Gertrude Himmelfarb offered what she called a “neo-Luddite” dissent about “the new technology’s impact on learning and scholarship.” “Like postmodernism,” she complained, “the Internet does not distinguish between the true and the false, the important and the trivial, the enduring and the ephemeral. . . . Every source appearing on the screen has the same weight and credibility as every other; no authority is ‘privileged’ over any other.”
World Community Studies Weekly - 0 views
Evernote shared notebook: - 0 views
Better World Ed - 0 views
WhatWasThere - Put history in its place! - 0 views
Digital History | Promises and Perils of Digital History - 0 views
-
-
“A dismal new era of higher education has dawned,” he wrote in a paper called “Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education.” “In future years we will look upon the wired remains of our once great democratic higher education system and wonder how we let it happen.”3
-
In the past two decades, new media and new technologies have challenged historians to rethink the ways that they research, write, present, and teach about the past. Almost every historian regards a computer as basic equipment; colleagues view those who write their books and articles without the assistance of word processing software as objects of curiosity.
- ...18 more annotations...
21st Century Schools - 0 views
Online Collaboration - 0 views
Historypin | Home - 0 views
Your School: Using a Geographic Perspective - National Geographic Education - 0 views
Google Earth Lessons - 0 views
1 - 15 of 15
Showing 20▼ items per page