a key part of the accord talks.
  • In July, the proposed plan will be high on the agenda when the premiers hold their annual meeting. In October, Hoskins will host the next federal-provincial meeting of health ministers, where he will again lobby hard for a national framework accord on pharmacare. His long-term goal is to have an agreement by July 1, 2017, that says at a minimum Canada will have a national plan in place within five years. To help Hoskins succeed, the public needs to become involved and tell politicians they care deeply about this issue. It will be impossible to get traction on pharmacare unless there's a sustained public call for action. A concerted public campaign would help ensure improved access to prescription drugs for all Ontario and Canadian residents, providing them with the medications they need.
Govind Rao

High-paid health bosses brought about own undoing - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Sun Nov 29 2015
  • When high-flying politicians or senior executives come crashing down to earth it is often because their outrageous spending habits or sky-high salaries have been exposed to the public. That's what happened, for example, to Bev Oda in 2012 when the federal Conservative cabinet minister resigned her seat in the House of Commons after it was revealed she had ordered a $16 glass of orange juice at a London hotel and made taxpayers foot the bill.
  • As first revealed three weeks ago by Toronto Star reporter Theresa Boyle, Health Minister Eric Hoskins is signalling that Queen's Park will scrap the CCACs and transfer much of their duties to the province's 14 Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs), which oversee regional health planning. Hoskins will unveil the changes in a "discussion document" to be released in the coming weeks. For years, patients have complained that the $2.5-billion-a-year home-care system was a mess, with too much bureaucracy, a drastic shortage of funds for face-to-face care, mismanagement, lack of oversight, uneven treatment and a culture of fear.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • And that's exactly what is happening now with the pending demise of 14 huge Ontario agencies that oversee the delivery of home care to hundreds of thousands of patients each year and employ tens of thousands of workers. The bosses involved are the chief executive officers of the 14 Community Care Access Centres (CCACs) in Ontario. These government agencies, which have been embroiled in controversy for several years, are responsible for co-ordinating access to home and community care services, such as nursing, physiotherapy and personal support workers.
  • Politicians and bureaucrats at Queen's Park, however, regularly dismissed the complaints and did little to fix the broken system. Indeed, under former health minister Deb Matthews, the CCAC bosses were never really challenged to improve their operations. Some were openly hostile, arrogant and aggressive, operating with a sense of entitlement that saw them run their agencies as they saw fit. But as happened to Oda, the heady days for the CCAC executives came to a sudden halt when their skyrocketing salaries and stunning pay raises were revealed. In some cases, CCAC bosses were paid raises topping $65,000 a year, with salaries over $300,000. Others saw their pay jump by more than 50 per cent over three years.
  • Even more revealing was the fact that while the CCAC bosses were getting massive pay raises, many of the therapists, personal support workers and nurses who actually provide care to patients were earning less than $25,000 a year and hadn't seen a pay raise in years. Other managers in the CCAC system also earn huge salaries. One vice-president of strategy, communications and engagement earned $193,000 in 2014. In the Toronto Central CCAC, there were 45 employees earning more than $100,000 in 2014. In the Ontario Association of CCACs (OACCAC), there were 37 employees earning more than $100,000 with the executive director earning close to $300,000.
  • Worse was the fact that the CCAC executives were also ordering their staff, most of whom cared deeply about and worked hard to deliver good care, to trim patient services such as the number of visits to patients by front-line health workers in order to meet their budgets. Suddenly, politicians at Queen's Park took notice.
  • n early 2014 an all-party legislative committee asked auditor general Bonnie Lysyk to conduct a wide inquiry into CCAC operations. Lysyk's report, released in September, described in detail a bloated CCAC system that costs too much money, does nothing very well and where barely 62 cents of every dollar goes to actual direct patient care. For Hoskins, that was the final straw. Now he is about to unleash the biggest change in health-care delivery in Ontario in a generation. Through it all, the CCAC executives were often their own worst enemies.
  • Instead of explaining why they deserved huge salaries, they became aggressive, hiring expensive lobbyists and public relations experts to promote their agencies, denouncing journalists and critics who raised legitimate concerns about the system, and misleading their own staffers on how their operations were faring or what the future might hold for them. When news first surfaced that Hoskins was planning to dismantle the CCACs, the executives denied any real moves were coming and that their futures were in jeopardy. Some CCAC bosses went so far as to tell their staff that the Star's articles about the pending demise of the CCACs were "inaccurate."
  • In recent days, though, the CCACs have gone silent as they come to grips with the realization that their jobs and agencies are likely doomed. Hoskins is not waiting to start the transformation, but his initial timetable for dismantling the CCACs has proven to be problematic. Hoskins originally wanted the LHINs to start assuming some CCAC roles, such as responsibility for front-line staff, as early as three months from now. But sources say these timelines keep being blown up because the LHINs are not yet ready to take on increased duties.
  • Still, Hoskins is planning to press ahead. He will get more ammunition on Dec. 2 for the home-care transformation when Lysyk releases the second part of her inquiry into CCACs. For patients waiting for needed treatment and who have tangled with the CCAC bureaucracy and bosses in the past, the changes can't come soon enough. Bob Hepburn's column appears Sunday. bhepburn@thestar.ca
healthcare88

Provinces, Ottawa spar over health transfers; Ontario warns cuts will lead to 'declinin... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Wed Oct 19 2016
  • Provincial and territorial health ministers are imploring Ottawa not to diminish its role as a funding partner in health care any further. Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins, who co-chaired a meeting of his counterparts from across the country on Tuesday, said funding from Ottawa will be "inadequate" if the federal government proceeds with its plans to cut the annual increase in health transfers next year.
  • "(It) will result in a declining partnership," he told a news conference at the King Edward Hotel in Toronto. "What we are asking as provinces and territories is that the federal government ... not withdraw further, that we want them to sustain the level of partnership that traditionally has been there," he said. Canadians have seen that partnership "very seriously erode" since medicare was created about a half century ago when the federal government footed half the bill, Hoskins said. Today, Ottawa is paying only 20 per cent of the tab, a share that will decrease further if Ottawa next year cuts the annual increase in the Canada Health Transfer to 3 per cent from 6 per cent.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Federal Health Minister Jane Philpott, who co-chaired Tuesday's talks, tried to steer the conversation away from money and toward system improvement, innovation and accountability. She repeatedly pointed out that Canada spends more on health care than many other developed countries that have superior health systems. She expressed disappointment that planned system improvements that Ottawa funded in the 2004 health accord did not materialize. Philpott indicated that she wants new funds to be targeted to such areas as mental health and system innovation. She also reiterated an earlier commitment to provide $3 billion for home care, including palliative care.
  • I have made it clear to them that we would love, for instance, to invest in innovation," she said. "I want to know how they want to use those investments in innovation. I have told them that I am very interested in mental-health care." Hoskins said his provincial and federal counterparts are on board with that, but that they need a boost in the annual increase in health funding as well just to maintain the status quo. "You can transform and we have to transform, but you have to do that in a way which respects and understands that you need to sustain the existing system," he said. Hoskins cited a Conference Board of Canada report that found that a spending increase of 4.4 per cent is needed "just to keep the lights on, just to keep the existing services working" because of pressures from a growing and aging population. Quebec Health Minister Gaétan Barrette said Ottawa's current plans for health spending will amount to $60 billion less over the next decade for the provinces and territories.
  • "It says to Canadians, 'We will not provide up to the level of $60 billion.' That's what's at stake," he said. The 2004 health accord - which includes annual funding hikes of 6 per cent - expires next spring. The former Conservative government decided unilaterally that annual health spending will increase at a lower rate of 3 per cent after that. The provincial and territorial ministers are hoping Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will reconsider that when the first ministers meet later this year. Hoskins said a 50-per-cent cut in the annual funding increase will translate to $1 billion less for the provinces and territories next year. Ontario alone stands to lose $400 million. Philpott apologized about confusion over comments she made earlier on accountability for funds. Some provincial and territorial ministers expressed anger over an insinuation that health transfers were not being spent on health. Philpott said that was not what she meant.
  • I apologize if people misunderstood," she said. "There is certainly no intention to make accusations." Philpott said the Canada Health Transfer, which stands at $36 billion, will increase by about $19 billion over the next five years. "It's really important for Canadians to know that we are going to continue to contribute to the Canada Heath Transfer," the federal minister said. Philpott said that over the last five years, $9 of every new $10 spent on health in Canada came from the Canada Health Transfer. "We are contributing he largest part to spending." In addition to the Canada Health Transfer, extra funds will be provided for targeted priorities with strings attached to ensure transformation goals are met, she said.
  • This is Canadians' money ... We want to find a way that we can work together so that as we agree to make new investments, that we have already got a sense of plan," Philpott said. In elaborating on why Ottawa should fund new, more efficient ways of providing health care while at the same time provide sufficient funding for the current health system, Hoskins offered the example of dialysis for kidney failure. The ministers discussed how it would make more sense to monitor blood pressure to prevent kidney failure and thereby lessen the need for dialysis, he noted. "That's great and we are all working toward that end, but you still have to provide dialysis today because that individual who needs it will be dead in three weeks without it," Hoskins said.
Govind Rao

Health minister puts patients first; He's determined to make his mark - despite protest... - 0 views

  • Hamilton Spectator Mon Feb 2 2015
  • Reaching that goal requires integrating health-care delivery to break silos, but it also needs a push. He believes he can achieve faster results through greater accountability, by putting the accent on transparency, collaboration and innovation. Hoskins stresses the value of "open data and transparency" in helping people identify problems and achieve best practices: "Having it in the public domain builds confidence in the health-care system ... Our default is we disclose and reveal and share and are transparent." In trying to transform the ministry, Hoskins also seems transformed himself as minister. The first physician to helm the health portfolio in decades, he is back in his comfort zone trying to shake things up - more in control than as minister of economic development, where he had limited success nursing Ontario's ailing economy back to health. Hoskins concedes that being a doctor helps him "get up to speed faster," but insists he retains a healthy dose of humility
  • He is also pitching for a national pharmacare program to complete the unfinished business of medicare. A long overdue idea (pharmaceuticals play a greater role than ever in managing disease), Hoskins believes with a federal election looming, Ontario can help push it onto the national agenda. Whether it's the dream of national pharmacare or the reality of provincial medicare, Hoskins needs willing partners at ground level. A natural loner in the world of wheeling-and-dealing politicians, he is now without allies among his fellow physicians. An ambitious plan to claw back payments to doctors and reallocate it to community care has alienated the powerful OMA, whose members act as gatekeepers for most health-care spending, which consumes 42 per cent of the provincial budget. Talks to reform an outdated fee-for-service model have been put on hold by the OMA. Hoskins still belongs to the OMA. And he makes a point of practising family medicine several days a year (pro bono, to avoid any conflict over the minister billing his own ministry). Seeing patients is a useful reminder that a lone doctor can only help one person at a time, while as minister he can improve the health of an entire province. And as the most visionary physicians quickly learn, you can't do it on your own. Martin Regg Cohn writes on provincial affairs.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

More than 500 doctors billed Ontario for more than $1 million in fees last year, health... - 0 views

  • The most expensive doctor in Ontario, an eye specialist, billed the province for $6.6 million last year. We don’t know his or her name or where he or she practices, but we know how much that work costs taxpayers each year thanks to a release Friday by the Ontario government of the billing information of the province’s most expensive doctors. Getty Images/ThinkstockThe Ontario Medical Association says physicians have already seen a 6.9 per cent cut over the last year, but the province wants to rein in fees for radiologists and other specialists. Over the 2014 to 2015 time period, more than 500 doctors billed the province for more than $1 million in fees. They represent just two per cent of all doctors, but cost $677 million a year, or over six per cent of the more than $11-billion Ontario spends each year on physician compensation. And many of them charge much more than $1 million, the government’s release shows. Thirty-six billed more than $2 million.
  • The release intends to debunk a recent ad campaign from the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) arguingthe province’s efforts to rein in certain types of doctors’ fees is hurting patient care. It’s all part of a years-long dispute over doctor fees that’s pitted MDs against the province in a war over patients’ (and voters) hearts and minds. Yet, it’s not family doctors’ fees and their practices that Health Minister Eric Hoskins wants to see reduced, but the most costly specialists’ billings.
  • “It’s not our neurosurgeons who are billing over $1 million,” Hoskins said, “It’s a very narrow category of specialists. The data released shows three specialties tend to bill the most of the 506 doctors who topped $1 million: 154 diagnostic radiologists made the list, 85 opthamologists (eye surgeons) and 57 cardiologists. Twenty-five of the highest billing doctors specialize in addictions and prescribing methadone. 
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • He wants the OMA to return to the negotiating table and discuss lowering some of the 7,300 fees on the physicians’ pay schedule. He said the province has made no less than 80 offers since talks broke down two years ago — close to one a week — to no avail. If they don’t, he said he’s prepared to make another unilateral cut (even though the cuts imposed in 2015 have already sparked the second Charter challenge from the OMA this decade). “If necessary we will be forced to make those changes,” he said. Hoskins doesn’t want to cut back on all doctors’ pay, but create a more equal system that doesn’t go over budget every single years, as has historically been the case.
  • “The top biller, an ophthalmologist, billed more than $6.6 million last year. The top diagnostic radiologist billed more than $5.1 million and the top anesthesiologist billed more than $3.8 million,” a government fact-sheet states. That’s far above the average doctor’s gross payment of $368,000 a year. And though the OMA argues that often doesn’t account for overhead and staffing costs, the province also subsidizes pay in many indirect and direct ways, including allowing doctors to incorporate, which reduces tax and liability burdens. Ontario, unlike many provinces, covers 80 per cent of doctors’ liability insurance. Hoskins said the ministry even sometimes covers hardware costs like computers.
  • Hoskins says his goal is to make things more equal and better distribute the money going to certain specialists whose work has gotten easier. MRIs and CT scans used to take an hour, now they take 20 minutes. Same with cataract surgery — that’s why diagnostic radiologists and eye surgeons are so disproportionally represented on the list.
Govind Rao

A golden chance to fix Ontario's home-care system - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Sun Mar 15 2015
  • Patients are being discharged from hospitals without any home care or are being cut off from services they desperately need due to a lack of adequate funding for home and community care, says Natalie Mehra, the coalition's executive director. The government spends just $4.3 billion a year of its overall $50-billion health budget for care at home and in the community. In its report, the Donner panel made 16 recommendations ranging from developing a system that focuses on patient needs instead of those of service providers to putting more money into the system. Importantly, though, the expert panel has opened the door for Premier Kathleen Wynne and new Health Minister Eric Hoskins to completely overhaul the entire structure of the home-care system.
  • Such an overhaul could mean the demise of much-criticized Community Care Access Centres (CCACs), which co-ordinate home and community care for patients who are discharged from hospitals, and increase the role of Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs), which oversee health-care planning in regions across the province. Many health-care experts contend that former health minister Deb Matthews spent years making the CCACs the centre of power for home care, despite mounting evidence they were ineffective and obstructionist. Under Matthews, the CCACs operated with little oversight, creating fiefdoms where private-service providers who were critical of their practices saw their contracts not renewed or their funding reduced.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Widespread cases abound of how CCACs, which receive about $2.4 billion a year, have unilaterally cut off in-home services for needy patients or denied services, particularly in rehab therapy areas, to patients discharged from hospitals. Meanwhile, salaries of top CCAC executives have soared dramatically while incomes of front-line care workers have stagnated or in many cases actually fallen. Although the panel of experts was not assigned specifically to study it, the structure of the home- and community-care sector was a major concern for patients, their families and service providers. They told the panel they had to deal with an inefficient, cumbersome structure that is failing to deliver services that patients need. In an interview, Donner described the issue of structure as "the elephant in the room." The panel's report declared that it "is clear that the current structure is not working" and urged "that the sector's immediate efforts address the functional changes needed. If form follows function, we believe that the structure we need to enable and sustain these functional changes will become clear over time."
  • That's a clear message to Wynne and Hoskins that the panel believes it's time to blow up or radically alter the role of the CCACs and LHINs. Currently, the CCACs are at the centre of the "structure." But in its report, the panel virtually ignores them. Instead, it suggests LHINs should oversee home care, identifying and correcting gaps in care and bringing more accountability to the sector. When the CCACs were created, those functions were to be a huge part of their role. So what happened? Is the omission of any talk of the role of CCACs deliberate? Is it a signal that the panel believes the CCACs should be abolished or greatly reduced and the job of assessing and assigning at-home care handed over to LHINs? Encouragingly, Hoskins said in a news release the panel's recommendations "will be an important guide as we improve and transform the home and community sector."
  • In the coming months, though, Wynne and Hoskins must consider some major questions in the wake of the two reports last week. The biggest question is whether they have the appetite to dismantle the CCACs that Matthews, who remains a powerful cabinet minister, spent years building up. Everyone agrees it will be tough to change a system that has become so entrenched. But as the expert panel's report shows, change is desperately needed - and fast. For Wynne and Hoskins, this is a golden opportunity to fix our ailing home-care sector. They should not waste it. Bob Hepburn's column usually appears Thursday. bhepburn@thestar.ca
Govind Rao

Health minister aims to investigate MD pay; Province imposes two rounds of fee cuts on ... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Wed Oct 21 2015
  • Health Minister Eric Hoskins says he wants to create a task force to tackle the thorny issue of how doctors get paid. He met with the Ontario Medical Association on Tuesday and urged that the organization representing the province's 28,000 doctors take part in the proposal. The idea to create a task force was first proposed last December by Ontario's former chief Justice Warren Winkler who served as a conciliator during contract negotiations between the province and its doctors. The two sides never reached an agreement and the province has since imposed two rounds of unilateral fee cuts on doctors. The OMA says that, in total, physician fees have been slashed by 6.9 per cent this year.
  • Hoskins says he needs to divert the money from the $11.6-billion physician services budget into home care. He maintains that Ontario doctors are the best paid in Canada, earning an average of $368,000 before expenses. (Some doctors, for example, family physicians get much less than that while specialists, for example, ophthalmologists, get much more.) In his report, Winker warned that the two sides were on a "collision course" unless significant reforms were made.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Hoskins said he wants to follow through on Winkler's recommendation to create a task force to make recommendations for improving and funding physician services. "One of the things Winkler spoke to was putting together a team from the OMA and from the ministry and other stakeholders, to really, in a serious way for quite frankly the first time, look at the issue of physician compensation and the delivery of health services by physicians," Hoskins said. "(It would address) how they can and should be best compensated, how to create a sustainable way of doing that, how to frame it within the reforms that are taking place in the health-care system. There's a lot we can do together," he added.
  • The OMA has so far issued no public response. The organization's board of directors is gathering on Wednesday and plans to discuss the Hoskins' meeting. In an email update sent to doctors on Monday, OMA president Dr. Mike Toth said board members plan to discuss next steps, including possible legal action. The update hints that doctors may be preparing to take some sort of job action. Toth wrote that 200 physician leaders met on Sunday and held a "brainstorming exercise designed to test and confirm innovative and impactful actions that members might undertake in various clinical settings and geographic areas across the province."
Govind Rao

Health minister vows to lift hospitals' cloak of secrecy - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Wed Jul 1 2015
  • A controversial law allowing Ontario hospitals to investigate medical errors in secrecy is about to be overhauled by the government. The act will no longer grant hospitals the power to leave grieving families in the dark over what went wrong with their loved ones' care, Health and Long Term Care Minister Dr. Eric Hoskins told the Star on Tuesday. Changes to the Quality of Care Information Protection Act (QCIPA) include involving families in reviews of medical errors, giving families the right to call for an independent investigation into a medical mistake, and creating a public registry of all critical-care incidents that occur in Ontario hospitals.
  • Following a series of Star investigations into hospital secrecy under QCIPA, Hoskins last August called on an expert panel to review the act. The panel highlighted serious holes in the system and called for significant legislative changes. On Tuesday, Hoskins told the Star the government would be implementing "every one of the 12 recommendations" made by the panel. "I can't imagine what individuals and their loved ones go through when a critical incident occurs in a hospital environment," Hoskins said. "If this government can help them understand what did happen, if we can respect them by involving them in the process, if we can do the absolute maximum in terms of sharing information to give them confidence that hopefully it will never happen again to anyone else, that's the least we should be able to do for people in such tragic circumstances."
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Among significant changes: 1. Develop clear guidance on when and how hospitals should use QCIPA to avoid the large variation in how the act is currently used. 2. Amend the act to ensure appropriate disclosure to patients and families following a critical care incident so they are informed about the results of an investigation, including what happened and what measures would be taken to prevent future incidents. 3. Establish an appeal mechanism for the investigation of critical incidents so in circumstances where patients or families are not satisfied with a hospital review, they can request an investigation from an independent body, possibly the Office of the Patient Ombudsman. 4. Establish a publicly available database or registry that contains information about all of the critical incidents investigated in Ontario hospitals, including the type of incident, the causes and the recommendations to prevent future incidents. 5. Patients and families must be interviewed as part of the process of investigating critical incidents and then be fully informed of the results.
Govind Rao

Hefty bill worries senior ; Garson woman says she can't afford $6,000 air ambulance rid... - 0 views

  • The Sudbury Star Fri Oct 16 2015
  • A bill of almost $6,400 for an air ambulance transfer from one Alberta hospital to another is keeping a 77-year-old Garson grandmother awake at night. Jean Wright simply cannot afford to pay it. The last thing Wright thought she had to worry about when she returned from Alberta after an unexpected hospital stay was a bill for an air ambulance transfer, ordered by a physician.
  • It was a small facility and, while staff treated her well, a doctor there decided the elderly woman should be transferred to a larger hospital in Edmonton for more complex treatment. She was to be taken by land ambulance, but the vehicle didn't have a connection for the medical support she needed for the two-hour journey. When the doctor ordered an air ambulance, Wright and her daughters asked if the cost of the flight would be covered by provincial health insurance and they were told it would be. Wright, who also has kidney problems, was so ill in Vermillion, she didn't know where she was when she was at the small hospital. When the doctor said he was going to transfer her to "the city," she asked: "Where's the city?" Wright spent seven days in an Edmonton hospital being treated for fluid around her heart, a condition similar to congestive heart failure. Her daughters drove back to Sudbury while she was in hospital. Wright has a son who lives in Edmonton and she stayed with him for several days after being released from hospital before flying home.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Wright, who has diabetes and underwent a triple heart bypass three years ago, was in good health when she and two daughters drove to Vancouver and then Squamish, B.C., in August for a family wedding. On the return trip, the trio stopped for the night at a motel in a small town of fewer than 4,000 people called Vermillion, about 200 kilometres east of Edmonton. There, Wright took ill. She couldn't breathe and was having a difficult time walking, so her daughters rushed her to the local hospital.
  • When she got back to Garson, she and her husband, Jim, hitched up their trailer and went camping for two weeks. They had a wonderful time, but when they returned, there were two envelopes in the couple's mail box. One was a bill for several hundred dollars for examinations by three different doctors in Alberta. The other was a whopping $6,380 bill from an air ambulance company called STARS (Shock Trauma Air Rescue Society). Quite fittingly, Jean Wright was shocked when she opened the envelope, because she thought the flight was covered, she said in an interview at her Garson home.
  • Wright and her daughters had heard about the Alberta woman who was visiting family near Timmins when she went into early labour and had to be air-lifted to Sudbury. That woman was billed about $10,000 by Ontario's air ambulance service. After Amy Savill went public with her story, the Alberta and Ontario governments agreed to split the bill for the air ambulance. When Wright received her bill, she called one of her daughters and said the younger woman "almost fainted" when she heard the amount. Wright thought: "If I have to pay this bill, they're going to wait a long time. I don't have that kind of money." She is a retired school bus driver and her husband an Inco pensioner.
  • Wright visited the constituency office of her MPP, Nickel Belt New democrat France Gelinas, who is also her party's critic for Health and Long-Term Care. Gelinas wrote Health Minister dr. Eric Hoskins on Oct. 8, saying provincial governments should "pay the bill as a hospital emergency service when a patient is forced to take air or ground ambulances to the nearest hospital for the necessary emergency treatment. "Hospital and physician services are supposed to be free to all Canadians," wrote Gelinas. The Ontario Legislature is recessed this week and Gelinas hasn't received a reply from Hoskins, she said Thursday. She intends to speak with Hoskins about it Tuesday when the Legislature resumes sitting.
  • Wright contacted the Edmonton hospital about the smaller bill for doctors' services she received and was told to discard it. She hasn't contacted STARS, but Gelinas said her constituency staff will stay on the case. Gelinas wants Ontario's health minister to establish a policy in which air ambulance transportation for Ontarians out of province is paid by government if ordered by a physician. If Ontarians travelling outside the province require air ambulance transportation, and know they have to pay for it, many will not get the treatment they need because of that cost, said Gelinas.
  • "This is wrong," said Gelinas of someone like Wright being billed for transportation to get emergency care. The basic tenet of medicare is that all Canadians have access to good health care "no matter the thickness of their wallets. Gelinas, Nickel Belt federal NdP candidate Claude Gravelle and Sudbury federal NdP hopeful Paul Loewenberg have scheduled a news conference for Friday at 11 a.m. in front of Health Sciences North to talk about how the NdP health plan will improve health-care delivery for people in Northern Ontario.
  • Jean Wright shows off an invoice for more than $6,000 for an Alberta air ambulance ride on Thursday. Wright required medical care involving an air ambulance while on vacation in Alberta.
Heather Farrow

Ontario moves to bolster oversight of 1,200 medical clinics - 0 views

  •  
    Health Minister Eric Hoskins plans to introduce legislation to improve accountability, safety and quality at non-hospital clinics.
  •  
    Health Minister Eric Hoskins plans to introduce legislation to improve accountability, safety and quality at non-hospital clinics.
Govind Rao

Ontario vows 'self-directed' home care; Pilot project would give patients or their care... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Thu May 14 2015
  • n a bid to respond to a blistering report on home care in Ontario, the provincial government is promising a series of minor fixes to the system, including a Canadian-first pilot project that would give patients or their caregivers money to spend on the home health services of their choosing. Details were scant on the government's plans for experimenting with "self-directed care," an approach that Health Minister Eric Hoskins said is already working well for some parents of autistic children who have been given the flexibility to spend public funds on the programs they believe are best for their children. Dr. Hoskins said that although it was too early to say where the pilot programs would be located, who would qualify or how much they would cost, he was excited about eventually offering more choice to patients as they heal or age at home.
  • "We will provide them with the funds to effectively purchase their own home care under terms where they will have even greater control," he told reporters Wednesday at The Second Mile Club, a seniors' day program in Toronto. "We'll start, obviously, at a smaller scale to allow us the opportunity to make sure we get it right." The minister also announced some other changes to the home-care system, including $5-million for funding 80,000 more hours of at-home nursing care by raising the cap to 150 visits per month from the current limit of 120; developing a "statement of values" for the system; and making it clear which services are available to patients in their homes, no matter where in the province they live. He rehashed some old promises, too, including the extension of 5-per-cent annual increases in funding for home and community care and the phasing in of a $4-an-hour raise for home-care personal support workers, which The Globe and Mail reported has been delayed this year because of problems with the rollout last year.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Experimenting with self-directed care was one of 16 recommendations for improving home care made in March by a group of experts led by Gail Donner, the former dean of the Faculty of Nursing at the University of Toronto. "It's a positive first step, a really good beginning," Dr. Donner said Wednesday of the minister's 10-point plan. "I'm glad he mentioned this is the first phase because we have still lots of work to do in the transformation." Dr. Donner's report criticized Ontario's publicly funded home care sector as disjointed, opaque and onerous to navigate, making it "a system that fails to meet the needs of clients and families." But the report also acknowledged the breadth and depth of the challenge faced by the 14 local Community Care Access Centres (CCAC) that co-ordinate home care in a province that is moving aggressively to keep patients out of expensive hospital and nursing home beds. Although the Liberals have doubled funding for home and community care since taking office in 2003, the number of patients receiving services through the CCACs has also doubled in that time, with a sharp increase in the number of complex-needs, long-term patients seeking care, the report said.
  • Auditor-General Bonnie Lysyk is currently investigating the CCACs, but she told The Globe and Mail Wednesday that her findings will be released in the fall, not this spring as was widely expected. Her audit will be released in two parts - the first will respond directly to a request from opposition members of a legislative committee and the second will be part of her annual report in December. Some groups, including the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, have called for the CCACs to be scrapped altogether, but both Dr. Donner and Dr. Hoskins said Wednesday that basic fixes must precede larger reform. "We believe we need to get ... some consistency, transparency and accountability into the system," Dr. Donner said. "Then, do we need to deal with the structure? Yes, we do. Our view was that's not where you start." The provincewide organizations that represents the CCACs welcomed the minister's announcement, as did the health-care arm of the Service Employees International Union , the labour group that advocated for the raise for personal support workers. But Michael Hurley, the president of the Ontario Council of Hospital Unions, which is part of CUPE, slammed the plan as falling woefully short of the needs in the sector.
  • "We can't pretend to people that it's possible to downsize the acute-care sector and that they can rely on the community sector without a substantial investment and this doesn't deliver that," he said. "We haven't been given a system - we've been given another announcement of an another experiment."
Govind Rao

Problems implementing pay hike for PSWs undermine Liberal health plan in Ontario - Info... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Mon May 11 2015
  • INTO THE HOME The cost of moving health care out of hospitals It was one of the showpiece promises that Ontario's Liberals made before their government fell last year: a $4-an-hour wage hike for the personal support workers who are critical to the government's plans to shift health care out of expensive hospitals and into the home. More than a year and an election victory later, the PSW "wage enhancement" program is beset by so many complexities that the government has delayed indefinitely the second phase of the pay hike - a $1.50-an-hour raise that was due April 1 - while it works to mop up the problems on the ground, a Globe and Mail investigation has found.
  • Twenty-seven mostly non-profit health-care agencies across the province are refusing to accept the government-funded increase and pass it on to their workers, while one of the largest privatesector employers of PSWs in Ontario cut what it pays in mileage and travel time just after the first phase of the raise kicked in last fall, leaving some employees worse off than they were before the wage-enhancement program began. The PSW raise was also more expensive than expected, costing the province at least $77.8-million in 2014-15, 56 per cent more than the $50-million earmarked for the first year of the pledge.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • Although Health Minister Eric Hoskins has vowed that this year's portion of the raise will eventually be doled out retroactively to April 1, the delay has caused "a lot of confusion, uncertainty and frustration," among PSWs in the home and community care field, according to Kelly O'Sullivan, the chair for CUPE Ontario's health-care workers. "It adds to the ongoing precarious nature of this work," she said. "You can't even depend on a wage increase that's been promised to you by the government."
  • The government's PSW Workforce Stabilization Strategy was designed to make home-care work less precarious, not more. PSWs deliver more than half of all home-care services, helping clients to dress, bathe, prepare meals, tidy up and manage medications, among other tasks. Yet their paycheques are traditionally smaller and their schedules more erratic than those of PSWs who work in hospitals and nursing homes, making it difficult to retain quality workers in home and community care. Persuading PSWs to choose the home-care field is essential to the Ontario government's efforts to keep people out of hospitals and nursing homes for as long as possible - a way to stretch increasingly scarce health-care dollars and respond to the public's desire to heal and age at home.
  • People interviewed for this story were quick to praise the Liberals for trying to improve the lot of home-care PSWs and their clients by raising their minimum wage to $16.50 an hour from $12.50 over three years. The intention was laudable, they said. The execution of the plan was not. "This should be the best news story ever," said Deborah Simon, the chief executive officer of the Ontario Community Support Association, which represents hundreds of non-profit agencies that help people at home. Instead, Ms. Simon said, the Byzantine rules around the pay hike have created an "administrative burden" for organizations.
  • At the heart of the problem is which workers - and which kinds of work - qualify for the government-funded pay bump. While the government set a wage floor of $16.50 an hour as of 2016-17, it delivered the public funds through a "wage enhancement" that only applies when PSWs are providing "personal support services" funded by Local Health Integrated Networks (LHINs), the province's regional health authorities.
  • That means time spent in training, travelling to clients' homes or performing tasks such as food preparation do not qualify for the higher rate. Initially, even statutory holidays were paid out without the increase, although that has been reversed. Jason Lye, national head of independent living services at March of Dimes, says his agency spent months clarifying provincial rules, only passing on the first phase of the raise retroactively to workers in February in the form of a "blended rate" that takes into account how they historically have divided their time.
  • "The way I like to interpret it is when you see the whites of the clients' eyes, you are paying the $1.50," Mr. Lye said. There were other complications. The raise goes to all PSWs doing work that qualifies, meaning the $4 increase goes to everyone, whether they are making a base wage of $12.50 or $22 an hour. That has put pressure on employers to give raises to others, such as registered practical nurses and supervisors.
  • The rules also exclude some PSWs because of where they work or because the provincial funds that pay for their services do not flow through the province's 14 LHINs. The result is that PSWs within the same organization can be treated differently. Kingsway Lodge Fairhill Residence in the southwestern Ontario town of St. Marys chose to reject the increase because it would create an untenable disparity in its already well-compensated PSW work force. Hourly wages there range from $17.73 to $20.44. The organization operates a nursing home with round-theclock care, a retirement home and six supportive-housing suites where residents receive a few hours of personal support per day. The wage enhancement would have applied only in the supportive apartments. "There would be no way to do it because our staff flow between the three levels of care," said Theresa Wakem, the facility's administrator. At Traverse Independence, an agency in Kitchener that serves adults with physical disabilities and acquired brain injuries, management had to find $27,000 in a $6-million budget to give eight PSWs working in a day program the same raise as their colleagues. "It was a hardship," said CEO Toby Harris. The agency eliminated half a supervisor's job to cover the increase.
  • The wage enhancement helped a little bit, but we're still on the losing side," said the PSW, who asked not to be named. The company's London employees are not unionized. The PSW said some workers in London are refusing to serve clients outside the city because they are paid so little to travel there. "If I drove six hours in the county, I'd be lucky to get paid for three hours," the PSW said. Dr. Hoskins said before the Liberals committed to the pay increase, "we didn't have a tremendous amount of information about our PSWs - who they're working for, how much they're being remunerated."
  • The ministry is gathering data so it can "fine-tune" the second year of the program, including whether future increases should apply to all PSWs, even those already earning much more than $16.50 an hour, he said. He added that nearly 500 health-service providers have passed the increase on to their PSWs and the government expects the 27 holdouts to follow suit. As for Revera's changes, "I find that unacceptable," Dr. Hoskins said. "The ministry would be looking into those circumstances if they were brought to our attention." Ms. O'Sullivan, the CUPE representative, called the program's rollout "a reflection of a broader problem" with home and community care in Ontario.
  • If we can't figure out - we as in the government, the agencies and the unions - how everyone should be getting something as simple as a wage increase in an equitable way, can you imagine if you are a family member or a patient needing care, what the system must be like?" This is the first article of a Globe investigation into the challenges of moving health care out of hospitals and into the home. If you have a personal story to tell, contact Elizabeth Church at echurch@globeandmail.com and Kelly Grant at kgrant@globeandmail.com.
Govind Rao

'Bundled' health care faster, less expensive; Team approach before, during and after su... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Thu Sep 3 2015
  • A health-care initiative that saves up to $4,000 per patient and cuts down on emergency room visits is being rolled out at dozens of hospitals and through home-care providers across the province. The "bundled care" program connects patients with a single team of clinicians who meet and care for them before, during and after surgeries, even providing services once the patient has gone home. It cuts out the confusion often associated with health-care visits because it keeps much of a patient's health-care team the same throughout the process, and often assigns a co-ordinator - usually available 24/7 by phone or iPad - to manage that team.
  • The program was first used at St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton in 2012, with tangible success, but will soon be coming to dozens of care providers, Dr. Eric Hoskins, the province's minister of health and long-term care, has announced. The pilot project, Hoskins said Wednesday, will involve six teams: One team each in the London Middlesex, Hamilton Niagara, Haldimand Brant and North York regions, focusing on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure One team in Ontario's central west area, prioritizing patient transitions from the hospital to their homes, while reducing system duplication by providing electronic visits. One team in Mississauga Halton that will allow cardiac surgery patients to go home on average three days sooner.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • One team in Toronto focusing on stroke care. "These new care teams will make it easier for patients to transition out of hospital and to receive the care they need at home, where we know they'd rather be," Hoskins said in a statement. "This kind of care puts patients first by organizing their care team around the specific needs of a patient, delivering better access and better outcomes." At St. Joseph's, the project has garnered rave reviews from lung patients, whose hospital stays have been shortened by up to 33 per cent. Thanks to the program, the number of post-discharge emergency room visits has been slashed in half and rates of hospital readmission within 60 days for progam patients have been cut by 56 per cent.
  • To date, the program has been available to those being treated at St. Joseph's for compromised lung functions, congestive heart failure and lung cancer, and for those needing open-heart surgery or surgery for knee and leg issues. Kevin Smith, the hospital's CEO, had previously told the Star he hopes to expand the range of patients for whom the program is available, and to bring on more clinicians. The province said Wednesday that it "plans to support additional bundled care teams in the coming year based on the results" of the new projects.
  • Nurse Anna Tran, left, visits with Audrey Holwerda, 82, at her home in Hamilton as part of St. Joseph's hospital's bundled health-care program. • Peter Power for the Toronto Star
Govind Rao

NDP appeals to province for action on nurse assaults; Critics want Queen's Park to do m... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Fri Jul 3 2015
  • Ontario's NDP health and labour critics are calling on the government to take action following a Star report detailing the rising number of nurses reporting assaults by patients. In an open letter, labour critic Cindy Forster and health critic France Gélinas urged Health Minister Eric Hoskins and Labour Minister Kevin Flynn to improve the safety of patients and staff in Ontario's health-care system. "It is deeply disturbing that nurses and health-care professionals are facing increasing levels of workplace violence in our province," wrote Gélinas and Forster.
  • In an emailed statement to the Star, a spokesperson for the health minister wrote that Hoskins and Flynn are committed to ensuring Ontario's nurses have safe workplaces, but acknowledged there is room for improvement. "We recognize that there is more work to be done, which is why Minister of Labour Kevin Flynn met with the (Ontario Nurses' Association) earlier this year to discuss these very issues, and meets regularly to keep an open dialogue so we can continue working together to protect health-care workers," read the statement. On Thursday, the Star reported on the dramatic increases of reports of assaults on nurses at several Toronto-area hospitals over the past three years.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • At the University Health Network, the number of reported violent incidents against staff by patients doubled in two years. Reported assaults included incidents of verbal abuse, as well as patients kicking, punching and throwing urine at staff, according to reports obtained by the Star through an access to information request. UHN said the increase is likely due to a change in the method of reporting incidents and to a push from unions encouraging staff to increase reporting.
  • "Sadly, I'm not surprised (by the increase in assault reports)," said Doris Grinspun, CEO of the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, who called on the government to hire more nurses. "When you do not address staffing, the temperature only raises more and more." ONA president Linda Haslam-Stroud told the Star Thursday that she is in discussions with Hoskins and Flynn about addressing workplace violence for nurses but is waiting for confirmation of how they plan to tackle the issue. She added that talking is not enough. The ONA wants to see increased hospital staffing levels, better trained security guards and more accountability from CEOs.
Govind Rao

Why our health ministry is following doctor's orders: Cohn | Toronto Star - 0 views

  • The first physician to helm the health portfolio in decades, Dr. Eric Hoskins is in his comfort zone as he tries to shake up his $52-billion ministry.
  • Published on Sat Jan 31 2015
  • The doctor is in. Now the pressure is on. As Dr. Eric Hoskins tries to chart a new course as health minister, he’s already offside with his fellow health-care professionals: Physicians walked out of pay negotiations earlier this month, while home-care workers walked off the job this week for higher wages.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • to constantly strive for.” Home care is “cheaper, it’s more efficient, it leads to a better quality of life, it’s more respectful.”
  • He is also pitching for a national pharmacare program to complete the unfinished business of medicare. The idea is long overdue — pharmaceuticals play a greater role than ever in managing disease — and Hoskins believes with a federal election looming, Ontario can help push it onto the national agenda.
Govind Rao

Ontario wants more patients to get same-day or next-day appointments, Ontario health mi... - 0 views

  • Ontario wants more patients to get same-day or next-day appointments with doctors, Health Minister Eric Hoskins says.
  • By: Rob Ferguson Queen's Park Bureau, Published on Mon Feb 02 2015
  • But Hoskins, a physician, acknowledged Monday after a lunch speech on transforming the health-care system that he’ll have to get doctors on side after imposing a contract on MDs, leaving many angry. Home and community care nurses are also on strike.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • “We will face some challenges as we go forward,” Hoskins told reporters after a 34-minute address that also talked about better home care, more telemedicine and improved supports for dementia as the population ages.
Govind Rao

Ministers begin talks on prescription drugs - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Thu Jan 21 2016
  • Provincial and territorial health ministers have agreed to begin talks on improving access to prescription drugs, and are asking the new federal government to join the discussions. The move, which gained the support of health ministers during a meeting in Vancouver on Wednesday, is the first step toward the possible inclusion of a national pharmacare plan in a new health accord, said Ontario Health Minister Eric Hoskins, who introduced the proposal. Mr. Hoskins, who has long pushed for more equitable access to pharmaceuticals, said the current negotiations on a new health deal provide a unique opportunity for governments to consider what a Canadian pharmacare plan might look like.
  • Such a plan might be a combination of public and private insurance, he suggested, that could start with an agreement among governments about what prescription drugs to cover. "I like to believe we have a generational opportunity to really create a visionary document," Mr. Hoskins said in an interview on Wednesday. While there is no guarantee that Canadian governments can agree on a national drug plan, he said, they need to try. "It would be unfortunate if we didn't take advantage of the opportunity and at least do the hard work to look at the possibilities and to have the courage to dream and to think of the bigger vision." A working group set up by the provinces will look at improving "equitable and appropriate access to pharmaceuticals based on evidence," according to a release issued after the closeddoor meeting.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Provincial and territorial health ministers began two days of talks on Wednesday, and federal Health Minister Jane Philpott will join them on Thursday. The meetings are the beginning of what is expected to be a year of intense talks aimed at negotiating a new deal on health that will set national standards and deliver the stable funding the Liberals promised during the election campaign. The federal Health Minister has indicated she wants to steer the talks away from dollars at this stage of the negotiations, but B.C. Health Minister Terry Lake said on Wednesday that is not likely.
  • "You can't talk about health care without talking about dollars," he said. "It consumes 43 per cent of many of our provincial budgets." The first day of the talks covered a range of topics, from physician-assisted dying to access to drugs for rare diseases to newborn screening, according to a summary released afterward. While the topic of supervised injection sites was not specifically discussed, Quebec Health Minister Gaetan Barrette said in response to a journalist's question that his province will soon follow B.C.'s lead. Insite, a supervised injection facility, has operated on Vancouver's Downtown Eastside since 2003, and a second site has just received federal approval to operate in the city's west end. "We've watched the Insite project with great interest, and it works. We're in favour of this type of initiative," Mr. Barrette said.
1 - 20 of 96 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page