Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged social services

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

FREE SPEECH; Speech therapy can prevent a lifetime of struggles, but an early start is ... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Mon Aug 31 2015
  • Four-year-old Eddie Hopkins is focused on a game of I spy. The object of his attention is a tube of lipstick in a picture. Can he say what it is? "Lipstick," he says, but it sounds more like "lit-git." Maybe lipstick is too hard. Can he say stick?
  • "Sti-ck," he says, hesitating before the k sound. One more try. "Sti-ick!" he shouts confidently, dividing the word into two. It seems like a small accomplishment, but for Eddie, it's the first and major step toward speaking normally. Like tens of thousands of children in Ontario, Eddie is in need of speech therapy. He has problems pronouncing the hard k sound, known as an unvoiced velar stop. He often switches it with the voiced velar stop, which most people know as the soft g sound, bringing him from "stick" to "stig." He also switches his sh and s sounds, and has issues with pronouncing two consonants together, such as the "cl" in "clown."
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • The average number of people on wait lists as of May, 2015, is 611. Some regions have shorter wait lists, such as Toronto Central, which currently has zero. Others are in the four digits, such as the Central East CCAC, which stretches east from Victoria Park Avenue in Scarborough and north to Algonquin Park, and has 1,516 children waiting for speech therapy. Waiting that long can have a large impact on a child's ability to do well in school, according to Anila Punnoose, a director of Speech-Language and Audiology Canada. During the months or years children are waiting to get speech services, they can quickly fall behind in school, she said. A 1996 study found children with language deficits are more likely to experience social difficulties including interacting with their peers, which impacts their behaviour. Other studies have shown that children who don't get speech therapy early are at a greater risk of problems in their academic performance and mental health.
  • A lot of speech problems carry over to literacy, because a knowledge of speech sounds is crucial when learning to read, Punnoose said. "It's all about what you hear in those sounds. ... Do you know the beginning sounds in that word? A child who doesn't have good phonological awareness doesn't understand any of that," she said. When looking at school performance, Punnoose said early struggles carry through to later years. A child with speech problems who has difficulties learning in the early years won't be able to build on those lessons in later years as effectively as their peers, she said. Early intervention can mitigate and prevent those problems, she said. "If children are having severe difficulties with speech in kindergarten, it's a predictor that there's going to be academic difficulties, and especially reading and writing difficulties, by Grade 3," she said.
  • Jocelyn Fedyczko, Eddie's speech pathologist, has worked in a range that includes children from preschool all the way to teenagers. She said early intervention is crucial with young children such as Eddie. "The earlier you can help a child out, the more progress you see," she said. When a child gets to the top of the wait list, they get assessed again, and receive a block of treatment, usually around 10 or 12 sessions, says Peggy Allen, president of the Ontario Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists (OSLA). That's often not enough to treat even minor to moderate issues such as Eddie's. Fedyczko said she can get through two to three sounds in that time, depending on the child. Many children have problems with more sounds than that, she said. But when a child finishes their block of treatment and needs more, because they haven't worked through all the sounds, for example, they go back to the bottom of the wait list, Allen said.
  • A spokesperson for the Toronto Central CCAC said they do not have an upper limit to the number of sessions per block assigned by a speech-language pathologist. The pathologist determines three goals for a child to achieve and assigns the number of sessions according to that. If after these sessions more goals are identified, the child is re-referred to the program, the spokesperson said. Parents who are worried about the impact waiting can have on their child can go to private clinics, if they have coverage or can afford the sessions out of pocket. Trish Bentley, Eddie's mother, decided to go for private therapy with Eddie's older brother Oliver. He was put on a six-month wait list for speech problems slightly more acute than Eddie's.
  • B.C.: Children's speech therapy is organized through the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) and through the Ministry of Education by way of school districts. Children are divided between preschool and school age. Preschool children go through regional health authorities. School-age children go through the school boards, but the pathologists there will often offer consultative services, rather than oneon-one speech therapy. B.C. also has a "no-wait-list" policy for children with autism, which translates to parents getting around $22,000 a year for therapy until the age of six, and $6,000 a year after that. Alberta: Health Services is in charge of speech therapy in that province. It offers both a preschool and a school program. The school program, unlike Ontario's, is done completely through the schools, with no CCAC-type system to refer out to. Saskatchewan: The school districts are responsible for speech therapy. Each school district divides up services slightly differently, though they all differentiate between children under three years, from three to five years, and from six to 18 years.
  • But the problems go deeper than a lack of funding, according to Allen. She said many of the issues in Ontario stem back to a series of agreements in the 1980s between the provincial Ministry of Long-Term Care, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Community and Social Services. These agreements divided up who is in charge of different treatments, between the school boards and the CCACs. At the time of their creation, these agreements made sense, but times and needs have changed, she said. "It's difficult when ministries make agreements that are frozen in time. It's very difficult to provide the kind of services that we all expect and want Ontarians to receive," she said. Dividing up the services is necessary when trying to manage resources, but the fragmentation is hurting children more than it's helping, Punnoose said.
  • Dividing services by language issues and other issues doesn't make sense when treating a child, she said. "You shouldn't be splitting up the kid," she said. Punnoose said she wants to see speech therapy come together under one roof. It would mean co-operation from all three ministries, as well as a major reorganization of the funding, but she believes it would be a better model for children. "Students are in schools the better waking part of their lives. Why wouldn't we have the services right there in an authentic environment where it's totally accessible," she said. There are changes coming.
  • Last December, the Ontario government announced more funding for preschool speech and language programs, as well as efforts to integrate speech services better, through its Special Needs Strategy. Punnoose says it's a good step. "The government recognizes that the system was broken," she said. For now, the choice for parents in many CCACs will be between long wait lists and paying for private service. Hunter-Trottier said many parents, even those with coverage, don't know about the latter option. "We sometimes get parents here in tears, saying, 'Oh my goodness, the services here, I wish I had known about that a year ago,' " she said. Bentley said she won't be looking at public services for Eddie, as she's happy with the service she gets at Canoe. "I'd be open to it, but I'm not going to actively seek that out," she said.
  • For Eddie, what matters is the progress he makes. Within 10 minutes of his trouble saying "lipstick," he was opening up a treasure chest, with a key. With little prompting, he used the same technique as before, separating the sounds of the word. "Kuh-ey," he said. Could he try it all together? He pauses for a second. "Key," he says, almost flawlessly, beaming at his success. SPEECH THERAPY IN EACH PROVINCE
  • Speech therapy, like all healthcare matters, is regulated differently in each province and territory in Canada. Information on how each system works is difficult to come by. But generally, most provinces have very similar systems - and challenges - according to Joanne Charlebois, CEO of Speech-Language and Audiology Canada. Charlebois said Ontario's wait times are probably worse than those in other provinces, but she's spoken to people across Canada who tell her similar stories. Here's a breakdown of how it works across the country. Ontario: Speech therapy for children falls under the responsibility of three ministries: the Ministry of Long-Term Care, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Community and Social Services. Children in Ontario are divided by age and by the nature of their speech problem. Children under school age qualify for Ontario's preschool speech and language program. Once in school, those children with language problems - major problems speaking or understanding words or sentences - go to a school speech pathologist, while any other problems, such as pronunciation, stuttering, voice and articulation are referred to the Community Care Access Centres, which employ contract speech pathologists.
  • Rather than wait those six months, Bentley took him to Canoe. "As time went on, we said enough of this, he's going to be past the point of catching the problem," she said. For families who don't have coverage and who can't afford private services, though, the only option is to wait. Finding the cause of the long waits is hard, but one thing is certain: It's not due to a lack of speech pathologists, according to Shanda Hunter-Trottier, the owner of S.L. Hunter Speechworks, another private clinic in Toronto. She used to have problems finding qualified speech pathologists, but now she's facing the opposite problem. "I've been practising for 26 years. ... In the last five years, [I] have more resumes than I can keep track of," she said. Rather, she says, it's a large web of problems that slows down the system. First among these is a lack of public funding. "There's a lot of speech pathologists that don't have jobs, but these places aren't hiring. The cutbacks have been atrocious," she said.
  • Manitoba: School districts are also in charge here. The inschool speech-language pathologists offer services from classroom-based programming to individual therapy. Quebec: The system here is more like Ontario's. Speechtherapy services are offered through the local community service centres (CLSC), similar to Ontario's CCACs. The CLSCs are not obliged to provide speech therapy in English, though some, especially in areas with a large anglophone population, usually do. Nova Scotia: The province has 28 speech and hearing centres, with 35 pathologists in total. They assess and provide treatment for children and adults. School boards in the province also have speech-language pathologists who also have a teacher's certificate.
  • Prince Edward Island: The province provides free speech services for children until they enter school. Northwest Territories: Speech therapists are only able to visit some remote communities once or twice a year. Instead, the province offers a service called Telespeech, where pathologists can help people without having to be physically present. Nunavut: The territory had no speech pathologists in 2013, according to Statistics Canada.
Irene Jansen

Social impact bonds wrong model to address homelessness, unemployment and poverty < Pol... - 1 views

  • CUPE is raising serious concerns about the future of social programs in Canada as the Harper Conservative government pushes for more private sector involvement. The union is calling for an open public discussion on the use of for-profit business models to finance and deliver public social services.
  • In November 2012, Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC), announced that the Conservative government was looking for ideas which use for-profit private financing to address social and environmental initiatives. This approach - known as the social financing model or a social impact bond - allows corporations to profit from financing privatized social programs at public expense.
  • CUPE points out several major issues with the social financing model that have been experienced throughout the world, including concerns about the economic sustainability, fairness and risks associated with this model.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Other issues raised include: using for-profit business models to deliver social programs to those who need them most; promoting profits from social ills; and the danger of stable, long-term publicly funded programs being displaced by short-term, profitable initiatives.
  • Read CUPE’s submission to HRSDC
Irene Jansen

Senate Committee Social Affairs review of the health accord. Evidence, October 6, 2011 - 0 views

  • Pamela Fralick, President and Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Healthcare Association
  • I will therefore be speaking of home care as just one pillar of continuing care, which is interconnected with long-term care, palliative care and respite care.
  • The short-term acute community mental health home care services for individuals with mental health diagnoses are not currently included in the mandate of most home care programs. What ended up happening is that most jurisdictions flowed the funding to ministries or other government departments that provided services through established mental health organizations. There were few provinces — as a matter of fact, Saskatchewan being one of the unique ones — that actually flowed the services through home care.
  • ...77 more annotations...
  • thanks to predictable and escalating funding over the first seven years of the plan
  • however, there are, unfortunately, pockets of inattention and/or mediocrity as well
  • Six areas, in fact, were identified by CHA
  • funding matters; health human resources; pharmacare; wellness, identified as health promotion and illness and disease prevention; continuing care; and leadership at the political, governance and executive levels
  • The focus of this 10-year plan has been on access. CHA would posit that it is at this juncture, the focus must be on quality and accountability.
  • safety, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness
  • Canada does an excellent job in providing world-class acute care services, and we should; hospitals and physicians have been the core of our systems for decades. Now is the time to ensure sufficient resources are allocated to other elements of the continuum, including wellness and continuing care.
  • Home care is one readily available yet underused avenue for delivering health promotion and illness prevention initiatives and programs.
  • four critically important themes: dignity and respect, support for caregivers, funding and health human resources, and quality of care
  • Nadine Henningsen, Executive Director, Canadian Home Care Association
  • Today, an estimated 1.8 million Canadians receive publicly funded home care services annually, at an estimated cost of $5.8 billion. This actually only equates to about 4.3 per cent of our total public health care funding.
  • There are a number of initiatives within the home care sector that need to be addressed. Establishing a set of harmonized principles across Canada, accelerating the adoption of technology, optimizing health human resources, and integrated service delivery models all merit comment.
  • great good has come from the 10-year plan
  • Unfortunately, there were two unintended negative consequences
  • One was a reduction in chronic care services for the elderly and
  • a shift in the burden of costs for drugs and medical supplies to individual and families. This was due to early discharge and the fact that often a number of provinces do not cover the drugs and supplies under their publicly funded program.
  • Stakeholders across Canada generally agreed that the end-of-life expectations within the plan were largely met
  • How do we go from having a terrific acute care system to having maybe a slightly smaller acute care system but obviously look toward a chronic care system?
  • Across Canada, an estimated 30 to 50 per cent of ALC patients could and should benefit from home care services and be discharged from the hospital.
  • Second, adopt a Canadian caregiver strategy.
  • Third, support accountability and evidence-informed decision making.
  • The return on investment for every dollar for home care is exponentially enhanced by the in-kind contribution of family caregivers.
  • Sharon Baxter, Executive Director, Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association
  • June 2004
  • a status report on hospice, palliative and end-of-life care in Canada
  • Dying for Care
  • inconsistent access to hospice palliative care services generally and also to respite care services; access to non-prescribed therapies, as well as prescription drug coverage
  • terminated by the federal government in March of 2008
  • the Canadian Strategy on Palliative and End-of-Life Care
  • Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association and the Canadian Home Care Association embarked on what we called the Gold Standards Project
  • In 2008, the Quality End-of-Life Care Coalition released a progress report
  • progress was made in 2008, from the 2004 accord
  • palliative pharmaceutical plan
  • Canadians should have the right to choose the settings of their choice. We need to look for a more seamless transition between settings.
  • In 2010, the Quality End-of-Life Care Coalition of Canada released its 10-year plan.
  • Seventy per cent of Canadians at this point in time do not have access to hospice palliative care
  • For short-term, acute home care services, there was a marked increase in the volume of services and the individuals served. There was also another benefit, namely, improved integration between home care and the acute care sector.
  • last summer, The Economist released a document that looked at palliative services across 40 countries
  • The second area in the blueprint for action is the support for family caregivers.
  • The increasing need for home-based care requires us to step up and strive for a comprehensive, coordinated and integrated approach to hospice palliative care and health care.
  • Canadian Caregiver Coalition
  • in Manitoba they have made great strides
  • In New Brunswick they have done some great things in support of family caregivers. Ontario is looking at it now.
  • we keep on treating, keep on treating, and we need to balance our systems between a curative system and a system that will actually give comfort to someone moving toward the end of their life
  • Both the Canadian Institute for Health Information and the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation have produced reports this year saying it is chronic disease management that needs our attention
  • When we look at the renewal of health care, we have to accept that the days of institutional care being the focus of our health care system have passed, and that there is now a third leg of the stool. That is community and home care.
  • Over 70 per cent of caregivers in Canada are women. They willingly take on this burden because they are good people; it is what they want to do. The patient wants to be in that setting, and it is better for them.
  • The Romanow report in 2002 suggested that $89.3 million be committed annually to palliative home care.
  • that never happened
  • What happened was a federal strategy on palliative and end-of-life care was announced in 2004, ran for five years and was terminated. At best it was never funded for more than $1.7 million.
  • Because our publicly funded focus has been on hospitals and one provider — physicians, for the most part — we have not considered how to bring the other pieces into the equation.
  • Just as one example, in the recent recession where there was special infrastructure funding available to stimulate the economy, the health system was not allowed to avail itself of that.
  • As part of the 10-year plan, first ministers agreed to provide first dollar coverage for certain home-care services, based on assessed need, by 2006. The specific services included short-term acute home care, short-term community mental health care and end-of-life care. It appears that health ministers were to report to first ministers on the implementation of that by 2006, but they never did.
  • One of the challenges we find with the integration of mental health services is
  • A lot of eligibility rules are built on physical assessment.
  • Very often a mental health diagnosis is overlooked, or when it is identified the home care providers do not have the skills and expertise to be able to manage it, hence it moves then over to the community mental health program.
  • in Saskatchewan it is a little more integrated
  • Senator Martin
  • I think ideally we would love to have the national strategies and programs, but just like with anything in Canada we are limited by the sheer geography, the rural-urban vast differences in need, and the specialized areas which have, in and of themselves, such intricate systems as well. The national picture is the ideal vision, but not always the most practical.
  • In the last federal budget we got a small amount of money that we have not started working with yet, it is just going to Treasury Board, it is $3 million. It is to actually look at how we integrate hospice palliative care into the health care system across all these domains.
  • The next 10-year plan is about integration, integration, integration.
  • the Canadian Patient Safety Institute, the Health Council of Canada, the Canadian Health Leadership Network, the health sciences centres, the Association of Canadian Academic Healthcare Organizations, the Canadian College of Health Leaders, the Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Nurses Association, the Canadian Public Health Association, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health and Accreditation Canada
  • We are all meeting on a regular basis to try to come up with our take on what the system needs to do next.
  • most people want to be cared for at home
  • Family Caregiver Tax Credit
  • compassionate care benefit that goes with Employment Insurance
  • Have you done any costing or savings? Obviously, more home care means more savings to the system. Have you done anything on that?
  • In the last federal election, every political party had something for caregivers.
  • tax credits
  • the people we are talking about do not have the ability to take advantage of tax credits
  • We have a pan-Canadian health/human resource strategy in this country, and there is a federal-provincial-territorial committee that oversees this. However, it is insufficient
  • Until we can better collaborate on a pan-Canadian level on our human resources to efficiently look at the right mix and scope and make sure that we contain costs plus give the best possible provider services and health outcomes right across the country, we will have problems.
    • Irene Jansen
       
      get cite from document
  • We have not as a country invested in hospital infrastructure, since we are talking about acute care settings, since the late 1960s. Admittedly, we are moving away from acute care centres into community and home care, but we still need our hospitals.
  • One of the challenges is with the early discharge of patients from the hospital. They are more complex. The care is more complex. We need to train our home support workers and our nurses to a higher level. There are many initiatives happening now to try to get some national training standards, particularly in the area of home support workers.
  • We have one hospital association left in this country in Ontario, OHA. Their CEO will constantly talk about how the best thing hospitals can do for themselves is keep people out of hospitals through prevention promotion or getting them appropriately to the next place they should be. Jack Kitts, who runs the Ottawa Hospital, and any of the CEOs who run hospitals understand one hundred per cent that the best thing they can do for Canadians and for their institutions is keep people out of them. That is a lot of the language.
  • We have an in-depth brief that details a lot of what is happening in Australia
  • I would suggest that it is a potentially slippery slope to compare to international models, because often the context is very different.
  •  
    Home Care
Irene Jansen

After all the months of debate, does the health bill actually stack up in law? | Left F... - 1 views

  • a test case campaign to challenge the establishment of a social enterprise – namely Gloucestershire Care Services Community Interest Company – has been fought and won by 76 year old Michael Lloyd, working with ‘a cross party coalition of anti-cuts campaigners’.
  • They argued the local PCT had acted unlawfully in planning to hand over management of nine county hospitals and 3,000 community health staff in what would have been the biggest planned transfer (so far) to a social enterprise in the country.
  • the Lansley edict of July 2011, that £1 billion of NHS services would be opened up to competition.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • NHS Gloucestershire had not put this work out to tender, nor explored in-house/NHS options which, campaigners say, would have made tendering unnecessary in the first place
  • only reduced staff terms and conditions upon the service leaving the NHS, would offer a key cost saving
  • any cost gain would be significantly reduced by the new social enterprise VAT bill
  • which would not have applied under the internal NHS model
  • “The South West is leading the charge to social enterprise – with 15,000 of 25,000 staff in the UK, likely to be affected by reduced terms and conditions, coming from the region.”
  • Lansley’s ‘do it quick never mind the risk’ stick, the underbelly of which we highlighted last week
  • the Hull example, where aside from the one-off transfer costs, when NHS Hull morphed into a social enterprise, they found the need to build an entire new wing to house the extra administrative staff – those who had been ‘cut loose’ from the NHS – because the new enterprises are required to have their own duplicate back office functions where previously they could draw on NHS central resources.
  • as long as matters are kept within the NHS there is no contract on which EU procurement law ‘actually bites’,
  • this result at the High Court also begs the question: now the Bill is passed, exactly how far are our current NHS providers obliged to put existing services out to competitive tender?
  • The Gloucestershire example seems to demonstrate there are more angles to take than even the government themselves had considered in their own search for profiteering loopholes.
  • Will it really be possible, as Professor Allyson Pollock advises, to “stop all commercial contracts”, citing the danger of the government continuing to claim commercial confidentiality trumps the public’s right to know about contract decisions.
  • The PCT is legally obliged to: 1). Involve public; 2). Consider NHS options; 3). Invite ‘expressions of interest’ (in bidding) – crucially, not the same as ‘inviting bids’; before 4). Deciding what to do, which may or may not involve ‘inviting bids’, depending on whether NHS bodies come forward, which would mean they didn’t need to go to stage of open tender, i.e. inviting bids.
Irene Jansen

Unions take antisocial view of NHS social enterprises | Healthcare Network | Guardian P... - 1 views

  • The term 'social enterprise' covers a wide range of entities, including groups led by charitable and/or volunteer organisations, as well as collectives of existing managers and staff within the NHS, operating as a limited company that is accountable to the trust from which the company is spun out.
  • Generally speaking, healthcare social enterprises operate on a shared ownership basis – usually among NHS employees, but also including people in the wider community – and have restrictions on how profits are distributed and the disposal of assets. It means NHS trusts commission such services, rather than directly providing services themselves.
  • The foundations of NHS social enterprises were laid down in January 2006 when the government published a paper – Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services – which outlined a shift away from care in hospitals and towards community-based healthcare wherever possible.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • But after initially supporting the idea of social enterprises when they were first mooted, the trade unions are now broadly against their creation, with Amicus claiming that a two-tier workforce is being created, and with employees transferring from the NHS securing comparable pension arrangements, whilst new staff have no such guarantee.
  • a step towards eventual privatisation
  • unions have launched successful campaigns against some
  • the bizarre situation where health visitors currently working in partnership with children's centres would be involved in bidding against each other to provide the same services
  • there have been a number of social enterprises founded across the NHS
  • health partnerships – as social enterprises are now termed in the NHS
  • So far, 27 trusts have created social enterprises and a further 20 will be created this coming October.
Govind Rao

Privatization: what it is, why it matters - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Telegram (St. John's) Tue Jun 23 2015
  • With oil prices down, an aging population and high unemployment, the conservative government of Newfoundland and Labrador is looking for a silver bullet to cut costs for public services and infrastructure. Their sights are settling on privatization to be that silver bullet. What is privatization? In its most narrow sense, privatization is the whole or partial sale of public services and/or infrastructure. It can include the sale of assets, functions or the entire institution.
  • With privatization, the service or infrastructure becomes funded and/or run by a private corporation. Privatization usually includes not only a change in ownership but also a change in the priorities, responsibilities and role of the state. Advocates of privatization offer free-market competition as the path to economic and social success, with promises of cost savings, lower risk, greater efficiency and more individual choice. Privatization takes several forms in Canada, including:
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • ? full privatization: where a government enterprise is sold in full to private investors. ? publicly funded with services and management delivered privately, sometimes unknown to the consumer. ? public funding of private services: government provides vouchers to consumers for the purchase of goods and services from private providers.
  • ? public/private partnerships (P3s): full outside contracting, management and service delivery of traditionally delivered public services such as hospitals, roads, schools and prisons. This can include private finance, design, building, operation and possibly temporary ownership of an asset. Can privatization deliver? After decades of experimentation with privatization in different forms across Canada, the data is clear on the failure to deliver on its promises and the high cost society pays - multiple costs, not only in economic terms but also quality and access to services, quality and quantity of jobs, as well as transparency and accountability.
  • Public/private partnerships (P3s) are the fastest-growing model of privatization in Canada. The P3 models vary but all include the reliance on private sector borrowing to finance the development of public infrastructure projects in a long-term lease arrangement; it is effectively leasing rather than owning and sometimes that lease includes maintenance as well. P3s cost more. Governments have always been able to borrow money more cheaply than private corporations. According to a University of Toronto study of 28 P3 projects in Ontario, P3s cost, on average, 16 per cent more than a traditional public contract. A recent auditor general of Ontario report found that P3 projects cost the province $8 billion more than if they were done under the traditional model.
  • If they cost more, why do politicians promote them? Political expediency - in P3 lease agreements the debt stays off the books or is postponed for decades. P3s hide debt - which is a dream for politicians looking for easy wins in hard economic times. It is also ideological and it is about private sector lobbying and influence. Public services are a boon to private sector deliverers with guaranteed public payments and profit margins over the long term. Supporters of privatization claim that it leads to better pricing for the public as consumers. A comparison of privately owned Manitoba Telecom Services, privatized in 1997, to SaskTel, Saskatchewan's publicly owned telecommunications crown corporation shows this to not be true. Twenty years after privatization of MTS, the cost of a basic phone with SaskTel is $8 less per month than from MTS.
  • Private corporations demand a shroud of confidentiality in order to protect their competitive position. This means that privatization reduces both transparency and accountability. An example of this is the Ontario privatization of municipal water testing which has been linked to the May 2000 bacterial contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ont., led to the deaths of at least seven people and the serious illness of 2,300 more from water contaminated with E. coli. The absence of criteria governing quality of testing, and the lack of provisions made for notification of results to authorities contributed to the worst public health disaster involving municipal water in Canadian history.
  • Health care is a sector where there is huge pressure on government to control cost, particularly in Newfoundland and Labrador with the aging demographic. Private interests see great profit opportunities. But in health care, for-profit does not deliver. In Manitoba, living in a for-profit long-term care facility increased the odds of dying in hospital or being hospitalized.
  • In a metadata analysis of hospitals in the U.S., Dr. Philip Devereaux, a cardiologist at McMaster University, concluded that the death rate in for-profit hospitals was two per cent higher than in not-for-profit facilities. In Alberta, the Health Quality Council of Alberta's Long Term Care Family Experience Survey in 2012 found that, on average, private and volunteer operated facilities offered poorer quality in terms of staffing levels, care of residents' belongings, and assistance with daily living activities such as toileting, drinking and eating, than publicly operated ones.
  • The scathing Ontario auditor general report indicates that there needs to be extensive and comprehensive reviews of provincial privatization projects. Until proper cost-benefit analyses and public reviews and reform of private funding and procurement models occur, governments and public bodies should place moratoria on further public-private infrastructure contracts. The citizens pay either way, but they pay more in a privatized model - either as tax payers or out of pocket.
  • The government has alternatives. The Newfoundland and Labrador Federation of Labour has published a number of reports and fact sheets on the progressive revenue options open to the provincial government. There are a variety of progressive revenue options open to municipalities as well. There are no silver bullets. It is time to stop stigmatizing government and public services and recognize them for what they are: the way we pool our resources to buy services cheaper, control costs, and maintain accountability for quality.
  • his should be a debate based on evidence, not ideology. Mary Shortall, president, Unifor Local 597
healthcare88

Inviting community inside; Nursing homes are trying to reduce social isolation of senio... - 0 views

  • The Province Sun Oct 30 2016
  • Despite a 95-year age difference, five-year-old Tony Han Junior and centenarian Alice Clark enjoy each other's company. After decorating Halloween cookies together, Han brings his own masterpiece, smothered in smarties and sprinkles, to Clark and encourages her to try it. Few words are exchanged, but smiles and giggles are constant at the intergenerational program at Youville Residence, a long-term care facility for seniors in Vancouver. Han Jr. is among a half dozen children visiting this day from the Montessori Children's Community - a daycare located on the same site as Youville, at 33rd and Heather.
  • Despite a 95-year age difference, five-year-old Tony Han Junior and centenarian Alice Clark enjoy each other's company.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • After decorating Halloween cookies together, Han brings his own masterpiece, smothered in smarties and sprinkles, to Clark and encourages her to try it. Few words are exchanged, but smiles and giggles are constant at the intergenerational program at Youville Residence, a long-term care facility for seniors in Vancouver. Han Jr. is among a half dozen children visiting this day from the Montessori Children's Community - a daycare located on the same site as Youville, at 33rd and Heather.
  • Montessori Children's Community administrator Kristina Yang said it's a win-win situation. "Even if there is not a lot of communication with words you can see the beautiful smiles on everyone's face. Many of the children come to know a lot of the seniors and when they pass by our window they'll be excited waving and saying 'Hi ,'" Yang said.
  • Youville occupational therapist Sheralyn Manning said the children's visits are a big part of the seniors'day. Besides planned events, such as doing crafts together, every so often the children will visit when the weather is bad and they are not able to play outdoors. Manning pointed out the friendship between Clark and Han has been particularly touching to watch and Clark has a recent craft project Han gave her prominently displayed in her room. When most people think of nursing homes the image that comes to mind is a stand-alone building offering residential care only for the aged.
  • It's a place seldom visited unless you are a family member, friend or volunteer. But these days more homes are trying to build bridges to the wider community. Of B. C.'s 460 government and private nursing homes, only a handful have daycares or doctor's offices on site, said Daniel Fontaine, CEO of the B. C. Care Providers Association, which represents 60 per cent of the privately-operated homes. But none are attached to a facility that offers a large variety of community services. One of the best Canadian examples of a nursing home that achieves just that, said Fontaine, is Niverville Heritage Centre, near Winnipeg. It is home to 116 seniors but is also a gathering place for major community events.
  • The centre hosts 100 weddings each year. As well, about 50,000 visitors drop in at the centre annually to access their doctor's office, dentist and pharmacist or visit the full-service restaurant and pub. "We found seniors don't want to be retired to a quiet part of the community and left to live out their lives. They want to live in an active community and retreat back to their suite when they want that peace and quiet ," said Niverville Heritage Centre's CEO Steven Neufeld.
  • Before the centre opened in 2007, he said, members from the non-profit board that operates the centre visited traditional nursing homes and discovered that the lounges that were built for seniors were seldom used. "I remember going to one place where there was a screened-in porch that was packed. The seniors were all there wanting to watch the soccer game of the school next door ," he said. Having services like doctors'offices, dentists, a daycare, a full-service restaurant, and hair styling shop on site fulfil the centre's mission of being an "inter-generational meeting place which fosters personal and community well-being." Fontaine said it's worth noting that Niverville was able to "pull all of this together in a community with a population of less than 5,000 people." He hopes more B. C. nursing homes follow Niverville's lead.
  • Elim Village in Surrey, which offers all levels of residential senior care on its 25-acre site, is on that track. There are 250 independent living units, 109 assisted living units and 193 traditional nursing home beds. The village also has a 500-seat auditorium, located in the centre of the village, that hosts weddings and is available for rent for other public events. Elim Village also rents out space in one of its 10 buildings to a school, which allows inter-generational programs to take place easily between students and seniors. Another "continuing care hub " at Menno Place, in Abbotsford, has a public restaurant called Fireside Cafe, popular with staff from nearby Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Centre. There's also a pharmacy and hairdresser on its 11-acre "campus " site but these services are available only to the 700 residents and staff. "We purposely try to involve the community as much as possible ," said Menno Place CEO Karen Baillie. "It's Niverville on a smaller scale." She said Menno Place partners with high schools and church groups and hundreds of volunteers visit regularly. "Seniors are often challenged with isolation and fight depression. That's why we have different programs to encourage them to socialize ," she said.
  • Research shows 44 per cent of seniors in residential care in Canada have been diagnosed with depression, and one in four seniors live with a mental health problem, such as depression or anxiety, whether they live in their own home or are in residential care. A 2014 report by the National Seniors Council found socially isolated seniors are at a higher risk for negative health behaviours including drinking, smoking, not eating well and being sedentary. The report also found social isolation is a predictor of mortality from coronary disease and stroke, and socially isolated seniors are four to five times more likely to be hospitalized.
  • Since more seniors now remain in their own homes longer those who move into care homes are often more frail and need a higher level of assistance, said Menno Place director of communications and marketing Sharon Simpson. Seniors with dementia, in particular, can be socially isolated as friends and family often find it more difficult to visit them as they decline, she said. But Simpson said an intergenerational dance program, run by ballet teacher Lee Kwidzinski, has been a wonderful opportunity for seniors with dementia to be connected to the community. The program is also offered in four other nursing homes in the Fraser Valley. "For them it's an opportunity to see children. You can see the seniors come to life, smiling and giggling at the girls'antics. It's very engaging ," she said. "Some may not be verbal but they are still able to connect. They feel their emotions and they know whether someone is good to them. They feel these girls and become vibrantly alive. It's one of the most powerful things I've ever seen."
  • Creating community connections is key as Providence Health begins its planning stage to replace some of its older nursing homes in Vancouver, said David Thompson, who is responsible for the Elder Care Program and Palliative Services. Providence Health operates five long-term-care homes for approximately 700 residents at four different sites in the city. "It's always been our vision to create a campus of care on the land ," said Thompson, of the six acres owned by Providence Health where Youville is located.
  • He said the plan is to build another facility nearby, with 320 traditional nursing home beds. One of the ways to partly fund the cost is to include facilities that could be rented out by the larger community, which would be a benefit to the seniors as well, he said. There is already child care on site, and future plans to help draw in the community include a restaurant, retail space and an art gallery. He said another idea is to partner with nearby Eric Hamber Secondary School by providing a music room for students to practise.
  • "Cambie is at our doorsteps. If you have people coming in (to a residential care facility) it brings vibrancy and liveliness ," Thompson said
Govind Rao

'We have the evidence ... Why aren't we providing evidence-based care?'; Mental illness... - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Sat May 23 2015
  • It's 4:30 on a Friday afternoon at her Sherbrooke, Que., clinic and Marie Hayes takes a deep breath before opening the door to her final patient of the day, who has arrived without an appointment. The 32-year-old mother immediately lists her complaints: She feels dizzy. She has abdominal pain. "It is always physical and always catastrophic," Dr. Hayes will later tell me. In the exam room, she runs through the standard checkup, pressing on the patient's abdomen, recording her symptoms, just as she has done almost every week for months. "There's something wrong with me," the patient says, with a look of panic. Dr. Hayes tries to reassure her, to no avail. In any case, the doctor has already reached her diagnosis: severe anxiety. Dr. Hayes prescribed medication during a previous visit, but the woman stopped taking it after two days because it made her nauseated and dizzy. She needs structured psychotherapy - a licensed therapist trained to bring her anxiety under control. But the wait list for public care is about a year, says Dr. Hayes, and the patient can't afford the cost of private sessions.
  • Meanwhile, the woman is paying a steep personal price: At home, she says, she spends most days in bed. She is managing to care for her two young children - for now - but her husband also suffers from anxiety, and the situation is far from ideal. Dr. Hayes does her best, spending a full hour trying to calm her down, and the woman is less agitated when she leaves. But the doctor knows she will be back next week. And that their meeting will go much the same as it did today. In its broad strokes, this is a scene that repeats itself in thousands of doctors' offices every day, right across the country. It is part and parcel of a system that denies patients the best scientific-based care, and comes with a massive price tag, to the economy, families and the health care system. Canadian physicians bill provincial governments $1-billion a year for "counselling and psychotherapy" - one third of which goes to family doctors - a service many of them acknowledge they are not best suited to provide, and that doesn't come close to covering patient need. Meanwhile, psychologists and social workers are largely left out of the publicly funded health-care system, their expertise available only to Canadians with the resources to pay for them.
  • ...42 more annotations...
  • Imagine if a Canadian diagnosed with cancer were told she could receive chemotherapy paid for by the health-care system, but would have to cough up the cash herself if she needed radiation. Or that she could have a few weeks of treatment, and then be sent home even if she needed more. That would never fly. If doctors, say, find a tumour in a patient's colon, the government kicks in and offers the mainstream treatment that is most effective. But for many Canadians diagnosed with a mental illness, the prescription is very different. The treatment they receive, and how much of it they get, will largely be decided not on evidence-based best practices but on their employment benefits and income level: Those who can afford it pay for it privately. Those who cannot are stuck on long wait lists, or have to fall back on prescription medications. Or get no help at all. But according to a large and growing body of research, psychotherapy is not simply a nice-to-have option; it should be a front-line treatment, particularly for the two most costly mental illnesses in Canada: anxiety and depression - which also constitute more than 80 per cent of all psychiatric diagnoses.
  • Why aren't we providing evidence-based care?" .. The case for psychotherapy Research has found that psychotherapy is as effective as medication - and in some cases works better. It also often does a better job of preventing or forestalling relapse, reducing doctor's appointments and emergency-room visits, and making it more cost-effective in the long run.
  • Therapy works, researchers say, because it engages the mind of the patient, requires active participation in treatment, and specifically targets the social and stress-related factors that contribute to poor mental health. There are a variety of therapies, but the evidence is strongest for cognitive behavioural therapy - an approach that focuses on changing negative thinking - in large part because CBT, which is timelimited and very structured, lends itself to clinical trials. (Similar support exists for interpersonal therapy, and it is emerging for mindfulness, with researchers trying to find out what works best for which disorders.) Research into the efficacy of therapy is increasing, but there is less of it overall than for drugs - as therapy doesn't have the advantage of well-heeled Big Pharma benefactors. In 2013, a team of European researchers collated the results of 67 studies comparing drugs to therapy; after adjusting for dropouts, there was no significant difference between the most often-used drugs - selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) - and psychotherapy.
  • The issue is not one against the other," says Montreal psychiatrist Alain Lesage, director of research at the Douglas Mental Health University Institute. "I am a physician; whatever works, I am good. We know that when patients prefer one to another, they do better if they have choice." Several studies have backed up that notion. Many patients are reluctant to take medication for fear of side effects and the possibility of difficult withdrawal; research shows that more than half of patients receiving medication stop taking it after six months. A small collection of recent studies has found that therapy can cause changes in the brain similar to those brought about by medication. In people with depression, for instance, the amygdala (located deep within the brain, it processes basic memories and controls our instinctive fight-or-flight reaction) works in overdrive, while the prefrontal cortex (which regulates rational thought) is sluggish. Research shows that antidepressants calm the amygdala; therapy does the same, though to a lesser extent.
  • But psychotherapy also appears to tune up the prefrontal cortex more than does medication. This is why, researchers believe, therapy works especially well in preventing relapse - an important benefit, since extending the time between acute episodes of illnesses prevents them from becoming chronic and more debilitating. The theory, then, is that psychotherapy does a better job of helping patients consciously cope with their unconscious responses to stress.
  • According to treatment guidelines by leading international professional and scientific organizations - including Canada's own expert panel, the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments - psychotherapy should be considered as a first option in treatment, alone or in combination with medication. And it is "highly recommended" in maintaining recovery in the long term. Britain's independent, research-guided scientific body, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, has concluded that therapy should be tried before drugs in mild to moderate cases of depression and anxiety - a finding that led to the creation of a $760million public system, which now handles therapy referrals for nearly one million people a year.
  • In 2012, Canada's Mental Health Commission estimated that only about one in three adults and one in four children are receiving support and treatment when they need it. Ironically, anti-stigma campaigns designed to help people understand mental illness may only make those statistics worse. In Toronto, for instance, putting up posters in subway stations in 2010 had the unexpected effect of spiking the volume of walk-ins at nearby emergency rooms by as much as 45 per cent in 12 months. Dr. Kurdyak treated many of them at CAMH. The system, he says, "has been conveniently ignoring this unmet need. It functions as if two-thirds of the people suffering won't get help." What would happen if the healthcare system outright "ignored" two-third of tumour diagnoses?
  • Essentially, argues Dr. Lesage, adding therapy into the health-care system is like putting a new, highly effective drug on the table for doctors. "Think about it," he says. "We have a new antidepressant. It works as well as many others, and it may even have some advantages - it works better for remission - with fewer side effects. The patients may prefer it. And [in the long run] it doesn't cost more than what we have. How can it not be covered?" ..
  • A heavy price This isn't just a medical issue; it's an economic one. Mental illness accounts for roughly 50 per cent of family doctors' time, and more hospital-bed days than cancer. Nearly four million Canadians have a mood disorder: more than all cases of diabetes (2.2 million) and heart disease (1.4 million) combined.
  • Mental illness - and depression, in particular - is the leading cause of disability, accounting for 30 per cent of workplace-insurance claims, and 70 per cent of total compensation costs. In 2012, an Ontario study calculated that the burden of mental illness and addiction was 1.5 times that of all cancers, and more than seven times the cost of all infectious diseases. Mental illness is so debilitating because, unlike physical ailments, it often takes root in adolescence and peaks among Canadians in their 20s and 30s, just as they are heading into higher education, or building careers and families. Untreated, symptoms reverberate through all aspects of life, routinely trapping people in poverty and homelessness. More than one-third of Ontario residents receiving social assistance have a mental illness. The cost to society is clearly immense.
  • Yet, when family doctors were asked why they didn't refer more patients to therapy in a 2008 Canadian survey, the main reason they gave was cost. For many Canadians, private therapy is a luxury, especially if families are already wrestling with the economic fallout from mental illness. Costs vary across provinces, but psychologists in private practice may charge more than $200 an hour in major centres. And it's not just the uninsured who are affected.
  • Although about 60 per cent of Canadians have some form of private insurance, the amount available for therapy may cover only a handful of sessions. Those with the best benefits are more likely to be higherincome workers with stable employment. Federal public servants, notably, have one of the best plans in the country - their benefits were doubled in 2014 to $2,000 annually for psychotherapy. Many of those who can pay for therapy are doing so: A 2013 consultant's study commissioned by the Canadian Psychological Association found that $950-million is spent annually on private-practice psychologists by Canadians, insurance companies and workers compensation boards. The CPA estimates t
  • hat 30 per cent of private patients pay out-ofpocket themselves. When the afflicted don't seek help, the cost isn't restricted to their own pocketbook. People with mental-health problems are significantly more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, and to become physically sick, further increasing health-care costs. A 2014 study by Oxford University researchers found that having a mental illness reduced life expectancy by 10 to 20 years, roughly the same as did smoking and obesity. A 2008 Statistics Canada study linked depression to new-onset heart disease in the general population. A 2014 U.S. study found that women under the age of 55 are twice as likely to suffer or die from a heart attack, or require heart surgery, if they have moderate to severe depression. The result: clogged-up doctors' offices, ERs, and operating rooms. And an inexorable burden for the patients' families forced to fill the gaps in caregiving - or carry on when they lose a loved one.
  • Canada's investment does not match that burden. Only about 7 per cent of health-care spending goes to mental health. Even recent increases pale when compared to other countries: According to a study by the Canadian Mental Health Association, Canada increased per-capita funding by $5.22 in 2011. The British government, meanwhile, kicked in an extra 12 times that amount per citizen, and Australia added nearly 20 times as much as we did. Falling off a cliff, again and again
  • In Winnipeg, Dr. Stanley Szajkowski watched for months as his patient, a woman in her 80s, slowly declined. Her husband had died and she was spiralling into a severe depression. At every appointment, she looked thinner, more dishevelled. She wasn't sleeping, she admitted, often through tears. Sometimes she thought of suicide. She lived alone, with no family nearby, and no resources of her own to pay for therapy. "You do what you can," says Dr. Szajkowksi. "You provide some support and encouragement." He did his best, but he always had other patients waiting.
  • These are the patients that family doctors juggle, the ones who eat up appointment time, and never seem to get better, the ones caught on waiting lists. Sometimes, they have already been bounced in and out of the system, received little help, and have become wary of trying again. A 40-something mother recovering from breast cancer, suffering from chronic depression post-treatment, debilitated by fear her cancer will return. A university student, struggling with anxiety, who hasn't been to class for three weeks and may soon be kicked out of school. A teenager with bulimia removed from an eatingdisorder program because she couldn't follow the rules. They are the ones dangling on waiting lists in the public system for what often amounts to a handful of talk-therapy sessions, who don't have the money to pay for private therapy, or have too little coverage to get the full course of appointments they need.
  • Patients refer to it as falling repeatedly off a cliff. And they can only manage the climb back up so many times. Family doctors interviewed for this story admitted that they are often "handholding" patients with nowhere else to go. "I am making them feel cared for, I am providing a supportive ear that they may not get anywhere else," says Dr. Batya Grundland, a physician who has been in family practice at Toronto's Women's College Hospital for almost a decade. "But do I think I am moving them forward with regard to their illness, and helping them cope better? I am going to say rarely." More senior doctors have told her that once in a while "a light bulb goes off" for the patients, but often only after many years. That's not an efficient use of health dollars, she points out - not when there are trained therapists who could do the job better. However, she says, "in some cases, I may be the only person they have."
  • Family doctors aren't the only ones struggling to find therapy for their patients. "I do a hundred consultations a year," says clinical psychiatrist Joel Paris, a professor at McGill University and research associate at the Montreal Jewish General, "and one of the most common situations is that the patient has tried a few anti-depressants, they have not responded very well, and from their story it is obvious they would benefit from psychotherapy. But where do they go? We have community clinics here in Montreal with six-to-12-month waiting lists even for brief therapy." A fractured, inefficient system
  • "You fall into the role that is handed to you," says Antoine Gagnon, a family doctor in Osgoode, on the outskirts of Ottawa. He tries to set aside 20-minute appointments before lunch or at the end of the day to provide "active listening" to his patients with anxiety and depression. Many of them are farmers or self-employed, without any private coverage for therapy. "Five of those minutes are spent talking about the weather," he says, "and then maybe you get into the meat of the problem, but the reality is we don't have the appropriate amount of time to give to therapy, even to listen, really." Often, he watches his patients' symptoms worsen over several months, until they meet the threshold of a clinical diagnosis. "The whole system could save on productivity and money if people were actually able to get the treatment they needed."
  • One result can be overloaded family doctors minimizing mental-health problems. "If you have nothing to offer someone," asks Dr. Anderson, "how much are you going to dig around to find out what is going on?" Some doctors also admit that the lack of resources can lead to physicians cherry-picking patients who don't have mental illness. And yet family physicians alone bill about $361million a year for counselling or psychotherapy in Canada - 5.6 million visits of roughly 30 minutes each. This is a broad category, and not always specifically related to mental health (some of it includes drug counselling, and a certain amount of coaching is a necessary part of the patient-doctor relationship). When it is psychotherapy, however, doctors admit it's often more supportive listening than actual therapy.
  • Except for a small fraction of GPs who specialize in psychotherapy, few family doctors have the training - or the time - to provide structured therapy. Saadia Hameed, a GP in a family-health team in London, Ont., has been researching access to psychotherapy for an advanced degree. Many of the doctors she has interviewed had trouble even producing a clear definition of therapy. One told her, "If a patient cries, than it's psychotherapy." Another described it as "listening to their woes." A 2007 survey of 163 family doctors in Ontario found that almost four out of five had not received training in cognitive behavioural therapy, and knew little about it. "Do family doctors really need to do that much psychotherapy," Dr. Hameed asks, "when there are other people trained - and better trained - to do it?"
  • What further frustrates treatment for physicians and patients is lack of access to specialists within the system. Across the country, family doctors describe the difficulty of reaching a psychiatrist to consult on a diagnosis or followup with their patients. In a telling 2011 study, published in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, researchers conducted a real-world experiment to see how easily a GP could locate a psychiatrist willing to see a patient with depression. Researchers called 297 psychiatrists in Vancouver, and reached 230. Of the 70 who said they would consider taking referrals, 64 required extensive written documentation, and could not give a wait-time estimate. Only six were willing to take the patient "immediately," but even then, their wait times ranged from four to 55 days. Psychiatrists are in increasingly short supply in Canada, and there's strong evidence that we're not making the best use of these highly trained specialists. They can - and often do - provide fee-for-service psychotherapy in a private setting, which limits their ability to meet the huge demand to consult with family doctors and treat the most severe cases.
  • A recent Ontario study by a team at CAMH found that while waiting lists exist in both urban and rural centres, the practices of psychiatrists in those locations tend to look very different. Among full-time psychiatrists in Toronto, 10 per cent saw fewer than 40 patients, and 40 per cent saw fewer than 100 - on average, their practices were half the size of psychiatrists in smaller centres. The patients for those urban psychiatrists with the smallest practices were also more likely to fall in the highest income bracket, and less likely to have been previously hospitalized for a mental illness than those in the smaller centres.
  • And those therapy sessions are being billed with no monitoring from a health-care system already scrimping on dollars, yet spending a lot on this care: On average, psychiatrists earn $216,000 a year. There is nothing to stop psychiatrists from seeing the same patients for years, and no system to ensure the patients with the greatest need get priority. In Australia, Britain and the United States, by contrast, billing for psychiatrists has been adjusted to encourage them to reduce psychotherapy sessions and serve more as consultants, particularly for the most severe cases, as other specialists do.
  • As the Canadian system exists now, says Benoit Mulsant, the physician-in-chief at CAMH and also a psychiatrist, the doctors in his specialty "can do whatever they please. If I wanted, I could have a roster of actor patients who tell me entertaining stories, and I would be paid the same as someone who is treating homeless people. ... By treating the rich and famous, there is zero risk of being punched in the face by a patient." Left out in all this, by and large, are other professionals who can provide therapy. It doesn't help that the rules are often murky around who can call themselves psychotherapists. While psychologists and social workers are licensed under their professional associations, in some provinces a person can call himself a marriage counsellor or music therapist with no one demanding they be certified. In 2007, Ontario passed a law to regulate psychotherapists, requiring them to register with a provincial college that would set standards and handle complaints. Currently, however, the law is in limbo, although the government has said it will finally bring it into force by December. The brain keeps many secrets
  • Science, however, has yet to find depression's equivalent of insulin. Despite being scanned, poked and stimulated over and over and over again, the brain keeps its secrets. The "chemical imbalance" theory is now viewed as simplistic at best. It may not do much for patients, either: A 2014 study published in the journal Behaviour Research and Therapy suggested that, rather than reassuring them, focusing on the biological explanation for depression actually made patients feel more pessimistic and lacking in control. SSRIs work by increasing the amount of serotonin, a chemical that helps deliver messages within the brain and is known to influence mood. But researchers aren't sure why the drugs help some patients and fail with others. "Basically, it's like we have a bucket of water and we pour it over the patient's head," says Dr. Georg Northoff, the University of Ottawa's Michael Smith chair of Neurosciences and Mental Health. "But you want a drug that injects the water in a very specific brain regions or brain system, which we don't have."
  • Critics of therapy have argued that it's basically "good listening" - comparable to having a sympathetic friend across the kitchen table - and that in the real world of mercurial patients and practitioners of varying abilities, a pill just works better. That's true in many cases, especially when the symptoms are severe and the patients is suicidal: a fast-acting medication is safer, and may even be necessary before starting talk therapy. The staunchest advocates of therapy do not suggest it should be the first course of treatment for psychosis, or debilitating chronic depression, or mania - although, in those cases, there is evidence that psychotherapy and medication work well in tandem. (A 2011 meta-analysis found that patients with severe depression who received a combination approach had higher recovery rates and were less likely to drop out of treatment.) But drugs also don't work as well as the manufacturers would like us to think. Roughly one-third of patients given a drug will see no benefit (although they often respond to a second or third medication). In randomly controlled trials, drugs often perform only marginally better than sugar pills.
  • Yet it's talk therapy that the public often views most skeptically. "Until you go to a therapist, or a member of your family has a serious psychological problem, people are unsympathetic [about therapy]," says Dr. Paris, the Montreal psychiatrist. "They are very skeptical, and they don't believe the research. It's amazing, because pharmaceutical trials will get approval for a drug on the basis of two clinical trials that they paid for. And we have 100 clinical trials and no one believes us."
  • Dr. Ajantha Jayabarathan, an assistant professor at Dalhousie University's medical school, spent her early years as a family doctor in Spryfield, N.S., trying to manage an overload of mental-health cases. Most of her patients had little insurance; there was one reduced-cost counselling service in town, but the waiting lists were long. In 2000, her group practice became a test site for a shared-care project, which gave the doctors access to a mental-health team, including weekly in-person consultations with a psychiatrist. "It was transformative," she says. "We looked after everything in-house.
  • Over time, Dr. Jayabarathan says, she learned how to properly assess mental illness in patients, and how to use medication more effectively. "I just made it my business to teach myself what to do." It's the kind of workaround GPs are increasingly experimenting with, waiting for the system to catch up. Who would pay - and how?
  • The case for expanding publicly funded access to therapy is gaining traction in Canada. In 2012, the health commissioner of Quebec recommended therapy be covered by the province; it is now being studied by Quebec's science-based health body (INESSS), which is expected to report back next year. A new Quebec-based organization of doctors, researchers and mental-health advocates called the Coalition for Access to Psychotherapy (CAP) is lobbying the government.
  • In Manitoba, the Liberal Party - albeit well behind in the polls - has made the public funding of psychologists one of its campaign platforms for the province's spring 2016 election. In Saskatchewan, the government commissioned, and has since endorsed, a mental-health action plan that includes providing online therapy - though politicians have given themselves 10 years to accomplish it. Michael Kirby, the former head of the Canadian Mental Health Commission, has been advocating for eight annual sessions of therapy to be covered for children and youth in need.
  • There are significant hurdles: Which practitioners would provide therapy, and how would they be paid? What therapies would be covered, and for how long? Complicating every aspect of major mentalhealth change in Canada is the question of who should shoulder the cost: the provinces or Ottawa. In a written statement in response to questions from The Globe and Mail, federal Health Minister Rona Ambrose lobbed the issue back at her provincial counterparts, pointing out that the Canada Health Act does not "preclude provinces and territories from extending public coverage to other services or providers such as psychologists."
  • But these issues aren't insurmountable, as other countries have demonstrated. Britain, for instance, has trained thousands of university graduates to become therapists in its new public program, following research showing that, as long they have the proper skills, people don't need PhDs to be effective therapists. Australia, which has created a pay-for-service system, also makes wide use of online support to cost-effectively reach remote communities.
  • So how would Canada pay for access to such therapy? It wouldn't be cheap, in the short term. The savings would come from what Canadians would not have to spend in the long term: in additional medical and drug costs, emergency-room visits and hospital stays, and in unnecessary disability payments, to say nothing of better long-term health outcomes for patients given good care earlier. Some of the figures being tossed around sound staggering. Rolling out a version of Britain's centre-based program across Canada would cost $950-million. Michael Kirby's plan would amount to $1,000 annually per patient. A 2013 report commissioned by the Canadian Psychological Association calculated that, based on predicted need, and assuming no coverage from private health-care plans, providing an average of six sessions of therapy a year would cost an estimated $2.8-billion annually.
  • But any of those figures would still be a fraction of the roughly $210-billion that Canada spends annually on health care. Figuring out how to make the system most costeffective is, according to sources, currently delaying the INESSS report to the Quebec government. "You need to facilitate the government," says Helen- Maria Vasiliadis, a professor of community health at the University of Sherbrooke. "You can't be going to policymakers and showing them billions and billions of dollars. People start having heart attacks. With evidence in hand, we have to present possible solutions."
  • An insurance-based plan is the proposal that has emerged from the Quebec-based CAP group, which sent its proposal to Quebec's health minister last month. In its design, the system would work much like Quebec's public drug plan - Quebeckers not covered through work plans would contribute to a provincial insurance program for therapy. That would be similar to the system that Germany has used for decades. One step forward, one step back
  • Last year, the Sherbrooke clinic where Marie Hayes works received provincial funding for a part-time psychologist and a full-time social worker. With a roster of 25,000 patients, the clinic team laid out clear guidelines for the psychologist, who would consult on cases and screen patients, and be limited to a mere four sessions of actual counselling with any one patient. "We wanted to be careful she didn't become a waiting list - like everything in the system," says Dr. Hayes. The social worker helps guide patients into services such as housing and addiction counselling. They have also offered group sessions for depression management at the clinic. As stretched as those new professionals are in such a large practice, Dr. Hayes says the addition of that mental-health team is improving the care she can provide patients. Recently, for instance, the 32- year-old mother with anxiety attended sessions with the psychologist. "She is making progress," says Dr. Hayes, "slowly."
  • At Women's College Hospital in Toronto, Dr. Grundland is not so lucky. Asked to describe a difficult case, the family-practice physician mentions a patient suffering from depression after a lifechanging accident. Every month, doctor and patient would repeat the same conversation they'd already had more than a dozen times - and make little real headway. Her patient, says Dr. Grundland, needs a trained therapist: someone she can see regularly, to help her move past her frustration, counsel her about addiction, and ease the burden on her family.
  • But there's no extra money in the patient's budget for a psychologist. "I do my best," Dr. Grundland says, "but it's not my area of expertise." Meanwhile, the patient isn't getting better, and in the time that it takes to make it through one appointment with her, Dr. Grundland could see three other people with problems she was actually trained to treat. "But," says Dr. Grundland, "she has nowhere else to go." Erin Anderssen is a feature writer at The Globe and Mail. OPEN MINDS How to build a better mental health care system
  • The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health has purchased advertisements to accompany this series. While CAMH professionals are quoted in this story, the organization had no involvement in the creation or production of this, or any other story in the series. $20.7-billion The cost, according to a 2012 Conference Board of Canada report, of lost productivity each year due to mental illness. What else does $20-billion represent?
  • $20B: Canadian spending on national defence, 2012-13 $20B: Market valuation of Airbnb, 2015 $21B: Kitchener-CambridgeWaterloo region's GDP, 2009 $21B: Amount food manufacturing contributed to the economy, 2012
Irene Jansen

Ça urge, car les besoins vont en croissant! | IREC | Institut de recherche en... - 2 views

  • mette en place un ensemble cohérent de services basé sur les valeurs d’accessibilité et de justice sociale
  • La politique des services à domicile doit continuer à relever du secteur public, c’est-à-dire des infirmières et des auxiliaires familiales et sociales des centres de santé et services sociaux (CSSS), tout en se préoccupant d’améliorer les arrangements institutionnels concernant le personnel du tiers secteur ».
  • le développement des services à domicile souffre de lacunes générées par un problème chronique de sous-financement&nbsp;: tendance à la privatisation, insuffisance de l’aide apportée aux proches aidants, partage de responsabilités mal défini concernant le rôle de certains fournisseurs de services, mauvaises conditions de travail des employés du secteur privé et du tiers secteur, listes d’attente décourageantes de plusieurs personnes en besoin urgent de services
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • la politique libérale sur la vieillesse présentée en mai 2012 ne répond pas aux enjeux réels. Avec seulement quelques centaines de nouvelles places en CHSLD, des investissements minimes dans les services à domicile et la poursuite en douce de la politique de privatisation des services qui, par définition, conduit à une dégradation de la qualité des services pour les moins nantis, nous sommes loin du compte ». &nbsp;
  • Bien que l’ancien gouvernement libéral ait annoncé des&nbsp;investissements additionnels de 71,6 millions de dollars dans les services à domicile, l’analyse permet aux chercheurs de constater que «&nbsp;le budget additionnel pour les entreprises d’économie sociale en aide domestique (EESAD) au terme de ce plan de cinq ans n’aurait été, dans la réalité, que de 20 millions $ », ont conclu les chercheurs.
Irene Jansen

NHS Support Federation - The year of cataclysm for the NHS December 2012 - 0 views

  • The controversial Health and Social Care Act passed in March 2012 ended the English National Health Service in all but name by abolishing the 60-year duty on&nbsp;the government to provide comprehensive healthcare for all.
  • treatments that patients used to receive are no longer available to them.
  • Surgeries, wards, units and community services have been closed and clinical staff shed as the NHS desperately seeks to make “savings” of £20 billion.
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • the private sector expects to win £20 billion of business from the NHS, according to the corporate finance adviser Catalyst
  • a few gluttonous companies—Virgin Care, Serco, Care UK—have secured dominant positions in the market
  • The biggest privatisations are taking place in community health services.
  • Local NHS bodies have already been instructed to outsource 39 types of service. Dubbed the “39 steps to privatisation,” this covers everything from autism care to wheelchair provision.
  • privatisation favours a few big winners over the co-ops, charities and social enterprises
  • Many Hospital Trusts are being pushed to the financial brink by the disastrous legacy of the Private Finance Initiative (PFI)
  • In a first for the private sector, in February 2012 Circle took over an entire general hospital at Hinchingbrooke in Cambridgeshire. The hospital has since fallen 19 places in the patient satisfaction rankings and its finances have worsened, forcing Circle to ask for a bailout after just six months. Despite being prepared to make a potential 20 percent cut to the hospital’s workforce, and while mostly owned by investment funds operating out of tax-havens like the Caymen Islands, Circle nevertheless vaunts its friendly-sounding business model under which doctors and nurses are given part-ownership of the company.
  • another controversial aspect of the Health and Social Care Act—the ability for NHS hospitals to earn half their income from private patients
  • revealed a tragic case where a consultant left half way through a dangerous birth to carry out a private caesarean section. The baby later died.
  • many of the dominant players in the new market are owned by ruthless private equity firms
  • the collapse of the Southern Cross care-home company
  • All of this comes before the most high-profile part of the Health and Social Care Act has even been fully implemented—the replacement of PCTs with Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs)
  • largely unaccountable new groups, who will in turn outsource the work to privatised “commissioning support units”
Govind Rao

Community Social Services Awareness Month proclaimed by Provincial Government | Hospita... - 0 views

  • March 20, 2015
  • A proclamation recently issued by the B.C. Provincial Government pays tribute to the vital role community social services play in our society. In declaring March 2015 as Community Social Services Awareness Month, the proclamation states “greater recognition and understanding of the critical role these services play in our communities is needed to ensure their continued accessibility, availability and improvement.”
Irene Jansen

Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Inc... - 1 views

  • Studies evaluated in this systematic review do not support the claim that the private sector is usually more efficient, accountable, or medically effective than the public sector
  •  
    Summary by Anna Marriott, Oxfam Access and responsiveness * Studies that measured utilization by income levels tended to find the private sector predominately serves the more affluent. In Colombo, Sri Lanka, where a universal public health service exists, the private sector provided 72% of childhood immunisations for the wealthiest, but only 3% for the poorest. * Waiting times are consistently reported to be shorter in private facilities and a number of studies found better hospitality, cleanliness and courtesy and availability of staff in the private sector. Quality * Available studies find diagnostic accuracy, adherence to medical management standards and prescription practices are worse in the private sector. * Prescribing subtherapeutic doses, failure to provide oral rehydration salts, and prescribing of unnecessary antibiotics were more likely in the private sector, although there were exceptions. * Higher rates of potentially unnecessary procedures, particularly C-sections, were reported at private facilities. In South Africa for example, 62% of women delivering in the private sector had C-sections, compared with 18% in the public sector. * Two country studies found a lack of drug availability and service provision at public facilities, while surveys of patients' perceptions on care quality in the public and private sector provided mixed results. Patient outcomes * Public sector provision was associated with higher rates of treatment success for tuberculosis and HIV as well as vaccination. In South Korea for example, TB treatment success rates were 52% in private and 80% in public clinics. Similar figures were found for HIV treatment in Botswana. Accountability, transparency and regulation * While national statistics collected from public sector clinics vary considerably in quality, private healthcare systems tended to lack published data on outcomes altogether. Public-private partnerships also lacked data. * Several reports ob
Irene Jansen

Senate Social Affairs Committee review of the health accord- Evidence - March 10, 2011 - 0 views

  • Dr. Jack Kitts, Chair, Health Council of Canada
  • In 2008, we released a progress report on all the commitments in the 2003 Accord on Health Care Renewal, and the 10-year plan to strengthen health care. We found much to celebrate and much that fell short of what could and should have been achieved. This spring, three years later, we will be releasing a follow-up report on five of the health accord commitments.
  • We have made progress on wait times because governments set targets and provided the funding to tackle them. Buoyed by success in the initial five priority areas, governments have moved to address other wait times now. For example, in response to the Patients First review, the Saskatchewan government has promised that by 2014, no patient will wait longer than three months for any surgery. Wait times are a good example that progress can be made and sustained when health care leaders develop an action plan and stick with it.
  • ...97 more annotations...
  • Canada has catching up to do compared to other OECD countries. Canadians have difficulty accessing primary care, particularly after hours and on weekends, and are more likely to use emergency rooms.
  • only 32 per cent of Canadians had access to more than one primary health care provider
  • In Peterborough, Ontario, for example, a region-wide shift to team-based care dropped emergency department visits by 15,000 patients annually and gave 17,000 more access to primary health care.
  • We believe that jurisdictions are now turning the corner on primary health care
  • Sustained federal funding and strong jurisdictional direction will be critical to ensuring that we can accelerate the update of electronic health records across the country.
  • The creation of a national pharmaceutical strategy was a critical part of the 10-year plan. In 2011, today, unfortunately, progress is slow.
  • Your committee has produced landmark reports on the importance of determinants of health and whole-of- government approaches. Likewise, the Health Council of Canada recently issued a report on taking a whole-of- government approach to health promotion.
  • there have also been improvements on our capacity to collect, interpret and use health information
  • Leading up to the next review, governments need to focus on health human resources planning, expanding and integrating home care, improved public reporting, and a continued focus on quality across the entire system.
  • John Wright, President and CEO, Canadian Institute for Health Information
  • While much of the progress since the 10-year plan has been generated by individual jurisdictions, real progress lies in having all governments work together in the interest of all Canadians.
  • the Canada Health Act
  • Since 2008, rather than repeat annual reporting on the whole, the Health Council has delved into specific topic areas under the 2003 accord and the 10-year plan to provide a more thorough analysis and reporting.
  • We have looked at issues around pharmaceuticals, primary health care and wait times. Currently, we are looking at the issues around home care.
  • John Abbott, Chief Executive Officer, Health Council of Canada
  • I have been a practicing physician for 23 years and a CEO for 10 years, and I would say, probably since 2005, people have been starting to get their heads around the fact that this is not sustainable and it is not good quality.
  • Much of the data you hear today is probably 18 months to two years old. It is aggregate data and it is looking at high levels. We need to get down to the health service provider level.
  • The strength of our ability to report is on the data that CIHI and Stats Canada has available, what the research community has completed and what the provinces, territories and Health Canada can provide to us.
  • We have a very good working relationship with the jurisdictions, and that has improved over time.
  • One of the strengths in the country is that at the provincial level we are seeing these quality councils taking on significant roles in their jurisdictions.
  • As I indicated in my remarks, dispute avoidance activity occurs all the time. That is the daily activity of the Canada Health Act division. We are constantly in communication with provinces and territories on issues that come to our attention. They may be raised by the province or territory, they may be raised in the form of a letter to the minister and they may be raised through the media. There are all kinds of occasions where issues come to our attention. As per our normal practice, that leads to a quite extensive interaction with the province or territory concerned. The dispute avoidance part is basically our daily work. There has never actually been a formal panel convened that has led to a report.
  • each year in the Canada Health Act annual report, is a report on deductions that have been made from the Canada Health Transfer payments to provinces in respect of the conditions, particularly those conditions related to extra billing and user fees set out in the act. That is an ongoing activity.
  • there has been progress. In some cases, there has been much more than in others.
  • How many government programs have been created as a result of the accord?
  • The other data set is on bypass surgery that is collected differently in Quebec. We have made great strides collectively, including Quebec, in developing the databases, but it takes longer because of the nature and the way in which they administer their systems.
  • I am a director of the foundation of St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto
  • Not everyone needs to have a family doctor; they need access to a family health team.
  • With all the family doctors we have now after a 47-per-cent-increase in medical school enrolment, we just need to change the way we do it.
  • The family doctors in our hospital feel like second-class citizens, and they should not. Unfortunately, although 25 years ago the family doctor was everything to everybody, today family doctors are being pushed into more of a triage role, and they are losing their ability.
  • The problem is that the family doctor is doing everything for everybody, and probably most of their work is on the social end as opposed to diagnostics.
  • At a time when all our emergency departments are facing 15,000 increases annually, Peterborough has gone down 15,000, so people can learn from that experience.
  • The family health care team should have strong family physicians who are focused on diagnosing, treating and controlling chronic disease. They should not have to deal with promotion, prevention and diet. Other health providers should provide all of that care and family doctors should get back to focus.
  • I have to be able to reach my doctor by phone.
  • They are busy doing all of the other things that, in my mind, can be done well by a team.
  • That is right.
  • if we are to move the yardsticks on improvement, sustainability and quality, we need that alignment right from the federal government to the provincial government to the front line providers and to the health service providers to say, "We will do this."
  • We want to share best practices.
  • it is not likely to happen without strong direction from above
  • Excellent Care for All Act
  • quality plans
  • with actual strategies, investments, tactics, targets and outcomes around a number of things
  • Canadian Hospital Reporting Project
  • by March of next year we hope to make it public
  • performance, outcomes, quality and financials
  • With respect to physicians, it is a different story
  • We do not collect data on outcomes associated with treatments.
  • which may not always be the most cost effective and have the better outcome.
  • We are looking at developing quality indicators that are not old data so that we can turn the results around within a month.
  • Substantive change in how we deliver health care will only be realized to its full extent when we are able to measure the cost and outcome at the individual patient and the individual physician levels.
  • In the absence of that, medicine remains very much an art.
  • Senator Eaton
  • There are different types of benchmarks. For example, there is an evidence-based benchmark, which is a research of the academic literature where evidence prevails and a benchmark is established.
  • The provinces and territories reported on that in December 2005. They could not find one for MRIs or CT scans. Another type of benchmark coming from the medical community might be a consensus-based benchmark.
  • universal screening
  • A year and a half later, we did an evaluation based on the data. Increased costs were $400 per patient — $1 million in my hospital. There was no reduction in outbreaks and no measurable effect.
  • For the vast majority of quality benchmarks, we do not have the evidence.
  • A thorough research of the literature simply found that there are no evidence-based benchmarks for CT scans, MRIs or PET scans.
  • We have to be careful when we start implementing best practices because if they are not based on evidence and outcomes, we might do more harm than good.
  • The evidence is pretty clear for the high acuity; however, for the lower acuity, I do not think we know what a reasonable wait time is
  • If you are told by an orthopaedic surgeon that there is a 99.5 per cent chance that that lump is not cancer, and the only way you will know for sure is through an MRI, how long will you wait for that?
  • Senator Cordy: Private diagnostic imaging clinics are springing up across all provinces; and public reaction is favourable. The public in Nova Scotia have accepted that if you want an MRI the next day, they will have to pay $500 at a private clinic. It was part of the accord, but it seems to be the area where we are veering into two-tiered health care.
  • colorectal screening
  • the next time they do the statistics, there will be a tremendous improvement, because there is a federal-provincial cancer care and front-line provider
  • adverse drug effects
  • over-prescribing
  • There are no drugs without a risk, but the benefits far outweigh the risks in most cases.
  • catastrophic drug coverage
  • a patchwork across the country
  • with respect to wait times
  • Having coordinated care for those people, those with chronic conditions and co-morbidity, is essential.
  • The interesting thing about Saskatchewan is that, on a three-year trending basis, it is showing positive improvement in each of the areas. It would be fair to say that Saskatchewan was a bit behind some of the other jurisdictions around 2004, but the trending data — and this will come out later this month — shows Saskatchewan making strides in all the areas.
  • In terms of the accord itself, the additional funds that were part of the accord for wait-times reduction were welcomed by all jurisdictions and resulted in improvements in wait times, certainly within the five areas that were identified as well as in other surgical areas.
  • We are working with the First Nations, Statistics Canada, and others to see what we can do in the future about identifiers.
  • Have we made progress?
  • I do not think we have the data to accurately answer the question. We can talk about proxies for data and proxies for outcome: Is it high on the government's agenda? Is it a directive? Is there alignment between the provincial government and the local health service providers? Is it a priority? Is it an act of legislation? The best way to answer, in my opinion, is that because of the accord, a lot of attention and focus has been put on trying to achieve it, or at least understanding that we need to achieve it. A lot of building blocks are being put in place. I cannot tell you exactly, but I can give you snippets of where it is happening. The Excellent Care For All Act in Ontario is the ultimate building block. The notion is that everyone, from the federal, to the provincial government, to the health service providers and to the CMA has rallied around a better health system. We are not far from giving you hard data which will show that we have moved yardsticks and that the quality is improving. For the most part, hundreds of thousands more Canadians have had at least one of the big five procedures since the accord. I cannot tell you if the outcomes were all good. However, volumes are up. Over the last six years, everybody has rallied around a focal point.
  • The transfer money is a huge sum. The provinces and territories are using the funds to roll out their programs and as they best see fit. To what extent are the provinces and territories accountable to not just the federal government but also Canadians in terms of how effectively they are using that money? In the accord, is there an opportunity to strengthen the accountability piece so that we can ensure that the progress is clear?
  • In health care, the good news is that you do not have to incent people to do anything. I do not know of any professionals more competitive than doctors or executives more competitive than executives of hospitals. Give us the data on how we are performing; make sure it is accurate, reliable, and reflective, and we will move mountains to jump over the next guy.
  • There have been tremendous developments in data collection. The accord played a key role in that, around wait times and other forms of data such as historic, home care, long term care and drug data that are comparable across the country. Without question, there are gaps. It is CIHI's job to fill in those gaps as resources permit.
  • The Health Council of Canada will give you the data as we get it from the service providers. There are many building blocks right now and not a lot of substance.
  • send him or her to the States
  • Are you including in the data the percentage of people who are getting their work done elsewhere and paying for it?
  • When we started to collect wait time data years back, we looked at the possibility of getting that number. It is difficult to do that in a survey sampling the population. It is, in fact, quite rare that that happens.
  • Do we have a leader in charge of this health accord? Do we have a business plan that is reviewed quarterly and weekly so that we are sure that the things we want worked on are being worked on? Is somebody in charge of the coordination of it in a proper fashion?
  • Dr. Kitts: We are without a leader.
  • Mr. Abbott: Governments came together and laid out a plan. That was good. Then they identified having a pharmaceutical strategy or a series of commitments to move forward. The system was working together. When the ministers and governments are joined, progress is made. When that starts to dissipate for whatever reason, then we are 14 individual organization systems, moving at our own pace.
  • You need a business plan to get there. I do not know how you do it any other way. You can have ideas, visions and things in place but how do you get there? You need somebody to manage it. Dr. Kitts: I think you have hit the nail on the head.
  • The Chair: If we had one company, we would not have needed an accord. However, we have 14 companies.
  • There was an objective of ensuring that 50 per cent of Canadians have 24/7 access to multidisciplinary teams by 2010. Dr. Kitts, in your submission in 2009, you talked about it being at 32 per cent.
  • there has been a tremendous focus for Ontario on creating family health teams, which are multidisciplinary primary health care teams. I believe that is the case in the other jurisdictions.
  • The primary health care teams, family health care teams, and inter-professional practice are all essentially talking about the same thing. We are seeing a lot of progress. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation is doing a lot of work in this area to help the various systems to embrace it and move forward.
  • The question then came up about whether 50 per cent of the population is the appropriate target
  • If you see, for instance, what the Ontario government promotes in terms of needing access, they give quite a comprehensive list of points of entry for service. Therefore, in terms of actual service, we are seeing that points of service have increased.
  • The key thing is how to get alignment from this accord in the jurisdictions, the agencies, the frontline health service providers and the docs. If you get that alignment, amazing things will happen. Right now, every one of those key stakeholders can opt out. They should not be allowed to opt out.
  • the national pharmaceutical strategy
  • in your presentation to us today, Dr. Kitts, you said it has stalled. I have read that costing was done and a few minor things have been achieved, but really nothing is coming forward.
  • The pharmacists' role in health care was good. Procurement and tendering are all good. However, I am not sure if it will positively impact the person on the front line who is paying for their drugs.
  • The national pharmaceutical strategy had identified costing around drugs and generics as an issue they wanted to tackle. Subsequently, Ontario tackled it and then other provinces followed suit. The question to ask is: Knowing that was an issue up front, why would not they, could not they, should not they have acted together sooner? That was the promise of the national pharmaceutical strategy, or NPS. I would say it was an opportunity lost, but I do not think it is lost forever.
  •  
    CIHI Health Canada Statistics Canada
Govind Rao

Why We Need to Transform Teacher Unions Now | Alternet - 1 views

  • This work reminds me of the words of activist/musician Bernice Johnson Reagon, of Sweet Honey in the Rock: “If you are in a coalition and you are comfortable, that coalition is not broad enough.”
  • February 6, 2015
  • Immediately following Act 10, Walker and the Republican-dominated state legislature made the largest cuts to public education of any state in the nation and gerrymandered state legislative districts to privilege conservative, white-populated areas of the state.
  • ...62 more annotations...
  • By Bob Peterson / Rethinking Schools
  • long history of being staff-dominated.
  • And it has. In New Orleans, following Katrina, unionized teachers were fired and the entire system charterized.
  • But it recognizes that our future depends on redefining unionism from a narrow trade union model, focused almost exclusively on protecting union members, to a broader vision that sees the future of unionized workers tied directly to the interests of the entire working class and the communities, particularly communities of color, in which we live and work.
  • It requires confronting racist attitudes and past practices that have marginalized people of color both inside and outside unions.
  • Having decimated labor law and defunded public education, Walker proceeded to expand statewide the private school voucher program that has wreaked havoc on Milwaukee, and enacted one of the nation’s most generous income tax deductions for private school tuition.
  • For nearly a decade we pushed for a full-time release president, a proposal resisted by most professional staff.
  • “Social Justice Unionism: A Working Draft”
  • Social justice unionism is an organizing model that calls for a radical boost in internal union democracy and increased member participation.
  • business model that is so dependent on staff providing services
  • building union power at the school level in alliance with parents, community groups, and other social movements.
  • The importance of parent/community alliances was downplayed
  • instead of helping members organize to solve their own problems.
  • Our challenge in Milwaukee was to transform a staff-dominated, business/service-style teachers’ union into something quite different.
  • only saw the union newsletter after the staff had sent it to the printer.
  • Key elements of our local’s “reimagine” campaign and our subsequent work include:
  • Building strong ties and coalitions with parent, community, and civic organizations,
  • broader issues
  • action.
  • earliest victories was securing an extra $5/hour (after the first hour) for educational assistants when they “cover” a teacher’s classroom.
  • lobby
  • enlist parents
  • we amended the constitution
  • consistently promoting culturally responsive, social justice teaching.
  • encourage members to lead our work.
  • release two teachers to be organizers
  • appear en masse at school board meetings
  • to shift certain powers from the staff to the elected leadership
  • new teacher orientation and mentoring are available and of high quality.
  • The strength of the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) 2012 strike,
  • rested in large part on their members’ connections to parent and community groups
  • Karen Lewis
  • Portland, Oregon, and St. Paul, Minnesota
  • In Milwaukee, our main coalition work has been building Schools and Communities United,
  • We wanted to move past reacting, being on the defensive, and appearing to be only against things.
  • Key to the coalition’s renewal was the development of a 32-page booklet, Fulfill the Promise: The Schools and Communities Our Children Deserve.
  • concerns of the broader community beyond the schoolhouse door
  • English and Spanish
  • Currently the coalition’s three committees focus on fighting school privatization, promoting community schools, and supporting progressive legislation.
  • schools as hubs for social and health support,
  • This work reminds me of the words of activist/musician Bernice Johnson Reagon, of Sweet Honey in the Rock: “If you are in a coalition and you are comfortable, that coalition is not broad enough.”
  • Our new professional staff is committed to a broader vision of unionism with an emphasis on organizing.
  • We need to become the “go-to” organizations in our communities on issues ranging from teacher development to anti-racist education to quality assessments.
  • nonprofit organization, the Milwaukee Center for Teaching, Learning, and Public Education
  • We provide professional development and services to our members
  • reclaim our classrooms and our profession.
  • We partner with the MPS administration through labor/management committees
  • multiple committee meetings, inservice trainings, book circles (for college credit), and individual help sessions on professional development plans or licensure issues.
  • we offered workshops that drew 150 teachers at a time.
  • More teachers were convinced to join our union, too, because our teaching and learning services are only open to members.
  • mandate 45 minutes of uninterrupted play in 4- and 5-year-old kindergarten classes
  • We also won a staggered start
  • convincing the school board to systematically expand bilingual education programs throughout the district.
  • school-based canvassing around issues and pro-education candidates, and organizing to remove ineffective principals.
  • With the plethora of federal and state mandates and the datatization of our culture,
  • It’s clear to me that what is necessary is a national movement led by activists at the local, state, and national levels within the AFT and NEA—in alliance with parents, students, and community groups—to take back our classrooms and our profession.
  • social justice content in our curriculum
  • waiting to use any perceived or real weakness in public schools as an excuse to accelerate their school privatization schemes,
  • On the other hand, speaking out can play into the hands of the privatizers as they seek to expand privately run charters
  • including participation on labor/management committees, lobbying school board members, and balancing mass mobilizations with the threat of mass mobilizations.
  • In the end, we recognize a key element in fighting privatization is to improve our public schools.
  • In Los Angeles, an activist caucus, Union Power, won leadership of the United Teachers Los Angeles, the second largest teacher local in the country.
Govind Rao

Five-year tentative agreement reached in community social services | Hospital Employees... - 0 views

  • December 3, 2013 The multi-union Community Social Services Bargaining Association (CSSBA) has reached a tentative agreement with the Community Social Services Employers’ Association (CSSEA) for the 11,000 union members working in community-based social services across the province. The five-year agreement significantly closes the wage gap between workers in this sector and those with equivalent positions in the community health sector.
Govind Rao

Ontario hospitals unprepared for aging population - Infomart - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Thu Apr 23 2015
  • With the provincial government set to table its budget today, much of the public discussion to date has focused on the future of alcohol sales and power generation in the province. While these issues are important, we must not lose sight of other priorities - particularly how best to care for our aging population. While Ontario hospitals have not received an inflationary funding increase over the last three years, the province's 149 public hospitals have been working very hard to adapt to meet the needs of patients. Hospitals have worked hard to help the government meet its financial objectives by improving operating efficiencies and reducing costs while also enhancing patient care. Over the past decade, Ontario hospitals have become the most efficient in Canada. Despite serving a record number of patients, wait times have gone down and more people are getting the care they need faster in areas such as cancer surgery, cardiac procedures, cataract surgery, and hip and knee replacement. And they're doing so with the fewest hospital beds, per citizen, of any Canadian province.
  • However, hospital leaders are now facing some very challenging budget decisions to contain costs and meet the ever-increasing service needs of Ontarians.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • When we established our universal health care system more than 50 years ago, the average Ontarian was 27 years of age and less likely to be living with chronic and complex health issues. In contrast, 60 per cent of our total hospital days last year were amongst older Ontarians, particularly those living with multiple health issues, and with minimal social supports.
  • When these patients end up in hospitals, it becomes a particular challenge to get them back in their own homes. In fact, more than 14 per cent of Ontario's hospital beds are currently occupied by patients like these who cannot be discharged because we don't have the right types of services available in the community. By having to stay in hospital, these patients aren't getting the kind of care that they should. And by remaining in hospital, the cost of their care and cost to their overall health is much higher than it actually needs to be. The majority of these patients are waiting for less costly at-home care services through home and community care agencies, or care in more supervised or assisted living environments, such as nursing homes. We also know that too many older Ontarians are still sent to nursing homes when there isn't enough home care, which is less expensive, available. With these growing pressures coming to a head, now is the time to act and make sure that our province can continue to provide the high-quality care that Ontarians want, need and deserve.
  • It is time to invest aggressively in home and community care, nursing home and assisted living services, and other vital areas so that patients can stay healthy and independent in their communities for as long as possible and when hospitalized, be discharged quickly and safely to get quality care in their community.
  • We need to identify the right mix of services to ensure all Ontarians can get the right kinds of care where and when they need it. That means knowing the right number of beds needed in hospitals or long-term care homes, as well as the number of assisted living spaces, home care hours, and primary care and mental health services required to meet the needs of our aging population. Given the exploding need for different kinds of services, it also means we need to be innovative by creating new models of care.
  • While the government has recently acknowledged the importance of robust health-service capacity planning, neither we nor any other Canadian jurisdiction currently has such a plan. This is worrisome because what we do know with absolute certainty is that the number of older Ontarians will double over the next two decades. With service demands growing rapidly at the same time that the system moves to further contain cost growth, we owe it to patients and clients to meet their changing health care needs not only for today but for the decades still to come.
  • Ontario needs clear-eyed and effective long-term planning to ensure its health care system has the ability meet the evolving health care needs of Ontarians. Until we know exactly what services the people of Ontario need, our system won't have the long-term plan required to meet them. Dr. Samir Sinha is director of geriatrics at Mount Sinai and the University Health Network Hospitals and provincial lead of Ontario's Seniors Strategy. Anthony Dale is president and CEO of the Ontario Hospital Association.
Govind Rao

Banker's budget benefits Bay Street - Infomart - 0 views

  • Thu Feb 25 2016
  • TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Feb. 25, 2016) - The provincial budget tabled today at Queen's Park looks like it was written by former TD Bank Executive Ed Clark for the benefit of Bay Street, not for the people of Ontario, says the president of Ontario's largest union. "On every major file, given the choice between benefiting Ontarians and benefiting Bay Street, the Liberals have chosen Bay Street," said CUPE Ontario President Fred Hahn. "It's not what Kathleen Wynne campaigned on; it's not what the people of Ontario need." This year's budget will hurt communities across the province as programs and services are cut in order to balance the budget by an arbitrary date.
  • "Maybe the Liberals missed the memo. Both their federal cousins and the people of Ontario clearly are less concerned about deficit than they are about investing in the economy to create the good jobs and public services we all need," said Hahn. Successive austerity budgets have left Ontario with the lowest per-capita program spending in Canada and serious cuts to front-line public services such as health care, schools, universities and social services. North Bay has seen more than 300 jobs cut from its hospital, Hamilton lost more than 70 child protection workers and the Toronto Catholic District School Board is looking at eliminating 100 educational assistants - cuts similar to those being seen in every community across the province. To make matters worse, he said, the budget continues the Liberal plan to privatize services and sell assets we all own in common. This includes the sale of 60 percent of Hydro One, which government watchdogs and economists warn will ultimately cost Ontario hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Continuing the privatization agenda flies in the face of AG's finding that P3 schemes have needlessly funnelled more than $8 billion into the pockets of private corporations.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • This government needs to stop letting bankers like Ed Clark drive the bus. They don't have the best interest of Ontarians at heart," said Hahn. Instead, he said, the government should restore corporate tax cuts, which former Premier Dalton McGuinty bragged amount to $8 billion a year. They should invest in public services that create good jobs and stimulate the economy in every community across the province. "The Liberals have a choice to make," said Hahn. "Stop the cuts that are dragging our economy down, or face the thousands of people they've left unemployed during the next election." CUPE is Ontario's community union, with more than 250,000 members providing quality public services we all rely on, in every part of the province, every day. CUPE Ontario members are proud to work in social services, health care, municipalities, school boards, universities and airlines.
  • Craig Saunders (416) 576-7316
Govind Rao

Health care hampered by red tape; Bloated bureaucracy: That means there is less money a... - 1 views

  • Vancouver Sun Wed Jan 20 2016
  • Byline: Brian Day Source: Vancouver Sun
  • Over 60,000 B.C. residents have signed a petition against rising Medical Services Plan premiums. Organizers report that the wealthy pay the same fees as those earning $30,000. Their point is valid. But their anger would probably be tempered if the funds garnished from wage earners were being used efficiently. Few are probably aware of the Medical Services Commission (MSC), an unelected body responsible for spending the $4 billion-plus in MSP premiums and other taxes. Their mandate is "to facilitate reasonable access throughout B.C. to quality medical care, health care and diagnostic facility services for B.C. residents under MSP."
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Hundreds of thousands of patients on B.C. waiting lists know that role is not being fulfilled. The health minister and premier recently admitted that patients were waiting inappropriately long times, and a health region spokesperson reported some "life-saving" procedures were being delayed. Provincial health commissions were the brainchild of Tommy Douglas, who believed they should be chaired by doctors and never subject to political influence. But the MSC is always chaired by a politicallyappointed civil servant. Douglas supported premiums and felt they made the public cost-conscious, creating a sense of individual responsibility. He would never have condoned the practices of raising premiums to compensate for fiscal failures, nor reporting low-income earners, delinquent with their payments, to collection agencies. The commission is wasting health care funds as it displays contempt, in terms of its fiscal and social accountability, toward taxpayers.. In one example of carelessness and incompetence, I received cheques from them totalling hundreds of thousands of dollars, for services on patients that I had never seen. I also received confidential personal information on hundreds of patients unrelated to me or our clinic. When informed of their error, they responded: "Just mail them back." They were not inclined to investigate.
  • In Canada, health providers are compelled by law to share confidential patient files with government employees armed with the right to inspect and copy patients' files. Your health record is considered public property; you cannot block government access. Consent is not needed, and you are not notified when Big Brother is looking. Privacy rights have been legislated away. I witnessed a defeated provincial cabinet minister's medical file being reviewed by a newly elected government. In the 1989 tainted blood inquiry, Justice Horace Krever was "shocked by the inadequate laws, the abuses of confidentiality, and the fact that so many people - except the patient - had access to medical records." Little has changed.
  • The MSC is also charged with defining what services are "medically necessary" - and therefore publicly insured. They have never created a definition, but have arbitrarily designated clearly essential services such as ambulance, drugs, physiotherapy, artificial limbs, and dentistry as unnecessary, creating a true two-tier structure of care. The government's last action in delaying our constitutional challenge on patient rights resulted from a "last minute" discovery of 300,000 documents they were legally bound to provide. After a delay of more than seven years, the plaintiffs in the coming June trial will confirm that the Supreme Court of Canada's 2005 finding - that patients are suffering and dying on waiting lists - applies in B.C. Supporters of a system that limits timely access are complicit in such outcomes.
  • Our public sector health system (MSC included), is grossly overstaffed with non-clinical workers. A 2011 study revealed that Canada has 11 times as many public health bureaucrats per capita as Germany, where there are no waiting lists. Canada has 14 ministries of health, each with bloated bureaucracies and commissions scavenging dollars that should go to patient care. The mentality that cost inefficiencies can be balanced by increased taxes or "premiums" is responsible for our escalating charges. Independent health groups in Europe rated Canada as last in value for money compared to hybrid public-private systems that have accessible public systems. The Commonwealth Fund, a non-profit foundation focused on issues affecting lowincome groups, ranked Canada 10th of 11 health systems in developed nations.
  • What specific changes would I incorporate if I were minister of health? Apart from incorporating the best practices of other hybrid systems (including private-sector competition), I would dismantle the ministry and its committees and commissions. Then I would resign. The finance ministry could fund patients directly (thus empowering them), and also assign budgets to the newly emancipated, self-regulated health organizations, allowing them to cater directly to patient needs. Maybe our June constitutional court challenge will point us in that direction. Dr. Brian Day is an orthopedic surgeon, medical director of the Cambie Surgery Centre, and a former president of the Canadian Medical Association.
  • Dr. Brian Day says bureaucrats at the Medical Services Commission sent him cheques totalling hundreds of thousands of dollars for services on patients he had never seen.
Govind Rao

Residents' aging forces cities to look at services - Infomart - 0 views

  • Calgary Herald Mon May 4 2015
  • In U.S. politics, "seniors' issues" usually mean Medicare and Social Security and how much to spend on them. That needs to change, as a new report from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development illustrates: The pressure of demographics will turn plenty of more mundane things into seniors' issues. For a glimpse into that future, take a look in Philadelphia's garages. The city is being squeezed by an aging population, poverty and housing costs. One in seven Philadelphians are already 65 and older, a number that is projected to grow 24 per cent by 2020. Most want to stay in their own homes. Many are poor. And as in many U.S. cities, money for social services is tight: Philadelphia's budget fell 12 per cent from 2013 to 2014 alone.
  • So in 2011, the city council adopted zoning changes that make it easier to build "accessory dwelling units" - such as garage, basement or backyard apartments - designed for the elderly to move into while they rent out their homes to make money or their families move in as caregivers. Putting Granny in the garage might not seem like loving elder care, but the OECD's report shows that cities need to try new policies, and fast. From 2001 to 2011, the number of people 65 or older living in developed-country cities jumped 24 per cent - three times the speed of growth for those cities as a whole. By 2050, one in four people will be 65 or older, with the fastest growth among those 80 and up.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • That means more than just finding new places for seniors to live: ¦¦ In Calgary, the tight job market driven by the oil boom has pushed the city to look for ways to keep more seniors employed, by retaining retired workers on short-term projects. And the share of those 65 and over is projected to double by 2042, so the city is also trying to rein in sprawl and increase the availability of transit, with an eye to making it easier for the elderly to reach social services. Cologne, Germany, started a program that lets students move in with seniors for free, in return for acting as caregivers. In Helsinki, an emphasis on keeping people in their homes for as long as possible, combined with an expected shortage of trained home-care staff, led to the development of floor-sensor systems that let nurses monitor seniors remotely. The OECD report shows that most developed cities face a variation of the same basic challenges: increasing the supply of affordable and accessible housing, making it easier for the elderly to get around safely and stay active, and finding ways to provide social services and other care for less money.
Govind Rao

Hospital, nursing home workers hold roadside vigil to protest privatization - Infomart - 1 views

  • Miramichi Leader Wed Aug 26 2015
  • Wearing their now-familiar red shirts and clutching makeshift candles made of Tim Hortons cups and whatever else they could find, nearly 200 unionized workers, mostly from the city's two nursing homes and the Miramichi Regional Hospital, lined up along Water Street in Chatham Head Monday night to rally against further privatization in the public sector. The candlelight vigil was organized by Kevin Driscoll, the president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 865, which represents hospital staff in Miramichi.
  • A number of other locals joined in on the demonstration, including representation from CUPE 1277 and 1256 of the Miramichi Senior Citizens Home and Mount St. Joseph Nursing Home, respectively, CUPE 1190, which acts on behalf New Brunswick's highway workers, the New Brunswick Federation of Labour and staff from Hebert's Recycling. Driscoll, who works as a nursing unit clerk at the Miramichi Regional Hospital, said that workers are growing more disenchanted by the day as the provincial government continues to give the private sector a greater role in its health care and senior care system. He said CUPE staff felt they had to do something to draw attention to these issues and, with the hospital serving as the backdrop as night fell on the city Monday night, everyone agreed that gathering on the side of the road by candlelight would help convey their message.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • "It shows that people here really care about the Miramichi and it's too bad that politicians don't care about it as much," Driscoll said. "They want to privatize the nursing homes, they want to cut to the Education Department, their cutting the highway budgets and they're cutting to every service they can think of, so where are we going to go? They don't seem to think that matters." The Liberal government, come the fall, is expected to have a deal in place that will see all hospital food and cleaning services being outsourced to a private firm.
  • Government officials, including Health Minister Victor Boudreau have maintained that the changes are needed in order to help the province get its finances in order and will save the province millions of dollars through efficiencies that will be brought in under private management. Driscoll says those efficiencies, CUPE fears, are simply going to amount to job cuts at hospitals throughout the Horizon Health Network. The union learned from the province earlier in the summer that food and facilities management giants like Sodexo, Aramark and Compass Group are involved in the bidding process.
  • "If they privatize these services, then these corporations are going to come in and say 'you don't need all these people' ... we're going to cut because they're going to want to make at least a 20 per cent profit. Driscoll said the hospital is just one example of the trend toward the greater privatization of public services the union is seeing. Nursing home workers at Mount St. Joseph Nursing Home and the Miramichi Senior Citizens Home have been protesting at various points throughout the summer after learning the Department of Social Development would be using a private-public partnership (P3) model in building a new 280-bed nursing home that will replace both of the city's current facilities, which are run by a volunteer board of directors. Workers at both homes will have to reapply for positions at the new nursing home if that's what they choose to do and, with a private company running things, the membership has said it is concerned that those who do catch on at the new place could be subject to reduced pay and benefits.
  • The government is expected to open up a request for proposals (RFP) in the coming weeks to begin the process of determining which proponent will build and operate what will likely be New Brunswick's largest nursing home by the time it opens. Currently, each of the three privately run nursing homes in the province are owned by Shannex. The unions have also warned that the move to a P3 model would lead to a reduction in the level of community outreach programming offered to local seniors through things like Meals on Wheels and adult daycare. Tourism Minister Bill Fraser, the Liberal Miramichi MLA who advocated heavily for the new nursing home to be built and the man at the centre of much of the unions' ire, has shot down those concerns in previous interviews. Fraser has reiterated that regardless of whichever proponent emerges with the right to build and manage the structure, the initiative represents a major upgrade in terms of nursing home infrastructure.
  • He said the standards of care are dictated by the province and will remain, at the very least, on par with what has existed at the two current nursing homes over the last several years. Programs like Meals on Wheels, adult daycare and lifeline, would remain in place and potentially even enhanced and in terms of jobs, he said there will be provisions written into the RFP asking that priority be given to local applicants and that with an increase of 26 beds, even more staff will likely be required. As for pay and benefits, he said staff at two of the three Shannex properties have already unionized and the third was in the process of doing that.
  • Nursing home staff have called on the province to force the boards at the Mount and the senior citizens home to amalgamate together and operate the new facility using a model similar to what was undertaken in Edmundston when two nursing home boards melded into one in order to operate the new $48 million, 180-bed Residence Jodin. Danny Legere, the president of CUPE New Brunswick, was on hand for the vigil and urged the Miramichi workers to keep up the fight. "I want to congratulate the people of the Miramichi for taking a stand - the fight that you have started is a fight for all New Brunswickers," Legere said. "The militancy that you are showing is exemplary and it has to be carried on from one end of the province from one end to the other."
  • Andy Hardy, a Miramichi native and the president of CUPE 1190, said his sector is used to certain services being contracted out to private interests but when it comes to health and senior care, he said it was "flat out wrong." "You're looking after the most vulnerable people in that building right there," Hardy said. "When you privatize the food services and the cleaning services all it is is for profit - the service goes down and the profit goes up, and for nursing homes as well." Length: 1090 words
1 - 20 of 223 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page